ACTION ALERT!! Move America Forward

~Snooper~

ATTENTION TO ORDERS!

The Following was received in an email message from Move America Forward (Mary Pearson).

SHAME ON THIS WOMAN:

FOR SHUTING DOWN THE BOY SCOUTS EFFORTS TO SUPPORT OUR TROOPS!

Meet Marsha Weinerman, a city official from Cambridge, Massachusetts.

She's made news recently because she decided to shut down the Boy Scouts care package collection boxes. You see, the Boy Scouts were sending care packages for our troops to enjoy at the holidays. But Marsha Weinerman said the Boy Scouts actions are 'too pro-war' and ordered law enforcement to remove the care package collection boxes.

The Boy Scout's troop leader is outraged:

"We have never seen anything like this decision in Cambridge before," Patterson wrote. The city is changing for the worse if decisions like this are allowed to be made."

Contact Ms. Weinerman and let her know that it is our troops' service that protects the rights of all Americans-including our freedom to vote: mWeinerman@cambridgema.gov

Or call Ms. Weinerman's office at: (617) 349-4363

You can show up Ms. Weinerman and those opposed to our troops by sponsoring a Christmas/holiday care package for our troops-and we'll be more than happy to send it over to Iraq and Afghanistan with love and appreciation:

And here's more on this story:

Melanie Morgan's got more on the story here:

Complete report at Move America Forward's "Daily File Blog"

Melanie Morgan also references this in her brand new WorldNetDaily column here:

[...] While these teenage troublemakers and their graying pony-tailed elders chant protests and go home to a warm house and a hot meal, they cannot be bothered to send a care package or a note of thanks or a Christmas card to the troops who they claim to support.

In Cambridge, Mass., the Boy Scouts were even ordered to remove collection boxes that gathered items for care packages for our troops.

Local city official Marsha Weinerman accused the Boy Scouts of being too "pro-war". (Those of you who wish to accuse Ms. Weinerman of being too anti-American are invited to do so by e-mailing her at mWeinerman@cambridgema.gov - be sure to let her know that, unlike her, most Americans are determined to show our troops we love and support them during the holiday season.)

Perhaps Marsha Weinerman and the city officials of Cambridge would be more interested in checking out the current calendar of Code Pink, which lists efforts to shut down military recruiting centers with "Breastfeeding/Playgroup for Peace" and "Circus Acts: Juggling for Peace." Here's their calendar for subverting victory. [...]

And here are the media stories about Ms. Weinerman's atrocious conduct: Breitbart

Wicked Local Boston Magazine

The Staff of Move America Forward

Lose The L.O.S.T.!!....UPDATED

What is L.O.S.T.? The Law of The Sea Treaty was drawn up by The United Nations. That, in and of itself, is reason enough to oppose this treaty. to truly understand LOST, there is a video series here and therein one will find the treaty and the ramifications thereof fully explained. The treaty would subject the United States to the authority of the United nations. This is totally unacceptable.

We have been fighting for years to prevent Senate ratification of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. This very objectionable treaty would put the United States in a de facto world government; it went into effect in 1994 but was never ratified by the U.S. Senate. Shocking as it is, President Bush is lobbying hard for passage of this massive, unprecedented redistribution of wealth from the United States to other countries. The Senate held a hearing last week, and is now poised to approve this treaty sometime before Congress' Christmas break. Please help us stop this very real threat to our sovereignty, security and economic health.

As you no doubt remember, this very dangerous treaty will seriously diminish our national sovereignty by transferring jurisdiction over the world's oceans and everything in them to United Nations agencies and bureaucrats. Yet I would remind you of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Black's admonition in Reid v. Covert, 354 U.S. 1 (1957), when he reminded us that our civil liberties cannot be subordinated by a treaty, by stating:

"It would be manifestly contrary to the objectives of those who created the Constitution, as well as those who were responsible for the Bill of Rights - let alone alien to our entire constitutional history and tradition - to construe Article VI as permitting the United States to exercise power under an international agreement without observing constitutional prohibitions. The court has regularly and uniformly recognized the supremacy of the Constitution over a treaty."

Yet today several U.S. Supreme Court justices are on record as using, and urging other justices to use, foreign law in deciding U.S. cases!

The LOST convention's purpose it to benefit Third World countries by fining and punishing the wealth and technological advantages of the industrialized West. The convention would subject our governmental, military and business operations to mandatory dispute resolution. Any disputes would be decided by the U.N. International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, a 21-member body representing 155 countries envious of American ingenuity and prosperity. The United States would have only one vote with which to protect American investment, and the transfer of sensitive, militarily useful and proprietary private technologies, and forced compliance with the Kyoto Protocol.

The LOST convention would be an open invitation to activist judges to interpret the convention's intentionally vague provisions against our national security and economic interests. In point of fact, were our Senate to approve the LOST convention, the odds are roughly 155 to 1 that the LOST tribunal would vote to cede U.S. claims to the North Pole and its oil riches to the Russians.

The LOST convention is a global tax mechanism, by which greedy U.N. hands will grab for billions of primarily American dollars to benefit corrupt nations around the world. The convention sets up a scheme to facilitate bribes and payoffs to U.N. officials that could make the U.N.'s oil-for-food scandal look like child's play. The Law of the Sea Treaty must be sunk!

This treaty cannot be allowed to be ratified and the ones cramming this treaty through the Senate must be arrested and tried for violating their Oaths of Office. This very treaty is an act of sabotage of American Sovereignty, plain and simple. International Law does NOT have authority over the Constitution of The United States unless, naturally, our CONgress Critters sign its citizens over to the United Nations.

Consider this an Emergency Action Alert.

ACTION TO TAKE

1. Contact your Senators (www.thomas.gov).

2. Contact Senator Mitch McConnell, Senate Minority Leader. Senator McConnell leads a block of 49 Republican votes - we only need 34 to stop LOST. Pressure on Senator McConnell is one of our best chances to stop this treaty.

3. Contact the White House (www.whitehouse.gov/contact/).

Tell them the Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST) remains a seriously flawed document, designed to transfer wealth and technology from industrialized states to those of the Third World. It is anathema to our Founding Principles and will threaten our national sovereignty.

Tell them the best protection of U.S. interests in the world's oceans is the U.S. Navy, which should not and must not be subject to orders or regulations made by any international tribunal.

Phone calls are the most effective way to contact your elected representatives. We may not have time to submit written letters. Call the Capitol Switchboard at (202) 224-3121. The switchboard operator will connect you directly with the Senate office you request. To contact the White House, you have the choice of leaving comments at (202) 456-1111, or talk with a live switchboard operator at (202) 456-1414, or fax at (202) 456-2461.

E-mails and faxes are many times ignored. Members of Congress have been changing their e-mail addresses and fax numbers when we send out alerts. If you prefer, though, you can send an e-mail by going to each member's website at www.thomas.gov.

If you choose to write, and do not know your Senators' mailing addresses, you may simply address your letters as follows:

Office of Senator (Name)
United States Senate
Washington, D.C. 20510

Should we do nothing, it won't be long before the United Stats is no longer the United States and we won't have a Constitution to stand on.

Join Senator Vitter:

Sen. Vitter Leads Assault on Sea Treaty

By Cliff Kincaid

The Senate battle over ratification of Law of the Sea Treaty (United Nations Convention on Law of the Sea - Provides universal control for the management of marine natural resources and shipping rights. Opened for signature on December 10, 1982 ) is heating up and may be brought to vote this month. If passed, it will destroy American Sovereignty. Sen. Vitter is bravely standing against all globalist forces that want to de-nationalize the United States. Now is the time for you to make your opinions known to your Senators!

We cannot stand idly by and watch the elitists sell us to the World Courts.

Which flag shall we fly?


This is NOT my flag...

Threat Level

SEVERE

Quin Hillyer
Michelle Malkin

Track back: Miss Beth's Victory Dance

Wake Up America

UPDATE: check Col North's article at Townhall. Permission Slip For The Sea

WASHINGTON -- In his 2004 State of the Union Address, President Bush said, "America will never seek a permission slip to defend the security of our country." Members of both parties and both houses of Congress applauded. But if the Senate votes to ratify the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea -- known as the Law of the Sea Treaty -- or its appropriate acronym -- LOST -- he and his successors are going to need lots of permission slips.

In 1982, Ronald Reagan, concerned about the treaty's implications for our sovereignty and national security, formally rejected LOST because it did "not satisfy the objectives sought by the United States." In 1994, William Jefferson Clinton, eager to appease One World Government advocates in his own party and at the United Nations, negotiated a parallel "agreement" that purported to address Mr. Reagan's concerns -- and urged ratification. Since then, LOST has gathered dust in the bowels of the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee. All that may be about to change. The deeply flawed, Soviet-era agreement giving unelected, unaccountable international bureaucrats control over 71 percent of the Earth's surface is now on a fast track to ratification.

Advocates for LOST -- among them Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Joe Biden, D-Del. -- claim that the Clinton-negotiated parallel "agreement" eliminates concerns about empowering international organizations to collect heavy fees or interfere with the U.S. military or intelligence collection. Yet a careful reading of LOST's 202 pages -- and the so-called agreement -- proves that's not true.

The U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea already has created a Byzantine array of international organizations to administer the provisions of LOST. Everything from compliance with global environmental agreements, to the collection of "user fees" from private companies, to disputes about military operations above, on or under international waters are subject to mandatory dispute resolution by one or more of these international bodies.

According to the U.N., the purpose of LOST is to preserve international waters for peaceful purposes. But Articles 19 and 20 of the treaty would proscribe the U.S. Navy from training with weapons, collecting intelligence or interfering with enemy communications in the territorial waters of other countries without their expressed permission. Military aircraft are prohibited specifically from taking off and landing in these waters, and severe limitations would be imposed on loading and unloading "any commodity, currency or person" including military equipment. Submarines are required to travel on the surface and "show their flag in territorial waters." Article 30 states that warships not complying with the laws of a coastal nation can be forced to leave. Disputes about these issues would be adjudicated by international lawyers. Right.

LOST's proponents discount these concerns by claiming the U.S. simply will exempt military activities from the treaty's compulsory dispute resolution requirements. However, the "opt out" clause in Article 298 fails to define such operations. In our own Congress, intelligence functions are not considered to be military activities, so it is far from certain that the U.N. would accept the U.S. position that intelligence operations over, on or under the seas are indeed military activities. If there is a dispute as to what is or isn't a military activity, LOST requires the matter to be resolved by international arbitration.

In 2003, Navy Adm. Michael Mullen, now the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee that rulings from these arbitration panels "could have an impact on operational planning and activities, and our security." Last week, in response to questions from Sen. David Vitter, R-La., during a committee hearing, professor Bernard Oxman, a witness supporting LOST, admitted that if the parties to a dispute can't agree on the arbitration panel, the U.N. secretary-general will chose the arbitrators. Lawyers in Pyongyang, Havana and Tehran: Call Turtle Bay.

LOST also opens the door to a long-sought U.N. goal: the redistribution of wealth by taxing Americans. The International Seabed Authority, a bloated, multinational bureaucracy headquartered in Jamaica, has the mandate to distribute revenues and "other economic benefits" on the basis of "equitable sharing criteria, taking into account the interests and needs of developing states." In addition to acting as a global IRS, the ISA also decides which companies from which nations will develop mineral resources on the seabed.

In urging ratification, former President Bill Clinton described LOST as "a far-reaching environmental accord" that would "harmonize" U.S. laws to "prevent, reduce and control pollution" in the "best practical means." But Article 213 requires nations to adopt "laws and regulations to prevent, reduce and control pollution of the marine environment from land-based sources." Thus, LOST could become a means of enforcing another agreement we never ratified: the Kyoto Protocol on global warming. Al Gore, call your office.

Before casting a vote to ratify LOST, all 100 senators should read Article 314 of this onerous treaty and Article II, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution. The U.N.-crafted document specifies that amendments to the treaty can be adopted -- and therefore enforced -- without the consent of any signatory. Yet our Constitution requires that two-thirds of our Senate concur in any treaty. Do 67 members of this Senate now want to surrender that authority to foreign governments?

Why do our CONgress Critters want to give our country away to foreign interests?

Also "sea": Eagle Forum

Call To Action...Support The Troops...Censure CONgress

In a previous post entitled Axis of Defeatists, I pointed out the sillyness of the Cut and Run rhetoric and others have pointed out that "redeployment" is a military term which means NOT what the current milquetoast CONgress Critters are implying it means. If you don't know what the term means, don't make up a meaning to suit your uneducated stupidity. Go look it up.

The Lame Stream Media has been outed upon several "events" and I am going to surmise one here and now. We Conservatives, especially the Reagan Era Conservatives, know for a FACT that there is Leftist Propaganda Machinations throughout the Lame Stream Media, in print and broadcast. It has been proven. Deny it all you want to...the facts remain.

In recent days, GWB and scads of CONgress Critters tried to get the Shamnesty Bill through and crammed down the Nation's throat. Democrat, Independent and Republican alike said, "Hell NO!". GWB and many CONgress Critters (D, R & I) and far-left Moonbat Brigades were upset with "us". The Media was having a Hay Day with it because it was PLAINLY obvious that the Executive and the Legislative branches were NOT listening to "us" and we were NOT buying into the crappola and all they could do was blame Bush. It was an opportunity to "show the world" how lame GWB was. Several Democrats even said as much. "We The People" were heard because the lame Stream Media saw a way to PROVE their "points" as dictated by their string pullers in the Camp of The Leftinistra.

Now, here we are, facing another "stab the troop in the back" episode with the lamest CONgress in the Nation's history, with an approval rating HALF of the approval rating of GWB, and we are to "believe" that the majority of Americans are WITH the lowest approved of CONgress in history. Does that seem even remotely feasible? The Lame Stream Media is using this as another opportunity to "show the world" that GWB is lame. And he is not. I may not agree with GWB ALL the time but he IS correct (mostly) on the GWOT. We fight them there so we don't fight them here. The problem with that has been amply discussed in other posts, namely, the ROE. Why aren't the majority being heard this time around?

This brings up an issue that the LAMEST CONgress in history will NOT address and it is way past time to continue to let them slide on it. This Nation is at war. PERIOD. The laws apply.

United States Code
TITLE 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
PART I - CRIMES
CHAPTER 115 - TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES

Section 2382. Misprision of treason

Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United States, or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State, is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both.

Section 2388. Activities affecting armed forces during war

(a) Whoever, when the United States is at war, willfully makes or conveys false reports or false statements with intent to interfere with the operation or success of the military or naval forces of the United States or to promote the success of its enemies; or

Whoever, when the United States is at war, willfully causes or attempts to cause insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny, or refusal of duty, in the military or naval forces of the United States, or

willfully obstructs the recruiting or enlistment service of the United States, to the injury of the service or the United States, or attempts to do so - Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.

(b) If two or more persons conspire to violate subsection (a) of this section and one or more such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each of the parties to such conspiracy shall be punished as provided in said subsection (a).

(c) Whoever harbors or conceals any person who he knows, or has reasonable grounds to believe or suspect, has committed, or is about to commit, an offense under this section, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

(d) This section shall apply within the admiralty and maritime jurisdiction of the United States, and on the high seas, as well as within the United States.

And why won't "they" address it? Because "they" protect their own...in CLEAR violation of said law. There are bigger fish to fry...you and I. Clearly, MANY in CONgress have violated these LAWS yet, "they" are ABOVE the law. Yes? No? Maybe? Read them and decide. And they whine about Libby's commutation...smoke and mirrors.

Pelosi violated the Logan Act and cowards did nothing. All she did was to go on a Mission of Her Own Agenda, an unsanctioned trip to Israel and then Syria, an enemy Nation of the United States and Israel (our ALLY), which she BOTCHED so badly Israel was livid.

There are CONgress Critters and Lame Stream Media moguls and puppets thereof, running around committing seditious and subversive and treasonous acts all around us and COWARDS in CONgress do NOTHING? In a time of WAR?

The Censure rules need to be enforced as well.

This is a Call To Action, I suppose. Demand Justice Be Served on those bent on causing The United States harm, in the long run. Write, call, fax and email...FLOOD them like we did over the Shamnesty issue.

Don't our troops deserve better action on our part than that which we accomplished over Shamnesty?

Action Alert

Sign This…NOW!

Sign This…NOW!

Tuesday, May 15, 2007 12:37 PM

First Name* Last Name* Email* Address City State select AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE DC FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MNMS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY ZIP Yes, I’d like to receive updates about staying involved. I’m a blogger and I’d like to help. Blog URL:

Congress has passed and President Bush has vetoed H.R. 1591, the Iraq Surrender Act of 2007.

This legislation, which you worked to pass, sets a timetable for surrender. It pulls the rug out from under our troops. That is shameful and wrong.

Your actions have already emboldened the enemy. Violent jihadists now know that the elected leadership of Congress would undermine the troops by holding their funding hostage to demands for surrender.

This Congress would bring us back to the dark days of the 1970s, when the world doubted our staying power. Except only much worse. Withdraw in April 2008, and on May 1, Iraq becomes an unchecked den of terrorism at the heart of the Middle East — a new base for the same people that struck our homeland on September 11th.

I stand with our troops. I stand for victory. I support the President’s veto and will urge my representatives to vote to sustain it.

There can be one and only one outcome in Iraq: We win, they lose.
NOTE!!: the “Submit” button doesn’t work…Go Here To Sign!!

Action Alert

Oppose Revoking Authorization for Iraq War

Oppose Revoking Authorization for Iraq War

Wednesday, May 09, 2007 11:51 PM

SHOULD THE IRAQ WAR AUTHORIZATION BE REVOKED?

Sen. Clinton (D-NY) and Sen. Byrd (D-WV) are drafting legislation that would revoke congressional approval for the war on Oct. 11 — five years after Congress cleared the way for the 2003 invasion. The war authorization gave President Bush permission to use military force against Iraq “as he determines to be necessary and appropriate.” Revoking the authorization would force Bush to return to Congress for another vote or wage war without explicit approval from lawmakers. Tell Congress and President Bush if you think the Iraq War Authorization should be revoked and new approval voted on by Congress or if Congress should stop micromanaging the war as some Republicans have said.

Click here to oppose hillary’s stupidity.

Tally so far: I would say the majority of Americans oppose the revoking nonsense.

As of 5/10/07, 1838 hours, CST there have been 47,711 voters.

49% say I Support Revoking the Iraq War Authorization
51% say I Oppose Revoking the Iraq War Authorization

Action Alert

We Win They Lose

We Win They Lose

Wednesday, May 02, 2007 5:48 PM

Join the fun!!

Sign Up And Join The Fight!

There can be one and only one outcome in Iraq: We win, they lose.

Blog Burst Here

The body of the petition:

To: Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House
Harry Reid, U.S. Senate Democrat Leader

Congress has passed and President Bush has vetoed H.R. 1591, the Iraq Surrender Act of 2007.

This legislation, which you worked to pass, sets a timetable for surrender. It pulls the rug out from under our troops. That is shameful and wrong.

Your actions have already emboldened the enemy. Violent jihadists now know that the elected leadership of Congress would undermine the troops by holding their funding hostage to demands for surrender.

This Congress would bring us back to the dark days of the 1970s, when the world doubted our staying power. Except only much worse. Withdraw in April 2008, and on May 1, Iraq becomes an unchecked den of terrorism at the heart of the Middle East — a new base for the same people that struck our homeland on September 11th.

I stand with our troops. I stand for victory. I support the President’s veto and will urge my representatives to vote to sustain it.

There can be one and only one outcome in Iraq: We win, they lose.

5/4/07 update: 4300 and rising!!

We Win, They Lose Keeps Growing

Posted by: Patrick Ruffini at 10:38 AM

Over 4,300 of you have signed the “We Win, They Lose” petition since we launched it on Monday. Can we get over 5,000 today?Last night, former Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist added his voice to the effort: The President was right to veto the bill because mandating withdrawaldates will only strengthen our enemy, and several bloggers havelaunched a new Internet campaign (www.wewintheylose.com) to make that point clear. RonaldReagan’s quote “We Win. They lose.” expressed our country’sdetermination to defeat the Soviet Union in the Cold War – the samedetermination we must maintain to achieve success in Iraq. I encourage you to visit www.wewintheylose.com,sign their petition and then tell your friends, family members andco-workers about it. Also, continue posting your thoughts regarding theWar on Terror on my blog. Together we can make clear to congressionalDemocrats that surrender is not a solution. I’m not sure Senator Frist would have been my candidate had he run, but he is one of the most accomplished and impressive statesmen of this political generation. And better still, he reads the blogs and is responsive to the grassroots. We Win, They Lose is also moving up on Digg. Will you Digg it so we can get even more people joining this effort?

CLICK THE LINK AND SIGN.

Call To Action

Impeach reid!!

Impeach reid!!

Sunday, April 29, 2007 2:29 PM

The little GOMER won’t step down on its own so he must be impeached or ejected. Make your opinion known!!

Well worth the investment!!

Wake Them UP In DC!!!

Action Alert

Demand The Truth From The Media!

Demand The Truth From The Media!

Friday, April 20, 2007 12:42 PM

Yeah. Right! ACTION ALERT!!!

Sign The Petition!!

Discover the truth about the illegal immigration issue!!

Democrats Attack Christ

The Leftinistra Have Done It Again!!

The Leftinistra Have Done It Again!!

Monday, April 16, 2007 8:41 PM

DEMAND AN APOLOGY FROM THE PARTY OF INTOLERANCE!!!

Now, WHY Would the Leftinistra want to censor Christ?

Democratic Party Easter message censors Christ, Ressurection

Send an e-mail to the Democratic National Committee telling them you expect a public apology.

Action Alert

Action Alert for Texicans…and Everyone Else

Action Alert for Texicans…and Everyone Else

Wednesday, April 04, 2007 1:37 PM

Oppose Senate Bill 896!!!

Sign Petition Here!!

Action Alert

A Call To Action!!

A Call To Action!!

Tuesday, April 03, 2007 4:56 AM

It might help…it might not.

Click here and sign the petition for fair tax

Traditional Values Attacked

Action Alert!!
Action Alert!!
Friday, March 30, 2007 10:52 AM

OK folks…this needs to be stopped as well. It is yet ANOTHER attack on our Traditional Values by the socialist left…the Leftinistra.

The Traditional Values Coalition has the details here!

Y’all know the drill…just do it! HR 1592 needs to be SMOKED!! If 90-proof is for it, it cannot be any good!!

Action Alert

Beware H.R. 328!!
Beware H.R. 328!!
Friday, March 30, 2007 6:43 AM

This is yet ANOTHER fine example of the antics of the current crop of Leftinistra to rewrite our Nation’s Constitution and shove down our throats their socialist ideologies.

This is truly incredulous… OUTRAGED does NOT nor can it describe this

Dems’ Unconstitutional Plot to Invent New Congressmen:

“…The bill that threatens to open up this Pandora’s box goes by the Orwellian name “District of Columbia Fair and Equal House Voting Rights Act of 2007″ (H.R. 328). It has already passed committee and is expected shortly to be rammed through the full House by the Democrat leadership. The purpose of H.R. 328 is to give the District of Columbia a voting representative in the House. According to its supporters, the bill is necessary to correct the “injustice” of the residents of the capital not having their own congressional delegation…”

Click the link and read the bloody garbage…I’m guessing that they really DO want a civil war.

Action Alert!

Surrender Is NOT An Option
Surrender Is NOT An Option
Thursday, March 29, 2007 1:41 AM

ACTION ALERT!! SIGN THE PETITION!!

ATTENTION TO ORDERS!!! CALLING ALL PATRIOTS (THEREALONES) TO FOLLOW THE LINK AND SIGN!!!

Tell the Pelosi-ites what we Americans really think….

Action Alert

ACTION ALERT!!!
ACTION ALERT!!!
Wednesday, March 28, 2007 7:43 AM

Take action NOW NOW NOW!!! This post includes a letter to use!!

American Congress for Truth

Action Alert

H.R. 1640, the Protecting Americans Fighting Terrorism Act of 2007

ACTION ALERT A Bill to Protect Americans from Legal Intimidation by Islamic Jihad

The six-imam issue has taken an unexpected turn. CAIR (Council on American Islamic Relations) has demanded the names of the passengers who reported the suspicious activity at Minneapolis Airport on November 21, 2006 so they can be included in their religious discrimination lawsuit. In response to this even more aggressive attack by American Muslims onAmerica’s security, Congressman Steve Pearce, R-NM, introduced in Congress the “Protecting Americans Fighting Terrorism Act of 2007, H.R. 1640.” This bill would protect Americans from being sued for reporting suspicious activities to law enforcement and security personnel. It is a very simple bill and is presented in full at the end of this Action Alert.

Please make your voice heard in support of this bill by asking your representative to co-sponsor H.R. 1640, the Protecting Americans Fighting Terrorism Act of 2007. Below is a letter you can send to your representative in Congress. Go to the American Congress for Truth CONTACT CONGRESS link at: http://www.americancongressfortruth.org/contact-congress.asp.

Email and/or fax the letter to your legislator. For much greater impact, ALSO call them at both their local offices and theirWashington offices. Every phone call represents one thousand voters. They need to hear from 40 to 50 people about the same issue to make it their top priority. 40 to 50 people represent 40 to 50 thousand voters on Election Day. That can make or break an election. This is the power you have as a voter.

Email this action alert to all your friends and urge them to do the same. Ask your friends to subscribe to our emails and action alerts. It is vital that we have them on our list to be able to notify them about such important issues so they can become a voice affecting your community and our nation. If you have never called a legislator before, it is very simple. A staffer will answer, and all you need to do is tell them you have a request for your representative. Then ask them to support the bill. Since this bill was just introduced in Congress, the staffer might not know about it, so you might have to explain it. Be passionate, but polite. Get the staffer on our side. That will make our voices even louder.

Thank you for doing your part in helping me protectAmerica, the dream that became my address.

LET MY NATION RISE Brigitte Gabriel

Dear Representative ________,

As your constituent, I ask you to co-sponsor H.R. 1640, the Protecting Americans Fighting Terrorism Act of 2007, introduced by Congressman Steve Pearce, R-NM.

H.R. 1640 To provide liability protection for individuals who report suspicious behavior to law enforcement agencies

“An individual shall not be liable for any injury or damages relating to such individual’s qualified disclosure of suspicious behavior. A civil action for damages related to such disclosure may not be brought in any State or Federal court. For purposes of this section, the term ‘qualified disclosure of suspicious behavior’ means any disclosure of the allegedly suspicious behavior of another individual or individuals to a State, Federal, or local law enforcement agency or other security personnel that is made in good faith and with the reasonable belief that such behavior is suspicious.”

As Americans, we must not allow ourselves to be bullied by political radical Islamic groups like the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) and other American Muslims. Whether it is an intimidation tactic or a full scale attack, Americans have the right and responsibility to protect themselves, to be vigilant, and to participate on an individual level in protecting our country. We cannot allow the advocates of political Islam to make Americans wonder if they could be sued before reporting possible terrorist activity.

As a voter I, as well as all my friends, colleagues and associates in your district, will be monitoring your vote on this issue. Thank you. Sincerely,

Your Name