I Am A Proud Member of Vets For Freedom

For up to date progress in the War In Iraq, please visit Vets For Freedom, an organization I am proud to be a member in good standing of.

Veteran's Suicide Hot Line Number!

1-800-273-TALK (8255) Call this number if you need help!!

A Vast Collection Of Buzzings At Memeorandum

If you wish to catch a buzz without the usual after affects, CLICK TO MEMEORANDUM. (It will not disturb the current page) That will be all. We now return to regular programming.

This Blog Is Moving

Greetings. After this weekend, this Take Our Country Back Blog will be moving to the new web site. Too many conservatives are getting zapped by the intolerant dweebs of the Obama Goons and seeing that this editing platform is a free site, Blogger can do pretty much what it feels like doing. Hence, I now have a paid site and will be migrating the last 1400+ posts shortly.

So, one day, you just may click this page somewhere and it will show up as "private". It has been fun but the intolerant Czarbie Goon Squads are brain dead idiots. They can come play at the new site which I OWN outright.

Saturday, October 2, 2010

Ongoing Serious Implications of Islamophobia

A/HRC/15/53, "Report of the Special Rapporteur on contemporary forms of  racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance, Githu Muigai, on the manifestations of defamation of religions, and in particular on the ongoing serious implications of Islamophobia, for the enjoyment of all rights by their followers."

    The report, issued 07/12/'10,  is in the form of a 19 page pdf file. It consists of an enumerated list of 91 paragraphs. Yesterday I wrote a post about the Rapporteur's statement introducing the report to the HRC. In this post I will deal with what I consider to be the most important segments of the report.

    The report is a reference to five classes of cases "pertaining to Human Rights Council resolution 13/16".  The cases are classified as follows.

  • acts of violence or discrimination, or incitement thereto, against individuals on the basis of their religion or belief
  • attacks on religious sites
  • religious and ethnic profiling
  • religious symbols
  • negative stereotyping of religions, their followers and sacred persons
    Physical assaults and vandalism are covered under domestic laws.  I see no need to get excited about the rare instances. The perpetrators should be found out, prosecuted and punished under existing statutes.

    When most criminal acts of a certain type are perpetrated by members of a known set, common sense directs law enforcement's attention to members of that set.  Most acts of Islamic terrorism are perpetrated by Muslim men between the ages of 17 and 40.  Only a Muslim, a damned fool or a traitor would object to giving extra scrutiny to members of that class when screening for security risks in transportation.

    Questions concerning religious symbols are raised in  ¶87 on page 18.  "The Special Rapporteur takes the view that the following questions should be kept in mind when assessing the legality of such bans or restrictions:"
  • is the construction, use or display of certain religious symbols constitutive of the freedom to manifest one’s religion or belief?
A search of the Qur'an, hadith & Reliance of the Traveller turned up a few mentions of minarets in Ibn Kathir's Tafsir and hadth; they related to the descent of Jesus. I found no legal requirement for the construction of minarets.  There is blessed good reason for banning them. Dr. Andrew Bostom explains in Europe News.

The venerable Brill Encyclopedia of Islam (EOI) entry on minarets makes plain that minarets are a political statement of Islamic supremacism. Interestingly, given current Turkish Erdogan’s provocative statement while mayor of Istanbul -- (the full statement was quoted in a NY Times story by Stephen Kinzer from 2/16/1998: "The mosques are our barracks, the domes are our helmets, the minarets are our swords, and the faithful are our army”), cited by opponents of minaret construction in Switzerland — the observations from the Brill EOI about the Ottoman perspective on minarets are of particular interest.

Refer to Islamic Architecture: Form, Function, and Meaning  By Robert Hillenbrand.  See also Brill's Encyclopedia of Islam Pg. 227.
The concept of minarets function as a symbol of supremacism is reinforced by the requirement that dhimmis not build as high as Islamic structures. [Reliance of the Traveller, o11.5(5).]

    I know of no good cause why the citizens of Switzerland should be compelled to allow the Muslims to lord it over them with minarets as symbols of power and supremacy.  If you  click the link to Reliance o11.5 and read the sixth item, you will discover that where Allah's writ runs, Christians are prohibited from displaying  crosses and ringing bells.  Reciprocity anyone?

  • Is the ban or restriction discriminatory (in a direct or indirect manner) vis-à-vis specific groups of  the population?    
Who else builds minarets?  Are they really analogous to steeples?
  • Is the ban or restriction on the display of religious symbols proportionate to the necessity for security measures by the State concerned?
My view is that this question  applies principally to the issue of banning the niqab.  The impossibility of identifying the wearer creates a security risk in that terrorists and robbers could gain a degree of impunity by cross dressing.  There have been law suits over ID photos taken wearing the niqab.  In that case, the insult to sanity is so obvious as to require no elaboration.
  • Is the ban or restriction on the display of religious symbols necessary to uphold the principle  of equality of men and women?
If that is what you are about, you'd better outlaw Islam altogether because the Qur'an clearly states the superiority of men in 4:34 and made women chattel  in 2:223.  Female inferiority is reinforced in  Sahih Bukhari 1.6.301 (deficient in intelligence & religion)..
  • Does the ban or restriction take into account the individual freedom to wear or not to wear religious symbols?
If a Muslima wants to wear a hijab, big deal. I see no reason to prohibit it; it does no harm, and, like a skunk's stripes, it serves as a visible warning sign.  The S.R. thinks that  "such questions should be provided by an independent and impartial judiciary and in light of the specific circumstances of each case under
consideration."

    In ¶88, also on pg. 18, the S..R. gets down to the important stuff.

The Special Rapporteur regrets reports of stereotyping which do not contribute to the creation of an environment conducive to constructive and peaceful dialogue among communities. Nonetheless, he recalls that peaceful expressions of opinions and ideas should always be tolerated, as long as they do not fall under the restrictions in articles 19, paragraph 3, and 201 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

  • regrets reports of stereotyping
Is it the reports or the stereotyping he regrets?  Presumably its the latter.
  • which do not contribute to the creation of an environment conducive to constructive and peaceful dialogue 
    • among communities
Conversations take place between individuals, not communities.  We ought to be one community, not Balkanized  enclaves. How could there be a constructive and peaceful dialogue when Islam has declared  and is prosecuting war against us?  Has the S.R. bothered to read the Qur'an & hadith?  [Fight those who... until...]

    Of course, those banners reading "Freedom Go to Hell",  "Islam Will Dominate The World" and "Behead Those Who Insult Islam" contribute greatly to "constructive and peaceful dialogue".  Yeah, right.

    We find ¶89 on page 19 of the report.

The Special Rapporteur distinguishes between stereotyping of religions on one hand and of religious followers or sacred persons on the other. With regard to stereotyping of religious followers and of sacred persons, the Special Rapporteur
recalls that the right to freedom of expression may be restricted in order to protect, inter alia, the rights or reputations of others. However, in accordance with articles 19 and 20 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, any restrictions on the right to freedom of expressions must be established in law; they must pursue a legitimate aim; and they must be proportional to the aim sought to be achieved. As a result, the Special Rapporteur believes that a very high threshold should be met and that the defamatory expressions targeting individuals must have been proven false before they warrant restrictions and sanctions thereon. Moreover, he recommends that sanctions be of a civil nature only and that fines arising from civil defamation procedures respect the principle of proportionality in order not to have a long-lasting and chilling effect on the right to freedom of expression.

  • stereotyping of religious followers
Are they Muslims or ain't they?  Muslims are commanded to obey Allah and his messenger. If they do that, then Allah's imperatives and Moe's sunnah must describe their attitude & conduct.
  • in order to protect, inter alia, the rights
Exactly what right would be protected by prohibiting criticism of Islam?  What right is violated when we reveal the fact that Islam is a predator preying on the human race?  What right do we violate when we expose its mercenary mission and martial method?  Would writing about prostitution, drug & bootlegging rackets violate some right of Mafiosi?
  • a very high threshold should be met
  • defamatory expressions targeting individuals must have been proven false
Should those restrictions apply to the case of Geeert Wilders?  Why was that not mentioned in this report?  Truth is not listed as a possible defense in the Dutch law under which Wilders is being persecuted.

    The issue of stereotyping religions comes up in ¶90.

With regard to stereotyping of religions, he recalls that vigorously interrogating and criticizing religious doctrines and their teachings is thoroughly legitimate and constitutes a significant part of the exercise of the right to freedom of opinion or expression. Therefore, the Special Rapporteur would like to reiterate that domestic blasphemy laws aiming to protect religions per se can prove counterproductive since they could result in de facto censure of robust examination of
religious doctrines and teachings and of inter- and intra-religious criticism. Moreover, the Special Rapporteur received reports that many of these laws afford different levels of protection to different religions and have often proved to be applied in a discriminatory manner. He was informed of numerous examples of persecution of religious minorities or dissenting believers, but also of atheists and non-theists, as a result of legislation on religious offences or overzealous application of laws that may be fairly neutral on the face of it. Consequently, the Special Rapporteur encourages States to move away from the notion of defamation of religions towards the legal concept of advocacy of racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence in order to anchor the debate in the relevant existing international legal framework, and in particular that provided in the  International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
  • vigorously interrogating ... religious doctrines constitutes a significant part of the exercise of the right to freedom of opinion or expression.
Where does he recall that from?  Is it not self-evident?
  • persecution of religious minorities or dissenting believers,
Such as the persecutions in Indonesia & Pakistan?
  • advocacy of racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence
Precisely how will you define and measure that abstract concept?  Self-appointed arbiters such as the Secretary General and the HRC2 assert that Fitna and the Motoons fit that concept.   In fact, Fitna and the Motoons describe incitement, they do not constitute it.

    ¶91 illustrates the insanity of the basic concept.

Advocacy of racial or religious hatred is a symptom, the external manifestation of something much more profound which is intolerance and bigotry. Intolerance against individuals based on their religion or belief unfortunately continues to be  manifested in different ways. It is therefore critical that States find the most effective ways through which to protect individuals from advocacy of hatred and violence by others. While legislative responses have often been relied on by States to respond to  these phenomena, they are far from being sufficient to bring about real changes in mindsets, perceptions and discourse. Indeed, tackling the root causes of manifestations of religious intolerance affecting individual’s human rights requires a much broader set of policy measures, for example in the areas of education, awareness-raising and interreligious and intercultural dialogue. The Special Rapporteur therefore strongly recommends that States put a strong emphasis on a  broad range of preventive measures which aim at fostering a peaceful society where, inter alia, freedom of expression and freedom of religion or belief may be fully exercised by all individuals.
  • Advocacy of racial or religious hatred is a symptom, the external manifestation of something much more profound which is intolerance and bigotry.
The Preface to the  Second Edition of the Calcutta Qur'an Petition  lists the numerous ayat which inspire hatred of non-Muslims. Faithful Muslims who go to the Mosque to pray curse us  17 times each day.  That is what they are doing when they recite the first Surah of the Qur'an, they are reminding Allah why he wants to burn us who "earned his wrath" and  "went astray".

  • advocacy of hatred and violence
    Get a clue, for Chrissake!!! "Fight them", Fight those who" and "  9:123. O you who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are close to you, and let them find harshness in you, and know that Allâh is with those who are the Al-Muttaqûn (the pious - see V.2:2). are the real incitement to violence.  Moe gave the believers an example to emulate: "I am  ordered to fight".

  • a peaceful society where ... freedom of expression and freedom of religion or belief may be fully exercised by all individuals
The S.R. just described a world without Islam.  Sorry, sucker, there is no religious freedom in Islam.  The penalty for apostasy is death!

08.0 APOSTASY FROM ISLAM (RIDDA)
(0: Leaving Islam is the ugliest form of unbelief
(kufr) and the worst. It may come about
through sarcasm, as when someone is told, "Trim
your nails, it is sunna," and he replies, "I would
not do it even if it were," as opposed to when some
circumstance exists which exonerates him of having
committed apostasy, such as when his tongue
runs away with him, or when he is quoting someone,
or says it out of fear.)
08.1 When a person who has reached puberty
and is sane voluntarily apostatizes from Islam, he
deserves to be killed.
08.2 In such a case, it is obligatory for the
caliph (A: or his representative) to ask him to
repent and return to Islam. If he does, it is
accepted from him, but if he refuses, he is
immediately killed.
   
    To comprehend the full enormity of that which the OIC seeks to impose upon us through the HRC & GA resolutions which they are seeking to insert into ICERD through a binding protocol, you need to delve further into Shari'ah.  O8.7  contains a list of 20 acts and attitudes which entail apostasy. Any negative statement about  Allah or Moe; any reviling or expression of doubt about Islam or denial of any part of the Qur'an gets a Muslim killed.  

    That same list of prohibitions is applied to dhimmis by extension. O11.5 lists legal and social restrictions on dhimmis.    O11.10 lists acts which violate the treaty of protection, subjecting the dhimmi who commits them to immediate execution.  Pay special attention to the fifth item in the list: :"(5) or mentions something impermissible about Allah, the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), or Islam. ".

011. IO The agreement is also violated (A: with
respect to the offender alone) if the state has stipulated
that any of the following things break it, and
one of the suhjects does so anyway. though if the
state has not stipulated that these break the agreement,
then they do not; namely, if one of the subject
people:
(1) commits adultery with a Muslim woman
or marries her:
(2) conceals spies of hostile forces;
(3) leads a Muslim away from Islam;
(4) kills a Muslim;
(5) or mentions something impermissible
about Allah, the Prophet (Allah bless him and
give him peace), or Islam.

    Because it inculcates hatred & incites violence, the intolerant war cult can not be tolerated.  Nor can we tolerate having its blasphemy laws imposed upon us.  We must rise up and raise  loud objections while we are still able to do so without being fined and imprisoned for  defending our lives and  liberty.  For this reason I exhort all lovers of life and liberty to sign the  International Qur'an Petition, copy it, paste it into an email and send it to everyone you can hope to influence with an exhortation to sign and forward it.




Article 19
1. Everyone shall have the right to hold opinions without interference.
2. Everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression; this right shall include freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media of his choice. 3. The exercise of the rights provided for in paragraph 2 of this article carries with it special duties and responsibilities. It may therefore be subject to certain restrictions, but these shall only be such as are provided by law and are necessary:
(a) For respect of the rights or reputations of others;
(b) For the protection of national security or of public order (ordre public), or of
public health or morals.

Article 20
1. Any propaganda for war shall be prohibited by law.
2. Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to
discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law..

  1.   7. Expresses deep concern in this respect that Islam is frequently and wrongly
    associated with human rights violations and terrorism and, in this regard, regrets the laws or
    administrative measures specifically designed to control and monitor Muslim minorities,
    thereby stigmatizing them and legitimizing the discrimination they experience;  [¶'5-7 of the pdf. The reference to the Motoons is obvious!]

Friday, October 1, 2010

Contemporary Forms of Racism: 'Islamophobia '

Mr. Githu Muigai, Special Rapporteur on contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination,xenophobia and related intolerance made a statement on his written report to the UNHRC September 28, 2010.  

  • Statement   5 page pdf, scanned image from type written document.
  • Full Report.   A/HRC/15/53  19 page pdf, text based. 
    • Citations located:
      • A/HRC/12/38  Previous special report concentrates on legal issues. 
      • Res 13/16 Apr30 '10  Defamation of Religions
      • A/HRC/15/45  Report of the Special Rapporteur on contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related
        intolerance on the implementation of General Assembly resolutions 63/162 and 64/147  07/15/'10
    Mr. Muigai apparently hoped to explain how defamation of religions and in particular, "the serious implications of Islamophobia"  impact on the "enjoyment of all human rights by their followers"

    "Islamophobia" implies irrational fear and loathing of Islam.  Since the hijackings, shooting incidents and bombings of the latter third of the last century and the more recent attacks in New York City and Washington D.C., fear and loathing of Islam is hardly irrational.  The history of Islam is a  1387 year trail of blood and  tears leaving an estimated 270 million innocent victims dead.

One of the most recent examples was the plan of a small group of individuals in Florida to organize a "Burn a · Koran Day" on ll September 2010. I very much regret this initiative and I welcome  the reactions of a wide variety of political and religious leaders opposing it. This event  demonstrates that actions undertaken by a small group of persons may sometimes  have worldwide repercussions. It is vital therefore to exercise caution in denouncing such acts, so as not to play into the hands of such individuals. 

    International Burn a Qur'an Day consisted of a web site, a Facebook page, banners, emails and television interviews.  No Qur'ans were burned by Pastor Terry Jones or his congregation.  Bibles and US flags were burned and property damage was done by rioting Muslims.

    President Obama, Secretary of State Clinton & General Petraeus did not exercise caution in denouncing the proposed Qur'an burning.  They imputed death & destruction  to Pastor Jones, instead of to its true source: the damnable doctrines of Islam  enshrined in the Qur'an and  preached in every Mosque.

play into the hands

    That is exactly what their kvetching does: it gives  those of us with rational objections to the doctrines and practices of Islam to expose them
to public view.

why burn the Qur'an?

propaganda for war

    ICCPR

Article 20

  1. Any propaganda for war shall be prohibited by law.

Qur'anic propaganda for war

  • 2:216. Jihâd (holy fighting in Allâh's Cause) is ordained for you (Muslims) though you dislike it, and it may be that you dislike a thing which is good for you and that you like a thing which is bad for you. Allâh knows but you do not know.
  • 8:39. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do. 
  • 9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued. 
  • 9:38. O you who believe! What is the matter with you, that when you are asked to march forth in the Cause of Allâh (i.e. Jihâd) you cling heavily to the earth? Are you pleased with the life of this world rather than the Hereafter? But little is the enjoyment of the life of this world as compared with the Hereafter.   
    9:39. If you march not forth, He will punish you with a painful torment and will replace you by another people, and you cannot harm Him at all, and Allah is Able to do all things. 
  • 9:111. Verily, Allâh has purchased of the believers their lives and their properties; for the price that theirs shall be the Paradise. They fight in Allâh's Cause, so they kill (others) and are killed. It is a promise in truth which is binding on Him in the Taurât (Torah) and the Injeel (Gospel) and the Qur'ân. And who is truer to his covenant than Allâh? Then rejoice in the bargain which you have concluded. That is the supreme success .

  • 9:123. O you who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are close to you, and let them find harshness in you, and know that Allâh is with those who are the Al-Muttaqûn (the pious - see V.2:2).
A search for "strive hard" in the Hilali\Khan translation  turned up 33 results. This sample is typical.
  • 9:41 March forth, whether you are light (being healthy, young and wealthy) or heavy (being ill, old and poor), strive hard with your wealth and your lives in the Cause of Allah. This is better for you, if you but knew.
    Surah Al-Anfal 39  commands Muslims to wage war against pagans until only Allah is worshiped on a global scale. It has neither geographic nor chronological limits.  Surah At-Taubah 29 commands Muslims to wage war against Jews, Christians & Zoroastrians until they are subjugated & extorted.  It has neither geographic nor chronological limits.

    Surah At-Taubah 111 reveals the relationship between Allah and Muslims. They are slaves, purchased to fight his battles.  In the same chapter, verses 38 & 39 warn Muslims that they go to war or go to Hell.  In Surah As-Saff, verses 9-13 tell Muslims how they can avoid Hell and enter Paradise: by jihad.  If that does not constitute propaganda for war under ICCPR 20.1, what would?

    The offensive verses listed above only scratch the surface of the evil of Islamic doctrine & practice.  They are the most important objections to Islam.  If international human rights covenants were enforced, those verses would be sufficient to outlaw Islam.  For that purpose I call your attention to the  International Qur'an Petition.

    A growing cadre of lovers of liberty are wising up to Islam. A search for ban Islam turned up 12,400,000 matches. A search for outlaw Islam turned up 605,000 matches.  The subject is turning up in blog posts, forums and comments all over the web.

negative stereotyping   

    This subject is raised on the fourth page of the statement.

Numerous cases of negative stereotyping of religions, their believers and sacred persons have also been brought to my attention. Among others, I received reports on TV broadcasts and cartoons depicting Jews, Muslims or other believers in a negative  manner; public protests against the Islamization of certain regions or countries; or books that were considered as insulting of the Buddhist religion. While I regret these worldwide reports of stereotyping which do not contribute to constructive dialogue among communities, I nonetheless recognize that peaceful expressions of opinions and ideas should always be tolerated, as long as they do not fall under the specific restrictions enshrined in articles 19 and 20 of the Intemational Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. `

Article 19

  1. Everyone shall have the right to hold opinions without interference.
  2. Everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression; this right shall include freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media of his choice.
  3. The exercise of the rights provided for in paragraph 2 of this article carries with it special duties and responsibilities. It may therefore be subject to certain restrictions, but these shall only be such as are provided by law and are necessary:
    1. For respect of the rights or reputations of others;
    2. For the protection of national security or of public order (ordre public), or of public health or morals.

Article 20

  1. Any propaganda for war shall be prohibited by law.
  2. Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law.
    The Special Rapporteur on contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination,xenophobia and related intolerance has clearly stated an objection to attempting to  outlaw "negative stereotyping".  His opinion runs counter to the mainstream.

Monday, September 27, 2010

International Burn a Qur'an Day: Fan the Embers!

The pr campaign initiated by Pastor Terry Jones, though it ended in a fizzle, afforded us an opportunity to expose the  evil contents of that abominable book. In Washington D.C., at the White House,  two courageous men revealed the contents and crumpled pages from a translation.  In New York, near the site of the proposed Ground Zero mosque, one brave man burned pages torn from a translation.

    Islam  has nothing to kvetch about because:

  1. Pastor Jones abandoned the burning ceremony.
  2. The crumpled Qur'an was a translation, not Arabic.
  3. The burned Qur'an was a translation, not Arabic. 
Muslims do not consider translations to be sacred.  The Qur'an's magic is in the sound; it is meant to be memorized and recited, not read.

    Yet Muslims are bitching like a nervous little dog tied up outside, cold, hungry & lonely:   barking incessantly. Their barking is both a threat to our liberty and an opportunity to expose Islam's damnable doctrines.  We must repulse the threat and exploit the opportunity.

threat:

    On September 22, 2010, Pakistan's delegate to the United Nations Human Rights Council submitted a draft resolution condemning International Burn a Qur'an Day.  The draft is a single page packed with feces, some old and stale, some fresh and pungent. [Emphasis added to quotes for clarity.]

stale feces

    The preamble contains  abusive  perversion  by reference to the U.N. Charter,  the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, ICERD & ICCPR.  It continues with a disingenuous call for one sided inter-cultural  dialogue.  It extends its spew of feces by  conflating criticism of Islam with racism by reference to the United Nations Millennium Declaration.  It aggravates the offense by conflating criticism with physical violence.

  •     Reaffirming the pledge made by all States under the Charter of the United Nations to
    promote and encourage universal respect for and observance of human rights and fundamental
    freedoms for all, without distinction as to race, sex, language or religion,
    Human rights belong to individual humans, not to groups, associations or institutions.  There is no right to be shielded by coercive force from all questioning and criticism.
  • Reaffirming also that all human rights are universal, indivisible, interdependent and  interrelated,
    This is exemplary kitman, the Islamic art & science of deception by obfuscation.  They are equating a non-existent & unstated right to be  shielded from criticism with our right of free expression.  The reaffirmation is boiler plate taken from previous Defamation of Religions resolutions.  The implicit false premise: "our right to be shielded from criticism  negates your right of free expression; you can't say anything about our demon, profit, doctrines or practices".
  • Reaffirming further that discrimination between human beings on the grounds of
     religion or belief constitutes an affront to human dignity and a disavowal of the principles of
    the Charter of the United Nations, and shall be condemned as a violation of the human rights
    and fundamental freedoms proclaimed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and
    enunciated in detail in the International Covenants on Human Rights, and as an obstacle to
    friendly and peaceful relations between nations,
    Pastor Jones proposed to burn an unholy book.  That is not an act of discrimination, it is a condemnation of a set of evil doctrines & practices. Condemning & incineration of the demon's manifesto of predation is not discrimination, nor does it pose an obstacle to peaceful international relations.  All of the threats and violence came from the other side, who burned flags & Bibles, destroyed property and killed people in their riots;  none came from the Dove World Outreach Center. 
  • Welcoming also the resolve expressed in the United Nations Millennium Declaration,
     adopted by the General Assembly in its resolution 55/2 on 8 September 2000, to take
    measures to eliminate the increasing acts of racism and xenophobia in many societies and to
    promote greater harmony and tolerance in all societies, and looking forward to its effective implementation at all levels, [Emphasis added.]
    The preliminary document for the recent Durban Conference contains  the key to the emphasized expression. Pay close attention to this, which constitutes a demonic distortion of the English language. I added the bold red font to make the evil  clause stand out.

4.  Emphasizes the urgent need to address the scourges of anti-Semitism, Christianophobia, and Islamophobia as contemporary forms of racism as well as racial and violent movements based on racism and discriminatory ideas directed at African, Arab, Christian, Jewish, Muslim and other communities;

The U.N. has equated opposition to Islam with racism.  Islam is not a race. Arab is a race; Islam, invented by an Arab,  enslaves Arabs, Africans, Asians & Europeans.  If we condemn Islam's sanctification  of mandatory genocidal conquest through terrorism, we are automatically branded as racist.   The intent is to silence us; to shut down debate arbitrarily.

fresh feces

    The novel crap is contained in a five point enumerated list of action items.

    Noting with deep concern the instances of intolerance, discrimination, profiling and
acts of violence against Muslims occurring in many parts of the world,

  1. Condemns in this regard the recent call by an extremist group to organize a ‘Burn a Koran Day’; 
  2. Condemns also any advocacy of religious hatred that constitutes incitement to I hatred, discrimination, hostility or violence
  3. Calls upon the international community to stand united against such events which undermine peaceful coexistence between nations and create an environment  conducive to violence; reprisal
  4. Calls upon also all States to condemn and oppose, in accordance with their obligations, under international human rights law, any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to hatred, discrimination, hostility  and violence;  
  5. Urges the international community to support all international and regional initiatives to promote cross-cultural and interfaith harmony.

extremist group

    Extremist connotes violent tendencies.  In common parlance, the Muslims who slaughter innocents in the name of Allah are labeled "extremists".  Who has Pastor Jones and his Dove World Outreach Center threatened?  Who have they assaulted?  Who have they killed?  They condemned and expressed an intention to burn the book which inspires & motivates terrorists.  What is extreme about that?

    This term of opprobrium, delivered in the absence of definition and evidence, constitutes  libel and slander.  Pakistan's delegate ought to be sued for libel and so should the UNHRC  when it passes that resolution.

incitement

    Exactly what did Pastor Jones say that incited anyone to hate Muslims?  Exactly what did he say that incited anyone to assault Muslims?  Precisely who acted on that incitement?  Did he brandish a sword and shout "Crusade, Crusade, Crusade! ?

undermine peaceful coexistence

    Did Pastor Jones call for war?  Did his congregation march upon  Pakistan's embassy hurling snones and firebombs?  Who  rioted?  Who incited them to riot?  Did they listen to the Pastor's sermon or their Imam's Kutbah at Juma Salat?

condemn and oppose

    President Obama, Secretary of State Clinton & General Petraeus  condemned and opposed  International Burn a Qur'an Day. They met their obligations. What more  do you demand?  Note the repetition of boiler plate from an earlier point.  What is its source?

ICCPR

Article 20

  1. Any propaganda for war shall be prohibited by law.
  2. Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law.
The United Nations
INTERNATIONAL COVENANT ON
CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS

That just happens to be an international human rights covenant, legally binding on and enforceable against signatories.

opportunity

    The enemy has pointed out our best weapon against it!  We have an opportunity to pick up and deploy that weapon.

demand enforcement of Art. 20!

  1.  Any propaganda for war shall be prohibited by law.
What institution violates that provision in its immutable constitution?  I have a clue for you: Pastor Jones proposed to burn it.

2:216. Jihâd (holy fighting in Allâh's Cause) is ordained for you (Muslims) though you dislike it, and it may be that you dislike a thing which is good for you and that you like a thing which is bad for you. Allâh knows but you do not know.

8:39
. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.

9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

9:38. O you who believe! What is the matter with you, that when you are asked to march forth in the Cause of Allâh (i.e. Jihâd) you cling heavily to the earth? Are you pleased with the life of this world rather than the Hereafter? But little is the enjoyment of the life of this world as compared with the Hereafter.

9:39. If you march not forth, He will punish you with a painful torment and will replace you by another people, and you cannot harm Him at all, and Allâh is Able to do all things.

9:123. O you who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are close to you, and let them find harshness in you, and know that Allâh is with those who are the Al-Muttaqûn (the pious - see V.2:2

61:10. O You who believe! Shall I guide you to a commerce that will save you from a painful torment.

61:11.  That you believe in Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad ), and that you strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allâh with your wealth and your lives, that will be better for you, if you but know!

61:12. (If you do so) He will forgive you your sins, and admit you into Gardens under which rivers flow, and pleasant dwelling in Gardens of 'Adn ­ Eternity ['Adn (Edn) Paradise], that is indeed the great success.


    If that ain't propaganda for war, what the Hell is?      ICCPR 20.1 requires that it be proscribed by law.  Who will enforce 20.1?

  1. Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law.
1:6. Guide us to the Straight Way 

1:7. The Way of those on whom You have bestowed Your Grace, not (the way) of those who earned Your Anger (such as the Jews), nor of those who went astray (such as the Christians). 

2:161. Verily, those who disbelieve, and die while they are disbelievers, it is they on whom is the Curse of Allâh and of the angels and of mankind, combined.

98:6. Verily, those who disbelieve (in the religion of Islâm, the Qur'ân and Prophet Muhammad ()) from among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) and Al-Mushrikûn will abide in the Fire of Hell. They are the worst of creatures.

98:7. Verily, those who believe [in the Oneness of Allâh, and in His Messenger Muhammad ()) including all obligations ordered by Islâm] and do righteous good deeds, they are the best of creatures.

Reliance of the Traveller, o.11.5 lists discriminations against non-Muslim subjects.
-2- are distinguished from Muslims in dress, wearing a wide cloth belt (zunnar); 
-3- are not greeted with "as-Salamu 'alaykum";
-4- must keep to the side of the street;
-5- may not build higher than or as high as the Muslims' buildings, though if they acquire a tall house, it is not razed;
-6- are forbidden to openly display wine or pork, (A: to ring church bells or display crosses,) recite the Torah or Evangel aloud, or make public display of their funerals and feastdays;
-7- and are forbidden to build new churches.

    If the cited ayat ain't incitement to & the cited Shari'an ain't discrimination against Jews & Christians,  what the Hell is?  ICCPR  20.2 requires that it be proscribed by law.l  Who will enforce 20.2?

    It is expected that the draft resolution condemning International  Burn a Qur'an Day will be debated and voted on this week.  It is certain that it will pass because the OIC and its allies have a majority of seats in the HRC.   This gives us a brief moment of opportunity. Let us seize it!!

International Qur'an Petition

    The petition linked immediately above cites the relevant provisions of ICCPR, ICERD & CPPCG and the Islamic doctrines which violate them.  It prays to the World Court for enforcement of those provisions which require civilized signatories to outlaw Islam.

    The link is to an html formatted copy which contains links to source texts. At the end of the text, it contains a signature link. I  urge you to  copy the petition, paste it into an email and send it to everyone you can hope to influence with an exhortation to sign and forward it.  Signing and promoting this petition is the best hope we have of prevailing over an existential foe which seeks to silence our protest against its intention to enslave us.

     U.N. resolutions are not binding, they lack the force of law.  ICERD can be enforced. At the end of November, the Ad Hoc Committee for the Elaboration of Complementary Standards will meet to write the resolutions into ICERD.  You can kiss the First Amendment goodbye, because it will be passed, signed and ratified.

    Our only hope of retaining our liberty  rests in raising the cost of this attack above the price Islam is willing to pay.  We must link full exposure of the Qur'an's evil contents to their attack against our free expression right.  We must do it now, while it is still legally possible.

    Act now if you love liberty and want to preserve it for yourself and your progeny.  Sign and propagate the International Qur'an Petition. Copy and cross post this blog post.  Seize the opportunity, it may be our last.

Sunday, September 26, 2010

Hector Aleem Update 09-18-10

Two points in this Hector Aleem update need to be brought  to the front burner and  reinforced.

  • Sunni Tehreek forced to start the trial on 18th September 2010 because a large mob gathered in front of the court so the judge had to obey what they said.
  • But the most interesting point I want to mention here is that when our lawyer asked the plaintiff (Muslim Cleric) that how do you get income? Because Sunni Tehreek is a religious organization and it can’t make much money; then the Plaintiff (Maulvi) replied that he got a sound system business which means that he sells DVDs and songs. And because of that the whole court laughed at the plaintiff.

mob rule

    Instead of  impartial justice, Pakistan has mob rule.  The courts bend to the will of the mob.  Since Christians are a minority, they can not obtain justice.

plaintiff sells music

    This point may go over many heads.  The audience laughed when the plaintiff's source of income was exposed because the Taliban and their allies forbid many forms of entertainment.  They burn down music shops and beat their owners,  killing many.   The revelation reduced the plaintiff's  probity as a witness several notches.

    Islam forbids musical instruments & entertainments because Moe  hated anything and everything that distracted his army from preparing for war. He wanted them to spend time honing their archery skills, not singing & dancing.

    The reputation of a witness is an important matter, as shown by this quote from  Reliance of the Traveller. [Emphasis added.] Testimony is accepted from one who...
o24.2(f) and who is outwardly respectable (0:
respectability (muru'a) meaning to have the positive
traits which one's peers possess in one's particular time and place. Sheikh ai-Islam (A:
Zakariyya Ansari) says, "Respectability is refraining
from conduct that is unseemly according
to standards commonly acknowledged among
those who observe the precepts and rules of the
Sacred Law." It is according to standards commonly
acknowledged (def: f4.5) because there are
no absolute standards for it, but rather it varies
with different persons, conditions, and places.
Such things as eating and drinking (A: in the
marketplace) or wearing nothing on one's head
may vitiate it (A: though the latter is of no consequence
in our times). as maya religious scholar's
wearing a robe or cap in places where it is riot
customary for him to do so).

024.3 Nor is testimony acceptable from someone
who:
( I) has committed an enormity (0: meaning
something severely threatened against in. an
unequivocal text from the Koran or hadith (dis:
book p) (N: though if someone who commits such
an act then repents (def: p77) and is felt to be sincere
in this, he regains his legal uprightness and his
testimony is accepted, provided he is tested after
his repentance long enough to believe in its
genuineness) ;
(2) persists in a lesser sin (0: because it then
becomes an enormity, as opposed to when one
does not persist therein. A lesser sin is one that has
not been severely threatened against in an
unequivocal text);
(3) or is without respectability (def:
024.2(f», such as a street-sweeper, bathhouse
attendant, and the like.

Mehwish Aleem
September 20 at 2:53pm 
Dear Group Members,

The hearing was on 18th September 2010, as you all know that we have applied for the quashment (Cancellation) of the case in the High Court. But the opponents i.e. Sunni Tehreek (a terrorist organization) wanted to start the trial in the session court. Sunni Tehreek forced to start the trial on 18th September 2010 because a large mob gathered in front of the court so the judge had to obey what they said. The mob also chanted death slogans against daddy and Christianity, they had long beards and were shouting a lot and that’s how they were trying to confuse our lawyer but they failed. And thanks to your support and sister Elizabeth who donated 50 Pounds which I gave to the lawyer and made him ready to go to the hearing. Our lawyer went to the court and he argued plus questioned the plaintiff marvelously. Our lawyer raised some very good and legal points. He continued to argue for about two and a half hours. There were some very interesting points which went against the plaintiff but I won’t disclose any information now as the judge has not given any decision yet. But the most interesting point I want to mention here is that when our lawyer asked the plaintiff (Muslim Cleric) that how do you get income? Because Sunni Tehreek is a religious organization and it can’t make much money; then the Plaintiff (Maulvi) replied that he got a sound system business which means that he sells DVDs and songs. And because of that the whole court laughed at the plaintiff. I don’t know about the court but according to my observation, everything was on our side and I saw the plaintiff’s face which was really upset. Our lawyer was very happy but the procedure has not finished yet. I told you that this lawyer is very good for our case but he asks for a lot of money. So that is why you can donate any amount you can. You can even donate one Dollar because Penny Penny makes many many.

*****Target for the Donation*****

The target for donation is $5000 which is still a huge amount but I hope that all who can support us will support us financially and those who can’t donate can just pray for us. Prayers really help, so don’t forget to pray for daddy. And please also pray for our donation, this is the target so please keep the target in your prayers and pray that we achieve the target ASAP. Because I think that the case is at the end and Daddy (Hector Aleem) will be released very soon thanks to all of you.

Here is the link to Donate through pay pal: http://tinyurl.com/hectoraleem

And if you want to donate through any other way then feel free to contact me.

And here is the picture I took; it’s a picture of a message by Sunni Tehreek which is written on a wall. The message translates “Non Muslims are still alive” and below that message they have written the name of their organization i.e. Sunni Tehreek and they have also given their phone number. You can watch this picture by clicking this link; this picture is also in the group. And please invite all your friends to join this group.

Here is the link to the picture: http://www.facebook.com/home.php#!/photo.php?pid=424011&o=all&op=1&view=all&subj=298776303670&id=100000234098047

Thank you for all your support

God Bless You

Sukkah Destroys Peace

Latma strikes again with a new parody  timed for the Sukkot holiday.  The theme: building a sukkah  destroys peace.






http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qq9vmwv0zfk&feature=player_embedded


Lets connect the parody to the real world.


Israel’s settlement moratorium has made a difference on the ground and improved the atmosphere for talks. ...

We believe that the moratorium should be extended.  Barack Hussein Obama: U.N. General Assembly

Israel continues with its settlement policy on all Palestinian land, especially in holy Jerusalem,...

We reiterate that adherence to these principles and basis, in addition to a complete freeze of all settlement activities, can salvage the peace process and open horizon for its success.  Mahmoud Abbas: U.N. General Assembly


The unstated premises:  

  1. Constructing dwellings for Jews in Jerusalem is an obstacle to peace.  
  2. We can't negotiate if Jews are building homes.  
    When Jordan seized half of Jerusalem in  1948, they tore down synagogues, broke tombstones and used some for urinals.  They excluded Jews from  the area under their control in violation of international law and a public commitment.  Now they demand total control over East Jerusalem, to be their capital, and declare constructing apartments for Jews, even in West Jerusalem,  an obstacle to peace.      

The ostensible demands:

  1. East Jerusalem as the capital of Falestine.
  2. Gaza and the West Bank  to form  a contiguous  Judenrein territory.
  3. 1947 borders.

The real demands:

  1. All of Israel "from the river to the sea".
  2. No Jew left alive anywhere. 

The obstacle to peace:

Islam: the ultimate AssWholliness:

  1. 9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued. 
  2. o9.8: The Objectives of Jihad

    The caliph (o25) makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians (N: provided he has first invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice, and if they will not, then invited them to enter the social order of Islam by paying the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya, def: o11.4) -which is the significance of their paying it, not the money itself-while remaining in their ancestral religions) (O: and the war continues) until they become Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll tax (O: in accordance with the word of Allah Most High,...
  3. 7:167. And (remember) when your Lord declared that He would certainly keep on sending against them (i.e. the Jews), till the Day of Resurrection, those who would afflict them with a humiliating torment. Verily, your Lord is Quick in Retribution (for the disobedient, wicked) and certainly He is Oft­Forgiving, Most Merciful (for the obedient and those who beg Allâh's Forgiveness).
    1. Eternal Humiliation placed on the Jews   ..."In the future, the Jews will support the Dajjal (False Messiah); and the Muslims, along with `Isa, son of Mary, will kill the Jews. This will occur just before the end of this world."...
    2. 3:112. Indignity is put over them wherever they may be, except when under a covenant (of protection) from Allâh, and from men; they have drawn on themselves the Wrath of Allâh, and destruction is put over them. This is because they disbelieved in the Ayât (proofs, evidences, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.) of Allâh and killed the Prophets without right. This is because they disobeyed (Allâh) and used to transgress beyond bounds (in Allâh's disobedience, crimes and sins). 
      1. The Good News that Muslims will Dominate the People of the Book

  4. Sahih Muslim Book 041, Number 6985:
    Abu Huraira reported Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: The last hour would not come unless the Muslims will fight against the Jews and the Muslims would kill them until the Jews would hide themselves behind a stone or a tree and a stone or a tree would say: Muslim, or the servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me; come and kill him; but the tree Gharqad would not say, for it is the tree of the Jews.
  5. The Good News that Muslims will conquer the Known World, and ultimately the Entire World
    (He it is Who has sent His Messenger with guidance and the religion of truth,) with beneficial knowledge and righteous good deeds. Indeed, the Islamic Shari`ah has two factors, knowledge and deeds. The true religious knowledge is by definition true, and the accepted Islamic acts are by definition accepted. Therefore, the news and creed that this religion conveys are true and its commandments are just,
    (that He may make it superior to all religions.) all the religions of the people of the earth, Arabs and non-Arabs alike, whether having certain ideologies or being atheists or idolators.

    Who can perceive the unmitigated arrogance of Islam and its allies who demand that Israel commit  suicide?  How can Israel survive with Islam's artillery and rockets on the Golan Heights and mountain tops overlooking her cities?  How can she withstand invasion  on a narrow strip of land nine miles wide?  How can Israel survive as a free and democratic Jewish state when flooded by millions of Muslims bred for the purpose of her conquest?

    Someone must grow testicles and a spine; see and declare the evil intentions of Israel's enemies and curse them.  Someone must tell Abbas & Obama to go to Hell.  Someone must defy the U.N. and  E.U.; tell them to go to Hell.

    If "never again" has any meaning, this is the hour to stand up for it; to say it loud & clear and mean it.  We will learn, in the coming hours, whether Bibi has any of the stuff of greatness.  If he acts with cowardice and extends the construction freeze, in whole or in part, then the world will know that he is an unworthy traitor, and the Jews should act on that knowledge by replacing him with someone with conviction and courage enough to tell the world  where to go.    

U.N. Abuse: Mahmoud Abbas Spews Feces

Thanks and a tip of the hat to EAWorldview for posting video and a trascript of Mahmoud Abbas  spewing feces at the General Assembly.  As is my habit, I will quote the most egregious lies out of context, interspersed with my comments.


Mr. President, excellencies, ladies and gentlemen, the suffering of the Palestinian people as a result of Israel's colonial occupation is crystal clear to the world.

suffering

    Everything they bitterly kvetch about is a consequence of their own actions.  If they were not constantly attempting politicide and genocide, Israel would not need to retaliate or take  security measures.

Since the occupation of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, including east Jerusalem in 1967, Israel continues with its settlement policy on all Palestinian land, especially in holy Jerusalem,...

settlement policy

    Jews are building and living in Judea & Samaria, where the prophets lived long ago.  For what good reason should they be excluded ?   "Palestine" and  Israel are synonymous terms: they describe the same geographic area.  In 1948, Arabs invaded Israel and illegally seized East Jerusalem, the West Bank and Gaza.
Did Falestinians kvetch about it?  Did they complain of  "illegal occupation" ?  Did they demand a state of their own?  Why not???

Palestinian land

    "Palestinian" and Jew are synonymous terms.  "Palestinian" does not describe Muslim Arabs, it describes Jews.  That area was inhabited by Jews when Rome renamed the territory after the Philistines when they suppressed a rebellion.   In 638, caliph Umar  invaded, conquered and occupied the Levant.  Why would he do that? 1  The Ottoman Empire lost it in World War One. Israel got some of it back, its their land, not Fallestinian's.

We now face a unique situation. If international law stipulates the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by force, how can we, then, deal with the current situation where Israeli settlement policy will undermine the goal of establishing a geographically contiguous Palestinian state and implementation of the will of the international consensus that has been expressed in the various resolutions and principles, including the roadmap, which we all agreed upon and which is based on the principle of land for peace and ending the occupation that began in 1967.

acquisition of territory by force 

    Egypt and Jordan acquired that territory illegally   in 1948, they took it by force, in the process of trying to eliminate Israel  and exterminate the Jews.  In 1967 they tried again and Israel took her land back fighting  in self-defense.

Palestinian state

    There is no good cause for establishing a Falestinian state. If there was, Egypt and Jordan would have established it between 1948 and 1967.  No demand was made for it and no offer to create it because there is no need for it.  There never was a  Falestinian state.  Jerusalem was never the capital of any nation other than Israel.

land for peace

    Israel gave you land, they withdrew from Gaza. You responded by turning it into a launching pad for increased attacks.  Only a damn fool would give you more land in exchange for empty promises.

Immense efforts have been exerted and many conferences have been held during the past years, particularly since the signing of the Oslo Accords in 1993. Yet all of this has not led to a conclusion of this conflict.

conclusion of this conflict

    In 1948, your side had a choice: accept the unfair division of land that gave you  too much  or go to war.  You went to war.  That was your choice and you should bear the consequences.

    You could have chosen peace at Oslo. Instead, you violated the accords and continued war. You could have chosen peace at Wye River. Instead, you chose continued war.  Only you can end the conflict.  We know that you will never end it and we know why.  The doctrine of your damnable war cult demands that you conquer the entire world. 2  The sunnah of your Profit tells you that the gates of  the celestial bordello won't swing open for you until you kill the last Jew. 3

All of these active efforts and initiatives, which have been welcomed and supported by us and by the Arab states, are, however, confronted with Israeli intransigence, which refuses to adhere to the requirements for relaunching the peace process.

peace process.

    That phrase is supremely offensive to a thinking mind.   The real process  of making peace is victory.  Israel can make peace by ushering you into Hell, where you belong, with Allah & your Profit.  There will be no peace until you are defeated.  You will not be defeated until you are eradicated.  This is the fatal fact which none dares contemplate.

    When people believe4 that they will be blessed if they kill & conquer5 and damned if they do not6, nothing but death will stop  their predation upon the human race.  This unpleasant truth explains why Muslims remain Hellbent on genocidal conquest after 1400 years.

How is it conceivable that negotiations can be held on the borders and on Jerusalem at the same time that Israeli bulldozers are working to change the reality on the ground with the aim of creating a new reality and imposing borders as Israel desires?

negotiations

            Muslims do not negotiate, they demand.  Abbas demands  the entire Levant.  He pretends that he will settle for Judea, Samaria and half of Jerusalem.  Yet, at home in his own language, he  repeats Aafat's chant: "from the river to the sea".

In this regard, I would like to express our deep appreciation for the important speech delivered before this august (ph) body two days ago by President Obama, in which he affirmed the necessity for ending the occupation that began in 1967 and the legitimacy of the settlements. He also stressed the necessity for establishing an independent, sovereign and viable Palestinian state and for addressing all of the finance status issues in the negotiations, foremost among these Jerusalem, refugees, borders, water, settlements, and others. We reiterate that adherence to these principles and basis, in addition to a complete freeze of all settlement activities, can salvage the peace process and open horizon for its success.

occupation

    How about ending the occupation which began in 638?  Get the Muslims out of Israel!!

legitimacy of the settlements

    Israel won her land back while defending against aggression by the parties who stole that land in 1948. It is Israel's land, Jews have a right to build homes and live in that land.  No one else has any right  to or claim on that land.   When you commit genocidal aggression, you run the risk of losing lives and land. Thats tough. Suck it up.

Palestinian state

    If you wanted a state, why didn't you accept the deal in  1948?  If you wanted a state, why didn't you  carry out the commitments you made at Oslo?  If you wanted a state, why didn't you accept the deal at Wye River?

    There is no desire and no need for a Falestinian state.  They never had one and they don't want one.  If they did, they would go to Jordan.  They want to destroy Israel, exterminate the Jews, restore the caliphate and conquer the world.  They are Muslims; that is Islam's agenda.

freeze of all settlement activities

    Netanyahu, foolishly & treacherously issued a ten month construction freeze so that Abbas could negotiate.  Abbas frittered away those ten months. Now he demands that the freeze be extended.  Netanyahu must tell him to go to Hell.  Netanyahu must tell Obama to go with Abbas.

    There is absolutely no reason for preventing Jews from building homes in Israel!  Jews live in Jerusalem, it is their capital city.   This is the moral equivalent of Mexico demanding that we not construct homes in Texas.

Time is running out and the risks are becoming greater as a result of the continued suffering of the Palestinian people under the last remaining occupation in the world. We call upon the international community to uphold international law and international legitimacy and to exert pressure on Israel to cease its settlement activities, to comply with the signed agreements, and desist from the policies of the occupation and colonial settlements, to release the 10,000 -- correction, the approximately 11,000 prisoners and detainees, to lift -- and to lift the unjust siege imposed on the Gaza Strip, which was subjected months ago to a devastating aggression, causing thousands of casualties among civilians, wreaking unprecedented destruction of infrastructure and public facilities, including even hospitals, mosques, schools, and United Nations facilities.

occupation

    Abbas can end the occupation any time he likes by getting the Hell out of Israel.

Palestinian people

    Joseph Farah of World Net Daily said it better than I can.
Way back on March 31, 1977, the Dutch newspaper Trouw published an interview with Palestine Liberation Organization executive committee member Zahir Muhsein. Here's what he said:
The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct "Palestinian people" to oppose Zionism.
For tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa, while as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa, Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan.  Palestinian people do not exist

comply with the signed agreements

    Which provisions of the Oslo Accords did you comply with?  Did you cease incitement to violence?  Did you cease hero worship of terrorists?  Did you take the hate & incitement out of your school books?  Did you make a good faith attempt to stop cross border attacks?  Go to Hell with your arrogant, obnoxious demands, hypocrite.


  1. Sunun Abu Dawud Abu Dawud 14.2477
    Narrated Ibn Hawalah:

        The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: It will turn out that you will be armed troops, one is Syria, one in the Yemen and one in Iraq. Ibn Hawalah said: Choose for me, Apostle of Allah, if I reach that time. He replied: Go to Syria, for it is Allah's chosen land, to which his best servants will be gathered but if you are unwilling, go to your Yemen, and draw water from your tanks, for Allah has on my account taken special charge of Syria and its people. [Emphasis added.]
  2. The Qur'an sanctifies & mandates conquest, confirmed by codification in Islamic law (Reliance of the Traveller). 
    1. 8:39 . And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.
      1. O9.8: The Objectives of Jihad
        The caliph (o25) makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians (N: provided he has first invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice, and if they will not, then invited them to enter the social order of Islam by paying the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya, def: o11.4) -which is the significance of their paying it, not the money itself-while remaining in their ancestral religions) (O: and the war continues) until they become Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll tax (O: in accordance with the word of Allah Most High,...
    2. 9:29.Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
      1. The caliph fights all other peoples until they become Muslim (O: because they are not a people with a Book, nor honored as such, and are not permitted to settle with paying the poll tax (jizya) )...
  3. Sahih  Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 177:
        Narrated Abu Huraira:

        Allah's Apostle said, "The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. "O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him." [Emphasis added.]
  4. The Qur'an defines believers in three ayat which reveal what we need to know about Islam.  Believers spend in the way of Allah, which is a code phrase for jihad. Believers have sold their souls to Allah, becoming his slaves; killing and being killed for him.  Follow these links and read the context. 
    1. 8:2
    2. 9:111
    3. 49:15
  5. 61:10. O You who believe! Shall I guide you to a commerce that will save you from a painful torment.

    61:11.  That you believe in Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad ), and that you strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allâh with your wealth and your lives, that will be better for you, if you but know!

    61:12. (If you do so) He will forgive you your sins, and admit you into Gardens under which rivers flow, and pleasant dwelling in Gardens of 'Adn ­ Eternity ['Adn (Edn) Paradise], that is indeed the great success. 
  6. 9:38. O you who believe! What is the matter with you, that when you are asked to march forth in the Cause of Allâh (i.e. Jihâd) you cling heavily to the earth? Are you pleased with the life of this world rather than the Hereafter? But little is the enjoyment of the life of this world as compared with the Hereafter.

    9:39. If you march not forth, He will punish you with a painful torment and will replace you by another people, and you cannot harm Him at all, and Allâh is Able to do all things.