The Leftinistra (Armies of the Socialist American Liberal) Are Claiming Victory In Iraq

~Snooper~

I haven't written on this subject that has recently surfaced (AGAIN) because it chafes my posterior. In all of 2007, 2006, 2005 the American Progressive (socialist scum) did everything they could to lose the war on the Front in Iraq. In 2007, they tried and failed 45 times. Due to their BDS, Bush Derangement Syndrome, as pronounced and diagnosed by Dr Krauthammer, they committed treason, subversion, sedition and Crimes Against The United States. They were and still are directly responsible for emboldening the enemy, rendering aid and comfort to the enemy, thereby causing the deaths and the wounding of thousands of US and Coalition Troops. And they were proud of that all in the name of political expediency and political power. They are also responsible for that theoretical 1,000,000 Iraqi deaths that they blamed President Bush for.

You can read all about this in my vault of knowledge here and here. I call it my Democrats and Terrorists files.

Flash back: a long time ago, Hillary Clinton who opposed the war right after she was for it and then waffled for her campaign, she tried to lay claim to the success of the Troop Surge, even though she opposed it, because the Iraqi Government listens to her every word. Here is a memory jogger:

Link:


Link (Reid the war is lost moment)


Link (suspending disbelief)

Now, we have that same group of lying-ass scum doing the same for the guy that said the war was a Bush War and that he would end it which he hasn't yet, he is laying claim to the Victory our Troops have wrought. This is beyond the pale of audacity. I'm not going to excerpt anything just yet but I will link the titles to various locations:

Oh Brother... Libs Want to Take Credit For Iraq Success
NY Times Scurrying To Give Obama Victory Credit For Their Shared Defeat In Iraq
You Tell Me: MSM Laying The Foundation For “Obama And Dems Won The Iraq War” - Bullshit Scam?
NYT's Friedman tries Obama victory in Iraq
As Expected, the New York Times Tries to Give Obama and Liberals Credit for Iraq Success

Friedman: Iraq Could Positively Tilt Arab World...Thanks to Obama

The blood of our Troops and our fellow citizens are on "THEIR" hands and not GWBs. Period.

A Jihadi Thug Has A Big Mouth: Dr. Ayman al-Zawahiri, Chief Idiot

~Snooper~

WOW! Talk about eating their own, we have a terrorist that was once on the same page as the Democrats is now attacking the Democrats. I guess they see what we have been seeing and warning about for the entire time that BDS was on an epidemic scale. I have been wondering out loud and quite often that it has been difficult to ascertain who was talking to who and who was leading who by the short hairs and now we know. You can read the unfolding conundrum here and here under the heading of Democrats and Terrorists.

Yesterday, the Chief Jihadi Haji Scum Bastard Dr. Ayman al-Zawahiri showed his ass and hurled racial slurs toward the non-black guy, the half-breed Barack. I guess it shouldn't bother him seeing that he isn't black. He is more than likely laughing it off as I am.

The idiot doctor said to the idiot democrats that all of their efforts were for naught because he is going to continue the Jihad. And what have we been saying for almost forever? That EXACT same thing. And the fools thought that if anyone but a Republican was in office things would be different. Simply amazing. Vindication tastes so sweet but the cost is unacceptable. Thanks RINOs and the Fair Weather and Fraud Conservatives. Ya done screwed up and are too cowardly to admit it.

Testing The Waters So To Speak

~Snooper~

The world knows that Czarbie isn't up to the task. That is why the USSR Reborn has begun pressing Czarbie's buttons. I wonder how many times he has had to change his shorts in the last week or so. No matter. He won't have to worry much about that after 12/1/08 anyway.

Russia was the first test and he failed...he abandoned an ally, Poland. Good job moron.

Now, Al Qaeda is feeling their oats. Bin Laden is said to be getting ready to release a video instructing Czarbie that if he fights Islam, Islam will fight him. Please. I am shaking in my boots. For a dead guy he sure does release a lot of videos. Pat Dollard more or less is reporting the same but he has a real cool picture which is presented to the left. What with the Imam releasing Obama's Kenyan records in the next few days, I suppose that Bin Laden is upset with a Muslim fighting a Muslim.

Al Qaeda in Yemen says that they are planning an attack on the USA that will make 91101 a stroll in the park by two lovers at sunset. We have been hearing these kinds of threats since 91101 but President Bush and our Troops have seen to it that it never took place. If Czarbie does what he has said he would do in order to get elected, those kinds of attacks will be a regular event. If Czarbie doesn't do what he said he would to get elected, that would make him out to be the liar that we already know he is. Naturally, his zombies will fall for whatever reason he issues and more than likely left-over BDS will be the cause.

Jihad Watch:

Of course, we have heard this before, and it is quite possibly just another attempt to "strike terror into the hearts of the enemies of Allah" (Qur'an 8:60). But Jane Novak explains why there may be more to it this time. "Warning of new bin Laden attack," by Paola Totaro in The Age, November 10 (thanks to Armies of Liberation): [...] read the rest

The folks at The Big Feed seem to think that the terrorists didn't get the Hope and Change memo.

Hot Air:

An Arab newspaper in London has reported that al-Qaeda intends on launching an attack on the US that would “outdo by far” the 9/11 attacks. Al-Quds al-Arabi also reported that their Yemeni contact within AQ, a “former senior operative”, says the terrorist network has already begun consolidating its networks in preparation for the attack: [...] read the rest

In other news, apparently that Agricultural facility in Syria that Israeli and American fighters took out last summer was actually indeed a uranium processing facility. I wonder where they got it from. Good thing that secret order was signed in 2004, eh? I haven't written on the "secret order" for the obvious reasons but since the New York Slimes screwed the nation again, what the hell.

I wonder what the motivation behind this "leak" might have been. Oh, never mind. We already know the answer to that as well.

Ayers, Gaffes, Dissent and Broken Campaign Promises

~Snooper~

Shame on The New Yorker

Shame on The New Yorker and its editor David Remnick for playing a role in the attempt of Bill Ayers and his publisher to resurrect both Ayers’ book and his reputation. Beacon Press has announced that they are releasing an updated version of Ayers’ 2001 book Fugitive Days on November 12th, a publication date purposely held until after the election. As most everyone knows, the original edition had the misfortune of being published on 9/11/2001, a date that led to cancellation of Ayers’ book tour, and to reams of negative publicity. The last thing the American public wanted to hear about was the glamorization of a 1960’s terrorist. [...] read the rest

We really shouldn't expect anything different, should we? The Enemies of The State do have an agenda. The List of 45 spells it all out don't you know?

Bill Ayers Redux

[...] Call me crazy, but somehow I doubt that if Martin Luther King had been able to react to 9/11 he would have used the terminology Jeremiah Wright used. But that’s just me. Poor Bill Ayers. Poor Rashid Khalidi. It’s always such a bummer when meanies throw your words (and deeds) back in your face and start asking all those rude questions and making you all upset. I’ve thought long and hard about why the Ayers story got no traction in the press. The only conclusion I can come to is that baby boomer-age managers, who hold the lion’s share of decision-making posts at the most influential media outlets, are still romanticizing the ’60s — and to a lesser extent, the early ’70s — adhering to the “the enemy of my enemy is my friend” mentality. Sure the Weather Underground kicked up a fuss, but we didn’t want to go to Vietnam, man! Besides, all those hippie chicks raising their fists in defiance of the Man were hotttt. The younger people in newsrooms go along with their superiors’ narratives because, not to put too fine a point on it, they’re completely and wholly ignorant about American history. They wouldn’t know the SDS or the Symbionese Liberation Army from a hole in the wall. [END] read the rest

Indubitably.

Is it Still Patriotic to Oppose the President?

In order to counter cries from the right that left was not patriotic the Democrats began to claim that opposing the president and his policies was in fact a patriotic thing to do. Hillary Clinton had this to say at one point: I am sick and tired of people who call you unpatriotic if you debate this administration’s policies. We are Americans and have the right to participate and debate any administration. The question now is, is it still patriotic to oppose an administration’s policies? Hillary claimed that is was patriotic to debate ANY administration’s policies. I oppose President-elect Obama, i oppose his policies and what he stands for. I intend to be right here writing about everything that Obama does that I do not agree with, and there is quite a bit. Does that make me patriotic? According to Hillary it does. Or does that only apply to certain administrations? [...] read the rest

No, dissent is now racist.

Libs Suddenly Find Themselves Defending the Flag

Figures. It wasn't that long ago that the American Left was burning and crapping on the flag. Suddenly, all of that has changed. Veteran Lou Schrader of Las Cruces, New Mexico flew his flag upside down on Wednesday in protest of Barack Obama winning the presidency. This alarmed his liberal neighbors. [...] read the rest

Incredible isn't it? This is even more incredible. Haven't we been saying this for nearly 4 years now?

Now They Tell Us... Obama May Have to Adjust Timetable on Iraq

Media. Is. Dead.
After a two years of bloviating, spinning and promising to retreat-- the media is finally reporting that Obama's timetable on Iraq will not work. ...Three days after the election. [...] read the rest

OOPS! He lied. I wonder how many will die because of it. He lied here as well...

Candidate Obama’s Meddling in Iraq Confirmed

[...] During the same trip Obama also tried to persuade the US commanders, including Gen. David Petraeus, to suggest a “realistic withdrawal date.” They declined. (…)”. Bob Owens in a PJs article “Obama’s Questionable Diplomacy in Iraq” had a reaction to the allegations from the Multi-National Force Iraq Press Desk. Fast forward to breaking news this morning by The Right Perspective, mentioning the comments made by an Iraqi MP in newspaper Aswat al Iraq. The article “Lawmakers call on Obama to pull out troops from Iraq” quotes legislature Mohammed al-Mehmedawi of al-Fadila bloc saying … “Obama advised Iraqi politicians not to sign the pact.” “He did so because he believed that if the pact would not be signed, it would be a landmark for republicans’ policy failure in Iraq,” he noted. The keen observer may have noticed nothing was spared in the Obama campaign to win the Presidency. A number of efforts crossed the line of generally accepted standards of proper conduct. The above was clearly one of them. [...] read the rest

We call that Logan Act and Smith Act violations.

Jihadi Leaders Says Obama's Win A Victory For 'Radical Islamic Groups'

Confirming what we, and others, said quite often before the election, a Jihadi leader, Abu Omar al-Baghdadi, leader of the Islamic State of Iraq, in a 25 minute taped speech, posted to the Al Hesbah website, says that Barack Obama's election win, was a "victory" for radical Islamic groups. [...] read the rest

There's that damn Democrats and Terrorists connection again.

Did You Know the Group William Ayers Headed Killed More People Than The Klu Klux Klan

In the last 50 years the KKK Klu Klux Klan killed 6 people compared to William Ayers’ group, the Weathermen, which murdered 7 people, not counting the three Weathermen who blew themselves up while making bombs in Greenwich Village. Seventeen children were left without fathers. They attempted to murder 5 more innocents when they fire bombed the home of a judge in the middle of the night, when his innocent children were asleep in the home. In 2001 Ayers told the New York Times he is sorry they did not do more! They claimed responsibility for more than 30 bombings! Sorry that he did not murder more people and orphan more children? The Ayers/Obama people tell the lie that Ayers’ group were merely anti-Vietnam war protestors. Absolutely untrue. According to court filings, FBI wiretaps, and the FBI agents who infiltrated undercover, the goal of the Ayers’ led Weathermen was to take control of America in a violent revolution, and to change us into a classic Communist country. They opposed the Vietnam war not because it was a war, but because it was a war against Communism. William Charles Ayers, his wife Bernardine Rae Dohrn née Ohrnstein, and his group were such wacked-out, murderous lunatics, so psychotically out of touch with reality, that they actually believed that by setting off more than 30 bombs and murdering police officers, that they could overthrow our government and seize control in a Communist dictatorship. [...] read the rest

OOPS.

Peace Movement's True Colors

Skye emails from the road that this is what she encountered today in West Chester, PA after years of a weekly confrontation over the war; [...] read the rest

The following are must read posts and I whole heartedly agree with their content. I have been hearing that we must take the High Road. That pathetic attitude is EXACTLY what the libtard moonbat fruit loop brigades want. I didn't swallow that nonsense "then" and I most assuredly will not adopt that failed policy this time.

AFTER THE USA TURNS SHARPLY TO THE LEFT, ANOTHER SOCIALIST COUNTRY TURNS TO THE RIGHT: NEW ZEALAND!

OTHERS AGREE: THE GOP SHOULD PLAY BARE-KNUCKLED HARDBALL AGAINST OBAMA - AND ASAP!

PRESIDENT-ELECT OBAMA DESERVES TO BE TREATED AS HARSHLY AS BUSH WAS

Interesting. I have been preaching this as well. Take the damn gloves off because the European model, whatever the hell that is has been returning to NON socialist values and tenets and so has the vast majority of the remaining socialist nations on this planet. This is all simply amazing. But, then again, I read the List of 45 and all becomes all so very clear.

AQI wants Obama to keep his promise on Iraq

Voters weren’t the only people counting on Barack Obama to keep his campaign promises. Terrorists in Iraq want to see whether Obama will abide by his pledge to get American troops out of their way so that they can get back to the business of slaughtering Iraqis. That includes al-Qaeda in Iraq: [...] read the rest

That Didn't Take Long... Obama Surrenders To Russia

Earlier this week Russia warned the US about the planned US missile defense pact with Poland.

Today Obama surrendered.

He may not be in office but Barack Obama already backed down on his commitment to Poland to go ahead with a missile defense system. [...] read the rest

Damn. He isn't even in the White House yet and the idiot is surrendering. Oh. Wait. That's what idiots and cowards do...surrender. I forgot. My bad. Carry on.

The American Democrat Party: Culture of Death

~Snooper~

I have been saying this for years and folks just laughed and some just laughed it off. Some said that this too shall pass. To me, those that laughed for whatever reason are still in a state of insanity due to their purposeful neglect.

Recently, J.R. Dunn wrote a column entitled, "Democide". In that piece, in part:

"Over the past fifty years, something on the order of a half-million Americans have been killed by liberal policies."

That line appears to have gotten to people, as it should. Among the many welcome comments on my piece on Christopher Buckley, a number both on AT and elsewhere referred to that statement -- my contention that liberalism is not only a failed ideology, but a deadly one, an ideology that kills, and kills in large numbers. Many of the comments called it "incredible", "unbelievable" and "shocking".

That's in no way difficult to understand. Achieving awareness of the lethal nature of liberalism's excesses is much the same as coming to realize that your friendly, familiar neighborhood is actually overrun by vampires. [...]

Most of you that know me know that I am undertaking a project that proves the above beyond a reasonable doubt. The proponents of American Liberalism, no matter their stature in life and position are directly responsible for not only killing millions dying of Malaria, they have murdered entire generations of "voters"...they died of abortion. They are directly responsible for the deaths and wounding of American and Allied Forces in several wars and Police Actions, Iraq and Afghanistan being in the present tense.

I loathe them all. They disgust me. They cannot be trusted. Their ideologies have been attempted in many Nations and those principles of which they stand resulted in entire populations to be enslaved to the governments under which they lived and live and those governments have failed time and time again. Their system does not work. Period. It never has and it never will. Slavery - that is what the Democrat Party of the USA is all about. A historical search will bear that out, especially before, during and after the American Civil War.

But, that won't stop them. It is all about Power to these people. Nothing else matters. If our Troops are killed, maimed or wounded, they could care less. I have seen it first hand. If they can enslave the American Population, the more Power they will have.

Barack Obama is the Shining Example of the Culture of Death. He supports infanticide, no matter how he tries to spin it. He voted FOR infanticide and that is a matter of public record. He and his Goons can deny it all they want to...facts are facts and the record is the record. SPIN THAT.

The Vatican has declared the American Democrat Party as the Culture of Death. Joe Biden has been practically excommunicated from The Church. Nancy Pelosi was heavily and handily chastised by her Archbishop over her rewriting Vatican principles and history. Nancy now knows that history didn't start the day she was hatched.

The American Democrat Party is directly responsible for the MILLIONS of deaths following their cowardly retreat from Vietnam. They are directly responsible for American deaths in Vietnam. That is a historical fact. They can deny all they want to and spin as much as they want to but I bet they have a hard time explaining it all when the demons come.

[...] It will come as no news to readers of this site that liberal policies tend to fail. But some of them fail catastrophically. And when they do, they kill. They kill in large numbers. They have been killing for decades, and they will continue to kill for as long as we allow it.

The process is called democide, the murder of a populace by its own government. It can occur through malice, or indifference, or through incompetence. Almost always, it is instigated by an ideology -- fascism, Nazism, communism... and liberalism. According to Dr. R.J. Rummel, the sole scholar of democide (you'd think there would be droves of researchers working on such a critical topic -- but you'd be wrong), 262 million people have died by such means over the past century. Against that number, a half-million is a bagatelle, a drop in the bucket.

But it happened in our country. It happened in America. [...]

We can stop it and we can change things but we have to actually ACT and DO something and hopefully, we do it via the ballot box and getting our Vertical Alignment all squared away with our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ.

For further reading, feel free to consult a minor collection of writings on the subject of Democrats and Terrorists.

The People Obama Doesn't Want To Offend Are Planning To Strike Israel

~Snooper~

This should make Barack happy seeing that he doesn't like Israel anyway.

Senior Tehran officials are recommending a preemptive strike against Israel to prevent an Israeli attack on Iran's nuclear reactors, a senior Islamic Republic official told foreign diplomats two weeks ago in London.

The official, Dr. Seyed G. Safavi, said recent threats by Israeli authorities strengthened this position, but that as of yet, a preemptive strike has not been integrated into Iranian policy. [...]

In other news that will make Obama is happy is this:

The Fairfax County Registrar—and possibly other Registrars in Virginia—is rejecting most Federal Write-in Absentee Ballots (FWAB) cast by our men and women in uniform.

The FWAB is a federally mandated write-in ballot that allows military servicemembers and their dependents to cast an absentee ballot when they have not received a ballot before the election. It is a safety net that allows a service member to vote even if the mail truck hasn't reached his or her remote base in Iraq or Afghanistan in time to cast a regular absentee ballot. [...]

Here we go again, not allowing the military to have their say. What else will make The One happy? Oh. Yes. The Fairness Doctrine. That will keep the heat off of the non-US citizen for sure. I guess the above could be at least two of those scenarios that Joe Biden was "flourishing" about.

Here is something else that Barack might be happy about.

[...] I predict the total annihilation of the United States, as a result of the many injustices it perpetrates around the world. These are people who do not believe in Allah or in the reckoning of Judgment Day. The only thing they believe in is brute material force. [...]

Yep. Sounds just like a Democrat to me. The problem is that the yammering came from HAMAS.

The most recent thing that will make Obama happy is that Biden has been removed from the campaign trail after his flourishing. I guess it wasn't all that flourishing after all.

All of the MSM and certainly all of the Democrats have slammed Governor Palin as being such a lousy pick as John McCain's VP choice.

I think the joke is on them ........... Senator Joe Biden has repeatedly embarrassed the Democrats and they apparently have sent him home to "dry out." The guy is obviously on the bottle and his daily gaffes prove it!

For anyone who thinks perhaps I am picking on poor 'ol Joe just remember it was Joe Biden who took the lumber to Joe The Plumber in an effort to discredit him in front of America. He has no shame whatsoever. [...]

Poor guy. Maybe he is a McCain plant after all?

Czarbie's Goons and Media Cannot Produce

~Snooper~

The loonier the Czarbie Goons, I mean Truth Squads get and the more the Lame Stream Media climb into Czarbie's trousers in search of his Marxist Trouser Trout, the worse their predicament. Think about it.

With the millions the Czarbie Camp has spent, both legally and illegally collected/received, the best he can do is a dead even race? I have never said that McCain is going to win in a landslide that is a Reaganesque occurrence. However, I will still stick by my original opinion back in March and again in May that McCain will take the election with 40 States.

Will it be a close election? Absolutely. Why? Because Czarbie and his Handlers are pulling out all the stops in this election. It is a do or die scenario for them. They have also jumped the shark. They have underestimated their "progress" with our youth for the last few decades. Czarbie's Handlers have chosen the most inexperienced clown that they could because he was the only one available that is clueless and has a severe case of the "ME ME ME ME" syndrome. As Mr. Grey Ghost explains...

Barack Obama can have the whole entire mass media in his back pocket and rich, elitist liberals can fund his campaign till kingdom come, but the idea of having an inexperienced (hey, I'm just quoting Joe Biden there), radically Left, socialist for a President seems to finally be wearing thin on most Americans [...]

I so love being dead nuts correct. I wonder how the Czarbie Trouser Trout worshipers at Digital Journal are handling the bad news.

The American People also realize that the more the media no longer hides their Czarbie gism sucking selves from the public eye, the more they recognize their ignorant bias. Gateway Pundit said it "Rather" well: Most. Corrupt. Media. Ever.

Personally, the most appalling thing about this election doesn't come from any candidate on the Right or any of the bloggers on the Right. The most appalling thing about this election comes from the folks reacting to the statement that Sarah Palin uttered; "God will do the right thing on election day." Holy Cow! One would think that the world had come to a screeching halt! Check out the mutterings at Memeorandum...but the "musings" are in the comments section at the CNN post. If there is any doubt whatsoever about the demonic influences on Czarbie's gism guzzlers, just check the screen shot to the left.

First off, God does not condone the murder of the unborn. Czarbie does and that is merely a scratch on the surface of how evil Czarbie and his pathetic trolls are indeed. Read the comments and see for yourselves.

To add credence to my assertion, one merely needs to read the Holy Scriptures to bear this out. Also, the Vatican has recently come out with the following: Vatican official attacks U.S. Democrats as “party of death”.

[...] Burke, who was named prefect of the Vatican’s Supreme Court of the Apostolic Signature in June, told the Italian Catholic newspaper Avvenire that the U.S. Democratic Party risked “transforming itself definitively into a party of death for its decisions on bioethical issues.” He then attacked two of the party’s most high profile Catholics — vice presidential candidate Joe Biden and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi — for misrepresenting Church teaching on abortion. He said Biden and Pelosi, “while presenting themselves as good Catholics, have presented Church doctrine on abortion in a false and tendentious way.” [...]

Both Nancy Pelosi and Joe Biden have been pretty much ex-communicated from their Church because of their views on abortion. Is it any wonder, then, why George Soros, the self-proclaimed One World Socialist Order, is financing and promoting a group or groups of "liberated" and "socialized" Catholics? (Note: refer to these two posts.)
What does the List of 45 say about this?

27) Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with "social" religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity, which does not need a "religious crutch."

Amazing, isn't it? Have the pieces fallen into place yet?

In an address delivered to a women’s group last week, Archbishop Charles Chaput of the Archdiocese of Denver strongly criticized Obama-supporting Catholic Doug Kmeic, and called it absurd for self-professedly pro-life Catholics to support Obama, “the most committed ‘abortion-rights’ candidate … since the Roe v. Wade decision of 1973.” [...]

And, yes, we are in the midst of an American Civil War Part 2. The only difference is there are no lead and steel projectiles in the air...just yet. And, yes, the Democrats and the terrorists are indeed in league. (Please reference posts here and here) And, the terrorists, working in league with the Democrats in this nation are trying to remove the barrier to world dominance of the Caliphate and World Socialism. The evidence is overwhelmingly damning. The proponents of World Socialism/Communism and the Global Caliphate have a long history of working with each other because their very tenets are barely separable. This from WUAs:

We have often seen, written and posted about Democrats joining in with terrorists and al-Qaeda, siding with them, using their same arguments as if reading the same script and today we see it again.

The Washington Post writes a piece about al-Qaeda trying to scare American voters into voting for Barack Obama, by saying they want John McCain to win and connecting him to the financial crisis, even though Mccain was the one who proposed regulations for companies like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and Democrats opposed those restrictions, and what do the liberals in the blogosphere do?

They jump on the al-Qaeda bandwagon, joining them in their quest to get Obama elected.

"Al-Qaeda will have to support McCain in the coming election," said a commentary posted Monday on the extremist Web site al-Hesbah, which is closely linked to the terrorist group. It said the Arizona Republican would continue the "failing march of his predecessor," President Bush.

Quite amusing, one has to wonder is it al-Qaeda mimicking Democrats or Democrats mimicking al-Qaeda?

My heavens they are so predictable, both Liberals and al-Qaeda.

They are "predictable" because they are in essence, one in the same. More at this Memeorandum link as well...

Thankfully, Jihad Watch keeps us posted as does My Pet Jawa. I have often spoken of and written about the Electronic Jihad as well as the Global Cultural Jihad. As the Campaign Spot wrote, it looks like Al Qaeda has a blog. Whereas that is nothing new, it does show how AQ and other enemies so much want an Obama presidency because they know he will do nothing to stop them. They fear a McCain presidency and for obvious reasons.

Naturally, the libtards show their complete lunacy on the subject of the threats we face. The liberal think tank wants the US to go all Dhimmi...in part:

[...]“Regardless of who gets elected as the US President, there is going to be a change in policy commitments,” Grand stated while observing that the objective of the recommendations is to ensure that the next generation of leaders from the US and the Muslim world understand each other.

The Doha Compact calls for four broad changes in how the US and the Muslim world approach one another. They are:

1. A new style of foreign policy focused less on an ‘Axis of Evil’ and more on building ‘Partnerships of Equals’ to address shared challenges.

2. Jointly addressing the conflicts that have long divided the US and the Muslim world, as they have a shared interest in resolving them peacefully.

3. The US needs to understand that one of the key problems deepening divisions with the Muslim world has been ‘How Muslims perceive how the West perceives them.’

4. The US and the Muslim world should partner in improving education and investing in people, so as to unleash the full talents and potential of the region’s citizenry. [END]

All of the above in the Gulf Times is lib-speak for "let the enemy win" all in the name of "peace". The consequences of that are quite dire. This is one more example in a long list of examples where the American Liberal is working with the terrorists in order to bring about the Caliphate. The problem is this - the liberals don't get it. Well, most don't...there are others that are all on board with that and Czarbie is one of them.

Let the Democrats be upset. Perhaps they will trip themselves up as they always do...ask Joe the Plumber. They whine and complain about being labeled as terrorist sympathizers but the fact remains - it is true. They are. Again, some know it and most don't - that doesn't change the fact that they are terrorist sympathizers. Facts are facts and actions are actions. From Gateway Pundit:

Sorry... I'm not getting what all of the fuss is about?

Didn't the Dems (and Obama) vote to cut-n-run from Iraq?... Like how many times?

Don't they call our troops cold-blooded killers and compare them to Nazis?

Here's a question--- How many times can you vote to defund your military at war before you get labeled an appeaser? Is it 5- 10- 20 times?

And-- Do you really think the terrorists in Gaza and Iran support your party because of your economic plan?
Please.

Sometimes the truth hurts.

UPDATE: Although it's always a close call, lilnilhil wins the brainless and angry Obamatron troll of the day award:

Delete.

AMEN.

Obama will lose this election. The pollsters have admitted as such even though they are busily trying to show something else. However, the only ones they are fooling are the fools.

The Cats Are Out Of The Bag

~Snooper~

This article is up at Canada Free Press

Commentary Magazine: SPECIAL PREVIEW: Liberals and the Surge

[...] And yet, no matter what most American believe or what reality tells us is so, leading liberal observers and politicians, long in the vanguard of opposition to the war, have denounced the surge at every point. Even as some, in the face of overwhelming evidence, have been forced to concede a modicum of American progress, they have done so reluctantly and have downplayed the role played by administration policy in achieving that progress. Others have denied that significant progress has been made at all. [...]

The remaining article goes along the same way as the above but I would like to add my personal view on this subject. I call it the Dems and Terrorists Syndrome, DTS for short. The link provided is but a small inkling into the research going into this subject. What I have found so far is a direct correlation to the violence spikes in Iraq (also in Afghanistan but mostly in Iraq) and the political rhetoric of the Democrat Party. Without disclosing all I know at this time, the evidence is damningly overwhelming.

We know that the Democrat Party leadership tried their hardest to lose the War in Iraq for political gain. Political Power means more to them than the safety and well-being of our Troops in and out of combat zones. Just ask John Murtha. In all of 2006 and 2007, time and time again, the political rhetoric encouraged, emboldened and enabled the enemy. Some of our politicians and their citizen support structure rendered aid and comfort to the enemy. Look to Code Pink for the most blatant activity in this regard. Remember, the War In Iraq is no longer a viable campaign issue - to the Leftinistra, the Armies of the socialist American liberal.

Keeping the above in mind, John Whitehead at Right Side News writes: Is it Time for a Rebellion? I would say most assuredly yes. It is our Constitutional Right to do so. We can do it one of two ways...via the ballot box or taking up arms. We have the Constitutional Right to "change our government" when it becomes our Lords and not our Servants. Our very Founding was exactly that. What was it Thomas Jefferson once said?

“God forbid we should ever be twenty years without such a rebellion …. And what country can preserve its liberties, if its rulers are not warned from time to time, that this people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms …. The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.” Thomas Jefferson, in letter to William S. Smith, 1787

I am willing to die for that which I believe and from the cowardice revealed from the ones that feign a false Patriotism, I doubt - seriously doubt - that they would be willing to sacrifice their all for their cause. Nevertheless, in John Whitehead's article, he was referring to the recent most unconstitutional "bail out" bill that eventually got through the Dishonorable Halls of CONgress, full of con men and women against the will of the American People.

[...] There was a time when such a blatant disregard for the burden being laid upon the American taxpayer would have elicited howls of outrage, protest marches and perhaps even outright rebellion. Today, however, many Americans understandably feel helpless to do anything about their plight. After all, despite the fact that calls and emails to congressional offices were overwhelmingly against the $810 billion pork-laden bailout, the legislation passed anyway.

Yet consider this: at its core, the quest for the American dream is about gaining sovereignty over one's life and property. Without it, there can be no freedom. While we have become accustomed to equating property with land ownership, the term is much more fundamental and personal. It refers to a kind of sovereignty over one's life and possessions--especially one's money. Questions about who has ultimate control over our money, how much of it can be claimed by government and how it gets spent go to the heart of the battle over property rights. [...]

I have also been talking about - not espousing - the impending American Civil War Part 2. I can smell it and I can taste it and I can feel it. Can you?

While the Marxist that is Obama snickers behind the curtain as he plots and schemes the ruination of the United States Constitution in his bid to reshape the United States of America into the United Socialist States of America, True American Patriots are ever vigilant in tracking the Enemy Within. As Obama attempts to rewrite his own history and tries to distance himself - in theory - for show - from socialist/Marxist radicals that have for decades plotted and schemed the destruction of this nation from within, True American Patriots are watching his every move.

As the Obama Goon Squads, excuse me, the Truth Squads become more and more violent each and every day as we approach E-Day, keep in mind who and what shaped Barack's politics. It certainly wasn't the United States Constitution that he modeled his "community organizing" after. Ask Saul Alinsky.

From an article in the CFP, Jim O'Neill writes a piece entitled, "The American People Aren’t Stupid". It ends thusly:

[...] From the Third Presidential Debate, October 15, 2008:

MCCAIN: While you were on the board of the Woods Foundation, you and Mr. Ayers, together, you sent $230,000 to ACORN, and you launched your political campaign in Mr. Ayers’ living room.
OBAMA: That’s absolutely not true.
MCCAIN: And the facts are facts and records are records.
OBAMA: And that’s not the facts.

Obfuscate, misdirect, and downplay all dangerous questions, but most importantly, simply deny.

Who does Obama think he’s fooling? The American people aren’t stupid. [END]

I beg to differ, Sir, respectfully. The misguided, uneducated and emotional are indeed that stupid. The others that know who and what he is are the dangerous ones, George Soros being one of them. After all, he alone brought down the Bank of England. And now he is "advising" CONgressmen on the economic down turn? And Soros is also gathering and organizing a "transition team" for Barack?

Indeed. The cats are out of the bag and Joe the Plumber is the one what done it.

Colin Powell's Endorsement Negated by Prominent American Black Leaders

~Snooper~

With a HT to Right Truth via this You Tube video, Colin Powell's endorsement of Barack Hussein Obama means little to nothing if it means anything at all. How a former General in the US Military can side with a man that has had a hand in the deaths and wounding of American and Coalition forces doesn't necessarily stun this DAVFW but it does raise some eyebrows.

I have been conducting very intense and in-depth research on the subject of aiding and abetting the enemy in a time of war and the results of that research is indeed astounding. All in the name of political gain, the prominent leadership of the Democrat Party here in the United States have, in their quest and lust of power and control, are directly and indirectly responsible for emboldening and enabling of the enemy. This has resulted in prolonging the war with the consequences of causing the casualties of war. Colin Powell throwing in with this group strips him of any respect he may have once had from this DAVFW. Colin Powell has become a political hack. Congratulations.

I have been a subscriber to the National Black Republican Association since its inception and know exactly where they stand on the issues and they do not support the Marxist Obama. Check out Right Truth for a listing of other prominent Black Americans and see for yourself. I suppose Colin Powell didn't want to be classified as an Uncle Tom? I suppose that is better than being considered a turn-coat on those that have served, are serving and will serve. His endorsement of Barack disgusts me but it was to be expected...birds of a feather and all that.

Democrats and terrorists, RINOs and terrorists are one in the same...the scourge of the United States.

This ill-conceived endorsement casts a dark shadow on men like Stephen Fortunato.

More at Memeorandum...and LGF...

Politik Ditto:

[...] Eh, I really don't see this as a big deal. For starters anyone whose been paying attention to Powell of late knows that he's been leaning Left for years now, esp. in his criticism regarding the handling of the Iraq war. In turn, perhaps he remains bitter about taking many of the hits from the press since it was he that was front and center on the Bush administration's reasons for us needing to go into Iraq. Secondly, as a prominent black man in the political world, with a black man running for president, Powell's in a no-win situation: feeling guilty if he doesn't endorse Barack while also being a labeled a "sellout" or "Uncle Tom" or any other smear liberals use towards Black people don't toe the line and vote Democratic. Lastly, Powell's had such a relatively low profile since he resigned as Secretary of State that his endorsement just doesn't strike me as being that significant, except to liberals of course. [END]

Exactly so. A RINO is a RINO is a RINO...not to be respected and/or listened to.

Michelle Malkin here and Memeorandum...The Colin Powell endorsement: Triumph of hope over reality

Spree at WUAs...As Obama's Lead Slips, Powell Endorses Obama

The obligatory Colin Powell endorses Barack Obama post....actually from listening to Powell over the last months, I seriously thought he already had and just hadn't made it official, so while it isn't a surprise by any stretch of the imagination, the left is acting all surprised. [...]

ATB...ONCE AGAIN, COLIN POWELL PROVES HE'S A BIG FAT JERK
Atlas Shrugs...Benedict Powell
Chicago Ray...Powell Tries To Cleanse His War Damaged Image By Endorsing Obama

[...] A man who himself pushed very hard for the war at the time and now has become a rewriter of history of sorts, hoping to score a role in an Obama White house with a cabinet position as a joint chief perhaps so he can again try and send his previous position as a Bush Secretary of State down the memory hole to remove his name from the mischaracterized failures of the Iraq war scenario, made worse of coarse by the over the top liberal discourse from within the country fueling the rsistance and Al Queda the entire length of the process. [...]

Jules Crittenden...Albatrosses for Obama
Lovely Jenn...Colin Powell Endorses Barack Obama, er The Messiah
Sarge Charlie...Powell endorses Obama

[...] Did Colin forget the he was an Uncle Tom along with Rice and Justice Thomas, maybe he is trying to make amends to the black community. [END]

Neocon Express...Racist Endorsement

As I predicted a few days ago, Powell endorsed Obama. Some ask a very simple question: When was the last time Colin Powell ever endorsed a white liberal Democrat for high office? Answer? NEVER! What is the logical deduction? Powell's sudden endorsement of the most liberal member of the United States Senate was based on race, and race alone. [...]

STACLU...Colin Powell Endorses Obama

[...] I will not attempt to speculate whether race had any impact on Powell’s endorsement, however that won’t stop others like Rush. [...]

.

Fight The Fight Citizen Soldiers!

~Snooper~

Now is the time for Citizen Soldiers

The above link will take you to Atlas Shrugs.

Listen, we are under attack from within. The media has been indistinguishable from the Democrat party having thrown off any semblance of objective reporting. No negative Obama Biden stories - no investigative journalism on the deep corruption of Obama's ascent and sketchy background and terrible alliances. The massive vote fraud is unfathomable.

The Democrats want their Black president - no matter if his father was more Arab than African. No matter if he grew up on the streets of Indonesia. Nothing matters. [...]

Be sure to check the post out. There is actionable duties thee to perform.

Whereas we cannot distinguish between the "media" and the Democrats, we also cannot distinguish the Democrat Party leadership from terrorists. For instance, in recent days the terrorists have stated that the current financial non-crisis crisis is a victory for them like they had something to do with it. Isn't it just like a democrat to lay claim to something they had nothing to do with? Oh. Wait. Democrats didn't say that. See? One cannot tell the difference between a democrat or a terrorist.

When an enemy of the USA proclaims that they want to see Obama as President, one has to wonder about that one. And while we are at it, when an American Presidential Aspirant tries to lose the war we are in for political gain, shouldn't we question his treasonous actions and his loyalties? Sarah Palin is correct...Obama is indeed unfit to command. When a Presidential Contender says that our Troops are "just air raiding villages and killing civilians", I certainly do question the frauds' motives.

Even Joe Biden knows Czarbie is unqualified and is a liar as well as a proponent of the usual DCN Double Standard. I spit in his face. Every political leader in our nation and many others knows for a fact that Obama was willing to lose the war for political expediency. Not only id he a pathetic anti-Americanist, he is a traitor.

A profoundly important point is being missed in the campaign debate over which candidate was right on Iraq. In 2006, when conditions on the ground were trending downward and a decision was required either to continue the struggle or to cut our losses, Barack Obama stated that the proposed deployment of more forces, the "surge," was doomed to failure and instead called for a phased withdrawal of all forces within a defined period.

In short, Sen. Obama was willing to lose. It was an astonishing display of ignorance to be so cavalier about defeat, almost as if losing a war was tantamount to losing a set of tennis -- something without lasting consequence.

I recall very vividly April 30, 1975, the day we acknowledged defeat in the Vietnam War -- the day Ambassador Graham Martin and others were evacuated ignominiously from the roof of our embassy in Saigon. Only later did it become clear how damaging that defeat was.

There were consequences for all nations, especially small states who are vulnerable to great-power pressures. In the late 1970s it contributed to a greater Russian willingness to take risks and a more aggressive Soviet foreign policy. Indeed, in the years immediately following our defeat in Vietnam, an emboldened Soviet Union established a dominant influence in Angola, Ethiopia, South Yemen, Mozambique, Nicaragua and ultimately invaded Afghanistan with 100,000 troops. [...]

I remember as well. I know first hand what it is like when filthy, dirty, scum politicians turn their backs on the lives of Troops protecting their worthless lives from situations that THEY got us into in the first damn place. Screw Czarbie and his followers and may they rot and burn in hell for the sins and the crimes they have committed against our Troops for their precious and pathetic power grabs.

And now, due to political expediency, as his own son heads of to war, Joe Biden is now balking and doing what he accused Czarbie of doing. What a coward and political hack bastard he is.

Not only is Czarbie unqualified to lead a fart factory, Joe Biden should be ashamed. They disgust me beyond contempt.

The Dogs of War Unleashed - Obama Exposed

~Snooper~

Bring it on Czarbie Thugs and Goons! Bring it on!

While the BBC whines about Sarah Palin linking Czarbie to known terrorists, I just have to laugh. I have known this for several years. He fits the mold in my collection of posts, articles and items that I call Democrats and Terrorists. Folks, he isn't the only Democrat guilty by association at all.

Pamela Gellar has the continuing series of voter fraud issues linked directly to Czarbie. Naturally, the trouser rompers that support the Marxist fraud will whine. While more and more evidence is compiled each and every day revealing the known ties to illegal activities of the Czarbie and his ties to known fellow anti-Americanists, Don Surber brings us this:

[...] The Times called Ayers a 1960s bomber when in fact the bombings were began in 1970 and ended with the 1981 robbery of a Brinks truck which left two terrorists (named in the story) two police officers (not named) and a Brinks guard (also not named) dead.

Ayers famously said 20 years later in a story published in the New York Times on 9/11 that he has no regrets– other than that he did not cause more mayhem.

This was said not when Obama was 11 (actually Obama was 20 when the Brinks robbery went down) but when Obama was 40.

Ayers said this 6 years after he met Obama and was working within the system.

Some on the Left consider Ayers a hero. [...]

Indeed. This is why I question their patriotism...no one can truly identify to whom or to what they swear their allegiance. It most assuredly is not to the United States Constitution no matter the rhetoric to the contrary. Just like Ron Paul, just because one can say and spell "constitution" doesn't mean one knows what is says...just ask Sen KKK Byrd. Folks...character does matter and Czarbie is a character but there is nothing honorable about the fraud at all.

Certainly, this country has never seen as Far Left a ticket at Obama-Biden ticket.
Never has America seen a presidential candidate with such inexperience.
Never has there been a presidential candidate with such poor judgement.
On his one major vote in the US Senate on the surge in Iraq Barack Obama was wrong. [...]

That right there is out of the ballpark! The "controversial" article published in August of 2001 can be found here and clicking out will bring you here. As LGF has done, I too have saved the article just in case one of the Czarbie Goons has it removed in an effort to stifle constitutional rights and also to rewrite history as the Leftinistra are prone to do. LGF also has a good article of this here published back in May.

In yet another turn of events, Czarbie just cannot get enough of those Weather Underground anti-Americanists. He now has another one on his payroll. I wonder how many he wants to make Cabinet Members? No matter how the Czarbie Trouser lickers try to spin Czarbie's anti-Americanist crap, we will be sure to bring out the Truth. Catch the video of pathetic spin here. NOTE!!!: language warning at this post...

More at Memeorandum...

David Bernstein / The Volokh Conspiracy: What Passes for Objective Reporting this Election Season …

Jennifer Rubin / Commentary: Ready, Aim, Fire

Jay / Stop The ACLU: Obama's Poor Judgement of Associates: Who Would Obama Choose for Supreme Court?

Krooney / TIME.com: PALIN: OBAMA “PALLING AROUND WITH TERRORISTS”

Pamela Geller / Atlas Shrugs: PALIN UNLEASHED DOES THE HEAVY LIFTING

A.L. / The Anonymous Liberal: Palling around with criminals and sleeping with separatists

Steve Diamond / Global Labor and Politics: Obama Hit by Palin on Ayers Link - Why not throw him under the bus?

Scared Monkeys: Water Seeks Its Own Level ... Sarah Palin Tells Crowd Obama Is …

Marc Ambinder: America In McCain And “Other” — In Englewood, Colorado …

TBogg: Pal Palin — Sarah Palin: … Sarah Palin delighted to extend …

Steve J. / RADAMISTO: PALIN CHANNELS SEAN HANNITY

Dave Johnson / Seeing the Forest: Palin Calls Obama A Terrorist, Traitor

Marc / USS Neverdock: Palin says Obama ‘palling around’ with terrorists