The Democratic Party Is In Trouble

~Snooper~

I can tell from all the distraction techniques being utilized by the rabid moonbat loser bloggers and the theoretical astute propagandists within the Leftinistra's zoo.

Wall Street Journal: Frustration Builds for Democrats

WASHINGTON: The way in which Senate Democrats wavered and then consented to the confirmation of Michael B. Mukasey as attorney general reflects the party's broader struggle to make headway on its national-security agenda, despite President Bush's unpopularity. [...]

Washington Times: Change Called Crucial for '08

Democratic strategists are warning their party and its presidential contenders that they have failed to connect with the voters' demands for change. [...]

Newsweek: This Won't Be the Iraq Election - Fareed Zakaria

[...] When the president announced the surge last January, I wrote a column arguing that it was likely to succeed militarily (by providing better security) but would probably fail politically (because of a lack of political reconciliation). I was both right and wrong. More U.S. troops have meant better security. But they are not at the heart of current improvements in Iraq. The key is that Petraeus has been willing to do what no American official has until now: accept Iraq for what it is and not what Washington wants it to be. Searching for a stable order, Petraeus has allied himself with whoever, within reason, could produce that order. [...]

Financial Times: Democrats Wake Up to Being the Party of the Rich

[...] The decision by Senate majority leader Harry Reid, the Nevada Democrat, surprised many Washington insiders, who saw the plan as appealing to the spirit of class warfare that infuses the Democratic party. Liberal disappointment in Mr Reid was palpable at media outlets such as USA Today, where an editorial chastised: "The Democrats, who control Congress and claim to represent the middle and lower classes, ought to be embarrassed." [...]

Yes, yes, I know. All of this is old news but it doesn't hurt retelling it all. After all, we all know that the elections coming up in 2008 will not be about the Iraq War. It will not be about the impeachment of anyone for uncommitted crimes. Remember, UFO boy's theatrical event to pander and cater to his kook fringe moonbats failed in more ways then one. Knowing he, Dennis Kucinich, was just making noise, he was called on the carpet and his fellow libs quickly shelved the whole quagmire.

The election WILL be about illegal immigration and taxes. Really. That will be the platforms. The War In Iraq is as good as won...the fighting is long from being over but the AQ are on the run and have run into Pakistan. With all the blustering about what they "would do differently than GWB", we shall see what their responses will be for Pakistan. Obama had once said that he would bomb Pakistan and Hillary has changed rhetoric about Pakistan during several debates.

Every time I hear a Democratic Party Presidential Aspirant yammer on about nothing, really, I hear the ramblings of a Phony Patriot.


Anyway, Hillary will retreat into wherever she is right now and will undergo a complete make-over since her self-induced trouncing of self during the last debate. She got got.

The Leftinistra ALWAYS run on the mantra of "change". But, what change have they affected? N.O.T.H.I.N.G.. Why is that? That is easy to answer. They lied to get into power back in 2006 and ever since then, they have back-peddled and waffled and lost EVERY contest. The "change" they wish to affect is not what the vast majority want. And, the vast majority are NOT the kook fringe Moonbats of The Fruit Loop Brigades.

Stand by for the whining.

Even that loser Greenwald knows it.

Catch the wave