Another Third Political Party
The Centre Party a U.S. Political Party
I do so solemnly swear that the United States of America is in dire straights in regards to the political machinations of the Democratic and Republican Parties. Neither Party leadership really has a clue. They have been sucked into the quagmire of jockeying for Command and Control that they have forgotten about "We The People". They spend MUCH of their time...way too much time...pandering to the fruit loops that espouse the ideals of ANSWER and Code Pinko type organizations that CLEARLY are proponents of a hybrid mix of Socialism and Communism and I have so dubbed and coined the phrase...Socio-Communal Despotists. I hereby declare exclusive ownership and copyrights and originality of said term, so published on this day, 8/2/2007. However, feel free to use it.
~SIDE BAR: Other terms I have coined and made widely known are Leftinistra and Lame Stream Media. These are MY terms that I "invented" which are used near and far and RIGHTfully so. Anyone and anybody can use the terms.
Another term I "invented" is MANGINA. Email me if you don't know what that means and you cannot figure it out on your own. END SIDE BAR~
As the title to this post so implies,I am in search of a viable third party. In my side bar on the main page of this blog, there is a section called "Third Parties". I have included this particular party called The Centre Party. As in the other two that I have listed, I have issues with them.
I will begin by posting their "Adopted Points" and I shall comment on each.
Points adopted that no political party will discuss:
First off...SPELL CHECK! If you are going to come across as a viable "join me" entity, hire a professional proof-reader. At least I have an excuse. 4 of my fingers don't work so well anymore.
Beyond that, I have one issue with Point 1. Who gets to define what a "rouge entity" is? This will need to be explored further and properly annotated.
SPELL CHECK!!! Judas Priest, man!Issue. Eminent Domain my ass. Dump the whole concept in the Boston Harbor where it belongs with the rest of the tea. Abandon the entire thought process. If the government wants or needs the property, they can pay the going fair market value, IF the owners WANT to sell. If not, either up the ante or move on. Confiscation of personal property is unacceptable under any condition.
Exact same comment in regards to Point 2, plus one more. There is NO significant proof or scientific or medical documentation that power lines give you cancer. Damn.
Agreed. Besides, they are "fugly". First Point I can accept entirely.
Are you serious? Dump Point 5. LOL!! Damn!
Who is your writer? And who is coming up with these lame "points"? Dump #6. It sounds like a pet peeve and governance cannot ever be developed over pet peeves. Get over it.
This is getting ridiculous. Who are you people? Methinks this isn't a "real" party here. Sounds like someone hates faxes and junk mail and is trying to start the No Fax Or Junk Mail Party.
Agreed. Due diligence is indeed called for. I wonder if they use fax machines.
Is your writer an American or is this all a joke?
Anyway. Agreed...as soon as the proof-reader gets finished.
In essence, agreed. However, further discussion must render a clear and concise manner and not this babbling-brook diatribe.
You started out OK but digressed into something I have no definition for or of. Government cannot dictate ethics. Dump Point 11.
Results of "study" is as follows...I am STILL looking for a viable Third Political Party. This one ain't it.OK. Good and bad. Who pays the tab? And people are responsible for their own actions and not the companies that provide a service for responsible people.
Fully articulate your talking points or quit while you are ahead.
Please hire a spell-check team. Thanks for the effort though.





