I Am A Proud Member of Vets For Freedom

For up to date progress in the War In Iraq, please visit Vets For Freedom, an organization I am proud to be a member in good standing of.

Veteran's Suicide Hot Line Number!

1-800-273-TALK (8255) Call this number if you need help!!

A Vast Collection Of Buzzings At Memeorandum

If you wish to catch a buzz without the usual after affects, CLICK TO MEMEORANDUM. (It will not disturb the current page) That will be all. We now return to regular programming.

This Blog Is Moving

Greetings. After this weekend, this Take Our Country Back Blog will be moving to the new web site. Too many conservatives are getting zapped by the intolerant dweebs of the Obama Goons and seeing that this editing platform is a free site, Blogger can do pretty much what it feels like doing. Hence, I now have a paid site and will be migrating the last 1400+ posts shortly.

So, one day, you just may click this page somewhere and it will show up as "private". It has been fun but the intolerant Czarbie Goon Squads are brain dead idiots. They can come play at the new site which I OWN outright.

Thursday, July 22, 2010

3 Things You Should Know About Islam

This video probably won't be up long, but it has been saved and is being reposted elsewhere. It states the most vital facts about Islam at a fairly high level of abstraction, leaving the reader with the task of researching the details.

I want you to watch this video and tell your friends and family to watch it. I want it to go viral before it is pulled down by the intolerant, bigoted forces of obscurantism.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZHdMlT3E7cg&feature=player_embedded

For those who prefer the short course: refer to my blog post: What’s Wrong With Islam/Muslims?

The Qur'an is the foundational text of Islam. It is approximately one third as long as the Bible. It contains much redundancy, little context and no chronology.
Reading Surahs 2,3 &4 is essential to understanding Islamic jihad & misogyny. The second Surah deals mainly with defensive & retaliatory fighting. Surahs 8 & 9 contain the imperatives for global conquest. Surahs 47, 48 & 61 add some important reinforcing details.

The Qur'an is available free on line in many languages, translations and formats. The Muslim Student Association at USC hosts three parallel translations: Pickthall, Shakir & Abdullah Yusuf Ali without commentary.

The Skeptic's Annotated Quran presents Pickthall's translation with a graphic index in the right sidebar.

Abdullah Yusuf Ali's translation is available with his commentary at altafsir.

The King Fahd Complex hosts the Hilali & Khan translation with commentary. That translation includes parenthetical expressions from three tafsirs. it is reputed to be 95% accurate, excepting only the terms "fight" and "marry". In the former case, the true expression is fight and kill, in the latter case, it is a common obscenity.

Maududi's translation & commentary displays the Arabic text, English translation & explanation and offers Arabic recital for those who want to know what it sounds like.

Hadith are sayings, observations made by Muhammad's companions. They help to confirm and explain the Qur'an and form half of the basis of Shari'ah.
USC-MSA hosts abridgments of four of the six canonical hadith collections. Sahih Bukhari is considered the most authentic. Its books of Jihad, Khumus & Expedition contain most of what you need to know about jihad.

Tafsir are explanations of the Qur'an, verse by verse. Other verses and hadith form the basis of tafsir. Ibn Kathir's Tafsir is the most widely accepted. Qtafsir has an alpha-numeric search engine so that you can look up a verse by its Surah:Ayeh numbers. In several cases, the topic titles will tell everything you need to know. Here are a few samples. Click them to read the topics at http://www.tarsir.com.

Umdat as-Salik is the all purpose Shafi'ite handbook of Shari'ah: Islamic law. It was translated by Nuh Ha Mim Keller as Reliance of the Traveller, a 1250 page book. That had to be a pure labor of love. It is divided into books, each named with a single letter. Book O treats of justice. Chapter 9 details the law of jihad. From my point of view, it is the most important part of the book. Book M treats of marriage. Open it to 3.13 for a real eye opener.

Maktabah has a pdf version of Reliance that you can search. Here are some extremely relevant samples for readers with less intense curiosity.

Posted by Ben at 7/22/2010 10:07:00 PM |

Labels: , , , ,

Get Real, Jeffrey

One of my Google Alerts brought up this garbage:

Responsible for Equality And Liberty (R.E.A.L.) condemns such calls for hatred against any identity group, any religion, and R.E.A.L. rejects calls by those who seek to deny anyone’s freedom of religion and freedom of worship.

We urge all those who hate to release the burden of hate from their hearts, and respect their fellow human beings and our universal human rights.


I was not able to find the wall post of which they complain. The older posts link was not functioning. The complaint concerns a wall post on SIOA's Facebook page. The post linked to a blog post about legal considerations for banning Islam.

A quick visit to the About Us link discovered a familiar name: Jeffrey Imm. I have read several articles written by him about Islamic supremacism, and I agreed with them.

Founder’s Summary:
Our non-partisan group is focused on a consistent support of our universal human rights in all parts of the world, with emphasis on these four areas:
– 1. ensuring religious freedom and pluralism / defying religious supremacism
– 2. supporting racial harmony / defying racial supremacism
– 3. supporting gender equality / defying misogyny
– 4. defending human liberty / defying totalitarianism

It is not possible to oppose supremacism, misogyny & totalitarianism without opposing Islam. Those three evils are all intrinsic and foundational to Islam.
Allah demands that Islam be made superior; dominant over all religions. That objective is to be obtained by offensive warfare. That warfare is the foundation of the relationship between Allah and Muslims.

Islam is a way of life: jihad-- predation upon the human race. If Muslims abandon jihad in favor of productive pursuits, Allah will curse them and not lift the curse until they return to jihad. Aggressive warfare, genocide & terrorism are intrinsic sacraments of Islam.

Islamic law requires a minimum of one or two military attacks on disbelievers in every year, failing only in a year when Islam lacks sufficient men or material.


If none of those concerned perform jihad, and it does not happen at all, then everyone who is aware that it is obligatory is guilty of sin, if there was a possibility of having performed it. In the time of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) jihad was a communal obligation after his emigration (hijra) to Medina. As for subsequent times, there are two possible states in respect to non-Muslims.

The first is when they are in their own countries, in which case jihad (def: o9.8) is a communal obligation, and this is what our author is speaking of when he says, "Jihad is a communal obligation," meaning upon the Muslims each year. [Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9.1]


Islam is misogynistic; women are property, literally fields to be plowed. Women inherit half as much as men, A woman's testimony is given half the weight of a man's. Islam permits wife beating.

Islam is totalitarian, it encompasses the entirety of human life, dictating everything from conception to burial. Only Allah has the right to be worshiped.
Only Allah has the right to rule.

Do you have a right to live? If so, then others have an obligation not to kill you. If you are a not Muslim and are not living as a dhimmi under a treaty of protection in return for paying extortion, then Islam is at war against you. Your blood and property are not sacred to Muslims.

Do you have a right to worship or not as you choose? If so, then others have an obligation not to interfere with your worship. But Muslims are obligated to fight you until only Allah is worshiped; until Jews and Christians are subjugated and extorted.

Islam is 180° out of phase with the values of Western Civilization. If it can't defeat us militarily, it will out breed us and defeat us demographically. Recent shootings, attempted bombings and vehicular assaults should be a clue for you.

Islam is not divisible; Muslims can not pick and choose the parts they like, they must accept the whole package. Islam is incapable of reform because the Qur'an is Allah's perfected word which can not be changed.

We need to get rid of Islam. So long as Islam wears the false mantle of religion, the free exercise clause of the First Amendment protects it. Only an amendment to the Constitution can remove that camouflage and enable Congress to outlaw Islam.

Here is something you can do: Outlaw Islam! Amend the U. S. Constitution to exclude Islam from the definition of religion. Copy the blog post with the petition text, signature link, and links to the evidence presented. Paste it into an email and broadcast it widely!!

There is something else you can do: demand enforcement of international human rights law.
ICCPR

Article 20

  1. Any propaganda for war shall be prohibited by law.
  2. Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law.
The Qur'an is an egregious violation of those provisions, it can not be changed, so Islam must be outlawed.

Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide

Article 3

The following acts shall be punishable:
  • (a) Genocide;
  • (b) Conspiracy to commit genocide;
  • (c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide;
8:67, which states that a Prophet must make a great slaughter before ransoming captives and 47:4, which directs Muslims to kill and wound "many of them" are obvious violations of 3(c) as the infamous genocide hadith.

Our only recourse is to demand that the World Court enforce those provisions, proscribing Islam by law. That is the mission of the International Qur'an Petition. If you love life and liberty, you will sign the International Qur'an Petition, copy it, paste it into an email, and send it to everyone you can hope to influence with an exhortation to sign and forward it.

While Muslims have a 'right' to practice Islam, all our rights are forfeit. It is not possible that there can be a right to attack, kill, rape, enslave and plunder.

Posted by Ben at 7/22/2010 03:44:00 AM |

Labels: , , , ,

Wednesday, July 21, 2010

Cordoba House is Not the First Mosque of Triumph

Tom Burnett has a reminder for us, sent through another Alec Rawls blogburst. The issues of triumphalism & supremacism are not limited to any single place; they rise whereever Islam erects its symbols of conquest.

9:33. It is He Who has sent His Messenger (Muhammad ) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islâm), to make it superior over all religions even though the Mushrikûn (polytheists, pagans, idolaters, disbelievers in the Oneness of Allâh) hate (it).

48:28. He it is Who has sent His Messenger (Muhammad ) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islâm), that He may make it (Islâm) superior over all religions. And All-Sufficient is Allâh as a Witness.

61:9. He it is Who has sent His Messenger (Muhammad ) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islâmic Monotheism) to make it victorious over all (other) religions even though the Mushrikûn (polytheists, pagans, idolaters, and disbelievers in the Oneness of Allâh and in His Messenger Muhammed ) hate (it).

Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 11.5, has a list of seven severe limitations on conquered Jews & Christians; two of which are relevant to this issue.

-5- may not build higher than or as high as the Muslims' buildings, though if they acquire a tall house, it is not razed;

-7- and are forbidden to build new churches.

Islam must be made superior, victorious: dominant. Its Mosques must be larger and more numerous than churches, as a sign of domination. Muslims are planting their flag, symbolically seizing territory. Is there some part of this you can't comprehend?


Flight 93 father: ground zero mosque is the SECOND mosque being built on a 9/11 site Pamela Geller, who is leading the fight against the ground zero mosque in New York, has posted the following letter from Tom Burnett Senior. To our fellow 9/11 families and to all who are concerned about the Ground Zero mega-mosque in New York: We want everyone to know that the Park Service is right now building an even larger Islamic victory mosque atop the Flight 93 crash site. Many of you were outraged in 2005 when the Crescent of Embrace design was unveiled to be a half-mile wide Islamic shaped crescent: Crescent publicity shot and Islamic crescent and starLeft: 2005 publicity shot of the Crescent of Embrace design. Right: typical Islamic crescent and star, viewed from a similar angle. Few people know that this giant crescent actually points to Mecca, or understand the religious significance of this orientation. A crescent that points the direction to Mecca is a very familiar construct in the Islamic world. Because Muslims face Mecca for prayer, every mosque is built around a Mecca direction indicator called a mihrab. The classic mihrab is crescent shaped. Here are the two most famous mihrabs in the world: Crescent publicity shot and Islamic crescent and starLeft: the Mihrab of the Prophet, at the Prophet's mosque in Medina. Right: the mihrab of the Great Mosque in Cordoba Spain. Face into the crescent to face Mecca As with the Medina and Cordoba mihrabs, a person facing into the Crescent of Embrace will be facing Mecca. In the image below, superimposed red lines show the orientation of the Flight 93 crescent. The green qibla circle is from an online Mecca-direction calculator: 60%SizeMeccaOrientationGraphicA person standing between the tips of the crescent and facing into the center of the crescent (red arrow) will be facing almost exactly in "qibla" direction (the Muslim prayer direction). You can verify the qibla direction from Somerset PA using any number of on-line Mecca-direction calculators. To be precise, the Crescent of Embrace points 1.8° north of Mecca, ± a tenth of a degree. The final construction drawings alter this orientation slightly, so that instead of pointing a little less than two degrees north of Mecca, the actual crescent will point less than three degrees south of Mecca. Such small deviations from Mecca are insignificant by Islamic standards, which developed over a period of more than a thousand years during which far flung Muslims had no accurate way to determine the direction to Mecca. The Park Service does not call the Crescent of Embrace a crescent anymore. Now they call it Circle of Embrace, but the only actual change was to add an extra arc of trees (planted to the rear of a person facing into the giant crescent) that explicitly represents a broken off part of the circle. The unbroken part of the circle, what symbolically remains standing in the wake of 9/11, is just the original Crescent of Embrace. It is still a giant Islamic shaped crescent, still pointing at Mecca. This is the Park Service's official explanation for the design: the terrorist attacks are depicted as smashing our peaceful circle and turning it into a giant crescent. A clearer depiction of Islamic victory is hard to imagine, so no one should be too surprised that the damned thing points to Mecca, and actually turns out to be a mosque. Other mosque features Mosque design is based on a dozen typical mosque features, every one of which is realized in the Crescent/Circle design, all on the same epic scale as the half mile wide crescent-mihrab. Note, for instance, that the 93 foot tall minaret-like Tower of Voices is topped with another Islamic-shaped crescent, akin to the crescent-topped minarets seen in many Islamic countries: 60%SizeMeccaOrientationGraphicAn Islamic shaped crescent, soaring in the sky above the symbolic lives of the 40 heroes, which literally dangle down below. In Islam, there is only heaven and hell. Symbolic damnation? The Flight 93 mosque needs to be stopped, along with the Islamic victory mosque at ground zero in Manhattan. May the fight against these two desecrations strengthen each other. Sincerely, Tom Burnett Senior Loving father of Flight 93 hero Tom Burnett Junior Pamela's Atlas Shrugs post includes a second letter from Mr. Burnett, thanking her for her help and passing on some information about the design selection process. (The vote for was 9 to 6 from a judging panel where family members were outnumbered 8-7 by left wing design professionals.) Want to join our blogburst against the crescent mosque? Just send your blog's url. There is also an online petition that people can sign. Contact information for the Flight 93 Memorial Project here.

Posted by Ben at 7/21/2010 06:06:00 AM |

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, July 20, 2010

Wafa Sultan Interview

I received an email update from a blog about the case of Geert Wilders. That email contained a link to a pair of videos of an interview with Wafa Sultan who was called as a witness for the defense. Although Wafa Sultan is very articulate, it appears that her knowledge and passion outstrip her ability to communicate them. Between her soft voice, my computer's weak audio card and my hearing loss, I had difficulty with the audio.

When asked, she clearly states her admiration of Geert Wilders and support for his mission. In the first video, the interviewer, who had obviously done some preparation, probed deeply for the circumstances of her apostasy. That part is not easy listening but it is vital to understanding Wafa Sultan and her mission.

The dark side of Islam is exposed to view in the first video, though not in great detail. Wafa Sultan emphasizes the need to read the Qur'an. She exhorts both Muslims and non-Muslims to read it and the Sira.

The second video opens with scenes from the courtroom, narrated in Dutch. That is followed with sound bites from the first interview further questions. It iconsiderably shorter and ends with a brief sports segment.

A third vidio on the page consists of high lights from the vain interview, it appears to be a second generation copy, with much lesser video quality, but the sound track is considerably stronger than that in the original. It, too loses some quality, and there is Arabic chanting in the background.

That third video intersperses Islamic counterpoints between the money quotes. Unfortunately, al-taqiyya & Kitman are employed. I will append a dissection below the video.




sitestat

http://vodpod.com/watch/3948812-wafa-sultan-defending-geert-wilders-1



sitestat

http://vodpod.com/watch/3948819-wafa-sultan-defending-geert-wilders-2




http://vodpod.com/watch/3967600-ban-the-quran-islam-wafa-sultan-aka-shaytan

  • Mr. Wilders is well known here for saying that Islam is a backward culture and he has said many times in public that as far as he is concerned, the Qur'an should be banned and people wearing head scarves should be taxed accordingly.
    • I one hundred percent agree with him. the way they behave against non-Muslims--they are brainwashed to believe--indoctrinated to believe that their mission on earth is to take over and to force non-Muslims to become Muslim. The Islamic values don't match with western values. They're not for freedom.
      • [Text display] The Truth The Quran instructs Muslims to treat non-Muslims courteously in a spirit of kindness and generosity, given they are not hostile towards Muslims.
        • I can't find that verse, but I did find these, which contradict that assertion: 38:28, 8:39, 9:29, 9:73.
      • "Allah does not forbid you from those who do not fight you because of religion and do not expel you from your homes--from dealing kindly and justly with them. Indeed, Allah loves those who act justly. Allah only forbids you from those who fight you because of religion and expel you from your homes and aid in your expulsion--(forbids) that you make allies of them. And whoever makes allies of them, then it is those who are the wrongdoers." (Quran 60:8-9)
        • That tactic is called cherry picking, selecting a verse out of context to distort the meaning. Start reading at the first verse of the surah then go here and search for this expression: as friends.
  • You have said many times that you are fighting Islam, that you see Wilders as in that same group?
    • Yes he is, yes we're not fighting Muslims, we are not against Muslims, Even Mr. Wilders has said that many many times. We have to distinguish between Islam and Muslims, we are not against Muslims but we're totally against Islam.
      • Does that make sense? not against Muslims, but against the Muslim religion, Islam??
      • If they are against our way of life 'Islam' then quite clearly they are against Muslims too!
        • I can not deny the fact that Sultan fell into a common logic trap. It would be better to steer clear of p.c. altogether.
  • But if you're saying that -- you just said "I don't have a problem with Muslims, I have a problem with Islam", now it seems that you have a problem with at least some Muslims.
    • No doubt about it. I don't want to generalize my attitude, of course I have problems with some Muslims. But I don't want to say every Muslim is a threat, that's not fair. My Mother is a Muslim and she's still stuck in Islam. She is the most peaceful woman on earth, but she's illiterate, she's never read the Qur'an or the life of Muhammad. She practices Islam the way she heard her mother and her grandmother talking about Islam. So that's what I mean, I can not consider my mom as a threat. But she doesn't know much about Islam. But its about Muslims who know.
      • Now she says the problem is with the 'literate' Muslims who understand Islam & the Quran!
        • The problem is believing Muslims who understand and attempt to carry out Allah's commands and emulate Muhammad. To fully comprehend this, read 9:111.
      • But Muslims who have no knowledge of Islam are ok! (according to her)
  • Do you --you said "I decided to fight Islam itself not just extremism or Wahhabism but Islam itself?
    • Because I don't believe there is radical Islam, I truly believe the term 'radical Islam' is Muslims trademark. The west invented this term for the sake of being politically correct.
    • Growing up in Syria I had never heard of radical Islam, Wahhabi Islam, militant Islam, political Islam. I heard only of the one Islam, normal Islam.
  • And you say all Islam is bad?
    • No doubt about it. You know, there is no Qur'anic verse that says "don't kill".
        • Not in those words, but 4:93 tells Muslims not to kill believing Muslims.
      • According to Islam it is a great sin to kill an innocent person!
        • It is a great sin to kill a believing Muslim(4:93). Only Muslims can be innocent. Disbelief is equated to waging war against Allah. If you are not a Muslim, you are not innocent.
      • For that cause we decreed for the Children of Israel that whosoever killeth a human being for other than manslaughter or curruption in the earth, it shall be as if he had killed all mankind, and whoso saveth the life of one, it shall be as if he had saved the life of all mankind. Our messengers came unto them of old with clear proofs (of Allah's Sovereignty), but afterwards lo! many of them became prodigals in the earth
        • Muslims love to quote 5:32, but never quote 5:33, which lists the punishments prescribed for those who wage war against Allah, which is defined to include disbelief. .
    • Yeah, look, my mission is to create doubt about Islam for the sake of every country on earth--they need to be stopped. This is my message
  • And you say you are on a mission, when is the mission successful--mission accomplished?
    • I consider it successful from the very beginning once you believe in something and you are determined to do it you cannot succeed,[sic] eventually we will win I have no doubt...

Posted by Ben at 7/20/2010 06:48:00 AM |

Labels: , ,

Monday, July 19, 2010

Pat Condell Blasts Shari'ah

Once again, Barenaked Islam got there first, embedding this video. I am going to add some value by transcribing the video so that you can have another chance to savor and absorb some truth. I will also add some commentary.

While run time is less than seven minutes, Pat packs in a log of words. It appears to me that he needed to stop to take a breath but pressed on regardless because of the importance of his message. Transcribing this took about two hours. That investment of time will be worth while if anyone reads and heeds Pat's wisdom.

http://barenakedislam.wordpress.com/2010/07/18/pat-condell-sharia-in-the-west-is-like-urine-in-a-water-hole/#comment-40151

You know, it always amazes me how many people. in the west would happily compromise the foundations of our entire civilization to appease religious fascism. I find it disturbing that they would care so little about their children's future, even if they are too complacent or naive or politically blinkered to care about their own.

I have a problem with one phrase: "religious fascism". Fascism is an authoritarian form of government. Islam is a deen: way of life which conflates the spiritual and temporal into one tyrannical regime. Islam has a religious component which is secondary, not primary. Islam is primarily a war cult preying upon the rest of the human race.

And one of the most depressing questions I get asked by people like this is "Why do you hate Muslims?". Its depressing because anyone who has seen my videos knows very well that I've never expressed hatred for anyone. Hate is for losers, we all know that, because its self-destructive--we do all know that--don't we?

Now, its often claimed that many people in the west are converting to Islam and its true that some are but its also true that many Muslims in the west are leaving Islam but you don't hear so much about them for obvious reasons.

Some of them have been brave enough to make themselves known and reach out to help other Muslims who want to escape the tyranny of their religion. And, like them, its the religion that I have a problem with, not the people. So, no, I don't hate Muslims, thanks for asking; I wish them well, even the fanatics who stand at the roadside with their dopey little banners and bulging eyeballs calling for death to the west; I even wish those boneheads well in that I wish them good mental health if that isn't too wildly optimistic.

I believe it is very over optimistic to wish those boneheads good mental health. Their insanity is obvious even to the untrained observer.

And, of course I know that there are lots of moderate peaceful Muslims indeed, many of them are so moderate and peaceful -- they're invisible and silent and thats part of the problem.

Islam is neither moderate nor peaceful, it is literal, absolute, intolerant and violent, all by design. Muslims who do not fit that mold are termed hypocrites, whose Islam does not reach beyond their throats. They are to be killed and gathered together with us--into Hell.

And, just because there are lots of peaceful Muslims, it doesn't mean that the religion itself is not an aggressive fascist ideology that threatens all our freedom nor does it mean that western governments aren't falling all over themselves to make excuses for it; pretending that Islam has nothing to do with the violence inspired and sanctioned by its scripture and repeatedly carried out in its name.

There are three critical ideas: only Allah has the right to be worshiped, only Allah has the right to rule and Muslims are obligated to enforce those rights. "violence inspired and sanctioned"? No! commanded! 8:39, 9:29 & 9:127 are commandments, not suggestions. The violence is how Muslims enforce Allah's rights.

Just look at the craven behavior that allowed the massacre at Fort Hood to take place--we know it could have been prevented-- but thanks to political correctness in the American Army--the American Army-- all the warning signs were ignored in case somebody got offended. All reference to Islam has been airbrushed out of the official Pentagon report even though the guy handed out copies of the Qur'an beforehand and shouted "Allahu Akhbar" as he carried out the murders.



I'm surprised the officers who charged him haven't been charged with Islamophobia; maybe they will be at the trial when we find out what a victim he is and how living in a decadent country like America--his religion is the only thing keeping him sane.

Pat said it, and said it with super clarity. I can't add anything more than "Amen".

All over the western world we've given Islamic supremacists the impression that they have every right to be outraged, insulted and offended by everything we do and say. And some of us have come to believe it ourselves, and that is the real core of this problem.

Our schools don't teach our history accurately, they emphasize the negative aspects and deprecate the positive aspects. As a result, we have lost knowledge of the superiority of western civilization.

Mark Twain said that "Faith is believing what you know ain't so." Well, political correctness is doing what you know ain't right.

In every western country, Islamic extremists are allowed to exploit religious privilege for political ends by claiming to represent all Muslims and the media always treats them as if they do.

When you represent Islam, you represent Muslims. Islam is what Moe said and did, as codified in the Qur'an, Sira & hadith. Islam is nothing else; nothing else is Islam.

These groups give themselves official sounding titles and talk a smooth line in community harmony while doing all they can to prevent integration--to keep Muslims apart and ghettoized in a separate society with a separate identity, separate rules and standards--in other words, they exist to cause division in society, to drive a wedge between communities that doesn't need to be there any more than they need to exist as organizations.

They exist for the purpose of conquering us, by out breeding us, deceit, subversion & intimidation if possible, by war if necessary.

Take, for example, the Council on American Islamic Relations, thats quite a puffed up, important sounding title, that implies equal ideologies--equal points of view that need to find a common ground--when, in fact, all that's needed is for Muslim immigrants to adapt to the American way of life or to British or Australian or Canadian way of life or not to go there; to respect the laws and customs like everyone else, not to try to change them to Islamic ones.

And not to define themselves as a separate group deserving special status. That's where it begins and ends, there is no debate, there is no common ground to find, there is no American Islamic relations and there is no need for any self-appointed council of Shari'ah advocating, Hamas linked religious fascists to oversee it.

Those two sentences are a gold mine of wisdom; read them repeatedly and absorb them completely.

Shari'ah in the west is like urine in a water hole: any amount is too much. Shari'ah dehumanizes women, it threatens the freedom and the dignity of every woman in the western world. It discriminates in such a fundamental way there's no way around it, there's no compromise.

Misogyny runs through it like a dye and that should be more than enough reason for us to banish it as aggressively and thoroughly as we banish rabies.

Pat, would you believe that Allah's Messenger has a contrary opinion about water pollution?
Sunan Abu Dawud Book 1, Number 0067:
Narrated AbuSa'id al-Khudri:

I heard that the people asked the Prophet of Allah (peace_be_upon_him): Water is brought for you from the well of Buda'ah. It is a well in which dead dogs, menstrual clothes and excrement of people are thrown. The Messenger of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) replied: Verily water is pure and is not defiled by anything.

If you live in the United States, and especially if you've ever accused anyone of Islamophobia, I urge you to read this book: Muslim Mafia If you read only one book this year or only one book in your whole life, make it this one for your sake and for the sake of your children, especially the female ones.

This book is the result of an undercover investigation that reveals the bare knuckle truth about CAIR. the Muslim Brotherhood, and the extensive network of Islamic fanatics who've eaten their way into American society like termites and seek to undermine it and destroy it from within.

It provides substantial documentary proof that Islamists have penetrated the highest levels of American politics and law enforcement in their quest to impose Shari'ah on the United States and get rid of the Constitution.

Aided and abetted by the most cowardly and shameful political correctness in government, in the media and especially within the FBI who seem to think its more important to be culturally sensitive than to defend national security. This is an important book, which is why the American media has so assiduously ignored it. In publishing it, the authors have done more for their country and for the civilized world than all the politicians on Capital Hill combined will have achieved in their entire careers.

Political Islam is a threat to all civilized people. Muslims, Christians, Hindus, Sikhs, Atheists, Buddhists and especially Jews. If America falls, we all do, so, wherever you live in the world, if you care about freedom, read this book and read it soon. Peace.

Posted by Ben at 7/19/2010 12:51:00 AM |

Labels: , ,

Friday, July 16, 2010

Geller vs Ramey

Pamela Geller posted a video of a joint interview with Ibrahim Ramey, who said some things that must be rebutted.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dcF9XxyZ55A&feature=player_embedded#at=13

It goes sour for me right off the bat when Ibrahim Ramey is introduced as affiliated with the Muslim American Society. After seeing the results of Balkanization in Czechoslovakia & Yugoslavia, I am compelled to say that I am an American. If you are a hypenated-American, and you ain't happy here, then its time to go home. So, go.

Two and one half minutes into the video, Ramey says that 9/11 was a "criminal attack, not an Islamic attack". That malicious malarkey raises my blood pressure significantly. I am PO'd. It is a good thing I was not within reach of him when he said that, because it would have precipitated a criminal act. That attack was planned over a span of eight years, by Muslims, motivated by the damnable doctrines of conquest, terror and genocide enshrined in the Qur'an and exemplified in the sunnah of their damned Profit. That attack was carried out by Muslims, who pronounced the takbir while slitting the throats of the flight crews.

When some damned Muslim slits a pilot's throat in the name of Allah and you assert that his act was not Islamic, I need to reach out and wipe the smirk off your face. It is equivalent to saying that the conquest of India and genocide of the Hindus was not Islamic or that the Assyrian & Armenian genocides were not Islamic. The denial of obvious truth is malicious and malignant. It must be repudiated.

Next, Ramey says that Muslims have First Amendment rights, like other Americans, in terms of freedom of religion. Yes, they do, because the founders of this nation, in their haste & process of compromise, and not anticipating that Muslims might immigrate at some future time, neglected to include a definition of religion in the Bill of Rights. Legitimate religions have spiritual and benevolent missions, they do good, not harm. Islam has a mercenary mission and is responsible for the early deaths of 270*106 people in the last 1400 years.

Is there a right to wage war upon us because we do not submit to your 'religion'? Is there a right to kill us, rape our widows, enslave our orphans and seize our property? All of those evils are inseverable parts of the practice of Islam and can neither be neglected nor expunged from it. If Jihad is possible in a given year, and is not performed, all who knew of the obligation are in sin.

If there is a right to practice Islam, then our rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness are voided because, as Moe said, our blood and property are not sacred to Muslims.

Next, he issued a denial of collective guilt. I did not hear Geller or anyone else assert that all Muslims are guilty of the Abomination. In my view, all who admired the act, who sympathized with its perpetrators, who celebrated or experienced schadenfreude share some the guilt. If you are a Muslim, and you disclaim that guilt, then in order to believe you I need to hear you sincerely abjure Surat al-Anfal, at-Taubah, al-Fath & as-Saff. You won't do that, because you can't do it and remain Muslim, so I will never believe you.

To add insult to injury, he asserts that Muslims are trying to establish a "new relationship with America" and "new relationships with the people of the United States. How can one discuss this without profanity? If they are Americans, then they are citizens of America and fellow citizens with us. No other relationship is possible. If they are Muslims, then they are predators and we are prey. Which are they???

He says that there are "numerous memorials" to the decedents. Show me an enumerated list, please; I believe that the politicians are still haggling over the design and execution of the Ground Zero Memorial, and the one in Pennsylvania is a crescent memorializing the ideology of the perpetrators, not the victims. He does not want to conflate the idea of a memorial into that of the right of Muslims to have a Mosque. When Muslims conquered India, they tore down the temples and replaced them with Mosques. They built two Mosques on the rubble of the Jewish Temple. They turned churches in Constantinople into Mosques. They build Mosques as a symbol of Islamic supremacy and that is exactly what the Cordoba House proposal is. They are rubbing our faces in the blood and decomposing flesh of the victims! If the insult does not bring you to the brink of incontinence, you may be taking too many tranquilizers.

Posted by Ben at 7/16/2010 04:03:00 AM |

Labels: , , ,

Wednesday, July 14, 2010

Terrorist Incitement

The excrement comes from Marifah, an Islamic forum. Its authenticity is confirmed by MEMRI. In the articles, quoted from al-Qaeda's new web magazine, Abu Basir Nasir al-Wuhayshi and Anwar al awlaki, exhort Muslims living in America to take revenge for Everybody Draw Muhammad Day and other criticism of Moe.

Asked for his advice to Muslims residing in the West, Abu Basir Nasir al-Wuhayshi replied that they should arm and train themselves for violence.

My advise to my Muslim brothers in the West is to acquire weapons and learn methods of war. They are living in a place where they can cause great harm to the enemy and where they can support the Messenger of Allah.

Note the clause which I emphasized, it has a basis in the Qur'an.

9:120. It was not becoming of the people of Al-Madinah and the bedouins of the neighbourhood to remain behind Allah's Messenger (Muhammad SAW when fighting in Allah's Cause) and (it was not becoming of them) to prefer their own lives to his life. That is because they suffer neither thirst nor fatigue, nor hunger in the Cause of Allah, nor they take any step to raise the anger of disbelievers nor inflict any injury upon an enemy but is written to their credit as a deed of righteousness. Surely, Allah wastes not the reward of the Muhsinun

I added emphasis to one crucial clause in the penultimate sentence to make one point extremely clear: taking any step to anger or injure disbelievers is imputed to a Muslim's credit as righteousness. Causing "great harm to the enemy" is valuable to Muslims because Allah will weigh their good deeds against their sins; the balance will determine their eternal destination.

There is no meaning in life if the Messenger of Allah is cursed while they listen to and see such crimes being committed in front of their eyes. It is not enough to defend him, may my father and mother be sacrificed for him, to participate in demonstrations and protests because these methods would not stop the West which is already used to them. The successful means are through explosive devices and sacrficing souls. That is more pronounced and successful way of defending him and this is a practice started by the Taliban of Pakistan, Nidal Hassan, and 'Umar al-Faruq, may Allah release them and on this path are men who are coming to you by the will of Allah.

Life loses its meaning for a Muslim who does not kill someone who criticizes Moe. Bombing and shooting are effective remedies. ....

O Muslims rise up in defense of your Messenger: a man with his knife, a man with his gun, a man with his rifle, a man with his bomb, by learning how to design explosive devices, by burning down forests and buildings, or by running over them with your cars and trucks. The means of harming them are many so seek assistance from Allah and do not be weak and you will find a way. The rights of the Messenger of Allah upon us are great and it is nothing for all of us to die for his sake; may our mothers be bereaved of us if we do not defend him.

Moe, who has been dead for 1368 years, has a right to the death of his critics? Yeah, right. The message of Anwar al Awlaki is similar.
The medicine prescribed by the Messenger of Allah (pbuh) is the execution of those involved. A soul that is so debased, as to enjoy the ridicule of the Messenger of Allah (pbuh), the mercy to makind; a soul that is so ungrateful towards its Lord that it defames the Prophet(pbuh) of the religion Allah has chosen for his creation does not deserve lfe, does not deserve to breathe the air created by Allah and enjoy a life provided for by Allah. Their proper abode is Hellfire.

Of course, the Imam cites precedent.

The Messenger of Allah(pbuh) called for assassination of Ka'b bin al-Ashraf and there are other incidents of his companions killing those who spoke against him. There was a blacklist of names of people in Makkah that were to be killed even if found hanging on to the clothes of al Ka'ba, the holiest site in Islam. This list included, among others, women who sang poetry defaming Muhamed(pbuh). Even though Muhammed(pbuh) prohibited the killing of women who are non-combatants, these women were an exception because of their unprecedented transgression.


Next, he complains that the system is supporting Moe's critics, making the entirety of Western Civilization in a state of war against Islam.

...The main elements in this system are the laws that make blasphemy legal. Because they are practicing a "right" that is defended by the law, they have the backing of the entire Western political system. This would make the attacking of any Western target legal from an Islamic viewpoint. The entire Western system is staunchly protecting and promoting the defamation of Muhammed (pbuh) and therefore, it is the entire Western system that is at war with Islam. Assassinations, bombings, and acts of arson are all legitimate forms of revenge against a system that relishes the sacrilege of Islam in the name of freedom.

We have the First Amendment because free speech is necessary for the preservation of liberty in a republican form of government. We must be able to criticize and question elected officials and candidates. We must also be free to criticize and question their policies & proposed legislation. Without free speech, our government could devolve into tyranny.

We must also be free to discuss inimical systems which threaten and attack us. Between 1787 and 1815, Muslim pirates attacked our shipping. President Jefferson gave them a lesson in civility, the effect of which has worn off.

According to Muslims, Moe is the greatest and best of men, a role model for everyone to emulate and his cult is the "right religion". How are we to judge those assertions without allowing the presentation of evidence? That requires free speech.

Allah selected as his ultimate messenger a man, who, after his selection as seal of the prophets, married the six year old daughter of his best friend and consummated the marriage when she was nine years old. According to Muslims, I just blasphemed Allah & his messenger. They say I should be killed for that.
I have evidence, from Islam's own cannon.
Sahih Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 64:

Narrated 'Aisha:

that the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old, and then she remained with him for nine years (i.e., till his death).

That is a muttawir hadith; there are other narrators who back it up. Go to http://www.islaam.net/main/hadithsearch.php and search for six years old. If it ain't true, why is it included in the most authentic of the hadith collections?

Allah's ultimate messenger ordered the murder of a critic.

Sahih Muslim Book 019, Number 4436:

It has been narrated on the authority of Jabir that the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: Who will kill Ka'b b. Ashraf? He has maligned Allah, the Exalted, and His Messenger. Muhammad b. Maslama said: Messenger of Allah, do you wish that I should kill him? He said: Yes. He said: Permit me to talk (to him in the way I deem fit). He said: Talk (as you like). So, Muhammad b. Maslama came to Ka'b and talked to him, referred to the old friendship between them and said: This man (i. e. the Holy Prophet) has made up his mind to collect charity (from us) and this has put us to a great hardship. When be heard this, Ka'b said: By God, you will be put to more trouble by him. Muhammad b. Maslama said: No doubt, now we have become his followers and we do not like to forsake him until we see what turn his affairs will take. I want that you should give me a loan. He said: What will you mortgage? He said: What do you want? He said: Pledge me your women. He said: You are the most handsome of the Arabs; should we pledge our women to you? He said: Pledge me your children. He said: The son of one of us may abuse us saying that he was pledged for two wasqs of dates, but we can pledge you (cur) weapons. He said: All right. Then Muhammad b. Maslama promised that he would come to him with Harith, Abu 'Abs b. Jabr and Abbad b. Bishr. So they came and called upon him at night. He came down to them. Sufyan says that all the narrators except 'Amr have stated that his wife said: I hear a voice which sounds like the voice of murder. He said: It is only Muhammad b. Maslama and his foster-brother, Abu Na'ila. When a gentleman is called at night even it to be pierced with a spear, he should respond to the call. Muhammad said to his companions: As he comes down, I will extend my hands towards his head and when I hold him fast, you should do your job. So when he came down and he was holding his cloak under his arm, they said to him: We sense from you a very fine smell. He said: Yes, I have with me a mistress who is the most scented of the women of Arabia. He said: Allow me to smell (the scent on your head). He said: Yes, you may smell. So he caught it and smelt. Then he said: Allow me to do so (once again). He then held his head fast and said to his companions: Do your job. And they killed him.

Awlaki cited that hadith in his magazine article. Is it possible that a pedophile and murderer was a saint who brought us the right religion? "Who will kill Ka'b b. Ashraf? He has maligned Allah, the Exalted, and His Messenger." Allah, the most merciful? In a pig's anus!!!

Muslims bitterly kvetch about wrongly associating Islam with terrorism. That complaint is included in their UN resolutions demanding global blasphemy laws. I mustn't mention the fact that Allah said he would cast terror, Allah did cast terror, with consequences and Moe bragged about winning with terror because that would be "negative stereotyping". Kiss my foot.

It is time to pull your heads out of the sand and admit the fact that we need to be rid of Islam. Sign the International Qur'an Petition and exhort everyone you can hope to influence to sign it and induce others to follow suit.

While we wait for the World Court to enforce international human rights covenants against Islam, lets amend the Constitution to acknowledge the fact that Islam is a predatory war cult, not a religion so we can outlaw it. Sign the Outlaw Islam! petition and urge your friends to sign it.

Posted by Ben at 7/14/2010 08:02:00 PM |

Labels: , , , ,

Tuesday, July 13, 2010

Why Don't We Draft a Bill to Outlaw Islam ?

One signer of the International Qur'an Petition asked a question which deserves an answer.

If Islam is a terrorist org., and it is, than why don't we draft a bill to outlaw it from our country and encourage other countries to do the same. That is the real petition we should be getting out there. Richard Margarit

We can not outlaw Islam with an act of Congress because of the First Amendment. The free exercise clause forbids such legislation. Removing Islam from the penumbra of the free exercise clause requires an amendment to the Constitution. The amendment must recognize the fact that Islam is a predatory way of life with a religious component, not a religion in the normal sense of the word.

Such an amendment was proposed by Pedestrian Infidel in March of '07. That proposal inspired the Outlaw Islam!! petition. The first of this pair of links is to the body of the petition in html format including links to Islamic texts. The second link is to the petition's signature form. At present, it has 182 signatures.

Today, 37 people clicked through from Islam Exposed to Freedom Ain't Free and one more came from another source. Yesterday, the petition was viewed five times. Only one of those 43 readers clicked through to sign the petition. The total number of page views is 1,857.

It is up to us, Richard, to read & sign the petitions and share it with others. The list of on line petitions in the sidebar at Islam Exposed was one of the reasons cited by Pakistan's Ministry of Telecommunications for banning the blog.

Posted by Ben at 7/13/2010 11:02:00 PM |

Labels: ,

Subscribe to: Comment Feed (RSS)
Visitor Tracker