Saturday, September 11, 2010
When I heard a sound bite on ABC radio news, I struggled to come up with a headline. I have settled on this:
Same Excrement, Different Day.President Barack Hussein Obama never tires of repeating the same al-Taqiyya; I tire of refuting his lies, but I will continue because I view truth as a sacred value which must be preserved in order to preserve liberty. As usual, I will take the worst lies out of context and refute them. Those desiring the whole sack of feces can choose between the video: Press Conference Video and the transcript.
The policies that weakened our economy belong to the LibTards in Congress and the White House, both Democrat and Republican. There is no free lunch and no magic wand. Due to the intentional destruction of our system of education, the general public lacks the knowledge of economics necessary to anticipate the stream of lies coming from hucksters & politicians. They did not learn from the .com bubble, so they bought into the housing bubble and got stung again.
This story has three morals:
- Get politicians & union goons out of the education system.
- Caveat Emptor!!!
- Never vote for a LibTard!!!
heartbreak of September 11thThis demagogue can enrage me without making an effort. Expressions like that make my blood boil. Evil men, motivated by the evil doctrines of an evil institution committed an evil act designed to destroy our economic strength and crush our will to resist. There are empty chairs at three thousand dinner tables because of that act.
enduring values of AmericaThose words are polluted by passage through the lips of demagogues who have no respect for our God given rights to life, liberty, property; freedom of speech, religion, assembly & petition. Islam is a predatory way of life, not a religion. It has a religious component which serves to motivate its murderers and camouflage their mercenary mission. It is 180° out of phase with each and every one of those American values to which the demagogue alluded. None of those are applicable to it.
National Day of Service and RemembranceShanghai us into slavery in the guise of honoring the dead. Christ save me, how I hate that liar!!! A day of cursing Islam and renewing our resolve to destroy it completely.
deepest values as AmericansThose alluded to above, which are enshrined in the Declaration of Independence & Constitution which Obama hates and violates. Abomination!!!
spirit of unity and common purposeUnity in cursing the evil institution which inspired the murderous act of war which killed three thousand and did billions of dollars of economic damage. Unity in seeking national security; in the urge to prevent further attacks. Unity destroyed by carping demagogues and their willing accomplices in the media. Common purpose wasted by a weak President who could not bring himself to name and declare war against the enemy.
suspicions, divisions can surfaceTranslation: "Islamophobic bigots are blaming Muslims for every evil on the face of the earth--scapegoating them as Hitler scapegoated Jews." No rational person is blaming our economic situation on Muslims or their war cult. They own the blame. for the accursed abomination of nine years ago and subsequent attacks both failed and successful.
not at war with IslamMuslims, motivated by the damnable doctrines of Islam, which promise them forgiveness of sins and eternal carnality in Allah's celestial bordello, attacked us in the name of Allah, as they are commanded to do by that demon. They shouted "Allahu Akhbar!" while slitting the throats of the flight crews. Islam declared and prosecuted war against us So, why the Hell are we not at war against it?
Deniers are damned fools, Shrub included. More than two hundred years ago, the Barbary Pirates sacked our shipping and nearly bankrupted the new nation with demands for tribute. When asked by what right they attacked us, they gave a very enlightening answer.
- founded on the laws of the Prophet
- written in their Koran
- those not submissive are sinners
- right and duty to make war on them
- enslave them
- martyrs going to heaven
- Prophet ordered us to fight you
- martyrs go to Paradise
- survivors will be your master
terrorists and murderersRead "Muslims". Terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam. "I will cast terror", "so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes", "to strike a terror", "Allah cast terror", "I have been made victorious with terror". How do you refute the Islamic record of what Allah & Moe said and did?
perverted IslamIn the previous paragraph, I gave you quotes from the Qur'an & hadith. Allah said that he would and did "cast terror". Moe said that he was made victorious with terror. What part of that do you not comprehend? I gave you links; click them and read multiple translations of the Qur'an and one translation of Sahih Bukhari.
`Who perverted Islam? Allah said something about war. I will quote one of those statements, an imperative commanding Muslims to wage war against Jews, Christians & Zoroastrians. This quote is from J.M. Rodwell's translation, linked to multiple translations.
What did Allah command Muslims to do? Most of the translators give it as fight. What does it mean? Moe told his companions what it meant to him, who is more expert in interpreting his revelations?
Narrated Anas bin Malik:
Allah's Apostle said, "I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.' And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah." Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, "O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?" He replied, "Whoever says, 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah', faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have." [Emphasis added.]
That Islamic scripture & oral tradition are codified in Shari'ah; Islamic law. I quote from Reliance of the Traveller, the handbook of Shafi'ite Fiqh.
- Make war upon...
- ordered to fight
- caliph makes war
- Sahih Bukhari 4.52 Jihad
- Sahih Bukhari 4.53 Khumus
- Sahih Bukhari 5.59 Expedition
- Sahih Muslim Jihad
- Sunan Abu Dawud Jihad
- Malik's Muwatta Jihad
- Extortion letter to the Rulers of Aqaba
not going to be divided
by ethnicityHow can anyone hear or read those words without cursing? Obama and his party have made a career of racial & ethnic division as well as economic class warfare which is exemplified early in his press conference. He demands that a Mosque be erected on Ground Zero but says nothing about a Greek Orthodox Church that has been frustrated by bureaucrats for nine years. America ain't hyphenated.
religious toleranceFirst, Islam is a predatory way of life, not a religion. It preys upon the human race. It declared and is prosecuting war against pagan and scriptural disbelievers.
Second, tolerance must be reciprocal; Islam is intolerant. Islam does not tolerate any religion, it only tolerates Islam. Get a clue.
Islam curses us.
When Islam triumphs over Christians, it imposes draconian legal and social restrictions on them. This quote from Reliance of the Traveller informs us that Christians can not give testimony in trials. Only Muslims can testify!
(a) is free;
(b) is fully legally responsible (mukallaf, def:
c8.1) (0: as testimony is not accepted from a child
or insane person, even when the child's testimony
regards injuries among ehildren that oeeurred at
(e) is able to speak;
(d) is mentally awake;
(e) is religious (0: meaning upright (024.4)
(A: and Muslim), for Allah Most High says,
"Let those of rectitude among you testify"
and unbelief is the vilest form of corruption, as
goes without saying); [Emphasis added.]
comply with Islamic rules that pertain to the safety
and indemnity of life, reputation, and property. In
(1) are penalized for committing adultery or
theft, though not for drunkenness;
(2) are distinguished from Muslims in dress,
wearing a wide cloth belt (zunna:r);
(3) are not greeted with "as-Salamu
(4) must keep to the side of the street;
(5) may not build higher than or as high as
the Muslims' buildings, though if they acquire a
tall house, it is not razed;
(6) are forbidden to openly display wine or
pork, (A: to ring church bells or display crosses,)
recite the Torah or Evangel aloud, or make public
display of their funerals and feastdays;
(7) and are forbidden to build new churches.
011.6 They are forbidden to reside in the Hijaz,
meaning the area and towns around Mecca,
Medina, and Yamama, for more than three days
(when the caliph allows them to enter there for
something they need).[Emphasis added.]
Exactly why in Hell should we tolerate a war cult which curses us, denies the sanctity of our blood and property, denies our rights; declares & prosecutes war upon us!??
clarity about who our enemies areWhat book contains a clear command to wage war upon us? Whose book is that? Then who the Hell is our enemy!?? "Its Islam, stupid!" Who prays for our defeat? Who burns our flag? Who marches in the streets chanting "Death to America!"? Who carries signs declaring "Freedom go to Hell!"??
The fact that Islam is divided into schismatic sects who hate each other's existence does not make any of them our friends or allies. They have one thing in common: hatred of disbelievers.
call that God different namesThere is one God, aid he ain't Allah! Allah is an ancient deity of pagan Arabia, previously going under different names including Baal and Sin. Read the Qur'an and see if it reflects the God you worship.
practice their religionDoes the practice of religion include obedience to religious obligations? Are you aware of the fard al-kifaya of Jihad? It binds all free, able bodied & sane adult male Muslims until a sufficient number have reported to the front. I refer doubters & dissenters to Reliance o9.1. Muslims can not practice Islam without waging war on us. Its what they do; what Allah purchased them for.
When disbelievers retaliate and invade Muslim lands, the obligation becomes fard ayn, binding upon all Muslims. If they are overrun, that includes women and children and Muslims wheresoever dispersed over the face of the earth.
Muslims are obligated to obey Allah and his Messenger. What did Allah command them to do? What did Moe do for them to emulate? In the last nine years of his life he started a war every six weeks on the average. Get a clue.
they are my friendsIf they are good, obedient Muslims, they are not your friends. Allah expressly forbids friendship & partnership with disbelievers, even if they are parents & siblings.
9:23. O you who believe! Take not for Auliyâ' (supporters and helpers) your fathers and your brothers if they prefer disbelief to Belief. And whoever of you does so, then he is one of the Zâlimûn (wrong-doers, etc.).
serious about negotiatingThere is no limit to treachery & irrationality. There is no peace between Muslims and Jews, never was and never will be. I have a few clues for you in addition to 9:29, previously cited.
Who might Allah send to torment the Jews? Any nominees?
Sunan Abu Dawud Abu Dawud 14.2477
Narrated Ibn Hawalah:
The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: It will turn out that you will be armed troops, one is Syria, one in the Yemen and one in Iraq. Ibn Hawalah said: Choose for me, Apostle of Allah, if I reach that time. He replied: Go to Syria, for it is Allah's chosen land, to which his best servants will be gathered but if you are unwilling, go to your Yemen, and draw water from your tanks, for Allah has on my account taken special charge of Syria and its people.
Sahih Muslim Book 041, Number 6985:
Abu Huraira reported Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: The last hour would not come unless the Muslims will fight against the Jews and the Muslims would kill them until the Jews would hide themselves behind a stone or a tree and a stone or a tree would say: Muslim, or the servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me; come and kill him; but the tree Gharqad would not say, for it is the tree of the Jews. [Emphasis added.]
The Roman Province of Syria was conquered by caliph Umar in 638, driving out many Jews and Christians. In 1948, the jews recovered a tiny fragment of their stolen patrimony. Muslims can't tolerate that because land once conquered must forever remain in Muslim hands, it belongs to Allah. Allah promised them a two to one kill ratio and victory. Israel's successful self-defense proves Allah to be an impotent idol. That is the ultimate blasphemy which Muslims will never accept. There will be peace when there are no more Muslims, not until then, no matter what suicidal concessions you force Israel to make.
we would burnThe planned Qur'an burning is a private affair, belonging to the church involved, not to the nation as a whole or the government.
contrary to what this nation's foundationThis nation was founded on Judeo-Christian ideals, not Muslim ideals. The founders declared that we are free to choose what, when & how to worship or not. Islam declares that only Allah has the right to be worshiped and that war must be waged to secure that right. The Qur'an contains the conquest imperatives behind the accursed abomination perpetrated nine years ago today. This nation was also founded on the ideal of free expression. Pastor Jones has a right to express his indignation at Islam's demon worship & genocidal conquest.
this kind of behaviorOur very existence offends Muslims. Nothing Pastor Jones can do will offend them more than the presence of our troops in Afghanistan. They need no further pretext for hating and attacking us. We can not exacerbate their hatred by any act or omission.
Backing down and suspending or canceling the protest as Pastor Jones has done is the worst possible error. It gives Islam a victory, proof that terror and the threat thereof is effective. It will enhance terrorist recruitment and funding.
My blog posts enrage them. One of my blogs has been banned by Pakistan. What is to stop you from demanding that my free expression of relevant, verifiable factual information be censored? By God I stand on the free speech clause of the First Amendment!!
Our national security is not endangered by those of us who expose & condemn Islam, it is endangered by traitors like you who appease Muslims and fail to eradicate Islam from the face of the earth.
consistent also with our imageImage be damned! Its the reality that is important, not any image, beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Khalid Sheikh Mouammad and his colleagues signed a confession in which they took pride in what they did, based on Allah's accursed imperatives and Moe's damned example. They need trials like you need a toothache.
Holding prisoners is the greatest possible incentive for fresh attacks because the enemy seeks hostages for exchange. Just usher them into Hell immediately and be done with them!!!
Those are unlawful enemy combatants, not purse snatchers. They do not deserve the privileges & immunities of citizens charged with petty offenses. F.D.R. set a good precedent, follow it.
willing to die, to kill other peopleBeing killed in battle against disbelievers is the only guaranteed ticket to the best levels of the celestial bordello. It is also the only certified get out of Hell free card. If they are fully informed and really believe, they will seek martyrdom.
not to live in fearAfter the accursed abomination there was anxiety over follow up attacks. During the D.C. Sniper episode, there was great anxiety and a few copy cat attacks. Those attacks are calculated to tear our social fabric, to induce paranoia and make normal life impossible. Ultimately, terrorism is intended to render its victims incapable of mounting an effective defense effort.
There is one and only one solution to this problem: remove the Islamic fifth column from our soil and keep them out. Deport Muslims and ban them from entering. If we won't do that, we won't have security.
churches and mosquesThe two do not belong in one sentence. Mosques are places where Muslims congregate to curse us and pray for our defeat. Seventeen times each day they remind Allah of why he wants to burn us; how we went astray or earned his wrath. Mosques are their armories. Recently, fifteen Muslims died in a Mosque in Afghanistan when their bomb detonated prematurely.
Religious faith is part of our strength. According to S.K. Malik's Qur'anic Concept of War, destroying faith is a necessary prerequisite to instilling terror.
all men and women are created equalIslamic law says that we can not build churches or maintain existing churches. Islamic law says that we can not testify in court. Islamic law says that the testimony of one man is equal to that of two women.
build a mosque on the siteThe St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church stood across the street from the towers. It was crushed when they collapsed. The bureaucrats of the Port Authority have given them the run around for nine years, they celebrated Christmas in a tent. But the Mosque is on the fast track.
practice their religion freelyThe practice of Islam involves waging war on disbelievers. President Obama said that Muslims have a right to practice Islam. President Obama is a traitor because he postulates a right to wage war against us. Democrats, ignoramuses and damned fools will deny this. Let them; facts trump emotions..
9:39. If you march not forth, He will punish you with a painful torment and will replace you by another people, and you cannot harm Him at all, and Allâh is Able to do all things.
peace-loving MuslimsHypocrites, not Muslims if they love peace; their Islam goes no deeper than their throats.
interested inThey are interested in pleasing Allah, staying out of Hell and getting into the celestial bordello. Believers sold their souls so that they fight in Allah's cause, "kill others and are killed".
improve my lot in lifeIn Psychology class, we were taught that all humans share a common hierarchy of needs. Tell that to Allah.
6:32. And the life of this world is nothing but play and amusement. But far better is the house in the Hereafter for those who are AlMuttaqûn (the pious - see V.2:2). Will you not then understand?
6:70. And leave alone those who take their religion as play and amusement, and are deceived by the life of this world. But remind (them) with it (the Qur'ân) lest a person be given up to destruction for that which he has earned, when he will find for himself no protector or intercessor besides Allâh, and even if he offers every ransom, it will not be accepted from him. Such are they who are given up to destruction because of that which they have earned. For them will be a drink of boiling water and a painful torment because they used to disbelieve.
4:74. Let those (believers) who sell the life of this world for the Hereafter fight in the Cause of Allâh, and whoso fights in the Cause of Allâh, and is killed or gets victory, We shall bestow on him a great reward. [Emphasis added.]
their religion is somehow offensiveWhat? Declaring unending warfare against the rest of the human race is not offensive? Declaring women to be half as intelligent and half as valuable as a man is not offensive? Declaring a right to enslave and rape non-Muslim women is not offensive? Declaring a right to enslave non-Muslim children is is not offensive?
Sanctifying terrorism & genocide is not offensive? Co-opting Jesus Christ as a genocidal warlord is not offensive?
Have you so soon forgotten what Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan did? How can anyone be sure that those enlisted Muslims are loyal, not just biding their time for the maximum return on their investment?
Friday, September 10, 2010
In the fog of ideological & psychological warfare, with conflicting claims of a face saving compromise which would relocate the Ground Zero Mosque of triumph and save the Florida Qur'ans from a fiery fate, we need to get back to basics and focus on the significant core issues.
The Imam behind the Ground Zero Mosque of Triumph, Feisal Abdul Rauf, issued a thinly veiled threat in an interview with The Larry King Show. The Washington post included a video clip in their article., headlined: "Imam Rauf: National security hinges on Mosque debate".
The Post placed this quote above the video: "Our national security now hinges on how we negotiate this, how we speak about it."
This was a particularly difficult interview to transcribe because both the interviewer and interviewee spoke rapidly and with soft voices. The video buffers too slowly on my connection, my eustachian tubes were not clearing, and my hearing aids are incompatible with my headset. I had to use the telecoils, and my monitor is louder than my headset. I did not get everything, but this should be close enough to convey the important meaning.
If we do move it, it will strengthen the argument of the radicals to recruit and their increasing aggression. The idea of [inaudible] is to create something like a Muslim Y. The YMCA was created one hundred and thirty years ago. to improve relationships between what was then called the American protestant religions by having young men and young women, of course they were separate at that time; YMCA/YWCA, common bond you know, by doing sports together and other programs together. [inaudible]
And that second street Y was an attempt by the Jewish community to create a center where you'd create that kind of bonding. We are now, today, where the Jewish community and the Catholic community was maybe seventy years ago, a century ago and this is our time; our turn to do that.
(What's on the table now?)
The biggest issue is the national security issue.
(How do you pull out without looking like you've lost?)
Without making it look both in this country and in the Muslim world. You must remember that what we do is watched all over the world. And we are very engaged with the Muslim world. And our security is really number one, our national security, our personal security is extremely important. And this issue has become now a national security issue. And therefore in our conversations, in our decision making process, we have to weigh many many factors and that has been dominant among them.
(Is there a middle ground that has you pull out of the center and do something else? that's what it sounds like you are saying.) We are discussing many things right now but, you know, we haven't found yet an option that would work in a safe way.
(What are ... what you are considering?)
As I said,. we consider everything in life. but we have to be very cautious here because the voices of the radicals have ratcheted up and we must make sure that the moderates take over the conversation.
(Given what you know now, would you have built?)
As I mentioned it, this story is not new. People knew about it. ...(Right, but given what you know now would you have said 'listen, lets not do it there because...' because it sounds like you are saying, in retrospect , you wouldn't have done it? )
Well,yes, if...if...(You would not have done it?)
If I knew this would happen, this would cause this kind of pain, I wouldn't have done it. My life has been devoted to peace making,
(...There are so many people who say... if you are saying it was a mistake, then why can't you get out of it and not do it?)
because we have to now make sure that whatever we do actually results in greater peace, not in greater conflict.
(Why do you think this structure is causing all this controversy now? )
Well there is a certain amount of anti-Islamic sentiment in this country (what now?) and we have seen it in the attacks upon mosques in various parts of the country in the last several weeks. So it is clear that this issue is not just about our center which is an attempt to create peace between Muslims and non-Muslims but this has aroused a certain anti-Islam sentiment which is unfortunate in this country--we need to look at it and have a discourse about it and make sure this does not dominate the discourse between us because Americans believe fundamentally and in a very fundamental strong way about freedom of religion, about separation of governments and churches, in separation of church and state which means the power of the government should not be used to coerce people to believe in any religion but it should be used to defend and protect religious rights and freedoms. So this is the conversation we need to have right now.
(Lets talk about money: one hundred million dollars is the price tag for this Islamic cultural center, where are you going to get the money?)
Well we have yet to raise a capital campaign...(You have no money for it yet?)
We haven't raised any money for it yet. .
(Where will you get the money?)
We'll get the money from whatever sources we can, domestically especially, and be very transparent about how we raise the money. This has been something that we have committed ourselves to . (Meaning you will list whoever is giving you money?) Yes. ( Will you turn down money from people who give money to say, HAMAS?) Absolutely. (No question about it; anyone who gives money to HAMAS can not give money to you ?) We will do whatever is absolutely correct and legal and safe thing to do.
(Which means what exactly? Because that's an extra condition?) You see, I'm the visionary behind it, I'm not the actual builder, I'm not the financial expert, I'm not the legal expert on these things, but I have a vision here of establishing something which I know, in my heart of hearts, will be a powerful instrument of peace.
( Who would you not take money from, who would you say no to, who would you turn away?)
We would turn it from anybody who was deemed to be a danger to this process. (People I think, here in New York and around the country would say ' that is sacred land, that is a special place for everyone in America-- is that a step toward peace?) As Clyde Haberman [sp?] and many many people have said, "look what exists in that neighborhood", look what exists around the corner. ( Oh, I believe you, I've lived downtown, so I know the neighborhood very well. )
So lets be clear, calling this particular block sacred ground is and what exists there... you know...(strip clubs and delis, I've been there a million times, but I think when people call it sacred ground, they're saying something terrible happened on this spot and and we've...)
We've got to be fair you can't say a place that has strip joints is sacred ground. We've got to be just, we've got to speak the truth we've got to have justice for everybody, we're a country of justice for all, not just for non-Muslims only or some groups and not for others This is what America is all about, Solidad. We've got to really mean what we say and say what our values are truly about.
This isn't... the discourse has been hijacked by people who say "no".
(you've heard about this Pastor in Florida, Terry Jones,who is proposing burning Qur'ans on 9/11, what do you think of that?)
I would plead with him to seriously consider what he is doing. (Why?) Its going to feed to the radicals in the Muslim world. Its dangerous, General Petraeus has said that. It is something that is not the right thing to do on that ground. ...
(Do you think he has a right to do it?)
And more importantly, well, we have freedom in this country, freedom of speech, but with freedom comes responsibility. It is a famous saying to shout fire in a crowded theatre, this is dangerous for our national security, and also the un-Christian thing to do. Jesus Christ didn't teach us to do that, we Muslims have a ... we look to the example of our Prophet- to our Prophet's sunnah. Many Christians say, 'What would Jesus do"
Jesus taught us to turn the other cheek, Jesus taught us to love your enemy, we are not your enemies. This is what Jesus taught us to do, and I would like to suggest that you know--we all have to live by the highest principles of our faith traditions
- "If we move from that location the story will be that the radicals have taken over the discourse"
- "the headline in the Islamic world will be that Islam is under attack."
- "I am concerned by the radicals in the Muslim world. "...
- "the danger from the radicals in the MW to our national security"
Muslims are taught that any step taken to injure or anger us is imputed to their credit as a deed of righteousness, to be weighed against their sins on Judgment Day. You'd learn that fun fact in 9:120, if you'd read that damn Qur'an instead of ignoring or burning it. They don't need any incentive from us to attack us.
- "If we do move it, it will strengthen the argument of the radicals to recruit and their increasing aggression."
- "The YMCA was created one hundred and thirty years ago. to improve relationships between what was then called the American protestant religions"...
- "We are now, today, where the Jewish community and the Catholic community was maybe seventy years ago, a century ago and this is our time; our turn to do that."
- "The biggest issue is the national security issue."
- "You must remember that what we do is watched all over the world."
- this issue has become now a national security issue.
- "we haven't found yet an option that would work in a safe way"
- "we have to be very cautious here because the voices of the radicals have ratcheted up and we must make sure that the moderates take over the conversation"
Did anything escape your attention in that quote? Look again. Who is Rauf concerned with? Only Muslims; our perceptions, attitudes, feelings and interests don't count, they are not under consideration. He ain't interested in anyone but Muslims.
- "If I knew this would happen, this would cause this kind of pain, I wouldn't have done it. My life has been devoted to peace making,"
- "we have to now make sure that whatever we do actually results in greater peace, not in greater conflict."
- "there is a certain amount of anti-Islamic sentiment in this country"
- " it is clear that this issue is not just about our center"
- "make sure this does not dominate the discourse between us because Americans believe fundamentally and in a very fundamental strong way about freedom of religion, about separation of governments and churches, in separation of church and state which means the power of the government should not be used to coerce people to believe in any religion but it should be used to defend and protect religious rights and freedoms."
How is it possible to have a discourse not dominated by the fact that your demon demands that you conquer and subjugate us? Freedom of religion means that we can choose any religion or none at all. Islam demands that it have a monopoly, that only Allah be worshiped. The two are not compatible, they are polar opposites.
Separation of Church and state means that the two institutions are independent, they do not interfere in each other's affairs. Islam demands that all law be Allah's law, Shari'ah, not man made legislation. That is the polar opposite of separation of church and state. Freedom of religion and separation of church and state do not serve as your license to wage war on us or dominate us by out breeding us, subversion & sedition.
- ( Will you turn down money from people who give money to say, HAMAS?) "Absolutely". (No question about it; anyone who gives money to HAMAS can not give money to you ?) "We will do whatever is absolutely correct and legal and safe thing to do."
- "We would turn it from anybody who was deemed to be a danger to this process."
Giving money to HAMAS is illegal. Taking money from HAMAS donors is not illegal. Their willingness to donate to you as well as to HAMAS tells us who & what you are. The fact that you want to disassociate yourself from them provides the same information. But we already knew that you are Muslims. What constitutes a "danger to this process" ? The implication is that you would reject money from anyone whose reputation or associations would impair your false image of peaceful moderation.
- "We've got to be fair you can't say a place that has strip joints is sacred ground."
If your loved one and colleagues were murdered by assassins motivated by the damnable doctrines of an accursed war cult, what is the effect on your psyche of the erection, on the site where the ash and smoke of your loved one settled, of a shrine where the war cult's devotees will remind their demon seventeen times every day of how your loved one and you have "earned" his wrath & "gone astray"; a place where they will curse us and supplicate their demon for "victory over the disbelieving folk"? Does that or does that not impair the sanctity of the site more than a strip club around the corner?
- "I would plead with him to seriously consider what he is doing. (Why?) Its going to feed to the radicals in the Muslim world. Its dangerous, General Petraeus has said that. It is something that is not the right thing to do on that ground. ..."
- 'What would Jesus do"
Thursday, September 9, 2010
Alec Rawls sent out another blogburst, updating the protest planned for Saturday September 11, 2010. Unfortunately I got behind in reading my email and neglected it.
As previously promised, Alec included an image of his newspaper advertisement and a link to the pdf file which you can print and mount on poster board or in a window.
Please do whatever you can to stop the erection of a symbol of Islamic triumphalism at the crash site!
Conservative hero Alan Keyes is asking whether there is a pattern of submission surrounding the nation's 9/11 sites. Apparently he has seen our video expose of Islamic and terrorist memorializing features in the crescent memorial to Flight 93 (now called a broken circle). Like any straight-thinker, he doesn't like what he sees. The Flight 93 crash site is no place for a giant Islamic-shaped crescent, no matter what it is called. On this point, Keyes cites Colorado Representative Tom Tancredo's 2005 objection to the newly unveiled Crescent of Embrace design:
Back in 2005, then-Rep. Tom Tancredo was reported to have sent a letter to the National Park Service "asking the Interior Department to reconsider the crescent-shaped design of the memorial to those aboard a plane hijacked on Sept. 11, 2001, because some may think it honors the terrorists." Tancredo quite sensibly argues that "regardless of whether 'the invocation of a Muslim Symbol' was intentional, 'it seems that such a symbol is unsuitable for paying appropriate tribute to the heroes of Flight 93 or the ensuing American struggle against radical Islam.'"Keyes notes our claim that the design is still replete with terrorist memorializing features and he seems to find it credible. Why shouldn't he? The damning features are all right there in architect Paul Murdoch's design drawings. Thank you Doctor Keyes! "It’s not just embarrassing. It is a dangerous willful blindness, spurning the woken vigilance of Flight 93." That's the last line of the full-page advertisement that Tom Burnett Senior and Alec Rawls will be running in the Somerset Daily American this Friday and Saturday (when the two first ladies will be in town for the 9/11 anniversary): Click for legible image. Full ad-copy PDF here (large file warning). We are hoping that visitors will hold onto our ad, maybe even tape it to their car windows, and most especially, show it to any press people they come across. Hey, if the Park Service can use 9/11 to plant the world's largest mosque on the Flight 93 crash site, we can use 9/11 to object. To join our blogburst against the crescent mosque, just send your blog's url.
Wednesday, September 8, 2010
General Petraeus is quoted by the Associated Press (on Yahoo! news) as saying that Qur'an burning would inflame passions.
The Secretary General of Nato is quoted in a similar vein.
Did Christians riot, destroy property and kill people when a photograph was published as "art" showing a crucifix immersed in urine? Did they riot when elephant dung was used in ersatz iconography? But Muslims, whipped to a frenzy by rabid clerics in Juma Salat riot on the basis of unfounded rumors as well as such egregious offenses as the Motoons & Fitna.
If rabid Muslims are going to harm our troops because a few Qur'ans are burned, they will also use blog posts, books, videos and articles exposing the intrinsic evil of Islam as a pretexts for outrageous acts of violence. If we follow the General's illogic, we must forbid all criticism of Islam, effectively annulling the First Amendment.
CNN quotes General Petraeus as saying that the Qur'an burning could "endanger" our troops and the mission. CNN quotes a statement from our Embassy in Kabul in which the Embassy condemns the Qur'an burning. in terms such as "acts of disrespect against the religion of Islam", "deliberate attempts to offend members of religious or ethnic groups" and "offensive messages, which are contrary to U.S. government policy ".
Msnbc reports on the remarks of Attorney General Eric Holder and other critics. They quote Holder as calling the burning "idiotic and dangerous" . They quote a group of religious leaders as referring to "anti-Muslim frenzy" and "disrespect for a sacred text".
State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley is quoted in a fulminating denunciation
Crowley called the burning "inconsistent with our American values" and "un-American".
Our servicemen are in harm's way in Afghanistan, viewed by the locals as "occupiers" to be tormented, killed and driven away. When Dar ul-Islam is invaded, jihad to repel the invaders is fard ayn, an individually binding religious obligation upon all able bodied male Muslims. I direct the attention of doubters and dissenters to Reliance of the Traveller, Book o9.1. They do not need any additional provocation.
Dove World calls Islam Satanic. It intends to protest Islam's attacks on us by burning Qur'ans. Is that an attack on a religion? Is Islam a religion? Muslims do use that word, but the principal term used to describe Islam is Deen: way of life. What is that way of life? What is its economic base, is it agriculture? Is it construction? Is it manufacturing? Is it trade and commerce? One saying attributed to Muhammad answers these questions for us. Read it carefully; I added emphasis to make critical points clear to you.
Narrated Abdullah ibn Umar:
I heard the Apostle of Allah, (peace_be_upon_him) say: When you enter into the inah transaction, hold the tails of oxen, are pleased with agriculture, and give up conducting jihad (struggle in the way of Allah). Allah will make disgrace prevail over you, and will not withdraw it until you return to your original religion.
Muhammad told the Muslims that if they engage in trade & agriculture to the exclusion of jihad Allah will curse them until they return to "your original religion". What did they give up? What must they return to? Jihad. What is jihad? Is jihad an-nafs, the struggle against ego and temptation an alternative to agriculture? How would it produce food or income with which to purchase food? What is jihad, and how does it rival agriculture as an economic activity?
Fortunately for us, Islamic law includes a clear and unambiguous definition of jihad. For clarity and ease of exploration, I have added emphasis and links to external references.
Jihad means "to war on non-Muslims". How does it produce income? The Qur'an has the answer to this question, distributed over several surahs. [Emphasis added for clarity.]
8:41. And know that whatever of war-booty that you may gain, verily one-fifth (1/5th) of it is assigned to Allâh, and to the Messenger, and to the near relatives [of the Messenger (Muhammad)], (and also) the orphans, Al-Masâkin (the poor) and the wayfarer, if you have believed in Allâh and in that which We sent down to Our slave (Muhammad) on the Day of criterion (between right and wrong), the Day when the two forces met (the battle of Badr) - And Allâh is Able to do all things.
Al-Anfal is variously translated as "The Spoils", "War Booty" or "The Windfalls". If Islam is a "religion of peace", why does its scripture tell us that Moe gets the loot, specifically the top 20%. That top 20% is called Khums. In Bukhari's collection of authentic hadith, the Book of Khumus describes the division of the spoils. Of course, that must be a rare and occasional necessity, because Islam is a "religion of peace". So why does that book contain 88 ahadith?
In Surah Al Fath, we learn that Allah has promised the Muslims "rich spoils" that they will capture.
48:20. Allâh has promised you abundant spoils that you will capture, and He has hastened for you this, and He has restrained the hands of men from you, that it may be a sign for the believers, and that He may guide you to a Straight Path.
48:21. And other (victories and much booty there are, He promises you) which are not yet within your power, indeed Allâh compasses them, And Allâh is Ever Able to do all things.
Did Allah deliver on his promise of "abundant spoils"?
33:27. And He caused you to inherit their lands, and their houses, and their riches, and a land which you had not trodden (before). And Allâh is Able to do all things.
In another ayeh, Allah reveals Moe's motivation: "the good of this world". What does that mean?
The translators included a parenthetical expression taken from tafsir. That expression tells us what Moe wanted: ransom money. The mission of Islam is mercenary, neither beneficent, spiritual nor anodyne. "Religion of peace"? Waging war, making a great slaughter is one of the duties of a Prophet. Got a clue yet?
The hadit have more clues for the clueless.
The spoils of war were not made lawful for any people before us, This is because Allah saw our weakness and humility and made them lawful for us.
Taking spoils was taboo among the Arabs. Allah gave Moe special dispensation because he saw Moe's weakness and humility. Lets take a good, close look at that humility. Khan bowdlerized this hadith when he translated Bukhari. Aisha Bewley did not.
How did Moe get his provision? What happened to anyone who disobeyed his command? So Allah saw his weakness and humility..... Humility?
Narrated Abu Huraira:
Allah's Apostle said, "I have been sent with the shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy), and while I was sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand." Abu Huraira added: Allah's Apostle has left the world and now you, people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did not benefit by them).
How was Moe made victorious? Who brought him the keys to the treasures of the world? What of those treasures?
Narrated Abu Huraira:
The Prophet said, "Khosrau will be ruined, and there will be no Khosrau after him, and Caesar will surely be ruined and there will be no Caesar after him, and you will spend their treasures in Allah's Cause." He called, "War is deceit'.
How about those treasures, did they inure to Moe's benefit?
Narrated Abu Huraira:
Whenever a dead man in debt was brought to Allah's Apostle he would ask, "Has he left anything to repay his debt?" If he was informed that he had left something to repay his debts, he would offer his funeral prayer, otherwise he would tell the Muslims to offer their friend's funeral prayer. When Allah made the Prophet wealthy through conquests, he said, "I am more rightful than other believers to be the guardian of the believers, so if a Muslim dies while in debt, I am responsible for the repayment of his debt, and whoever leaves wealth (after his death) it will belong to his heirs. "
How did Allah make Moe wealthy?
I have presented proof of the centrality of Jihad in Islam, that it is a predatory way of life, predation upon the non-Islamic human race, Dar ul-Harb, the land of war. Why is it the land of war? Because it is not yet under Islam's domination.
The entire world must be brought under Islamic domination because Allah's word must be made superior.
48:28. He it is Who has sent His Messenger (Muhammad ) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islâm), that He may make it (Islâm) superior over all religions. And All-Sufficient is Allâh as a Witness.
61:9. He it is Who has sent His Messenger (Muhammad ) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islâmic Monotheism) to make it victorious over all (other) religions even though the Mushrikûn (polytheists, pagans, idolaters, and disbelievers in the Oneness of Allâh and in His Messenger Muhammed ) hate (it).
Two ayat declare that Islam must be made superior, one declares that it must be made victorious. How would that happen? The context has a clue for you.
61:11. That you believe in Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad ), and that you strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allâh with your wealth and your lives, that will be better for you, if you but know!
61:12. (If you do so) He will forgive you your sins, and admit you into Gardens under which rivers flow, and pleasant dwelling in Gardens of 'Adn Eternity ['Adn (Edn) Paradise], that is indeed the great success.
"Strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allâh"; whatever could that mean? How would that make Islam victorious & dominant?
Narrated Abu Musa: A man came to the Prophet and asked, "A man fights for war booty; another fights for fame and a third fights for showing off; which of them fights in Allah's Cause?" The Prophet said, "He who fights that Allah's Word (i.e. Islam) should be superior, fights in Allah's Cause."
Muslims fight in Allah's cause, to make Islam dominant. Allah gives them the disbeliever's land in war victories. Got a clue yet?
Two ayat in Surah Al-Anfal tell us most of what we need to know about Islam.
8:39. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.
Who: disbelievers. What? Fight them until resistance ceases and only Allah is worshiped in the whole world. Got a clue yet? Surah At-Taubah has another clue for the clueless.
But Islam is a "great religion of peace". Surely those conquest imperatives must be metaphorical, allegorical or anachronistic. Yeah, right. I already showed you one of the confirming ahadith, in that quote from Reliance. "commanded to fight the people until"... . That same section told you that jihad is warfare against disbelievers. But you did not get a clue. Shari'ah has another clue for you. Those conquest imperatives are codified into Islamic law and one of them specifies its scriptural basis.
The caliph makes war on "people of the scripture" until they are subjugated and make annual extortion payments. The scriptural basis is At-Taubah 29.
Allah said "fight them" ; Moe said " I am commanded to fight" . What did Moe do? What did his rightly guided caliphs do? How did Islam build an empire that stretched from the border of China to the border of France?
When America won its war of revolution, it no longer had the protection of the British fleet. Her shipping was sacked by the Barbary Pirates. The young nation was nearly bankrupted by paying tribute. Adams & Jefferson asked by what right they attacked us. The answer has another clue for you.
Examine the crucial elements.
- Laws of the Prophet
- written in their Koran
- who should not have answered their authority were sinners,
- right and duty to make war upon them
- make slaves of all they could take as prisoners
- every Mussulman (or Muslim) who should be slain in battle was sure to go to heaven
Examine the crucial elements.
- ordered us to fight you
- until you worship Allah alone
- or give jizya
- martyrs go to Paradise
- survivors enslave you
Is the Qur'an a holy book, the sacred word of Allah or was it contrived by a venal con man, woven of plagiarized pseudepigrapha and situational scripture? You won't find the answer from the Qur'an alone, you need hadith to complete the puzzle. Moe, like modern cult leaders, had groupies. Moe wanted to accept their sexual advances. Allah accommodated his wishes.
Moe lusted after Zainab, whose father rejected him. Moe fixed up his adopted son with her, later taking advantage of a convenient divorce to snatch her.
33:38. There is no blame on the Prophet () in that which Allâh has made legal for him.That has been Allâh's Way with those who have passed away of (the Prophets of) old. And the Command of Allâh is a decree determined.
Sahih Muslim Book 008, Number 3330:
Anas (Allah be pleased with him) reported: When the 'Iddah of Zainab was over, Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) said to Zaid to make a mention to her about him. Zaid went on until he came to her and she was fermenting her flour. He (Zaid) said: As I saw her I felt in my heart an idea of her greatness so much so that I could not see towards her (simply for the fact) that Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) had made a mention of her. So I turned my back towards her. and I turned upon my heels, and said: Zainab, Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) has sent (me) with a message to you. She said: I do not do anything until I solicit the will of my Lord. So she stood at her place of worship and the (verse of) the Qur'an (pertaining to her marriage) were revealed, and Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) came to her without permission. He (the narrator) said: I saw that Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) served us bread and meat until it was broad day light and the people went away, but some persons who were busy in con- versation stayed on in the house after the meal. Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) also went out and I also followed him, and he began to visit the apartments of his wives greeting them (with the words): As-Salamu 'alaikum, and they would say: Allah's Messenger, how did you find your family (hadrat Zainab)? He (the narrator) stated: I do not know whether I had informed him that the people had gone out or he (the Holy Prophet) informed me (about that). He moved on until he entered the apartment, and I also went and wanted to enter (the apartment) along with him, but he threw a curtain between me and him, as (the verfes pertaining to seclusion) had been revealed, and people were instructed in what they had been instructed. Ibn Rafii had made this addition in his narration:" O you who believe, enter not the houses of the Prophet unless permission is given to you for a meal, not waiting for its cooking being finished..." to the words"... Allah forbears not from the truth."
If burning the Qur'an is an attack on Islam, it is a counter attack, subsequent to Islamic attacks upon us. Did you know that Islam denies the divinity, crucifixion, death and resurrection of Jesus Christ? Did you know that Islam curses Jews & Christians, that it calls us the worst of living creatures? Did you know that Allah turned some Jews into apes and swine? Why not? Because you have not read the Qur'an.
I admit that the International Burn a Quran Day may irritate Muslims. But it serves a larger purpose: it gives me and others a good excuse to expose the fatal facts of Islam to a curious public. The constant drumbeat of news coverage is raising interest and curiosity. A few more people will read this blog post. A few more will click the links and explore Islam's canon of scripture, tradition and jurisprudence than otherwise would. And I view that as a good thing.
So read the Qur'an already. Then piss on it, let it dry and burn it.
Posted by Ben at 9/08/2010 05:51:00 AM