Treason In Vermont...UPDATED

~Snooper~

BDS runs deep in Vermont in these trying times. It seems a bearded fellow from Brattleboro wants President Bush and Vice-President Cheney arrested should they ever step foot in the backwoods township.

It seems that the targets of the BDS have violated the United States Constitution in some way yet this "declaration" is what has violated the United States Constitution. Go figure. Another moonbat Double Standard.

A group in Brattleboro is petitioning to put an item on a town meeting agenda in March that would make Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney subject to arrest and indictment if they visit the southeastern Vermont community.

"This petition is as radical as the Declaration of Independence, and it draws on that tradition in claiming a universal jurisdiction when governments fail to do what they're supposed to do," said Kurt Daims, 54, a retired machinist leading the drive.

As president, Bush has visited every state except Vermont.

The town meeting, an annual exercise in which residents gather to vote on everything from fire department budgets to municipal policy, requires about 1,000 signatures to place a binding item on the agenda.

The measure asks: "Shall the Selectboard instruct the Town Attorney to draft indictments against President Bush and Vice President Cheney for crimes against our Constitution, and publish said indictment for consideration by other municipalities?" [...]

How about we round these poor and pathetic wastes of human flesh and ship them to Iran? It never ceases to amaze me how these types of anti-Americanists never list the alleged crimes against the Constitution. Do they even know of which they yammer?

From The Jawa Report

As the Surge continues to work as planned desperate lunatic fringe lefties get more and more idiotic. [...]

[...] Without the will and wherewithal (and luck, or, perhaps, a beneficent Providence) to enforce the Declaration of Independence, the Founding Fathers would have gone down in history as traitors to the Crown.

Kurt's little hissy fit is simply treason, without any noble purpose.

Stupid syrup-sucking stump jumper.

Spot on.

Catch the wave
And then some

see Rook's Rant

[UPDATE] Ray Robison has a must see video and "special" commentary. I was going to place it here but go there instead. The pics and vid explain the commentary.

mm.com here.

More here: some folks are late

Vermont's Most Wanted
Arresting the President? Impeachment?
Extreme BDS watch: Vermont group wants to overthrow the Bush administration
Welcome To Vermont, Now Off To The Hague
IN THE REALM OF EMOTION: Planet Hysteria
Activists want Bush, Cheney subject to arrest
It's called treason, folks.
Activists in Vermont town want Bush, Cheney subject to arrest
A Walking Call to Impeach Bush Arrives in the East Village

Finally! Impeachment Explained

~Snooper~

In an article in the Seattle PI, a moonbat comes out and reveals what the Fruit Loop Brigades of the Insignificant anti-Americanists are demanding. The article was written by the bleating Linda Boyd.

The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors. -- Article II, Section 4 [...]

It is apparent that the child can read. However, the application of what one has read is so off base and out of touch, it reveals a 100% non-understanding of that which the child read. Wishful thinking doesn't make a lie truth.

[...] On Nov. 6, Rep. Dennis Kucinich introduced articles of impeachment against Vice President Dick Cheney on the floor of the House of Representatives. For one shining moment the will of the majority of Americans and the promise of this nation's founders were truly represented.

The detailed charges were solemnly read from the House podium and televised on C-Span. House Democratic Leader Steny Hoyer made a motion to table the bill. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi lobbied hard for votes to table.

In a stunning turnaround, House Republicans changed strategy and voted decisively to prevent tabling the impeachment resolution. [...]

This is a shining example of politicians in a terrified frenzy that they are going to lose and lose hard come election season 2008. The Republicans and quite a few Democrats wanted to have the debate once and for all to be this ignorant chant to bed and permanently. The cowards of the Leftinistra didn't want a debate. They were counting on tabling the diatribe knowing bloody well that it is a non-issue and the measure would die.

I was so hoping for the debate but the cowards ran away from the fight...that "IS" what cowards do, you know.

Please take note of the lack of substantiation in the article. The poor child states that "momentum is building" for impeachment as the measure has died, as was the original intent anyway. The only momentum that is building is that Conservative Tsunami that will sweep this creep, liar and idiot into the Abyss of Obscurity IT so richly deserves.

Here are the "charges" based on rhetoric and non-factual events:

The vice president is accused of: [...]

By whom? The measure is dead...killed by the very individuals that drew it up. Oh. Wait. They have a history of being for something and then being against it lest they be found out as political morons that we already know they are.

[...] purposely manipulating intelligence to fabricate a threat of Iraqi weapons of mass destruction in order to justify an attack on Iraq; [...]

This poor fool never read the Iraq War Resolution. Neither does it recall the former President's admissions:

"When I left office, there was a substantial amount of biological and chemical material unaccounted for. That is, at the end of the first Gulf War, we knew what he had. We knew what was destroyed in all the inspection processes and that was a lot. And then we bombed with the British for four days in 1998. We might have gotten it all; we might have gotten half of it; we might have gotten none of it. But we didn't know. So I thought it was prudent for the president to go to the U.N. and for the U.N. to say you got to let these inspectors in, and this time if you don't cooperate the penalty could be regime change, not just continued sanctions." -- Bill Clinton, July 22, 2003

And, we have the blithering fools waffling and backpedaling on that which they proclaimed so idiots like Linda Boyd can make absolute fools of themselves on a regular basis. How soon the poor trolls forget the pre-Iraq War speeches made here, here and here, that the VAST MAJORITY of CONgress agreed to...until election time.

[...] deceiving Congress about an alleged relationship between Iraq and al-Qaida; [...]

And this was determined, how? I guess the ignorant moonbat doesn't know that AQ was in Iraq before we even got there...the second time.

[...] threatening aggression against the Republic of Iran, absent any real threat to the United States [...]

Threatening aggression? Wow. Absent any real threat to the US? Wow. Nothing like living in a cave, eh? Truly pathetic.

[...] illegal war, in violation of both international treaty and the Constitution [...]

Validation? Illegal war? Chapter and verse? Crickets? International Treaty? And the Constitution? Where are the validations for such tripe?

[...] widespread domestic wiretapping in violation of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, a felony. Bush already has admitted to this [...]

Congress made it law, silly. Please keep up with the issues.

You get the general idea here. This is so typical of the Pathology of A Moonbat it is painfully funny. Moonbats are high on emotion and zero balance of facts.

Catch the wave:

From The Astute Bloggers:

It is growing increasingly clear that the Marxist Nutroot left is becoming more and more the dominant force in the Democrat party. The increasing heat from the MoveOn.org Left to actually try and impeach Bush and Cheney is obviously a sign that the party's leadership is losing control of this runaway train. Is the self-destructiveness of the Democrats a positive development politically for Republicans? Sure it is. [...]

Michelle Malkin welcomes the proceedings and in a way I agree. It will only further our cause and the Abyss of Obscurity would be filled faster with the pathetic bones of the anti-Americanists.

More from A Newt One on this issue is here.

Gina Cobb writes here:

The Conservative Tsunami just got taller.

Even Nancy Disapproves of Nancy

~Snooper~

Then, just why in the hell is the Socialist Nanny Nancy still there? She has admitted to failure.

The world cannot wait. IMPEACH NOW!

The Leftinistra (Democrats)...An International Embarrassment - Rubber Chicken Award Issued

The Daily Kos proves the point here.

Don Surber straightens the KOSmonoffs out:

'Dennis Kucinich is on a quest of his own. He sees flying saucers and he acts like one, too'

That's from Alcee Hastings. Suffice it to say, Democratic leaders are pissed at Dennis for bringing up impeachment

I love it. Fox News is reporting that the Democratic leaders in Congress are seething over Dennis Kucinich for dragging impeachment onto the political stage.

Kucinich is an embarrassment to the party. He's like the Crazy Aunt who spills all the family secrets.

They want him to go back into the attic.

Republicans are handing him a megaphone. Spill, Auntie Dennis, spill.

Democratic Congressman Alcee Hastings had the line of the day. Hastings was impeached as a federal judge over bribery before he was elected to Congress, where bribery is called campaign contributions.

Irony, Dennis Kucinich barely survived a recall vote midway through his one 2-year term as mayor of Cleveland in the 1970s.

Hastings told Fox News: "Dennis Kucinich is on a quest of his own. He sees flying saucers and he acts like one, too." [...]

Gateway Pundit, The Weekly Standard and Michelle Malkin explain reality to UFO Boy...

Amy Proctor has this choice gem:

[...]I'm a federal contractor here at Fort Leavenworth, KS. I see first hand, day in and day out, the damage the Congress' lolly-gagging does on real business. We don't have the funds to buy necessary materials and equipment to function. This is the most effective and ethical Congress in history? I don't think so. It's the most retarded. I'd suggest Congress stop pretending to work hard and actually start doing it, for all our sakes, particularly in the military. They say they support the troops but won't pass military appropriations bills. Well, Democratic Congressmen, military families are waiting. [...]

Exactly so. I will add that the singularly WORSE "majority" led CONgress in the history of the United States, finds it to be a good thing to waste tax payers funds chasing UFOs, strawmen and shadow boxing. And they dare whine about GWB's approval ratings. Pathetic.

The Newsblobbers drivel the usual idiocy.

One of the Loons at 'Loon, Rebecca Traister regurgitates the Hate Speech we are all accustomed to from some imps:

[...] You are lying to yourselves. In a quest for an "electable," "not insane" presidential candidate, you are willfully overlooking the candidate who actually comes closest to representing the things in which you really believe: justice and peace and the basic freedoms that should be afforded to every American, regardless of race, class, religion, gender, sexual orientation or galactic origin. In an effort to distance yourself from the squish of the Birkenstock and the stench of the patchouli, you have convinced yourself that compromise and pragmatism light the path to the White House. And you are correct. But still, before walking listlessly down the aisle toward our impending union with tepid centrism, let's rip our clothes off for one final, ill-advised fling with ideological honesty. [...]

ROFLMAO!

And, you MUST go over to Redstate!!

Sister Toldjah:

[...] Why won't they press to impeach a man many of them believe is a "war criminal"? Politics, of course - which is also exactly why they haven't tried to impeach the President. They know their base would support it, but I'm sure they've done extensive polling which suggests that the rest of America doesn't support it. If they believed a majority of the American people would be on board with it, they'd be all over the Kucinich resolution in a New York minute. [...]

And, oddly enough, I agree, mostly, with Talk Left!!

Can we please look forward instead of back? I don't want to waste time trying to impeach Dick Cheney or George Bush.

Let's spend our energy trying to get a better President and Vice President in 2008.

Both parties in Congress today played games with Dennis Kucinich's impeachment bill. It now goes to the Judiciary Committee where I bet it never sees the light of day or debate. [...]

My friend Susan:

[...] Bottom line is the Republicans turned the tables on the Democrats and forced them to vote to send it to the Judiciary Committee to kill it.

Wait for the netroots reactions, I will update with them as they come in.

The nutty roots are beginning to understand what just happened. [...]

Catch the wave.

Kucinich becomes Snooper's second recipient of the Rubber Chicken Award, as initiated by my friends at Wake Up America.

Welcome, UFO Boy!

Code Brain Dead

The other day, Michelle Malkin and others informed us of the Moonbat Hunger Strike. Today, CNS News has a little blurb about it and it directs us to SFGate.

She joined a crowd of about 100 demonstrators dressed in hot pink hats, shirts and scarves and fought the wind to raise her sign: "Impeach Bush and Cheney!"

"My arms are aching, but I'm getting energy from the drivers -- so many are honking in support," she said.

Wrong, moron. They are honking because y'all are idiots and wish you would catapult yourself over the edge and plummet to the water below.

Here is what I think. Seeing that these morons have NEVER read the Constitution, they have NO business demanding impeachment of anyone. Not ONE person has come up with causation for impeachment. Not one. Oh, yes, we have moonbats that demand such action but, moonbats are the lowest life-form on the planet and have no more common sense that a dead gnat. At times,I think dead gnats have more brain power than these silly and insignificant moonbats. Personally,I think they should be placed under whale poop seeing that the stature of whale poop is the lowest one can go in the oceans of the world.

Alas! I digress. Actually, these fools, when conducting their inane hunger strikes, should be forced to go the limit. After all, this would mean more food for the rest of us and good fertilizer for a hog farm someplace.

Just a thought.

Fifteen Morons, aka Liberal Dolts

The following is an article written by JB Williams. I have never met him but I like his style and that which he writes. I don't necessarily agree 100% of the time but the differences we may have are so petty, it isn't even worth whining about.

This particular article, however, I agree with 110%. Why? Wouldn't you like to know? Perhaps, one day, when my book is approved to be written, one will understand The Why. Until then, you will have to want to know.

Please visit the web site of JB Williams.

High Crimes and Misdemeanors

The Impeachment of Vice President Cheney

Written by JB Williams

©2007 USA

Finally, a few congressional Democrats over in the peoples House have developed the backbone to actually stake their reputations and careers on the campaign rhetoric surrounding Iraq intelligence that led them to vote in favor of regime change in Iraq.

On April 24, 2007, Ohio Democrat Dennis Kucinich filed Articles of Impeachment against sitting Vice President Richard Cheney alleging unconstitutional misconduct, high crimes and misdemeanors on the basis of intentionally manipulated pre-war intelligence which resulted in both houses of congress voting overwhelmingly to authorize use of military force to depose the Hussein regime in Iraq.

Since that date, Kucinich has been joined by 11 cosponsors with 3 more looking to add their names to the bill, bringing support for Impeachment to 15 House Democrats.

Joining Kucinich are his cosponsors Rep Clay, Wm. Lacy [MO-1] - 5/1/2007, Rep Schakowsky, Janice D. [IL-9] - 5/1/2007, Rep Wynn, Albert Russell [MD-4] - 5/10/2007, Rep Clarke, Yvette D. [NY-11] - 6/6/2007, Rep Lee, Barbara [CA-9] - 6/7/2007, Rep Woolsey, Lynn C. [CA-6] - 6/7/2007, Rep Waters, Maxine [CA-35] - 6/12/2007, Rep Ellison, Keith [MN-5] - 6/28/2007, Rep Johnson, Henry C. "Hank," Jr. [GA-4] - 6/28/2007, Rep McDermott, Jim [WA-7] - 7/10/2007, Rep Moran, James P. [VA-8] - 7/10/2007, with Reps Sam Farr (CA-D), Bob Filner (CA-D) and Jesse Jackson Jr. (IL-D) looking to join the effort.

Please take a moment to make special note of each name on this list. Why, you ask?

Allow me to introduce you to the 15 dumbest individuals to ever occupy space in the United States House of Representatives, and oh, let me count the ways…

I linked the actual Articles of Impeachment above, so that you can verify my summary and document their insane ignorance for yourself. But in short, their charges revolve around the assertion that Vice President Richard Cheney misled Americans and specifically congress into supporting regime change in Iraq on the basis of false statements concerning Iraq’s Weapons of Mass Destruction, essentially doctoring intelligence to suit a predetermined agenda to depose the Hussein regime.

They make this charge on the basis that the following statements were used to trick America into war with Iraq and that these statements were all false.

"The problem is not nuclear testing; it is nuclear weapons. ... The number of Third World countries with nuclear capabilities seems to grow daily. Saddam Hussein's near success with developing a nuclear weapon should be an eye-opener for us all." - "One of the most compelling threats we in this country face today is the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. Threat assessments regularly warn us of the possibility that...Iraq...may acquire or develop nuclear weapons." - "If you don't believe...Saddam Hussein is a threat with nuclear weapons, then you shouldn't vote for me." - "Serving on the Intelligence Committee and seeing day after day, week after week, briefings on Saddam's weapons of mass destruction and his plans on using those weapons, he cannot be allowed to have nuclear weapons, it's just that simple. The whole world changes if Saddam ever has nuclear weapons." - "Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology, which is a threat to countries in the region, and he has made a mockery of the weapons-inspection process." - "We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."

The problem is that these statements were not made by Vice President Dick Cheney, though Cheney’s related statements which appear in the Articles of Impeachment were in complete alignment with each of these statements, as were the statements of so many others here and abroad.

These statements were all made by congressional Democrats, before, during and after any Bush administration assessments of an Iraq threat. Namely, in order of the quotes above, Harry Reid, Dick Durbin, John Kerry, John Edwards, Nancy Pelosi and Teddy Kennedy, all of whom have since accused the Bush administration of “lying” for making these same statements.

In fact, those of you who want to know why we are in Iraq should take a moment to watch this video which explains it so well. Here are the very statements that led congress to authorize military force to affect regime change in Iraq.

The Articles go on to make another important assertion. That Cheney (and Bush) made an effort to make a false connection between Iraq (the Hussein regime) and 9/11. Although any reader can make the connection themselves by reading the bi-partisan 911 Commission Report, page 66 to be exact, Bush and Cheney actually made no special effort to connect Hussein to 911, other than to ask the appropriate folks if there was any connection. They didn’t need to…

This Impeachment charge flies in the face of the evidence, specifically Bush’s own statement just nine days after 9/11, in which he said before the world, “Americans are asking, "Who attacked our country?” The evidence we have gathered all points to a collection of loosely affiliated terrorist organizations known as al Qaeda.” Note the missing reference to Iraq… When specifically asked in a news briefing, Bush later answered, “there is no evidence to suggest that Hussein or Iraq were in any way involved with the events of 9/11.”

Of course, Hillary Clinton said it differently, “Hussein has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members, though there is apparently no evidence of his involvement in the terrible events of September 11, 2001.”

When later asked by the press why we had to depose the Hussein regime after 9/11, Bush answered, "It is clear, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons. Should he succeed in that endeavor, he could alter the political and security landscape of the Middle East, which as we know all too well affects American security. - Now this much is undisputed.” OH – NO! Sorry, this isn’t a Bush statement. - This statement was made by Senator Hillary Clinton (D)… moments before she voted to authorize war in Iraq.

Bush actually answered that question this way, “The history, the logic and the facts lead to one conclusion: Saddam Hussein regime is a grave and gathering danger. To suggest otherwise is to hope against the evidence. To assume this regime's good faith is to bet the lives of millions and the peace of the world in a reckless gamble, and this is a risk we must not take.” - “The first time we may be completely certain he has nuclear weapons is when, God forbid, he uses one. We owe it to all our citizens to do everything in our power to prevent that day from coming.” (Note the missing words “imminent threat”)

Now – I’m not bringing this Impeachment effort and these facts to your attention because I think this political witch hunt is going anywhere. Even the 15 morons who signed on to this nonsense know that this is about as far as this initiative is going to go.

I bring this to your attention because the people have a right to know just how stupid, partisan and petty their politicians really are. This cast of fifteen fools top the list of House Representatives who are just too ignorant for their own good, much less the good of the American people. It’s time for all of them to find a career better suited to their lacking IQs. Idiots like this are dangerous with even an ounce of power.

We have heard these assertions for years now and finally, someone has put the charges and the alleged evidence on paper so that we can take a close up look at what they are alleging. In a perfect world, this bill would pass congress with 100% approval and proceed to trial without delay.

A legal trial would prove two things once and for all.

First, that Bush & Cheney took appropriate preventive (aka pre-emptive) action to ensure that terror organizations like Al Qaeda could not acquire raw weapons grade materials to be used in their unconventional martyr delivery system via other enemies like the Hussein regime. That regime change in Iraq was indeed a forgone agenda, as of 1998 when Clinton and congress made regime change in Iraq the official US policy on Iraq.

Second, - that these fifteen members of the House are just too stupid to remain in office.

One of two things is true and their filing of this Impeachment brief proves it.

Either Democrat members of congress failed to do their job of independently reviewing all related intelligence on Iraq before voting to send American troops into harms way, an option hard to prove since most of them made the same argument for deposing Hussein as Bush long before Bush made them, or, these Democrats are foolish liars trapped in their own web of deception, caught between what they are saying now and what they were saying then.

All evidence points to the latter.

I’d love to see this brief presented in any court in America…. Better than Cheney and the Bush policy on Iraq being completely exonerated, would be the circus that ended in the Impeachment of fifteen foolish and irresponsible House members who really must find a career better suited to their limited aptitude.

I’m thinking a traveling sideshow of Gucci clad dancing jackasses….