Florida Idgit Of the Year

Awwwwwwwww!!
Awwwwwwwww!!
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 8:10 PM

Poor widdle ilwegal alwiens!!!!

This is RETARDED!!! How far are these Leftinistra MORONS going to be allowed to go before they are stopped DEAD!!!!! WTFO??

A state legislator in Florida wants to put a stop to illegal aliens – no, not undocumented immigrants, but the use of the term “illegal alien” in official state documents.

Sen. Frederica Wilson, a Democrat whose district is home to thousands of Caribbean immigrants, said: “I personally find the word ‘alien’ offensive when applied to individuals, especially to children. An alien to me is someone from out of [sic] space.”

GOOD GRIEF!!!!

Florida Democrat Leftinistra…Go Figure

From outer space?

Moron.

Hypocrisy

Sistani
Sistani
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 7:56 PM

Did we hang him yet?

We insisted that the Ayatollah Sistani was surely a “moderate” and a friend to civil and religious liberty despite all the hard evidence to the contrary. Let me repeat my previous observations and predictions: The Ayatollah Sistani is an Islamist bent on establishing a theocracy not far removed from that found in Iran. He is an open anti-Semite and a not-too-subtle anti-Christian. He threw his support behind democratic elections because they were the handy vehicles for imposing religious authority all over Iraq. Nor is he the only one, or even the worst, only the most prominent. Yet while I believe the evidence is as clear here as it is in the case of [Ahmad] Chalabi, we only see what we want to see, not what’s visible. In our religious lives, hope may well be a virtue — but in foreign policy it is more often a sin, a temptation to willful blindness.
This is what happens when we fight a “more sensitive” war…

Sistani The Moderate

The Leftinistra are the SAME way…say one thing and then do another…

Pofessor Of Jihad?

Professor Jihadi…
Professor Jihadi…
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 6:38 PM

And the Leftinistra protect these people, why? Freedom of Speech does have its limits, yes?

Me and Julio Down by the Schoolyard

By Mike S. AdamsWednesday, February 28, 2007
Send an email to Mike S. Adams
Simply Amazing and Drudge Is All Over It
Go Drudge!!!

Excerpt: (unbelievable)

Yesterday afternoon, I logged on to the “Global War” blog (global-war.bloghi.com) of Associate Professor Julio Pino – a Muslim convert who teaches at Kent State University. The heading for the site used to read “The Worldwide Web of Jihad: Daily News from the Most Dangerous Muslim in America.” Now it reads “Are You Prepared for Jihad?” IN THE NAME OF OBL. 2007: THE YEAR OF ISLAMIC VICTORY!”

Why would a Leftinistra support and allow a SUBVERSIVE like this run loose, especially in a time of war?

HELLO??

Just Say NO To McCain

Could It Be????
Could It Be????
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 11:57 AM

McCain’s Campaign Collapses

Could this give way to a Tancredo/Gingrich ticket? Please let it be so!!

Blood Sucking Parasites

Responsible Approach?
Responsible Approach?
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 11:52 AM

I think NOT! It is more like an a blatant coward’s response to the coming Ultimate Reproach. What a bunch of LOSERS these Defeatocrats, aka Socialist Liberals, Pacifistic Cowards are, eh? They hide behind the facade of “caring” but what do they really care about? Their careers as life-long blood sucking parasites called politicians. That’s right. Parasites.

Poli = many.Tic(k)s = blood suckers.Politics = many blood sucking parasites.Democrats Back Away From War Fund Plan Liberals Are Losers…PERIOD!! Anyway, here is an excerpt on how the Leftinistra have backed off due to their ignorance of the Will of the American People (as opposed to the stupidity of the White Flaggers):

“…House Democratic leaders are backing away from a plan to scale back U.S. involvement in the Iraq war by using Congress’ most powerful tool _ withholding money in the budget.

Instead, party officials said Tuesday, leaders are weighing a proposal that would attempt to embarrass Bush into abandoning his war strategy. Under a plan discussed behind closed doors, Democrats probably would fund President Bush’s entire $93.4 billion request for war spending this year but require that any troops sent into battle that don’t meet certain standards receive a presidential waiver and that Congress be notified of the shortcoming.

The compromise is an attempt to please members who want to end the war immediately by cutting funding and others who do not want to appear as though Democrats are turning their back on troops.

“I think it’s a responsible approach,” said Rep. Chet Edwards, D-Texas…”

Chet Edwards = Moron

DNC Exit Strategy

Another Jackass…
Another Jackass…
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 3:44 AM

Liberals…when is someone going to authorize Hunting Season???????

Any Questions?

Stand Behind Me…
Stand Behind Me…
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 3:40 AM

Gorzilla!

GOREGASM????
GOREGASM????

Wednesday, February 28, 2007 2:45 AM

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

Unbelievable!! You guys MUST go read this one!!! OUTSTANDING!!

An Unconvenient Goregasm!!!! Too Funny!!

Enemies Of The State

The Enemy Within
The Enemy Within
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 12:42 AM

I am 52 years young. It is my experience that EVERY liberal needs to be treated as the enemy. Not EVERY democrat, republican or independent is a liberal.

Liberals, aka the Leftinistra, socialists, etc, have infiltrated EVERY aspect of American life, especially politics.

Too many times, we dangerously stereotype a group. Calling all democrcats liberal is wrong because it isn’t so. Calling all republicans conservative is wrong because it isn’t so. I know some democrats that are more conservative than the theoretical conservatives in CONgress. I also know some republicans that might as well be a socialist.

Thus, I would support rounding up all defeatists (liberals) and shipping them to the country of their choice whether they were a republican, democrat or independent.

A subversive (liberal) doesn’t deserve to live here. They sympathize with our enemies because they themselves are our enemies. We are at war, we MUST win and the liberals don’t want us to win.

PERIOD.

Loser v Winner

Winner vs. Loser
Winner vs. Loser
Tuesday, February 27, 2007 9:46 PM

YOU DECIDE

US Congressman Ric Keller: White Flag Republican

“…I’m for a surge of action in implementing the Iraq Study Group recommendations, which were arrived at in a bipartisan, unanimous fashion…”

US Congressman Sam Johnson: A Man That Gets It

“…Debating non-binding resolutions aimed at earning political points only destroys morale, stymies success, and emboldens the enemy.

“The grim reality is that this House measure is the first step to cutting funding of the troops…Just ask John Murtha about his ’slow-bleed’ plan that hamstrings our troops in harm’s way…”

Truther Fools

Conspiritorial Falderal
Conspiritorial Falderal
Tuesday, February 27, 2007 9:21 PM

Recently, as I was surfing the plethora of news outlets of the universe (that Gore invented) (LOLOLOLOL!!), I ran across an interesting place. On the surface, this site was quite informative and I was agreeing with perhaps 90% of the texts written therein. That’s when I got suspicious. I can’t help it. It is in my nature, my blood, to be this way. Being that way saved my life and others out “in the field”.

Then, I ran across a section of the site that just floored me and I was greatly disappointed. The other data was still good but this casts a shadow of doubt as to the sincerity of the data in which I agreed with, as I said ealier, 90%. The dubious section has to do with a Conspiracy Theory that has been debunked by “better” scientific data. Not “better” in that it agreed with me but “better” in that the evidence was overwhelming obvious that this particular theory is off-base, wrong and fool hardy.

911 Was A Plot With U.S. Government Knowledge

Oh, brother…not another one.

This site, as many others, claim they voted for GWB twice and were once skeptics as well and then prattle on how the government KNEW the infamous attacks were coming and LET it happen to justify the GWOT.

One word. FRUITLOOPS.

If you have a hankering, visit the site. It isn’t a raling diatribe like others are but, the message is the same.

I have been in covert actions many times and the levels of secrecy are so tight, it would seem that leaks would not happen. However, leaks happen. Hiding a “plot” like this one is virtually impossible…nay…I dare say, totally impossible.

Tehran: We'll Take NY

Any Questions?
Any Questions?
Tuesday, February 27, 2007 4:08 PM

Follow the links…

TEHRAN: “We’ll Take NY…..”

‘Nuf said..

Did You Miss This?

In Case You Missed It…I
In Case You Missed It…I
Tuesday, February 27, 2007 3:51 PM

New Tactics In The Global War On Terror Are Working

Bombings and Iraq [Rich Lowry]

My “Pentagon intel guy” writes in an e-mail:

Since my job at the Pentagon is to follow and report these kinds of things- there are several trends we are seeing lately.

1) Definite and measurable decrease in number of sectarian killings within Baghdad: From nearly 1,400 to 680 in the last two months.

2) We are killing and capturing increasing numbers of Sunni insurgents and Al Qaeda fighters. And when I say “we”- I mean Multi-National Forces Iraq as well as the Iraqi Army, the Iraqi Police Commando, and the newer “National Guard”/Territorial Forces in Anbar.

3) The recent bombings in ANBAR demonstrate red on red kinetic operations. Something which has been rare until the last few months. More and more Sunni tribes are pledging fealty to the Iraqi government and the Coalition and turning their back on the insurgents/AQI. This has caused them to be targeted.

We have seen the enemy bomb police recruitment drives, and now mosques of “apostate” Imams and Sheikhs who have sided with the Americans. This has happened twice in the last week. While the mainstream media considers this more proof of failure- it is actually a sign of the precarious position the terrorists are in. They need the Sunni population to protect them and shelter them. If they are now butchering them like everyone else- this could be a turning point in the relationship. This is crucial to watch. We need to protect the tribal leaders who have come over to us- and AQI knows that it is a death sentence for them if they can’t stop it.

My Take

The Way I See It…
The Way I See It…
Tuesday, February 27, 2007 1:07 PM

I’m not going to quote web sites, people, places or things. I have done my research…you do yours. The following is how I see things, garnering my opinions and beliefs from years of fighting terrorism, both abroad and on the homefront. It all began in 1974, for me. And you?
I have witnessed the various politically driven dolts in DC and several state-level “woe-is-me” political hacks rendering more and more support to the enemy, either on purpose or just because their education level is too much for them to process the Clear and Present Danger to this Nation.

Every day, every minute, every second, I find it indeed possible that our Nation WILL be struck again as it was on the infamous day we know as 911. We WILL be stricken either by the Al Qa’ida terrorists or one of their partners in murder. The evidence of this “feeling” I have is all around us. WAKE UP!! The enemy has openly stated that their goal is to kill us all and at the minimum, take us out of the picture. The United States is in their way.

I accuse the naysayer citizens and the cowardly and intellectually challenged politicians for aiding and abetting the enemy. These pathetic and poor excuses of Patriots, hiding behind their cowardice, claiming the United States can negotiate with the enemy, are allowing the enemy to have their way. They hide behind the facade of pacifism, which shades from view, their cowardice. When one doesn’t believe there is anything worth fighting and/or dying for, I will show you a coward. The Democratic Party Leadership and the majority of that pathetic political arm of American Politics are a prime example of cowardice in the face of the enemy. There are at least 24 cowards within the Republican Party.

I accuse the terrorist sympathizers internal and external of this Nation, whether citizen or not. And for those that do not vote, how dare you even voice an opinion on anything. Shut the hell up. As for those that do vote, don’t vote along Party Dogma. Vote how the evidence accumulates. As for the Silent Majority, stand up and be counted. Don’t sit back on your loins and wring your fingers and wonder what can be done. Stop with the cowardly “I don’t want to make any waves” crap. Get on a soap box and holler!

There are in FACT, and I personally KNOW beyond a shadow of a doubt, that there are terrorists cells inside our country, waiting for orders to strike. Political correctness won’t allow this to be openly expressed. It “might” offend someone or a group. SHUT THE HELL UP!!! We are being attacked from within, morons. WAKE UP!! Grow some thicker skin. When the PC Cowards call you names, smack them right in the mouth! They are cowards! They won’t “fight” back.

If some liberally controlled Lame Stream Media member sticks a microphone in your face and asks why you are such a bigot, grab the microphone and shove it up their worthless butts! That should get the point across. Political correctness is killing this country.

It is way passed time to take our country back. No longer is it a Federal Republic as our Framers emplaced and meant for it to be. It is now some sort of a morphed socialist mutated state of retardedness. We The People need to arise and take it back.

18 Ways To Identify A Leftinistra GOMER

Qualifications of the Leftinistra
Qualifications of the Leftinistra
Sunday, February 25, 2007 11:49 PM

What makes a Leftinistra a sniveling, whining, ungrateful and hate-filled mutant? There are all kinds of the usual or unusual causes and affects but, I have recently been sent an email that explains it all. Although it is “Rather” humorous, it is also “Rather” sad. Behold”

18 WAYS TO BE A GOOD LIBERAL

1. You have to be against capital punishment, but support abortion on demand.Does that make any sense to anyone? I mean, really. Does it? Think about it for a few moments and PLEASE leave a comment. I would REALLY like to know just how in the world these MOONBATS can justify such an obvious oxymoron as this.

2. You have to believe that businesses create oppression and governments create prosperity.OH! I get it! Capitalism keeps the little guy down by PAYING the individual on the merits of the individual’s productivity and contributions(s) to the overall success of the company the individual works for and the government GIVES money away, sort of a BRIBE, to individuals that are too LAZY to get out there and get a JOB!!! OH! Silly me. Somebody explain this to me, OK? Go for it. Give it your best shot!!

3. You have to believe that guns in the hands of law-abiding citizens are more of a threat than U.S. nuclear weapons technology in the hands of Iran or Chinese and North Korean communists.This is what I have to say about this. And it isn’t politically correct, either. “They” can have my weapons when “they” have to pry them from my dead, cold grip. When “they” come to collect my weapons, “they” best come heavily armed and be willing to die for “their” beliefs as I am for mine. End of transmission.

4. You have to believe that there was no art before federal funding.This all depends on what your definition of art is. LOL! Lazy people drawing and painting works of hiddeous nonsense, collecting TAX dollars to finance their horrid life’s existence and to foster more of their venom hate-filled souls, at the expense of the working class is unacceptable. GET A JOB YOU BIG DOPE!!

5. You have to believe that global temperatures are less affected by cyclical changes in the earth’s climate and more affected by soccer moms driving SUV’s.Is this REALLY neccessary to respond to? OK. It is. Global warming is a farce, a sham, a plea for attention and MANY times in my lifetime (born in the 50s) I have heard that we are 10 years away from world-wide calamity! Back in 1970, NYC was going to be under water. HELLO? Anyone been there recently? LOL!!!

6. You have to believe that gender roles are artificial, but being homosexual is natural.Touchy subject. I have some aquaintences that are “confused”. Were they born that way or was it a choice? I don’t know. However, to hear the moronic Leftinistra play this tune to their advantage to garner votes is pathetic. They sure know how to twist issues around, don’t they? Morons.

7. You have to believe that the AIDS virus is spread by a lack of federal funding.NEWS FLASH!!! The AIDS virus is spread around by irresponsible sex and drug addicts!! Morons that use the SAME needles and get their rocks off in complete abandon, get what they get due to THEIR choices and NOT the governments’ OR mine.

8. You have to believe that the same teacher who can’t teach 4th- graders how to read is somehow qualified to teach those same kids about sex.TRUE DAT!!!!!!!! I will teach my kids what they need to know, thank you very much. The Public Reeducation Camps called schools in this country SUCK. And that goes for the colleges as well. Friggin Leftinistra are EVERYWHERE in our theoretical education system. The NEA is packed full of socialist liberals and should be identified and shot for High Treason.

9. You have to believe that hunters don’t care about nature, but PETA activists do. AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!

10. You have to believe that self-esteem is more important than actually doing something to earn it.Just like respect, self-esteem is earned. It is not paid to you by dividends. YOU EARN IT!! Get over it. Morons.

11. You have to believe that Mel Gibson spent $25 million of his own money to make “The Passion of the Christ” for financial gain only.Yeah. There’s that pesky capitalism again. The MOST prosperous Nation in the known Universe, the United States, whose economy is based on INCENTIVE, is the root of all evil. Where do these morons come up with this crap? Was it because the movie gave glory to God? Now, had he made a movie of let’s say, how the frogs are dwindling in numbers and President Bush was the cause, Mel would be proclaimed the Savior of Frogs. Morons.

12. You have to believe the NRA is bad because it supports certain parts of the Constitution, while the ACLU is good because it supports certain parts of the Constitution.There’s that retarded and “Rather” obvious socialist liberal double standard garbage again. Think about it.

13. You have to believe that taxes are too low, but ATM fees are too high.Socialist liberals will do ANYTHING to distract from real issues, won’t they? Good grief.

14. You have to believe that Margaret Sanger and Gloria Steinem are more important to American history than Thomas Jefferson, Gen. Robert E. Lee, and Thomas Edison.Margaret Sanger is Planned Parenthood’s founding Mother. Her legacy of racism and eugenics is firmly established by this Hero of the Zeros. Gloria Steinem founded Ms Magazine and is the feminists most influential, eloquent, and revered feminist. HELLO? Naturally, after rewriting our history, these ladies are much more important than the Founding Fathers and Heros of the worst country there ever was, right? Morons.

15. You have to believe that standardized tests are racist, but racial quotas and set-asides are not.Affirmative Action. What a DUMB idea that was…still is. More DNC double standard crap.

16. You have to believe that the only reason socialism hasn’t worked anywhere it’s been tried is because the right people haven’t been in charge.Please do a thorough background check of the Kennedy’ and the Pelosi’s. They qualify for the next generations of socialists in this country. Perhaps they can make it work and turn this country into the New United Socialist States of America. By the way, that would be over my dead body.

17. You have to believe that homosexual parades displaying drag queens and transvestites should be constitutionally protected, and manger scenes at Christmas should be illegal.Anyone care to EXPLAIN that one?

18. You have to believe that this message is a part of a vast, right-wing conspiracy.IT ISN’T??? LMBO!!!

Nine Reasons Leftinistra Are Untrustworthy

9 Reasons
9 Reasons
Sunday, February 25, 2007 7:03 PM

So the leftinistra desire to have one of their own in the White House. How admirable of them. One should be asking themselves, “Is this a good thing to have a socialist in the White House?” Personally, I would say emphatically HELL NO!! Why?

Glad you asked. There is an article floating about that the Leftinistra would “Rather” no one know about. It is a fantastic article: A Leftinistra In The White House?

Sadly mislead democrats rally to the sides of the socialists as they listen to their “it sounds good and feels good” rhetoric. I have been witnessing it for YEARS. I voted for one, once. I was young and dumb. My parents WERE democrats so naturally, so was I. I learned my lesson the hard way. I voted for Jimmy Carter. As I grew in maturity, I noticed that Peanut Boy was selling this country down the river and thought “talking and talking and talking with our enemies” was the way to go. Moron. That worked real good with Iran, right? Moron.

There are 9 primary reasons why the socialist liberals, aka democrats, aka regressive morons, cannot handle the office of the presidency of the United States:

1) The Democratic insistence on treating the war on terrorism as a law enforcement issue will make it extremely difficult to deal with terrorist groups.The Leftinstra logic behind that one stems from the vaunted World Opinion. I spit on world opinion. Since the 1900s, which country has spent the most in blood, sweat, tears and money for EVERYONE in the world? And they DARE whine when we declare war on terror? To hell with them.

2) Ronald Reagan once said that, “Of the four wars in my lifetime, none came about because the U.S. was too strong.” Conversely, a super power that seems weak invites attack.A friend of mine has recently stated, “The socialists are going to make their beds with the Jihadists. For instance, 20% of Moscow’s population is Muslim due to declining birthrates among non-Muslims and immigration into Moscow. Expectations are that 50% of the Russian Army will be Muslim by 2010. The socialists do hold a weak upper hand at this time, but by demographics, they will not for much longer. So their socialists and our socialists will ally themselves with the Jihadist cause in the guise of multiculturalism, but it truth, it is because they believe that there is nothing worth fighting for. And believing nothing is worth fighting for is a more polite way of avoiding the fact that they are cowards and are afraid to fight.”

The Jihadists consider “running away” from battle as a sign of weekness. Indeed. That’s what the Leftinistra are. Weak.

3) When the only credible Democratic voice on national security in the Senate, Joe Lieberman, was defeated in the Democratic primary last year, the message sent to Democrats was, “Being serious about defending America may cost you your job.”Elected democrats and their sheeple hated old Joe over that deal because he broke with the spineless cowards and showed the world that they were cowards. Now, old Joe MIGHT switch to the GOP for the same reasons. The Leftinistra, being urged on by Jihad Jane, have never been serious, in recent years, about defending America. Why? Because they have nothing they consider fighting for. That’s why.

4) The Democratic base doesn’t take terrorism seriously and considers it to be nothing more than a distraction from socializing the economy, raising taxes, promoting gay marriage, and the other domestic issues that are near and dear to the heart of liberals.The Leftinistra seem to think that Corporate America Is A Worse Threat Than Terrorism! That is totally crazy. They rale against those institutions yet most of their Big Money Dogs are from Corporate America, most of them UNION!! DNC/Leftinistra double standards at work. If your base is full of cowards, so will the Big Dog.

5) Using the American military to further the interests of our country makes liberals uncomfortable, even though they’re usually happy to send the troops gallivanting off to the latest godforsaken hotspot that has caught the eye of liberal activists.The Leftinistra, at every opportunity, have stripped tha military to the bare bones, in an effort to project America as a Paper Tiger. Period. They scream, hoot and holler about Iraq but not Afghanistan. Why is that? Is it politically correct or incorrect or something? Is the only thing which drives the Leftinistra politics?

6) When the U.N. Security Council has members like China, France, and Russia that seem to be financially in bed with every country we end up at loggerheads with, the UN is going to be even more hapless and ineffective than normal.Oh PLEASE!! Remember when that bafoon Kerry said that the United States should be bound by the United Nations for any steps our country feels it needs to take in order to defend and protect her citizens? Remember that? It was called Global Approval or some retarded thing like that. Unbelievable.

7) The Democrats are overly concerned with “international opinion,” AKA “European opinion.”This is related to reason #1, above. Opinions. Flame the opinions of other countries run by the same genre of pacifistic cowards, aka Leftinistra, aka socialist liberals, aka regressive moonbats. Except for England (and sometimes not), European leaders are about the most wimpiest people in the whole Universe. Tinfoil soldiers is NOT what we need.

8) The Democrats want to close Guantanamo Bay and put the terrorists held there into the American court system.That is plain retarded and foolish. Since when do illegal combatants on top of being non US citizens deserve the frills of the United States Constitution. Can anyone point that chapter and verse out to me? I could go on and on but suffice it to say that the United States Constitution covers United States Citizens ONLY!!!

9) The intelligence programs that have helped prevent another 9/11 would be curtailed under a Democratic President.

Leftinistra don’t like intelligence because thay lack the capabilities to process it. It scares them. They might have to FIGHT a REAL fight. Friggin cowards. Again, whnever a leftinistra is in power, they strip our military and intelligence services to the bare bones. The money is used for touchy-feeling crap.

From the article: “If a Democrat were to win in 2008, it would give terrorists worldwide a four year respite to rebuild, reload, and run wild without serious opposition from the United States. The price our nation and our allies would pay in blood and treasure for that mistake would be incalculable.”

Exactly so.

Lieberman's Take

GO JOE!!!
GO JOE!!!
Saturday, February 24, 2007 11:16 PM

With the recent developments of the possibility of Mr. Lieberman jumping the sinking and stinking ship of the Socialist Liberal Party, aka Democratic Party, aka Regressive Party, I at first had my doubts. Not now.

My doubts were due to a continuing Congressional cascade towards self-indulgent stupidity and superiority complexes over the people they were elected to represent. Sounds “Rather” crass but that is the way I see it. Take a stab at proving me wrong. Go ahead and don’t be shy. Just make sure you have your facts together because I have mine.

The Congress has been slowly taken over through the years of people that promote their own personal agendas as well as the Party Hack Line, no matter the political party. They no longer represent “We The People”. People tend to accept a particular candidate even when their philosophies differ. That is OK as long as the elected officials represent their constituents, as is their function, as stated in the Constitution of the United States. This isn’t the case anymore…is it? Methinks not.

OK. Joe Lieberman. He votes with the Democrats MOST of the time…perhaps ALWAYS except when it comes to the Global War On Terror. He got alienated by the Hate Bush and Hate America Crowds and went Independent and won relection in CT. OK. Fine.

He also stated that he would “caucus with the Democrats” and parlay with the Republicans. OK. Fine.

The Hate Bush and Hate America Crowds have finally irritated Joe to such a degree, due to theri treasonous stance on the GWOT, that he now may jump ship. OK. Fine.
Proud Infidel from Victory Caucus sent me a link which convinced me to ruck up and accept him into the fold.

Read the article and decide for yourself. They are now referring to him as being a narcissist. WHAT? As Proud Infidel has stated, “And what the HELL was Clinton? Kerry? PELOSI!! Jesum - don’t even get me started on that woman!” LOL!!

Really. Go read that Leftinistra Rag and then check out the comments to the post. Simply amazing.

Whiners Of Iran

Iran Is Whining…AGAIN!
Iran Is Whining…AGAIN!

Saturday, February 24, 2007 1:27 PM

What a bunch of LOSERS!! No wonder the Leftinistra love them so much…they deserve each other.

Iran Says We Cannot Do It…LMAO!!

Excerpt:

“…We do not see America in a position to impose another crisis on its tax payers inside America by starting another war in the region,” Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki told reporters…”

“…Mottaki was responding to U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney, who renewed Washington’s warning to Iran earlier Saturday that “all options” were on the table if Tehran continues to defy U.N. demands to halt uranium enrichment.

At a joint news conference with Prime Minister John Howard during a visit to Australia, Cheney said the United States was “deeply concerned” about Iran’s activities, including the “aggressive” sponsoring of terrorist group Hezbollah and inflammatory statements by President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad…”

Iran’s retards leading that country KNOW beyond a shadow of a doubt that if they nuke Israel, they are “one with the atoms”. All this is, is more blathering pulling at the emotional cables of the Leftinistra mind-set.

Thanks to Jimmy Carter, Iran has been a pain-in-the-butt. Time to get that looked into.

Whack A Jihadi

Seal A Hole…
Seal A Hole…
Saturday, February 24, 2007 1:13 PM

…as to Whack A Mole…LOL!!!

“…The key to success is staying power. The always incisive Daffyd ab-Hugh has a good read on this dynamic. Counterinsurgency in Iraq has often been compared to a game of whack-a-mole — secure an area, only to have the insurgents pop up somewhere else. But if we slammed a mallet into the hole, and kept it there, then picked up a new one… and did the same?

This is a new game called Seal-a-Hole , and it has a very different dynamic from Whack-a-Mole: the normal game is one of futility; the game continues until the player gets tired and quits or he runs out of money. But Seal-a-Hole actually has a victory point: when all the holes are sealed, the game is over — and the player, America, has won…”

“…and the player, America, has won…”

That will agitate and irritate the socialist libocrats and librepubs for ages to come. Why can’t we bag and tag these jerks and send them on their way? Ya think there might be some 72+ virgins waiting for them some place? Jeesh! How many virgins ARE their in Mecca? LOL!!

Buggers Bugged

Shhhhhhh! Where’d They Go?
Shhhhhhh! Where’d They Go?
Saturday, February 24, 2007 1:07 PM

LOL!!! I know where they went! Back to clean their diapers. That’s where! THIS time, our troops are there to kick some serious tail…AGAIN…for real.

Shhhhh…The Surge Is Working

Excerpt: “…This turnaround in Baghdad is confirmed at home by the media’s near-deafening silence. If it seems like you’ve heard less about how Iraq is spiraling into civil war in the weeks since the surge was announced, this is why. Even some discordant voices in the media are starting to wonder what’s happening. Time magazine worries that it’s “Quiet in Baghdad. Too quiet.” That’s right — a dramatic reduction in violence is actually bad news…”

Bad news? Why is that? Read the TIMES in cahoots with CNN. You’ll see why. Even in the face of Good News, they whine because there isn’t Bad News but they still bash the troops. What a bunch of loser morons!!

Quiet In Baghdad…Too Quiet

Poor babies…
Excerpt: “…Until this week, though, the war in Ghazaliyah continued to rage even with Americans in the middle of it. “At least twice, three times a day, every day,” said Sgt. Jason McQueen, there were “straight-up gunfights all around you.” But now, said 1st Lt. Jake Furda, 26, “the biggest question of everyone’s mind is, ‘where the hell are they?’” …”

You get three guesses and the first 50 don’t count…

Remove The Politics Please

Petitions
Petitions
Saturday, February 24, 2007 11:36 AM

Write your own and email, fax, snail-mail or otherwise, send them in. It makes a difference.

This is a guide found on TownHall…

PETITION:

TO: U.S. House of Representatives and U.S. Senate
CC: Nancy Pelosi
RE: Anti-war resolutions tell terrorists and the world that Congress does not have the will to fight for what we believe.

I am opposed to the non-binding anti-troop resolutions voted on in the Senate and passed in the House. I believe they undermine the President’s authority to command our Armed Forces and negatively impacts our troops morale. Further, these resolutions embolden terrorists and our enemies by sending the message that the United States lacks the fortitude needed to win the global war on terror. General Petraeus is in command of our Armed Forces on the ground and I put my trust in him. Second guessing and armchair-quarterbacking the war effort from your cushy Capitol Hill office is no way for America to defeat its enemies and protect our citizens.

With all due respect Sirs, Leave the war strategy to those fighting the war.

Appeal For Courage

Redress…
Redress…
Saturday, February 24, 2007 11:32 AM
GET THE WORD OUT>>>>>>>>>>>>NOW!!!

Appeal for Redress

Sign this Appeal.

This site is an Appeal For Redress in support of our mission in Iraq.

An Appeal For Redress is an authorized means for active duty military to submit a grievance to Congress. It can be signed by Active Duty, Reserve, or National Guard military personnel.

It is authorized by DoD Directive 1325.6 and DoD Directive 7050.6.

The wording of the Appeal for Redress is:

As an American currently serving my nation in uniform, I respectfully urge my political leaders in Congress to fully support our mission in Iraq and halt any calls for retreat. I also respectfully urge my political leaders to actively oppose media efforts which embolden my enemy while demoralizing American support at home. The War in Iraq is a necessary and just effort to bring freedom to the Middle East and protect America from further attack.

If you are active duty, reservist or national guard, please Sign this Appeal.

Most service members fully support the war in Iraq and feel calls to retreat by Congress and attacks by our media on our conduct and mission act to motivate our enemy while demoralizing our support at home, directly increasing the threat we face and resulting in greater American casualties. This Appeal for Redress provides a way in which individual service members can appeal to Congress to fully support us and actively oppose media attacks on our mission and our morale.

This Appeal will be delivered to members of Congress.

Active Duty Members go here: GO FOR IT DO THE RIGHT THING

All others go here: DO THE RIGHT THING HERE!!

Victory

Victory At All Cost?
Victory At All Cost?
Saturday, February 24, 2007 1:09 AM

ABSOLUTELY!!!“You ask: What is our aim? I can answer in one word. It is Victory, Victory at all costs, Victory in spite of all terror. However long or hard the road may be, for without Victory there is no survival.”…Winston Churchill

Fly High You Eagles, Soar

Fly High You Eagles, Soar
Fly High You Eagles, Soar
Friday, February 23, 2007 4:04 PM

Fly High You Eagles, Soar

If I was able to attend this event, I would. I encourage all that can to do so. The anti-war, aka anti-American, fools will be marching on the Pentagon 3/17/07. There will be Bands of Brothers present to ensure no vandalism will ensue at the War Memorials. Hopefully, Jihad Jane will stroke out and do the world a favor.

Here is a poem written by Russ Vaughn for the event(s):

Fly High you Eagles, soar

On you we all depend.

To serve, to stand, support our war,

Our fallen to defend.

Stand firm, stand brave before our Wall;

Deal those a sorry fate,

Who answer Fonda’s hateful call:

Our nation they must hate.

Fly high you Eagles, soar,

Your keen eyes see below,

The leftist fools oppose this war,

To them no low’s too low.

They seek our Wall to desecrate,

To enhance their losing cause;

They seek to doom our nation’s fate;

They see nothing but our flaws.

Fly high you Eagles, soar,

Above those who seek defeat,

Who seek submission, nothing more,

To a terror they can’t meet.

They falter when the course is long;

They’re weak-willed, failed and bitter;

Got it all entirely wrong,

So typical of a quitter.

Fly high you Eagles, soar,

Stand proud before our Wall;

You are the nation’s heart, the core,

The essence of us all.

Know that we stand there with you,I

n spirit and in soul,

America’s not lost, not through,

We’ve a long, long way to go.

Fly high you Eagles, soar,

from your lofty, special station,

Know this is true forever more;

you’ve the blessing of your nation.

Queen Moonbat Pelosi

Pelosi Has Conditions?
Pelosi Has Conditions?
Friday, February 23, 2007 3:04 PM

She sure does. It is called lethal moonbatness.

Pelosi Backs War Funds Only With Conditions

Equipment, Training For Troops Would Face New Standards

By Jonathan Weisman and Shailagh Murray

Washington Post Staff WritersFriday, February 16, 2007; Page A01

WOW!! Read the article by clicking here

Sample: “…Congressional Democrats signaled a willingness to directly challenge and curtail Bush’s warmaking powers, a move that will almost certainly spark a legal or constitutional confrontation…”

It is a good thing this blog site provider has a Blog Nanny.

Morons. Moosetwits.

Slow-Bleed

No Way…Do The Right Thing?
No Way…Do The Right Thing?
Friday, February 23, 2007 2:34 PM

No Way To End A War By Charles KrauthammerFriday, February 23, 2007; A19
A voice from the wilderness?? This will be posted, in its entirety, for the socialist and pacifistic cowardly liberals over at the gop.com blog just to see how the lib moonbats that hang out there will implode. It ought to be funny to watch.

A short excerpt from here: No Way To Win A War

“…Slowly bleeding our forces by defunding what our commanders think they need to win (the House approach) or rewording the authorization of the use of force so that lawyers decide what operations are to be launched (the Senate approach) is no way to fight a war. It is no way to end a war. It is a way to complicate the war and make it inherently unwinnable — and to shirk the political responsibility for doing so.”

AIN’T THAT THE TRUTH??

The Problems With Liberals

Troubles Ahead
Troubles Ahead
Friday, February 23, 2007 2:26 PM

The top 9 reasons why a Democratic president can’t handle the war on terrorismBy John HawkinsFriday, February 23, 2007

from right here I was going to ellaborate further but, I cannot add anything to it at this moment!!Many people assume that the Democrats’ opposition to the war on terrorism and their unwavering determination to undercut the war in Iraq are solely an outgrowth of their dislike of George Bush. While Bush Derangement Syndrome and raw political considerations certainly are part of the problem, you’ve got to understand that the modern Democratic Party is simply no longer capable of dealing with a conflict like the war on terrorism because of the weird ideological tics of liberalism.Look at how weak and helpless Jimmy Carter was when he was confronted by the Iranians. And Bill Clinton? Despite being prodded to take action time and time again by world events like the bombing of the World Trade Center, Saddam Hussein’s attempted assassination of George Bush, Sr., the Khobar Towers bombing, the embassy bombings in Nairobi and Tanzania, the bombing of the USS Cole, along with India, Pakistan, and North Korea acquiring nuclear weapons under his watch, Clinton seemed incapable of dealing effectively with any serious foreign policy challenges.That being said, if this nation were unfortunate enough to be burdened for four years with Barack Obama, John Edwards, Hillary Clinton or one of the other liberals contending for the Democratic nomination, things would be even worse this time around. Why would that be the case? There are a variety of reasons for it.

1) The Democratic insistence on treating the war on terrorism as a law enforcement issue will make it extremely difficult to deal with terrorist groups. When you have heavily armed terrorists ensconced in foreign nations, sometimes with the approval of their government, it’s simply not practical to capture them, read them their rights, and take them back to America for trial. That is something that should be obvious after that approach was tried by Bill Clinton in the nineties and it failed to produce results. Going back to it in the post 9/11 world, which is what the Democrats want to do, is nothing but an invitation to catastrophe.

2) Ronald Reagan once said that, “Of the four wars in my lifetime, none came about because the U.S. was too strong.” Conversely, a super power that seems weak invites attack. After spending the last six years railing against the Bush Administration and fighting tooth and nail against almost every measure that makes it tougher on the terrorists, a Democratic victory in 2008 would be viewed by the world as nothing less than an American capitulation in the war on terror. This would encourage the terrorists to launch more attacks and cause our allies in the fight to lose heart.

3) When the only credible Democratic voice on national security in the Senate, Joe Lieberman, was defeated in the Democratic primary last year, the message sent to Democrats was, “Being serious about defending America may cost you your job.” After that, elected Democrats became even more reluctant to stand up against terrorism, which is really saying something, since the Democratic Party has been nothing but a hindrance in the war on terrorism since they voted en masse for the war in Afghanistan.

4) The Democratic base doesn’t take terrorism seriously and considers it to be nothing more than a distraction from socializing the economy, raising taxes, promoting gay marriage, and the other domestic issues that are near and dear to the heart of liberals. It’s old hat to hear Democrats say that they think global warming is more dangerous than terrorism, but at one point in 2006, 94% of the readers at the most popular liberal blog on earth, the Daily Kos, were actually saying that they thought that corporate media consolidation was a greater threat than terrorism. If you have a Democratic base that isn’t serious about fighting terrorism — and it isn’t — you will have a Democratic President that isn’t serious about fighting terrorism.

5) Using the American military to further the interests of our country makes liberals uncomfortable, even though they’re usually happy to send the troops gallivanting off to the latest godforsaken hotspot that has caught the eye of liberal activists. That’s why many Democrats, like Hillary Clinton, who oppose winning the war in Iraq, are all for using our military in Sudan. However, it is also why those same liberals will oppose using our military to tackle terrorists abroad except in Afghanistan, where it would be politically damaging for them to call for a pull-out.

6) When the U.N. Security Council has members like China, France, and Russia that seem to be financially in bed with every country we end up at loggerheads with, the UN is going to be even more hapless and ineffective than normal. Since the Democrats are so hung up on getting UN approval for everything we do, it will be practically impossible for them to move forward on any serious, large scale foreign policy enterprise.

7) The Democrats are overly concerned with “international opinion,” AKA “European opinion.” The Europeans have mediocre militaries, pacifistic populations, fetishize international law, and have extremely inflated views of their own importance. Other than Britain, they don’t have much to offer in a military conflict, yet even getting token forces from them that are minimally useful is like pulling teeth. Getting large numbers of European nations to cooperate with us on military ventures that are important to American security will be nearly impossible at this point — yet since Democrats place a higher priority on European approval than our national security, they will insist on it. This, combined with the logjam at the UN, would hamstring any Democratic President.

8) The Democrats want to close Guantanamo Bay and put the terrorists held there into the American court system. The justice system in the United States is simply not designed to deal with and interrogate terrorists or enemy fighters captured overseas by our troops. Putting the terrorists held at Gitmo into our court system would only mean that hundreds of terrorists would be freed on technicalities because it’s not advisable to reveal intelligence methods — or because our soldiers aren’t trained in the legal niceties that are necessary for policemen, but should be irrelevant in a war zone. How absurd would it be to catch a Taliban fighter entering Afghanistan, take him back to the United States, have him released by a liberal judge, and then dropped back off on the Afghan border where he’d be back shooting at our troops the next day? If a Democrat wins in 2008, we will get to find out all about it first hand.

9) The intelligence programs that have helped prevent another 9/11 would be curtailed under a Democratic President. As a general rule, Democrats favor weakening our military and intelligence agencies. Add to that the complete hysteria we’ve seen from liberals over programs like the Patriot Act and the NSA tapping calls from terrorists overseas to people in the U.S. Under a Democratic President, we would be sure to see our intelligence agencies systematically stripped of the powers they need to detect and foil terrorist plots.

If a Democrat were to win in 2008, it would give terrorists worldwide a four year respite to rebuild, reload, and run wild without serious opposition from the United States. The price our nation and our allies would pay in blood and treasure for that mistake would be incalculable.