Saturday, November 9, 2013

Inncidents Of Intolerance

A/C.3/68/L.48 Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping,stigmatization, discrimination, incitement to violence and violence against persons, based on religion or belief continues with another expresion of deep concern after welcoming previous resolutions.

Deeply concerned about incidents of intolerance, discrimination and violence
against persons based on their religion or belief in all regions of the world,

Deploring any advocacy of discrimination or violence on the basis of religion
or belief,

Strongly deploring all acts of violence against persons on the basis of their
religion or belief, as well as any such acts directed against their homes, businesses,
properties, schools, cultural centres or places of worship,
Strongly deploring, further, all attacks on and in religious places, sites and
shrines in violation of international law, in particular human rights law and
international humanitarian law, including any deliberate destruction of relics and
monuments,

Concerned about actions that wilfully exploit tensions or target individuals on
the basis of their religion or belief,

Expressing deep concern at the instances of intolerance, discrimination and
acts of violence occurring in the world, including cases motivated by discrimination
against persons belonging to religious minorities, in addition to the negative
projection of the followers of religions and the enforcement of measures that
specifically discriminate against persons on the basis of religion or belief,

Expressing concern at the growing manifestations of intolerance based on
religion or belief that can generate hatred and violence among individuals from and
within different nations, which may have serious implications at the national,
regional and international levels, and in this regard emphasizing the importance of
respect for religious and cultural diversity, as well as interfaith and intercultural
dialogue aimed at promoting a culture of tolerance and respect among individuals,
societies and nations,

    If they really cared about the Christians being shot, blown up, burned to death inside their churches and otherwise terrorized in Pakistan, Indonesia, Kenya, Nigeria and Egypt with governments turning a blind eye if not actively supporting the mayhem, perhaps they would send in peace keeping forces to protect the innocent victims instead of sitting around deploring the violence and wringing their hands.

    But they do not give a damn about that. Instead they are concerned that Pastor Terry Jones might burn a few thousand Qur'ans. They are concerned about Representative Bachman's letter to an Inspector General inquiring as to why Muslim Brotherhood infiltrators are not properly vetted.

    What are "incidents of intollerance"? What is so deplorable about discrimination? Shouldn't we try to expel and exclude the enemy fifth colomun from our midst?

    What are "insatances of intolerance"? Would CAIR's demands to shut down speeches by Usama Dakdok and Pamela Geller qualify as "instances of inteolerance", or is it their freedom of expression the UN is bitching about?

    Concerned about intolerance? Oh, really? Islamic law states that because we are not Muslims, we must be killed. Does the United Nations have a God blessed clue for Chrissake?

Concerned about violence? Do the United Nations have a God blessed clue about the Islamic law that requires Muslimsto engage in offensive warfare at least once in every year? Do they give a damn about Islam's promise of reward for acts of terrorism?

Sadly, their only concern is finding ways to shut us up: to squelch our exposure of the evil which masquerades as the "religion of peace".

Acts That Advocate Religious Hatred

acts that advocate religious hatred A/C.3/68/L.48 Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping,stigmatization, discrimination, incitement to violence and violence against persons, based on religion or belief continues with an expresion of deep concern..

Expressing deep concern at those acts that advocate religious hatred and
thereby undermine the spirit of tolerance,

acts that advocate

    Which came first, the hatred or the acts? Were the Maillot Massacre, Beslan, Mumbai Massacre, London & Madrid rail bombings and the WTC attacks expressions or advocacy of religious hatred?

    Burning the Qur'an is an expression of well justified hatred of evil doctrines and practices inimical to life and liberty. Rather than an advocacy of hatred, it is a warning against the hatred engendered by that damnable anthology of rabble rousing rants.

    Production and distribution of "Fitna", "The Innocence of Muslims": and "The Innocence of Jihad" are not acts advocating hatred, they expose hatred and incitement of violence intrinsic to Islam. Uttering and publishing this series of blog posts is not advocacy of hatered, it is exposure of treason against the human race on the part of the United Nations which seeks to erect a legal shied to prevent exposure of the damnable doctrines and practices of Islam. .

religious hatred

"So We planted amongst them enmity and hatred till the Day of Resurrection"

(And the disbelief of the disbelievers adds nothing but hatred of their Lord.) means, the longer they persist in their disbelief, the more Allah hates them, and the longer they persist in it, the more they and their families will lose on the Day of Resurrection....
http://www.islam-universe.com/tafsir//2.4445.html

Allah hates us, so Muslims must hate us. The concept is called Wala wal Bara, look it up in Wikipedia if you have any doubt.

...Allâh has cursed them for their disbelief, http://www.islamawakened.com/Quran/2/88/

...We have made it clear for the people in the Book, they are the ones cursed by Allâh and cursed by the cursers. http://www.islamawakened.com/Quran/2/159/

...it is they on whom is the Curse of Allâh and of the angels and of mankind, combined. http://www.islamawakened.com/Quran/2/161/

Verily! The worst of (moving) living creatures with Allâh are the deaf and the dumb, those who understand not (i.e. the disbelievers).
http://www.islamawakened.com/Quran/8/22/

...Verily, The worst of moving (living) creatures before Allâh are those who disbelieve http://www.islamawakened.com/Quran/8/55/

Verily, those who disbelieve (in the religion of Islâm, the Qur'ân and Prophet Muhammad ()) from among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) and Al-Mushrikûn will abide in the Fire of Hell. They are the worst of creatures.http://www.islamawakened.com/Quran/98/6/

spirit of tolerance

The United Nations demand that we not undermine the spirit of tolerance for the ultimate intolerance.

3:85. And whoever seeks a religion other than Islâm, it will never be accepted of him, and in the Hereafter he will be one of the losers.

3:110. You [true believers in Islâmic Monotheism, and real followers of Prophet Muhammad and his Sunnah (legal ways, etc.)] are the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind; you enjoin Al-Ma'rûf (i.e. Islâmic Monotheism and all that Islâm has ordained) and forbid Al-Munkar (polytheism, disbelief and all that Islâm has forbidden), and you believe in Allâh. And had the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) believed, it would have been better for them; among them are some who have faith, but most of them are Al-Fâsiqûn (disobedient to Allâh - and rebellious against Allâh's Command).

Sahih Bukhari Volume 6, Book 60, Number 80:

Narrated Abu Huraira:

The Verse:--"You (true Muslims) are the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind." means, the best of peoples for the people, as you bring them with chains on their necks till they embrace Islam.

If you o can read QV 3.110 & Sahih Bukhari 6.60.80 without cursing then you have a moral defect that should be removed from the gene pool: go hang yourself.

Freedom of Expression~Democracy

Freedom of Expression~Democracy META NAME="DESCRIPTION" CONTENT="Our duty is to expose evil, not to conceal it. If exposure of their damnable doctrines & practices pisses off Muslims, their reactions are their own doing and responsibility, not ours. Our lectures, remarks, blog posts and books are for the Western audience of free men who wish to remain alive and free, not for Allah's slaves who are Hellbound to torment us. "> A/C.3/68/L.48 Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping,stigmatization, discrimination, incitement to violence and violence against persons, based on religion or belief continues with reaffirmation of another obfuscation.

Reaffirming also the positive role that the exercise of the right to freedom of
opinion and expression and full respect for the freedom to seek, receive and impart
information can play in strengthening democracy and combating religious
intolerance, and reaffirming further that the exercise of the right to freedom of
expression carries with it special duties and responsibilities, in accordance with
article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,

expression & democracy

positive role that the exercise of the right to freedom of
opinion and expression and full respect for the freedom to seek, receive and impart
information can play in strengthening democracy

Freedom of expression and information are essential to maintenance of democracy. Without them, it becomes impossible to recognize, criticize and warn against impending tyranny. Liberty can not survive without freedom of expression.

religious intolerance

combating religious intolerance

That clause contains an embedded false premise which must be exposed and condemned: 'Intolerance of Islam must be combated.". Every free man has a right and duty to be intolerant of existential threats to his life, liberty and form of government. There can be no tolerance for Imperialistic doctrines such as Nazism and Communism. Islam is another intolerable threat to the human race.

In reality, Islam is not a religion: it is a deen; a way of life having religious, social, governmental and military components. Islam's military component, called Jihad, is its highest peak. The quote comes from page 1290 of Tirmidhi.

“Its head is Islam, its pillar is Salah and the apex of its hump is jihad.”

Moe said: "I have been raised for Jihad and I am not raised for tillage." He also said that Jihad is the original religion of Islam and Allah will curse Muslims for abandoning it.

Sunan Abu Dawud 23.3455

Narrated Abdullah ibn Umar:

I heard the Apostle of Allah, (peace_be_upon_him) say: When you enter into the inah transaction, hold the tails of oxen, are pleased with agriculture, and give up conducting jihad (struggle in the way of Allah). Allah will make disgrace prevail over you, and will not withdraw it until you return to your original religion.

Does that refer to Jihad an-Nafs: striving against the ego and temptation? How is that an alternative to agriculture and trade as a means of deriving income? How does one get killed or kill others in striving against temptation? How does one injure or enrage disbelievers in Jihad an-Nafs?

Was objection to the Nazi invasion of Europe an intolerance to be combated? Was objection to the attack on Pearl harbor an intolerance to be combated? Then neither is condemnation of the doctrines which inspired the Hindu genocide, Armenian genocide, Assyrian genocide or the attacks on Beslan, London, Madrid or New York City and Boston intolerance to be combated.

special duties and responsibilities

It is not possible to be and remain free without free speech. Another critical sentence in the resolution declares that terrorism must not be associated with any religion. Is terrorism an intrinsic sacrament of Christianity or Buddhism? But it is an intinsic sacrament of Islam: 3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67, 9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123, 33:26,27, 47:4,49:15, 59:2,13, 61:10-13; Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220. so why in Hell should we be made to keep silent about it?

In the most damnable words of the most damnable engineers of the God damn Abomination:

"Therefore, killing you and fighting you, destroying you and terrorizing you, responding back to your
attacks, are all considered to be great legitimate duty in our religion....

So, our religion is a religion of fear and terror to the enemies of God: the Jews, Christians, and pagans.
With God's wiling, we are terrorists to the bone. So, many thanks to God"

    Our duty is to expose evil, not to conceal it. If exposure of their damnable doctrines & practices pisses off Muslims, their reactions are their own doing and responsibility, not ours. Our lectures, remarks, blog posts and books are for the Western audience of free men who wish to remain alive and free, not for Allah's slaves who are Hellbound to torment us.

    There is no duty or responsibility to avoid pissing off evildoers by exposing their evil. Imams are always on the lookout for real or imaginary offenses with which to rouse the rabble to riot. The MoToons did not cause riots: rabble rousing rants at Jumah Salat did. Fitna did not cause riots: rabble rousing rants did. The Innocence of Muslims did not cause riots: rabble rousing rants did. Moe never threw a bomb because he died before the invention of explosives. The MoToons, while exaggerated, were conceptually true. Fitna is well documented. Innocence of Muslims is backed up by authentic texts of Sira.

    President Washington said it best:

If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.

Friday, November 8, 2013

everyone shall have the right to freedom of thought,conscience and religion

Reaffirming that the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights1
provides, inter alia, that everyone shall have the right to freedom of thought,
conscience and religion or belief, which shall include freedom to have or to adopt a
religion or belief of one’s choice and freedom, either alone or in community with
others and in public or private, to manifest one’s religion or belief in worship,
observance, practice and teaching,

The supposed right is stated without any consideration of content & consequence. Islam is inseverable, an all or nothing bundled package. Muslims are not empowered to select the bits they like and reject the rest. Observe the clear text of Surah Al-Baqarah 2.85.

2:85. After this, it is you who kill one another and drive out a party of you from their homes, assist (their enemies) against them, in sin and transgression. And if they come to you as captives, you ransom them, although their expulsion was forbidden to you. Then do you believe in a part of the Scripture and reject the rest? Then what is the recompense of those who do so among you, except disgrace in the life of this world, and on the Day of Resurrection they shall be consigned to the most grievous torment. And Allâh is not unaware of what you do.

Muslims are required to obey Allah and his Messenger; to emulate Moe.

3:32. Say (O Muhammad ): "Obey Allâh and the Messenger (Muhammad )." But if they turn away, then Allâh does not like the disbelievers.

33:21. Indeed in the Messenger of Allâh (Muhammad ) you have a good example to follow for him who hopes in (the Meeting with) Allâh and the Last Day and remembers Allâh much.

    Allah requires Muslims to wage perpetual offensive warfare against Pagans, until only Allah is worshiped on a global scale; against Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians until they are subjugated and pay extortion. Those Jihad obligations are fard al-kifaya: binding on all eligible male Muslims until a sufficient number have reported to the battle front. To obtain a clue, Read Shari'ah: The Reliance Of The Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9 from section 0 through section 14.

    Lest there be any lingering doubt that Jihad is permanent; continuous and undertaken offensively, on Islamic initiative, read pages 140-141 of the second volume of Hedaya, which is the Hanifi school's handbook of fiqh.

    Allah requires Muslims to engage in genocide: "great slaughter" otherwise expressed as "killed and wounded many of them" and Moe exemplified it, slaughtering several hundred men and boys who had surrendered.

    Allah requires Muslims to engage in terrorism: to administer harsh treatment to defeated victims to strike terror into prospective victims and to maximize military power to terrify them. Allah rewards terrorists for any act performed to injure or enrage disbelievers. Moe was made victorious with terror.

    Normative Islam entails terrorist, genocidal imperialism and its practice is incomplete without them. If Muslims abandon Jihad, Allah will curse them with disgrace, not lifting it until they return to their 'original religion'.

Reaffirming further that all human rights are universal,indivisible,nterdependent and interrelated

Reaffirming further that all human rights are universal, indivisible,
interdependent and interrelated,

What the Hell does that mean? My right to communicate and share my knowledge of the damnable doctrines & practices of Islam is not related to anything other than the right of the reader or listener to receive information. Those rights do not interfere with and can not be limited by a Muslim's 'right' to practice his 'religion'.

When an attempt is made to negate our right to accurately characterize and describe a perceived existential threat by imputing to the agent of the threat a 'right' to be free from 'offense' then our rights to life, liberty, property and self defense are unacceptably impaired.

Obligation to Prohibit Violence Based On Religion

Reaffirming also the obligation of States to prohibit discrimination and
violence on the basis of religion or belief and to implement measures to guarantee
the equal and effective protection of the law,

Are Egypt, Pakistan and Indonesia obligated to prohibit and punish violence against Christians and their churches based on the victim's status of not being Muslims? Who gives a damn about such an obligation? Who enforces it?

Instead, Muslims implement Allah's Jihad imperative, expressed in Surah At-Taubah 9.123, secondary to 9.29, to wage war neighboring Jews and Christians.

9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
9:123. O you who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are close to you, and let them find harshness in you, and know that Allâh is with those who are the Al-Muttaqûn (the pious - see V.2:2).

Who do Muslims obey: the United Nations which can not enforce its edicts, or Allah who will damn them to eternal Hellfire for not waging war?

Committment to Human Rights?

Exposing the United Nations as a Liar A/C.3/68/L.48 Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping,stigmatization, discrimination, incitement to violence and violence against persons, based on religion or belief begins by reaffirming an accursed lie.

Reaffirming the commitment made by all States under the Charter of the
United Nations to promote and encourage universal respect for and observance of
all human rights and fundamental freedoms without distinction as to, inter alia, religion or belief,

All states committed

Really? Are the members of the OIC fully committed to respect and enforce human rights without regard to religion or are they Muslims? The founder of Islam declared that our blood and property are not sacred to Muslims and that we only obtain human rights by becoming Muslims. Have the rulers of the OIC member states abjured Muhammad's sunah?

Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:
Narrated Anas bin Malik:
Allah's Apostle said, "I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.' And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah." Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, "O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?" He replied, "Whoever says, 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah', faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have."

Islamic law prohibits conquered Jews & Christians from ringing bells, displaying crosses, praying aloud in public, riding horses, owning weapons, building & repairing churches. Which document do the Islamic states commit to follow: the UN Charter or Shari'ah?

Obligation to fight or right to life?

Moe declared that he was obligated to fight us until we become Muslims. The demonic imperatives which establish that obligation are found in Surah Al-Anfal 8.39 and Surah At-Taubah 9.29. The Reliance Of The Traveller, handbook of Shari'ah of the Shafi'i school, makes it clear in O9.1 that Muslims are obligated to mount a minimum of one military expedition against passive infidels in every year when it is possible.

09.1 Jihad is a communal obligation (def:
c3.2). When enough people perform it to successfully
accomplish it, it is no longer obligatory upon
others (0: the evidence for which is the Prophet's
saying (Allah bless him and give him peace),
"He who provides the equipment for a soldier
in jihad has himself performed jihad,"
and Allah Most High having said:
"Those of the believers who are unhurt but sit
behind are not equal to those who fight in Allah's
path with their property and lives. Allah has preferred
those who fight with their property and
lives a whole degree above those who sit behind.
And to each. Allah has promised great good"
(Koran 4:95).
If none of those concerned perform jihad,
and it does not happen at all, then everyone who
is aware that it is obligatory is guilty of sin, ifthere
was a possibility of having performed it. In the
time of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him
peace) jihad was a communal obligation after his
emigration (hijra) to Medina. As for subsequent
times, there are two possible states in respect to
non-Muslims.
The first is when they are in their own countries,
in which case jihad (def: 09.8) is a communal
obligation, and this is what our author is speaking
of when he says, "Jihad is a communal obligation,"
meaning upon the Muslims each year.
The second state is when non-Muslims invade
a Muslim country or near to one, in which case
jihad is personally obligatory (def: c3.2) upon the
inhabitants of that country, who must repel the
non-Muslims with whatever they can).

For the benefit of those not sufficiently intelligent to obtain a God blessed clue, the Imam issued an explanatory fatwa of fewer words and greater clarity. it is quoted on page 18 of The Book of Jihad.

“The minimum participation in Jihad is once a year, and more is always better. It is not allowed to have a year pass you by without any fighting except out of necessity like the weakness of Muslims and the great numbers of the enemy, or fear of extermination if you attack them first, or lack of provisions, or similar excuses. Otherwise, if there is no necessity it is not allowed to delay attacking the non-believers for more than a year.” Imam Shafi’i states that.

Defense

Muslims assert that Islam only fights defensively. Show me the element of defense in the above cited ayat, hadith and law. There ain't any. Hedaya, the fiqh of the Hanifi school, clarifies the matter explicitly.
http://www.archive.org/stream/hedaysorguide00hamigoog#page/n154/mode/1up

The destruction of the sword is incurred by infidels, although they be not the first aggressors, as appears from various passages in the sacred writings which are generally received this effect.

If the Muslim states adhere to their sacred text, the sunnah of their Profit and their shari'ah, then they are not committed to our right to life. If they are committed to the right to life, then they are apostates, subject to the death penalty for apostasy, specified in Reliance O8.1.

Thursday, November 7, 2013

terrorism can not be associated with Islam?

terrorism can not be associated with Islam Every year the General Assembly of the United Nations resolves to shield Islam from criticism under the guise of "Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping, stigmatization, discrimination, incitement to violence and violence against persons, based on religion or belief"3

The '13 edition is labeled: A/C.3/68/L.48. Six paragraphs into the draft resolution, near the top of its second page, we discover the corrupt core of the resolution, contained in one sentence. that sentence is quoted below with the crucial clause highlighted for clarity.

Reaffirming that terrorism cannot and should not be associated with any religion, nationality, civilization or ethnic group,

Is terrorism associated with any religion? The operative expression is "Islamic terrorism"; why is that so? What did the perpetrators of the

Maillot massacre
Madrid rail bombing
London Subway bombing
Mumbai massacre
Beslan massacre
WTC1
WTC2,
Fort Hood massacre
Boston Marathon bombing

all have in common? They pronounced the Takbir when they attacked; the same words pronounced when Muslims sacrifice hadi for Eid festivals: "Allahu Akbar". They are Muslims.

Khalid Sheikh Mohammad and four co-conspirators signed a bragadocious confession in which they cited relevant Qur'an verses and classified their abomination as an act of worship.

With regards to these nine accusations that you are putting us on trial for; to us, they are not
accusations. To us they are badges of honor, which we carry with pride. Many thanks to God, for his
kind gesture, and choosing us to perform the act of Jihad for his cause and to defend Islam and Muslims.
Therefore, killing you and fighting you, destroying you and terrorizing you, responding back to your
attacks, are all considered to be great legitimate duty in our religion. These actions are our offerings to
God. In addition, it is the imposed reality on Muslims in Palestine, Lebanon, Afghanistan, Iraq, in the
land of the two holy sites [Mecca and Medina, Saudi Arabia], and in the rest of the world, where
Muslims are suffering from your brutality, terrorism, killing ofthe innocent, and occupying their lands
and their holy sites. Nevertheless, it would have been the greatest religious duty to fight you over your
infidelity.

Read that again, concentrating on the highlighted clauses. Mohammed Atta confirmed the obvious in his final message to the terrorists who hijacked the aircraft.

[...]3) Read al-Tawba and Anfal [traditional war chapters from the Qur'an] and reflect on their meanings and remember all of the things God has promised for the martyrs.[...]

[...]5) Pray during the night and be persistent in asking God to give you victory, control and conquest, and that He may make your task easier and not expose us.[...]

[...]When the confrontation begins, strike like champions who do not want to go back to this world. Shout, 'Allahu Akbar,' because this strikes fear in the hearts of the non-believers. God said: 'Strike above the neck, and strike at all of their extremities.' Know that the gardens of paradise are waiting for you in all their beauty, and the women of paradise are waiting, calling out, 'Come hither, friend of God.' They have dressed in their most beautiful clothing.

Did Khalid Sheikh Mohammid, Mohammed Atta & associates misunderstand, twist, distort or pervert Allah's word, Muhammad's Sunnah and Shari'ah or were they acting in obedience to Allah; emulating Muhammad?

I will cast terror

Who said that? Allah said that, in Surah Al-Imran 3.151, Allah said: "We shall cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve". In Surah Al-Anfal 8.12, Allah said: "I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved". What did Allah do?

Allah cast terror

In Surah Al-Ahzab 33.26, Allah said: "Allâh brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives." In Surah Al-Hashr 59.2, Allah said: "and He cast terror into their hearts, so that they destroyed their own dwellings with their own hands and the hands of the believers. ".

But they really fear

The real terror is Moe and his army, as revealed by Allah in Surah Al-Hashr 59.13: "Verily, you (believers in the Oneness of Allâh - Islâmic Monotheism) are more awful as a fear in their (Jews of Banî An-Nadîr) breasts than Allâh.".

Made Victorious with Terror

Two ahadith in Sahih Bukhari are explicit concerning how Moe was made victorious. 1.7.331: "Allah made me victorious by awe, (by His frightening my enemies) for a distance of one month's journey. " 4.52.220: "I have been made victorious with terror ".

Jihad Imperatives

Why did Atta tell the terrorists to study Surah Al-Anfal & At-Taubah? Because those chapters contain the primary Jihad imperatives and the threat and promise which motivate Muslims to implement them.

Mutilate bodies to terrify future victims: 8.12
Fight them until only Allah is worshiped and resistance ends. 8.39
Treat defeated victims harshly to strike terror into those to be attacked next. 8.57
Maximize military power to terrify intended victims 8.60
Make a great slaughter 8.67
Kill them wherever you find them 9.5
Fight people of the book until they are subjugated and pay extortion 9.29
Go to war or go to Hell 9.38, 9.39
Believers are only those who fight in Allah's cause, killing and being killed in return to the celestial bordello 9.111
Believers are rewarded with an upgrade in the celestial bordello for any step taken to injure or enrage infidels 9.120
Fight the disbelievers nearest you and be harsh against them 9.123

Casting Terror

How did Allah cast terror?

By genocide: 33.26-27, Sunan Abu Dawud 38.4390.
By murder:

By devastation of date palm groves.

Connect the dots

I will cast terror
I cast terror
to strike terror
to terrify
I was made victorious with terror
Every Jew in Medina was in fear for his life.
An entire Arab tribe converted out of fear when Bint Marwan was murdered.
Muslims terrorized Jews by destroying their livlihood.

Terrorism: intrinsic sacrament of Islam

    Any rational and intelligent person will come to the obvious conclusion upon examining the evidence and observing the pattern. There is no alternative. But the United Nations Ambassadors of Australia, Azerbaijan and Egypt (and the OIC member states) would have the United Nations declare that:
"terrorism cannot and should not be associated with any religion" . Those making the declaration and those who will vote to pass the resolution in the General Assembly are traitors to the human race. The resolution and its supporters are part of the problem, not part of the solution.

    If we can not associate terrorism with its source: Islamic doctrine & practice, then we can do nothing to eliminate it. Terrorism can only be eliminated by eliminating its source: Islam. The three international human rights covenants which require legal proscription of Islam for promoting war, genocide and suppression of human rights must be enforced. The present resolution was crafted to shield Islam from exposure, justice and eradication.

    Citizens of the United States can transmit to their Representative & Senators a link to the evidence of human rights violations. by signing the International Qur'an Petition. Europeans should copy the petition and email it to their Member of Parliament and MEP.