GWB Uses Poli-Speak To Trounce Congressional Trolls.

I watched this speech today and I also saw GWB wink a few times as he TROUNCED the passe and defunct orgasmnations of MoveOn and Code Pepto Dismal. I nearly laughed myself out of the chair.

That Abyss of Obscurity is getting full. Perhaps we should throw in some more shovels?

There really isn't any need to comment on the text of the speech. It speaks for itself. The video can be seen here and in my VODPOD when this site is finished. My VODPOD is located here at the moment.

Catch the wave.

President Bush's Remarks on the Global War on Terror
by President George W Bush
WebMemo

EDWIN J. FEULNER:

Ladies and gentlemen, on behalf of the 21 members of the Board of Trustees, the 240 employees and the 320,000 members of The Heritage Foundation around the country, it is my very great pleasure to welcome you here to our Heritage Foundation headquarters today.

Mr. President, 24 years ago last month we opened this building, and the man who wielded the scissors was the then-Vice President of the United States, George H.W. Bush. Fast forward 12 years, 1993, several of us had the opportunity to go to Coral Gables, Fla., to talk to a prominent entrepreneur there. We invited him to join our board. And businessman Jeb Bush served on our board with great distinction for five years before he went on to other things.

You sir, honored us just four years ago when you spoke at the Reagan Center to more than 1,000 members of our President’s Club, and you shared your insights and the outlook for the future then.

As you know, here at Heritage we focus on policy ideas. We let other people worry about horse races and things like that. And I would just leave you, sir, with two basic points. The first one: In the 14 months that you will be serving as our President, all of us look forward to working closely with you and your team on policy issues and ideas across the board. There are going to be many opportunities to do that, and we look forward to it.

And secondly, sir, I want you to know that you are always and will always be welcome at The Heritage Foundation. Ladies and gentlemen, please join me in welcoming officially President George W. Bush to The Heritage Foundation.

(APPLAUSE)

PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH:

Thank you.

Ed, thanks. Thanks for the kind introduction. I'm looking forward to working with you for the next 14 months, but you better put on your running shoes, because my spirits are high and my energy level is good and I'm sprinting to the finish line.

(APPLAUSE)

I congratulate you on your 30th anniversary as the president.

(LAUGHTER)

No such thing as term limits here.

(LAUGHTER)

And rightly so, because Ed is a person who has taken the conservative movement from one that used to meet in a phone booth here in Washington...

(LAUGHTER)

... to a robust group of folks who are shaping policy in Washington, D.C.

As a matter of fact, you've got a little bigger phone booth these days than you did 30 years ago.

(LAUGHTER)

I appreciate all you've done and I really want to thank Heritage.

One of the interesting things about the Heritage legacy is that the folks here have been tireless advocates, tireless champions of liberty and free enterprise and democracy and religious freedom.

These are values that came under attack on September the 11th, 2001.

Our nation was attacked by a brutal enemy that despises freedom, that rejects tolerance, that kills the innocent in the pursuit of a dark vision. These folks believe that it's OK to subjugate women and indoctrinate children and murder those who oppose their harsh rule.

They have stated clearly they want to impose this ideology on millions. They are at war with America because they hate what they stand for and they understand that we stand in their way.

And so, today I've come to talk to you about the war on terror, my firm commitment that we'll do everything in our power to protect the American people, and my call on the United States Congress to give us the tools necessary so we can do the job the American people expect.

I, too, want to thank the members of the Heritage Foundation board of trustees who've joined us. Thank you for supporting this important organization.

I can't tell you how important it is to have good centers of thought in Washington, D.C., people who are willing to look at today's problems and come up with innovative solution based upon sound principle to solve those problems. And that's how I view Heritage.

I thank all the members and guests who've joined us today as well. It's a pleasure to be with you.

It's been now more than six years since the enemy attacked us on September the 11th, and we are blessed that there has not been another attack on our soil.

With the passage of time, the memories of the 9/11 attacks have grown more distant. And for some, there is the temptation to think that the threats to our country have grown distant as well. They have not.

The terrorists who struck America that September morning intend to strike us again. We know this because the enemy has told us so. Just last year, Osama bin Laden warned the American people, quote, Operations are under preparation and you will see them on your own ground once they are finished.

Seven months later, British authorities broke up the most ambitious known Al Qaida plot since the 9/11 attacks, a plot to blow up passenger airplanes flying over the Atlantic toward the United States.

Our intelligence community believes that this plot was just two or three weeks away from execution. If it had been carried out, it could have rivaled 9/11 in death and destruction.

The lesson of this experience is clear: We must take the words of the enemy seriously.

The terrorists have stated their objectives. They intend to build a totalitarian Islamic empire encompassing all current and former Muslim lands stretching from Europe to North Africa, the Middle East and Southeast Asia.

In pursuit of their imperial aims, these extremists say there can be no compromise or dialogue with those they call infidels, a category that includes America, the world's free nation, Jews, and all Muslims who reject their extreme vision of Islam.

They reject the possibility of peaceful coexistence with the free world.

Again, hear the words of Osama bin Laden last year: Death is better than living on this Earth with the unbelievers among us.

History teaches us that underestimating the words of evil, ambitious men is a terrible mistake.

In the early 1900s, the world ignored the words of Lenin as he laid out his plans to launch a communist revolution in Russia, and the world paid a terrible price. The Soviet empire he established killed tens of millions and brought the world to the brink of thermonuclear war.

In the 1920s, the world ignored the words of Hitler as he explained his intention to build an Aryan superstate in Germany, take revenge on Europe and eradicate the Jews. And the world paid a terrible price. His Nazi regime killed millions in the gas chambers and set the world aflame in war before it was finally defeated at a terrible cost in lives and treasure.

Bin Laden and his terrorist allies have made their intentions as clear as Lenin and Hitler before them. And the question is, will we listen?

America and our coalition partners are listening. We have made our choice. We take the words of the enemy seriously.

Over the past six years, we have captured or killed hundreds of terrorists. We have disrupted their finances. We have prevented new attacks before they could be carried out. We've removed regimes in Afghanistan and Iraq that had supported terrorists and threatened our citizens and, in so doing, liberated 50 million people from the clutches of tyranny.

With our allies, we're keeping the pressure on the enemy. We're keeping them on the move. We're fighting them everywhere they make their stand, from the mountains of Afghanistan to the deserts of Iraq to the islands of Southeast Asia and the Horn of Africa.

On every battlefront we're on the offense, keeping constant pressure. And in this war on terror, we will not rest or retreat or withdraw from the fight until this threat to civilization has been removed.

(APPLAUSE)

I fully understand that, after six years, the sense of imminent danger has passed for some. And it can be natural for people to forget the lessons of 9/11 as they go about their daily lives.

I just want to assure you that I'll never forget the lessons of September the 11th, and nor will the people with whom I work.

I know that when I discuss the war on terror, some here in Washington, D.C., dismiss it as political rhetoric; an attempt to scare people into votes.

Given the nature of the enemy and the words of its leaders, politicians who deny that we are at war are either being disingenuous or naive. Either way, it is dangerous for our country.

We are at war. And we cannot win this war by wishing it away or pretending it does not exist.

Unfortunately, on too many issues, some in Congress are behaving as if America is not at war.

For example, in a time of war, it is vital for the president to have a full national security team in place. And a key member of that team is the attorney general.

The job of the attorney general is essential to the security of America. The attorney general is the highest ranking official responsible for our law enforcement community's efforts to detect and prevent terrorist attacks here at home.

I've selected an outstanding nominee to fill this vital role: Judge Michael Mukasey.

Judge Mukasey has a long record of accomplishments in matter of law and national security. He has been praised by Republicans and Democrats alike as a man of honesty, intellect, fairness and independence.

Judge Mukasey provided nearly six hours of testimony. He patiently answer more than 200 questions at the hearing. He's responded to nearly 500 written questions less than a week after his hearing.

Yet the Senate Judiciary Committee has been holding up his nomination.

As a price for his confirmation, some on that committee want Judge Mukasey to take a legal position on specific techniques allegedly used to interrogate captured terrorists.

As Judge Mukasey explained in a letter to committee members, he cannot do so for several reasons.

First, he does not know whether certain methods of questioning are, in fact, used, because the program is classified. And therefore, he is in no position to provide an informed opinion. He has not been read into the program and won't until he is confirmed and sworn in -- won't be until he's confirmed and sworn in as the attorney general.

Second, he does not want an uninformed opinion to be taken by our professional interrogators in the field as placing them in legal jeopardy.

Finally, he does not want any statement of his to give the terrorists a window into which techniques we may use and which ones we may not use. That could help them train their operatives to resist questioning and withhold vital information we need to stop attacks and save lives.

In the war on terror, intelligence is one of the most crucial tools for our defense. If a captured terrorist has information about a plot against our homeland, we need to know what he knows.

And so, that's why I put in place, under the CIA, a program to question key terrorist operatives and its leaders. Last year, Congress passed a law that allows the CIA to continue this vital program.

The procedures used in this program are safe, they are lawful and they are necessary.

(APPLAUSE)

Senior leaders in the House and the Senate from both political parties have been briefed on the details of this program. It's wrong for congressional leaders to make Judge Mukasey's confirmation dependent on his willingness to go on the record about the details of a classified program he has not been briefed on.

If the Senate Judiciary Committee were to block Judge Mukasey on these grounds, they would send a new standard for confirmation that could not be met by any responsible nominee for attorney general. And that would guarantee that America would have no attorney general during this time of war.

By any measure, Judge Mukasey is eminently qualified to be the next attorney general.

And now, after allowing his nomination to languish for 41 days, the Senate Judiciary Committee has scheduled a vote for next Tuesday.

Senate leaders must move this nomination out of committee, bring it to the Senate floor and confirm this good man.

(APPLAUSE)

Congress has also failed to act on intelligence legislation that is vital to protect the American people in this war on terror. Stopping new attacks on our country requires us to make sure we understand the intentions of the enemy. We've got to know what they're thinking and what they're planning. And that means we got to have effective measures to monitor their communications.

This summer Congress passed the Protect America Act, which strengthened our ability to collect foreign intelligence on terrorists overseas. And this good law closed the dangerous gap in our intelligence.

Unfortunately, they made this law effective for only six months. The problem is that Al Qaida doesn't operate on a six-month timetable.

(LAUGHTER)

And if Congress doesn't act soon, the law will expire, and the gap in our intelligence will reopen, and the United States of America will be at risk.

We must keep the intelligence gap firmly closed.

The terrorists are communicating with each other and are plotting new attacks. We need to know what they're planning.

(APPLAUSE)

We must ensure that the protections intended for the American people are not extended to terrorists overseas who are plotting to harm us. And we must grant liability protection to companies who are facing multi-billion-dollar lawsuits only because they are believed to have assisted in the efforts to defend our nation following the 9/11 attacks.

The Senate Intel Committee has approved a bipartisan bill that contains provisions to preserve our ability to collect intelligence on terrorists overseas, while protecting the civil liberties of Americans here at home.

This bill still needs some improving. But it's an important step in the right direction.

(APPLAUSE)

Time is of the essence. And the full Senate and the House of Representatives need to get -- pass a good bill and get it to my desk promptly so our intelligence professionals can continue to use the vital tools of the Protect America Act to keep us safe.

(APPLAUSE)

Congress is also stalling on the emergency war supplemental to fund our troops on the front lines in Afghanistan and Iraq. This crucial bill includes funds for bullets and body armor, protection against IEDs and mine-resistant ambush-protective vehicles.

Congress should be able to move the supplemental quickly. There's no reason why they're not moving the supplemental. After all, it had more than eight months to study most of its provisions.

In fact, nearly 75 percent of the funding requests in the supplemental were submitted along with my annual budget in February of this year.

The supplemental is critical for our troops. And Congress should not go home for the holidays while our men and women in uniform are waiting for the funds they need.

Congress also needs to pass the Department of Defense spending bill, as well as a funding bill for our nation's veterans.

There are reports that congressional leaders may be considering combining the funding bills for our military and our veterans together with a bloated labor, health and education spending bill.

It's hard to imagine a more cynical ploy than holding funding for our troops and our wounded warriors hostage in order to extract $11 billion in wasteful Washington spending.

If reports of this strategy are true, I will veto such a three- bill pileup.

(APPLAUSE)

I ask Congress to send me a clean veterans funded bill by Veterans Day and to pass a clean defense spending bill. Congress needs to put the needs of those who put on the uniform ahead of their desire to spend more money.

When it comes to funding our troops, some in Washington should spend more time responding to the warnings of terrorists like Osama bin Laden and the requests of our commanders on the ground and less time responding to the demands of MoveOn.org bloggers and Code Pink protesters.

Here's the bottom line: This is no time for Congress to weaken the Department of Justice by denying it a strong and effective leader. It's no time for Congress to weaken our ability to gather vital intelligence from captured terrorists. It's no time for Congress to weaken our ability to intercept information from terrorists about potential attacks on the United States of America.

And this is no time for Congress to hold back vital funding for our troops as they fight Al Qaida terrorists and radicals in Afghanistan and Iraq.

In the struggle against the terrorists and extremists, I hope I made my strategy clear today, that we will keep constant pressure on the enemy in order to defend the American people. We will fight them overseas so we do not have to fight them here at home.

(APPLAUSE)

At the same time, we'll use every available tool of law and intelligence to protect the people here. That's our most solemn duty. It's a duty I think about every day.

In the long run, the only way to defeat the terrorists is to advance freedom as the great alternative to radicalism and repression. We can have confidence in this cause because we have seen the power of liberty to transform nations and secure peace before.

Here at The Heritage Foundation, you understand this better than most. During the Cold War, there were loud voices in Washington who argued for accommodation for the Soviet Union, because they believed the watchword of our policy should be stability.

At Heritage, you knew that when it came to the Soviet Union, the watchword of our policy should be freedom. Together with a great president named Ronald Reagan you championed a policy of rolling back communism repression, and bringing freedom to nations enslaved by communist tyranny.

And by taking the side of the dissidents who helped millions across the world throw off the shackles of communism, you helped build the free and peaceful societies that are the true sources of stability and peace in the world. And now we're at the start of a new century, and the same debate is once again unfolding, this time regarding my policy in the Middle East. Once again, voices in Washington are arguing that the watchword of the policy should be stability.

And once again they're wrong.

In Kabul and Baghdad and Beirut and other cities across the broader Middle East, brave men and women are risking their lives every day for the same freedoms we enjoy. And like the citizens of Prague and Warsaw and Budapest in the century gone by, they are looking to the United States to stand up for them, speak out for them and champion their cause, and we are doing just that.

(APPLAUSE)

We are standing with those who yearn for the liberty -- who yearn for liberty in the Middle East, because we understand that the desire for freedom is universal, written by the almighty into the hearts of every man, woman and child on this Earth.

(APPLAUSE)

We are standing with those who yearn for liberty in the Middle East because we know that the terrorists fear freedom even more than they fear our firepower. They know that, given a choice, no one will choose to live under their dark ideology of violence and death.

We're standing with those who yearn for liberty in the Middle East because we know that when free societies take root in that part of the world they will yield the peace we all desire.

The only way the terrorists can recruit operatives and suicide bombers is by feeding on the hopelessness of societies mired in despair, and by bringing freedom to these societies, we replace hatred with hope.

And this will help us to marginalize the extremists and eliminate the conditions that feed radicalism, and make the American people more secure.

The lessons of the past have taught us that liberty is transformative. And I believe 50 years from now an American president will be speaking to Heritage and say, Thank God that generation that wrote the first chapter in the 21st century understood the power of freedom to bring the peace we want.

(APPLAUSE)

Thank you for coming. God bless.

(APPLAUSE)

Thank you.

(APPLAUSE)

END

And there ya have it.

Any questions?

Trouncing Moonbats Coast To Coast

A while back, the anti-Americanists were royally trounced in DC...at the GOE Rally and then outside the Code Pepto Dismal HQ, running an illegal operation as per zoning laws. Then, we had the Berzerkely trouncing. The moonbats are scattering at every turn.

We had stated that we have the momentum and we would build on that momentum.

That time has come and it doesn't look like we will waver one bit. Behold:

Tough Eagles:

[...]

The Charlotte Eagles have shown just what is possible when a bunch of local patriots get their heads together and go on the attack! I’d love to see events like this going on all over the country. Even in the blowing rain last Wednesday, this hardy bunch was in the faces of the moonbats, and they’ll be back again next week. What a hardy lot our folks are, and I urge you to join me in commending them on their steadfastness in the face of the worst Mother Nature and the leftist idiots could offer!

[...]

After Action in MD:

After Action In PA:

[...]

For those of you who may not have heard, last week marks the first time in 5 years that the Chester County Peace Brigade did not occupy the West Chester Courthouse steps.

[...]

Action in TN:

[...]

The police departmentt is expecting a large crowd, so come and support out troops in drowning these people out. This isn’t anti war, its anti AMERICA.

[...]

More After Action Reports will be posted as they come in.

Troofers No Longer Politically Expedient...Says Former President Clinton

Hat Tip to Wake Up America for this pretty funny story.

I, too, have never been a convert or a blind follower of any politician and most certainly have refrained from being a Party hack since I, and millions of others, got burned badly by the sweet talking Jimmy Carter of years of yore.

As anyone, having read this blog, can tell, I have never ever been a fan of William Jefferson Clinton. The only reason he made it to the White House is because that idiot Ross Big Ears Big Mouth Perot. Big Short Dummy.

However, I have always given credit where credit is due. This is one of those times.

Hat tip to NewsBusters where I first saw this story.

Early in his speech, Clinton was sporadically heckled. One heckler shouted that 9/11 was a fraud, and Clinton bristled. "No, it wasn't a fraud. I'll be glad to talk about it if you'll shut up and let me talk." The heckling continued, and he told another heckler "these people did not come here to hear you speak. If you don't have any self-control, we can deal with that."

When a third called 9/11 an "inside job," Clinton snapped back "How dare you? I live in New York, and I know who did that. You guys have got to be careful, or you're going to give Minnesota a bad reputation."

No matter the reason Bill Clinton said what he did is up for speculation. Although the Leftinistra have encouraged these Troofer Buffoons, using them as a shield to distract from their own forms of silliness and ignorance to bash Bush, it appears that everyone is sick and tired of these Troofer Moonbats.

I will wait and see the various reactions to this "development" to see if this was sincere or not. I watched the video (you can too by clicking the video in my VODPOD above) and it appears that Bill Clinton was "Rather" put out with these pukes; whether it was because of the heckling or their ignorance and disrespectful antics remains to be seen. The video is labeled Bill Clinton Takes On 9/11 Troofers.

One thing is for sure...the ONLY groups of people that interrupt, distract and make fools of themselves by heckling, are these types of idiots. You will never see anyone on our side of the fence on any issue acting as the Troofers and other anti-Americanist groups of fools.

Kudos to the former President of the United States of America, William Jefferson Clinton.

Catch the wave

Code Pepto Dismal anti-Americanists Trounced in Berzerkely

From Move America Forward web site:

Huge, Huge Success in Berkeley!

Hundreds Turn Out to Support U.S. Troops in - yes - Berkeley, California!!!

Mark this day down folks. It was Wednesday, October 17, 2007 that hundreds of pro-troop supporters turned out for a giant pro-troop rally in Berkeley, CA (one of the most anti-military & anti-war cities in this nation). Not only did the size of the rally shock the San Francisco Bay Area news media, it surprised the anti-war activists at Code Pink who were outnumbered on their own turf!.

Move America Forward and other pro-troop organizations and leaders put on a pro-troop rally to counter the harassment of the U.S. Marine Recruiting Center by Code Pink in Berkeley.

For 3 weeks the U.S. Marine Recruiting Center has faced protests (including vandalism and defacing of their building) and taunts against the Marines that they were "traitors" and "liars" and "murderers" and guilty of "assassination."

[...]

Move America Forward will be posting more pictures from the Troll Trouncing in the next few days so check in!

Here are the coverage outlets. Go take a look see.

TWO Videos on KPIX
KTVU Story
KTVU Video
KGO Ch7 Video
San Francisco Chronicle
Michelle Malkin’s Blog
Free Republic Thread1
Wake Up America Blog
Free Republic Thread2

The Moonbats of the anti-American Fruit Loop Brigades, financed by George Soros, were severely trounced. These idiots cannot comprehend that the men and women past and current that they are AGAINST are the VERY ones that make these idiots free to be retarded. If these ugly pukes did this over in Iran, they would be dead by dawn. George Soros should be ashamed of himself. Why did the moron come to this country, anyway?

Pipeline News has GREAT pics as well!

October 17, 2007 - Berkeley, CA - PipeLineNews.org - Sick and tired of Code Pink's constant harassment of the Marine recruiting center on Berkeley's Shattuck Avenue, today Move America Forward landed on the beaches and simply overwhelmed the Pink Panty Waists.

The "Progressives" aka Commies, are not only unaccustomed to being challenged on their home turf, they come unglued when confronted by superior numbers. We felt, and tremendously enjoyed their pain.

Yes. It must have really hurt being trounced in their own socialist back yard. So, Code Pinko Dismal Morons were trounced on their own turfs in Dc and Berzerkely.

SWEET!!

Michelle Malkin:

Reader Dr. Zoo sends photos of the Move America Forward pro-troops rally at the Marine recruiting center in Berkeley. More coming. Wonderful sight to see the Code Pinkos outnumbered and outflagged on “their” turf. Kudos to Melanie Morgan, our vets, and all the supporters who came to counter the recruiter-bashers:

AMEN!

Wake Up America is also covering the historical event of the Troll Trouncing in Berzerkely.
Gateway Pundit is also covering the event.

Serious Troll Trouncing Going On

Remember Nancy's Little Snit?

It MUST hurt getting trounced in your own back yard!!

As many of us have been saying for the last 2 years or so, the anti-Americanist Leftinistra are losing their steam...what is "left" of it. They have lost their forward momentum and their full steam ahead is in reverse now, desperately trying NOT to fall off of that Soros funded Abyss of Obscurity.

The whole lot of them are dumber than a box of turtle turds. And one of the anti-Americanists dared to bring a pocket knife to a Howitzer fight.

What a bunch of losers. I have heard these jack-asses say that the military is nothing but a bunch of trained killers. If that is so, is it REALLY a goos idea to piss us off?

Just wondering.

Catch the Tsunami

A Chronicle Of Moonbat Ignorance

Once upon a time, there was a post entitled, Two Stories on House Vote to Honor Ramadan. This happenstance irks the bejeebers out of me on many levels that it will be virtually impossible to detail. But, this issue is not what this post is about. The post is about the comments to this post. I hope Cyber Pastor doesn't mind and I hope SFBert doesn't mind either. As for the moonbat, I could care less what IT thinks.

This particular moonbat, as all trolls do, changes nics like snakes shed skin and in this particular case, IT is going by Halle Burton...typical, isn't it? Stuck on retarded. Anyway, here we go. This is ITS first comment.

""To offer respect for a major religion is one thing, but to offer respect for a major religion that has been behind the Islamic jihad, the radical jihad, that has sworn war upon the United States, its free allies and freedom in Iraq, is another thing," he stated."

Using that logic, would he condemn Christianity for Tim McVeigh's terrorist attach in OK? I think not, nor would it be appropriate to smear an entire religion for the actions of a few.

Gee. I wonder what this ignoramus is going. First off, McVeigh was a sworn agnostic right up until an hour before his execution. This troll knows this but keeps rambling on and on about McVeigh being a Christian knowing damn well that he was not at the time of the bombing in OK. So, that argument doesn't hold water.

Second, this idgit troll hasn't figured out yet that Islam Is Not a religion of peace, no matter ITS ignorant rants and spin. Anyone that has studied this "religion' of Islam, comes away with a knot in the pit of their stomachs. Islam is a cult of murder and death.

Several people, in the interim, tried to explain reality to the troll, to no avail as evidenced by ITS replies. Then, comes a special reply from one that I have seen elsewhere and seems to be consistant, removing doubt as to the possibility of being a multi-nic troll. Enter "Muslims Against Sharia".

Regardless of Jihad and Islamic terrorism, the resolution is a violation of the US Constitution which clearly states that "...Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion...".

Absolutely true. Congress has officially given the nod of approval of a body of people which, in the tenets of their credo, want us all dead or convert to Islam. What in the hell is wrong with our morons disguised as educated law makers in CONgress?

Others came along and, as myself, recognized the troll from the MIT site (long story for another day) and began the usual troll trouncing to get IT to spew the usual and it worked. Trolls are so predictable. After this, along comes Dean.

I am sick and tired of lefty/liberals proclaiming that the murderer Timothy McVeigh was Chritian. In reality McVeigh was agnostic his entire life right up until his execution when he asked for last rites to be given by a Catholic priest.

That does not support the notion that McVeigh was Christian.

Apparently halle burton you will believe anything the MSM projects as truth. Years as a professed agnostic doesn't suddenly disappear when a person asks for last rites prior to his execution.

Islam is NOT a religion....certainly NOT a religion of peace. Comparing the two shows how ignorant you are of reality.

Islam is an abomination and pure evil.

Halle burton you are wrong on many levels. Do your research and try, if you can, not using left wing tp's.

Not to be outdone, Halle Burton opines:

Dean, could you expand upon McVeigh's ties to Elohim City and its ties to the Covenant, Sword, and Arm of the Lord and then tell us that no one religion gets used and abused by the its extremists?

Too much, isn't IT? Enter Ben:

Terrorism is not an abuse of 'slime, it is an intrinsic sacrament, as witness 3:151, 8:12, 33:26-27 59:2 & Sahih Bukhari 4.52.220.

Sanctified by Allah, commanded by Allah, practiced & bragged about by Muhammad. Truth trumps, idiot!!!

And this isn't even the "good part"!! The good part comes when SFBert joins the fracas.

Ah Halle, the problem is this: in all those groups you mentioned, they can't come up with 1,500 hard-core supporters (even though they would like everyone to think there are more of them out there) but there are 150 million Jihadists in the Muslim world. And to understand what that means, one has to become a student of violence -- that is, what can a group achieve with it and what means of dispensation of it must be used. Other than the Japanese Kamikazes, no other group ever so willingly gives themselves to death to kill those they consider enemies. Those the Communists and Nazis celebrated for suicidal deaths were as a rule trapped with no way out in no-quarter given fights. General military history will not teach you about this. Studying the actions of individual heroes and of small unit fights will. That's why so few of those who have ever engaged in small unit actions are ever given opportunity to have input into rules of engagement or to treat with codifying the laws of war.

And Halle Burton said, "What?" To hide ITS ignorance, the syrup comes out only to be led to the slaughter.

SFBert, nice to hear from you again. I always respect and appreciate your thoughtful and insightful responses. You have a military background perspective that sheds light into an area I don't have first hand knowledge.

As to small groups, not unlike the 15 Saudis and 4 other hijackers on 9/11, it doesn't take many individuals to have a much larger impact. And, with small groups that can be anywhere, hiding in plain sight, doesn't it call for a different approach than using a unilateral, conventional military approach? To quote from Star Wars:

Princess Leia: The more you tighten your grip, Tarkin, the more star systems will slip through your fingers.

Even there, a small band of rebels was able to overcome a militarily superior power.

Too much, really. IT admits not having knowledge yet posts with that air of superiority when IT should merely STFU and STFD. IT goes off into the SciFi realm, to a situation that hasn't happened and more than likely won't...not in our lifetimes. This is a typical distraction technique utilized by lost trolls when they know they have wandered into an area that makes no quarter and has no mercy on purposeful stupidity, theoretically on a mission to change others to their way of thinking. That is pretty close to the very definition of insanity. SFBert continues:

Halle, I think you are on the verge of understanding. For example, both Nazis and Bolsheviks composed about 3% of their respective nations when they took power. They did it by violently killing those who actively opposed them, silencing those who opposed them less aggressively, and as for the rest, they led them into their camp with lies and promises. But the critical mass, the numbers of people needed to achieve change, was never that large. But those few were disciplined, ruthless, patient, and they never got distracted from their goals. In truth, neither the Nazis nor the Bolsheviks were really very strongly opposed though some from each group were thrown into prison and later released to continue to do evil. Neither the Weimar Republic nor Czarist Russia ruthlessly opposed those bent on destroying them.

Many of us believe that the Islamists now have reached the critical mass to win in most of the places they inhabit except that they lack the technical resources of the West to execute their plans. So they engage in asymmetrical warfare (used to be called unconventional warfare) to press their agenda.

If you're with me so far, follow my next post.

IT wasn't and SFBert knew that, having had this SAME conversation MANY times before at the previously mentioned MIT site. SFBert continues:

Part II to Halle:

Now how does one oppose such a group of fanatics? Historically the ones that succeeded were totally and absolutely ruthless and gave no quarter. Alexander the Great is an example. Kenghis Khan is another. In the West with our liberal traditions (liberal not being a bad word here), we respect human life whether it is good or bad and we base our ethics, laws, and expecations of conduct on those mores. But we again face an enemy who has no rules to fetter them in combat and whose definition of combat ranges blends with criminality. In WWII, one correspondent who witnessed the aftermath of a fight between a German company and one platoon of 101st paratroopers was appaled at the efficiency with which a small number of Americans literally wiped out a larger number of enemy. He asked the question," How can those killers in baggy pants ever be allowed to return home? How can they ever be allowed to be around our children and our daughters?" One soldier told him he should have been around during the fight and he would have understood. "Better we go home to your daughters than those dead SOB's over there." And when they went home, most of those soldiers left what the did behind and returned to normal living because that is what was expected of them.

It is not like that now. Society needs killers. (Not murderers. There's a difference.) But our society has evolved to where we don't appreciate those that can act against an enemy. They wish that our enemies could just be taken in custody and that they can later be released as changed persons. Won't happen. And so our laws, our rules of engagement, our policies are determined by what we believe we would do if we were in the enemies' shoes and we ignore the nature of our enemies. And we innoculate our children to loathe the warriors left among us and we count on them keeping the barbarians at bay even as we castigate them for what they and their leaders try to do. If you think I am being pessimistic, I am not. I am being a realist. Did you know that there are over 10,000 lawyers assigned to the Pentagon (JAG's and civilian)? We've ritualized war while the enemy hasn't. Going to the Star Wars mythos -- how would things have turned out if Leia and the rest were killed as soon as they fell in the Imperial troopers hands? The major lesson I brought back from Vietnam was this -- technology only trumps the guys in sandals, boots, or whatever for a while. Will eventually wins over tech.

Halle really gets all excited when IT gets all of this attention but, we all know that and as Spree so often says, stupidity cannot go unanswered. Reenter Ben:

Down to brass tacks, Bert. The conflict is existential; a death match. Us or them. One side gets exterminated. Which one?

Not my side, by God!! The Muslims prefer death over life; they seek it. Give it to them!!!

We will not win without the will and resolve to rid the world of Islam. In the last 1384 years, nobody has found that will and resolve. We'd better God blessed well find it before the Mujahideen match up nuclear weapons with delivery systems.

This is predator vs. prey, and Islam is the predator. Snakes can not convert from eating rabbits to eating grass. Today, at Snooper's I posted about Shrub's latest lie about Islam. I included a hadith wherein Muhammad cursed Muslims who would abandon Jihad and take up agriculture.

Anyone who gives a blessing, who cares about human life & liberty and the success and survival of the excellent experiment our founders began 230 years ago should go read that post and use the links therein contained to read the entire Qur'an & Hadith. Find out what Islam is, what it does and why.

Halle must be doing a Linda Blair at right about that point. Renter SFBert:

Ben, it is a fight to the death. What most folks don't want to accept is that the costs to fight now are low compared to what they are going to be later. They cry," It's too much. Bring them home!" Horsepatuties. The fight is coming our way anyhow and at least for now, we have time to start educating the few that can learn and the fewer that have the courage to understand what will have to be done. If they think that we will be worse than our enemies for fighting like our lives depend on it, they haven't seen the videos of women being shot in soccer stadiums, of them being buried and stoned to death, of men being beheaded because they happened to be teachers who allowed Buddhists in their classes, etc. There's a world of difference between being ruthless against those who wish us harm and being ruthless against those who have no wish to harm us nor have the means to do so. But I am afraid that we lack the institutional courage to be ruthless. The cost to us later will be great.

AMEN. Where did Halle Burton go? There was some more troll trouncing waiting for the usual moonbat freak out and it is soon coming. SFBert adds:

All -- Halle's comments and discussion was very timely. Although the MSM didn't cover the final result, the recent Article 32 hearing at Ft. Bragg is a perfect case to demostrate my point. Two Green Beret snipers shot a master bomb builder. Two investigations of the shooting by the Army call it justified. This was not good enough for Lt.Cdr. Douglas Velvel who is the JAG advisor to Lt.Gen. Francis Kearney,who was commander of special operations for Central Command. Kearney writes a memo to proceed with an Article 32 against Cpt. Dave Staffel and MSG Troy Anderson because no one at Ft. Bragg and Special Operations Command wanted to indict these guys for murder. Velvel knows the charges are wrong so he won't sign the charges himself. Instead he orders an enlisted man to sign the charges. When the hearing convenes, Velvel refuses to appear to explain why the snipers were charge excusing himself as Gen. Kearney's legal advisor. When the hearing concludes the charges are thrown out. This is not generally reported by the media.Gen. Kearney then states that the system worked, that now all know this was a good shoot because they were cleared by an Article 32 hearing. Of course, the guys went into big time debt to get attorneys to defend themselves from these false charges. Both state they will continue soldiering. But their compadres have other thoughts. If they are going to have to go through this every time they are in a shoot, they wonder if it is worth engaging the enemy.

The Marines at Haditha are another example.

The fools in the Democrat Party, other leftists, and the fools in government and the MSM do what they do and then expect that they will be protected in the long run by those they try to personally ruin for doing what we ask them to do??? I had a similiar experience myself many years ago. My reply was that I could ask my men to die for their country but I could not ask them to go to jail for their country. And this is what has seeped into our military as a result of our culture.

As a police officer I have had to go to grand juries for my shootings. I expected to. But I purchased legal insurance for those situations and accepted this as part of my employment.

Can we ask our men and women in the Armed Forces to give up their homes or give up their kids college savings just because they do what neccessity and duty demand that they do? If so, then we are too stupid to continue as a nation and we need to start over.

Does one stupid action by one of our commanders harm us? Kearney is now Deputy Commander of U.S. Special Operations Command. That means he now influences not just CENTCOM, but all our Special Operations Forces -- Green Berets, Rangers, Seals, etc.

If you were one of the elite troops, what would be running through your mind next time you were sent out to do a mission? I can tell you it is running through their minds and few $100,000 re-enlistment bonuses for Green Berets offset the possiblity of doing a...(the remainder was truncated and was cut off)

Here IT comes. The head stopped spinning from all of the above factual references from those that know and, right on cue, the troll just has to spew the usual Code Pepto Dismal, ANSWER and other anti-American hooey. Enter mental midget Halle Burton:

Who'd thunk it, that, on a pastor's blog titled 'Do the Right Thing' there would be so much support for what would amount to a policy of genocide. Will the future be us trying to kill as many of 'them' as possible while 'they' are trying to kill as many of us as possible, with neither being able to kill every last one of the other? Is this the best scenario that humanity can create here on earth?

I'd like to hear Pastor Ed's thoughts on Matthew 5, including the "love your enemies," should be understood in this context.

Having been thoroughly trounced, taken to the woodshed and being incapable of refuting anything, it regurgitates the usual vile nonsense and then tries to distract...move the conversation away from ITS own self-dug pit of obscurity. ITS comments are totally irrelevant at this point. SFBert, trying to console the wounded moonbat:

Halle: Who is advocating genocide? I've been reviewing the posts and don't see that. What I see (at least on my posts) is the advocacy for terminal action against those who are actively wanting to destroy us. And what does the future hold? My friends and I have a grim vision of an almost apocalyptic struggle in the future because we, the West, did not do what was neccessary to defend ourselves while the threat was young and immature. We are allowing it to get legs (on top of the 1500 years it has already had to do so) and are allowing it to demonstrate to Muslims that are sitting on the fence that they are winning, that they are the future, and that we are incapable of defending ourselves. One has to be around to strive for the Christian ideal. You can't if you're dead or if you have been forcibly converted to the Muslim ideal. And if you are a moderate Muslim, you aren't going to be to eager to proclaim your tolerance if your neighbors have an OK from God and temporal authorities to cut your head off if you do it. I think you know this. My question to you is why do you ascribe your virtues to Jihadists?

They are neither compassionate, nor tolerant, nor do they seek discussion as a means of ironing out differences. Holy cow! Remember 9/11. Remember how celebrated some hijackers were because they had the "strength" to cut the throats of a couple of stewardesses.

OOPS! There's those damn facts again...reality and "stuff". More facts from SFBeret:

From the book "The Navigation Log" by Martin Corrick 2002 Random House:

"...Around him was a broad grassy airfield, above was an open sky, yet the possession of these simple freedoms required formality and discipline of an inflexible kind..."

It is a story of twin brothers who flew in the Battle of Britain. One who died in the Battle. When pairs of fighters were directed against German formations there was plenty of opportunity between the earth and the sky to avoid the Germans and little criticism would fall to the pilots who were unable to vector in. But each pilot knew his duty and knew that their country, their people, and the better civilization needed them to make contact and train their guns on the Germans and kill them. They did so and they won.

This Halle, is what we are are getting away from. And it is not good.

To serve to fight, but to escape the duty to fight under the guise of legalities and concern about popular opinion, is why the bad guys will advance and those who we need to be our allies will avoid our friendship. We succeed where we show determination. We fail where we show what their culture perceives as weakness. It has been a long fight as far as wars go and it will continue on for much longer, but your side has made it so by the rules it imposes on the warriors who fight it.

Sigh. Alas! IT cannot help but try to recover and in the process, digs ITS hole deeper.

Bert, regarding genocide;

Ben wrote, "The conflict is existential; a death match. Us or them. One side gets exterminated. Which one?

Not my side, by God!! The Muslims prefer death over life; they seek it. Give it to them!!!"

You replied, "Ben, it is a fight to the death."

Roger chimed in with, "Right on Ben! Luvya!"

The sentiment here, unless I'm mistaken, is that the Muslims will kill all non-Muslims that don't convert to Islam; therefore, they need killing first. This smacks of collective punishment; whereby, because of the actions of a small, radicalized segment of a religion numbering in excess of a billion people, the final solution is the elimination of every last one.

Did I misconstrue?

Yes, IT did and IT knows it. IT still will not accept the cold hard facts of Islam. IT digs deeper, emitting the stench of superiority to hide ITS own inferiority:

Bert, you also asked about my ascribing my virtues to the jihadists. Was that what I was doing? Are we able to take on an adversary without descending to their barbarism? If we have to become like our enemy in order to defeat them, then what have we gained? Look at the other posts Pastor Ed added today about more gun violence in schools. Why is our society so violence-obsessed: that the way to deal with things too often ends this way? As a law enforcement professional, you must see this everyday.

On one level, I sure you are right about fighting and how to fight; and, I'm looking at this from a more philosophical perspective. Could this country be defeated from without by Islamic fanatics? I doubt it. Could this country be defeated from within by surrendering our rights, our freedoms and everything that makes us unique in the pursuit of security? Likely, yes.

SFBert explains:

Halle: Those who want us dead must be made dead first. The lesson that I am trying my hardest to teach is that because one fights will all their soul, and all their will, and all their means does not make us like the enemy. I have tried to use examples of the paratroopers and the RAF pilots. They did what they had to when they had to, but when the enemy was crushed and they returned to their normal lives, they were restored to being regular people and didn't absorb the blood lust of battle into their daily lives. Our enemies blood lust IS part of their daily lives. I can't make it any clearer. I have been in battle where it was a close thing as to whether we were going to win or not. I can't describe the horror and the freezing up of people who suddenly realize that there is a real possibility of losing. These were people who smugly believed because they wore U.S. Army on their uniforms that we would always win. It is one reason that the Army in its institutional wisdom placed people like me among their newbies. And I look around and see a world of Americans who don't understand we can lose and won't until the horror of it is only an arms length away. And they'll freeze and be totally useless because they never understood what the fight was about or what it would require. No, I was not a general. I never had more than a battalion. But I know to my bones that any fight is won by a single soldier next to his buddy who does what he has to do not just to stay alive, but to destroy the enemy he faces. I understand a battle not as a company vs. a company. I understand it as 216 guys vs. 216 guys. And it is why my guys always won. But I can't take you into battle to teach you that. But you have to first get it out of your head that we can always win. That is arrogance and good soldiers (no matter what derogatory names they call their enemies) will always credit their enemies for being at least as good as they are and recognize their strenghts. The individual US fighter's strength is belief in what he is protecting. His weakness is the leftist saturation of the media, academe, and government which is always ready to give him up because they have never had harm befall them and believe it never will.

The "chatter" goes on and the conversation turns to another subject but IT is still out of ITS league.

I brought y'all all of this so you can read the original post and see how the opposition, after falling to facts of which they cannot refute, instead of admitting defeat and/or ignorance and expressing an interest to learn more of that which we face, they move onto another subject which they feel more comfortable in.

So, remember this lesson in Leftinistra gorilla tactics and do not let it take away from the topic at hand.

dlawbaily Nominated For The Douchebagistan Award

Listen to this little whiner whine...the worm from the KOSmonoff Fruit Loop Brigade. I can always recognize a loser and I can smell them clicks and clicks away. Listen to the moron prattle on, proving IT has no earthly idea of that which it rambles.

This fatally flawed anti-Americanist, dwbaily, has the mind of a mental midget and from ITS verbiage so venomously spewed, IT must of had a horrible childhood. I can understand why IT was so disliked in ITS younger years.

This pathetic wannabe whatever, dared attack LT Pete Hegseth which runs the very successful and prominent Pro Troop organization Vets For Freedom of which I am a member and am very active in this fine organization. We are Patriots, unlike the doltish cads of the likes of the KOSmonoffs, Code Pinkish Fools and Skanks.

Uncle Jimbo initializes the volley:

WOW! I just read one of the sorriest, and I mean that both in the low character and poor execution meanings, hit pieces I have ever read (h/t LGF) . Some pissant has decided that Pete Hegseth of Vets for Freedom is the anti-christ and has cobbled together a classic conspiracist take on Pete and his evil handlers. This clown even decides it's worth playing the phony soldiers card, I mean now this has progressed from a lie about what Rush said, to an accepted fake but accurate urban myth, to just a smear against a vet who has honorably served.

[...]

Amazing isn't it. Sore losers always ramble on with such diatribes based on useless emotional discharges. Poor trolls for the KOSmonoffs. It is going to be just swell trouncing these fools into the primordial ooze from whence they slithered.

Uncle Jimbo continues with the "affect":

[...]

Remember back when the bastards at least lied about supporting the troops. We knew it was horse shite, but at least they had the decency to know they were wrong for hating the military. Now the facade has been abandoned and the hate that was there all along is out front for everyone to see. The left is working itself into a frenzy as the true believers are not being satisfied. They are not getting the defeat they voted for; they are not getting any impeachments; they are not getting a cut and run; they are having to listen to that lying traitor Betrayus; and they have had enough of having to talk nice about those baby-killing bastards.

[..]

Roger that LT! This is truly pathetic in that this tethered attack is nothing more than a loser's whine. It is equally fantastic in that their "udder" hatred of our military, unless members of the sad-sacked Whiners' Brigade of the defunct and yellow group called Vets for Peace are being talked about, and how guttural they will become when the end is near.

Here is the "kicker", exposing the useless punk twit at the Daily KOSmonoff ramblings:

But whatever personal treasure.......he may have left behind, Hegseth was not going just anywhere. He was going to the "IRON RAKKASANS" – 3rd Battalion, One-Hundred and First Got-Dam Airborne. The only airborne unit to have served in every American war since its inception. Storied. Heroic. Odd.

No, not the Rakkasans, of course. Just a little odd that he joined them. Because I’m adding up the months....hmm....Where did the Airborne training come in? Parachutist’s badge? Certainly not Ranger school. Advanced infantry training? Because the Rakkasans are a pretty hard-core airborne group, so, you’d think that a combat lieutenant.....

Did you catch it? No? Yes? Is this pathetic worm stupid or what?

OK. Here is the "clue". shhhhhhhhhhh! Don't tell the lying sack of crap that ITS mommy's milk is sour. I was going to rephrase with my own words but Uncle Jimbo says it "Rather" nicely. My verbiage was rated "R".

Except that the 101st "got-dam" Airborne isn't Airborne you cheese eating surrender monkey. It's chock full of legs who dangle by ropes from helicopters. If you even know what a "leg" is...

When moronic left wing loofas try their hand at military topics, they just look like moronic left wing loofas.

LOL!! Loofas!! LOL!!

My Troll's Blog!

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!! Poor slog.

IT has laid claim that IT has some very popular blog. Behold:

Sample Right Wing nut job stuff 14 days ago in Heretical Musings · Authority: 1

I took the links out but the data can be found at Technorati here: note the "authority"

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

General Petraeus Writes A Letter To The Troops

Straight from the General's pen to The Troops he leads to Victory...





Like Michelle says...I guess the Dems will start calling this the “Bush letter.”

On Troll Trouncing

The self-professed "more left than the leftists" and self-confessed Jihadi Troll has been denied access to and membership in the Patriots for Conservative Values. Imagine that. Such a loser this one is.

8-20-2007 3:52 am	from bob@replicaprops.com
Im interested in learning how we are going to prevent the dems from taking the white house from us. I want to know which republican has the best chance of beating Clinton
Action: Approve Deny Delete None

8-20-2007 3:58 am	from satorisport@hotmail.com
taxes, immigration, gun rights
Action: Approve Deny Delete None

8-20-2007 3:55 am	from redfox_1969@hotmail.com
Looking for like-minded Americans to promote conservative values among all levels of government leadership.
Action: Approve Deny Delete None

More "applications":

8-20-2007 4:05 am	from nmlifestyles@charter.net
I believe that the Constitution is the "rule of law" I believe in the literal interpretations of the "bill of rights" I believe that it is everyones Patriotic duty to be involved I don't believe there's ever been a situation that's been that bad that when government gets involved it doesn't get worse! THANX! Chris Lawton Greer, SC 864-325-6400
Action: Approve Deny Delete None

8-20-2007 3:37 am	from sifu78704@gmail.com
Relevant - 1. Get the Government out of my life! 2. Stop feeding the Military Industrial Complex! 3. Get these fake conservatives out of here! 4. The Constitution! Irrelevant - 1. Abortion 2. Gay marriage 3. The so-called "Christian Right".
Action: Approve Deny Delete None

8-20-2007 3:37 am	from joe.blocken@gmail.com
Action: Approve Deny Delete None

******************************

****************************************************************************

Here's the letter he sent when "turned down" as "sifu":

You people are a bunch of sad individuals.

I'm a Marine veteran of the Gulf war,... so tell me what's the fucking
problem?

Are you "Pastor Ed"? Are you the idiot with the sanity problem?

You better get on your knees and pray to your white superman-like god
for some courage and sense!

Patriots for conservative values.... give me a fucking break! Go read
the Constitution and the Bill of Rights for the first time!

We're taking this country back! Either the easy way or the hard way;
it's all up to "patriots" like you!

I wonder.. will you be on the front lines when it all goes down?

Freedom Fighter

"I swear upon the alter of God eternal hostitlity against all forms of
tyranny over the mind of man!" - Thomas Jefferson

*******************************************************************************************
Ladies, and Gents, following Bert's advice is bringing out some real nastiness from this guy--and some real desperation to get some attention from us. Hang tight, don't respond, no matter how tempted, keep moderating comments and banning IP's...I expect we'll start getting more IP's to ban any day now, because he's just not used to going this long without a response.

The sad sack just doesn't understand that ITS lies don't go unnoticed one bit. NEVER has IT gotten ITS "stories" straight. Pathological liars act in such manners.

Poor troll...

Salon Takes A Stab At Truth

Clearly, this leftist rag called Salon and useless dissemination of logic is "Rather" wanting in substance, clarity and truth. It is nearly so sad as to approach a twisted humor.

This "interview" and "explanations" thereof are clearly the rantings of a child that has lost an argument with its betters.

Glenn Greenwald(o) of Salon would have "us" believe that the now considered "infamous" by the rapid-rat Leftinistra Op-Ed from two "war-critics" was total nonsense because one of the authors has stated that he really isn't a war critic. That is not even debatable. It is apparent that Salon is having an anxiety attack in that it just may be shown that they are, once again, on the wrong side of an issue, as are the Leftinistra socialist syncopates on a regular and reliable basis. If anything is bad for American Tradition Values than it must be a good thing for the Socialist Prattling Salon Leftist Rag.

The Leftist Greenwald(o), a socialist sympathizer and supporter of the socialist aspirants to the presidency of the United States, in this article(?) whines about WMDs and the usual prattling of a whining, sniveling spoiled brat.

Greenwald(o) goes on and explains that these men weren't war critics because they did not demand withdrawal of troops. HEY! MORON! I DIDN'T DEMAND THE WITHDRAWAL EITHER YET I WAS CRITICAL OF THE WAR IN REGARDS TO THE ROE ISSUE!

Where do these people hide their brain matter? Never mind. Disregard last transmission.

I suggest to Greenwald(o) to actually do ITS own homework (but trolls hate doing their own). IT can start here and here and here and here and here and here and here and here and here and here and here and here, to name a few.

This article at Salon and the plethora of others across this land is indicative of the shoe being placed on the other foot. The more they whine about VICTORY the more they prove that BUSH WAS RIGHT.

The more they subject themselves to their own stupidity and BDS, the better for America because the majority of we Americans are finding it "Rather" comical that the obscure moonbat trolls, such as those which write for the likes of Salon and similar leftist rags, each slip further and further into the ditches of obscurity and insignificance.



The buzz here

ATTENTION TO ALL TROLLS, MOONBATS AND LEFTINISTRA!!

And to the Leftinistra...you have had your fun in the sun...and you have once again, failed miserably.

Here is my suggestion to you all, henceforth and forever more...