Memorial Disservice

The video of President Barack Hussein Obama's address to the memorial in Tucson at the White House Blog, as is the transcript.   As usual, I will expose the lowlights.

" It raises a question of what, beyond prayers and expressions of concern, is required of us going forward.  How can we honor the fallen?  How can we be true to their memory?"

    The honest answer to that question is to press on with our lives, as the victims and heroes would be doing if the event had not occurred.  But the question is superfluous, propounded for partisan political purposes.  Its purpose is to lay the groundwork for renewed attacks upon the first and second amendments.

"Already we’ve seen a national conversation commence, not only about the motivations behind these killings, but about everything from the merits of gun safety laws to the adequacy of our mental health system. "

    The mainstream of the 'national conversation' flows from the mouths of politicians & pundits, falsely laying blame for the massacre at the tongues of those who oppose President Obama's Socialist agenda.  Despite the mounting evidence that the shooter has used drugs, aroused fear among his classmates & teachers and was mentally ill, President Obama's chorus assigns blame to Palin & Limbaugh, who had nothing to do with the event.

"But at a time when our discourse has become so sharply polarized -– at a time when we are far too eager to lay the blame for all that ails the world at the feet of those who happen to think differently than we do -– it’s important for us to pause for a moment and make sure that we’re talking with each other in a way that heals, not in a way that wounds.  (Applause.)"

 

• 'If They Bring a Knife to the Fight, We Bring a Gun"
• 'We're gonna punish our enemies'.
• "Bitter clingers"

Rush Limbaugh had an excellent rant about the hypocrisy of the left's demand for 'civility'.

"We should be willing to challenge old assumptions in order to lessen the prospects of such violence in the future."

    Ever so subtle yet so obvious!  President Obama hinted at a renewed demand to disarm the citizenry, rendering us defenseless.  Does anyone else remember the old comic strip "There Oughta Be a Law?

"But what we cannot do is use this tragedy as one more occasion to turn on each other."

    Perish the thought!  That is exactly what they have done, shrill & loudly, starting with Krugman.

"If this tragedy prompts reflection and debate -- as it should -- let’s make sure it’s worthy of those we have lost.  (Applause.)  Let’s make sure it’s not on the usual plane of politics and point-scoring and pettiness that drifts away in the next news cycle."

    That is sheer hypocrisy, so obvious as to require no elaboration.

"And if, as has been discussed in recent days, their death helps usher in more civility in our public discourse, let us remember it is not because a simple lack of civility caused this tragedy -- it did not -- but rather because only a more civil and honest public discourse can help us face up to the challenges of our nation in a way that would make them proud. "

   
    What was it Nancy Pelosi promised us about four years back?  What did she deliver?  Open, honest, accountable & efficient government.  Yeah, right.  And Obama promised hope & change.  How well is that working out for you?   "You can keep your doctor."  "You can keep your insurance policy." "It won't raise the deficit." "No death panels."  Honest & civil! I really need to use profanity at this point.  Those are not white lies, they are not little brown lies; they are the stuff that makes your shoe stink even after you scrape it off the sole.

"I want to live up to her expectations.  (Applause.)  I want our democracy to be as good as Christina imagined it.  I want America to be as good as she imagined it.  (Applause.)  All of us -– we should do everything we can to make sure this country lives up to our children’s expectations.  (Applause.)"

    Even coming from an honest statesman, those statements would be inappropriate at a memorial service for murder victims.  They are the stuff of a campaign speech, not a memorial.  As it is, they come from the mouth of a lying, conniving traitor, and the hypocrisy disgusts me intensely.

    President Obama and his cronies seek to exploit a mass murder at once to condemn and silence his critics.  There is nothing so low that they will not limbo dance beneath it.  What appears to be a limbo dance is really a slithering sidewinder.     We made a horrific blunder in '08. We have a opportunity to correct it in '12.  We must take full advantage of that chance.

UN Abuse: Ahmadinejad Spews Feces

Thanks and a tip of the hat to   Dandelion Salad.  for posting videos and a transcript. I have taken quotes out of context interspersed with my commentary. Footnotes follow below the horizontal line.

In the Name of God, The Compassionate, the Merciful Oh God, hasten the arrival of Imam Al-Mahdi, Grant him good health and victory, and make us his followers and those who attest to his rightfulness.

    Ahmadinejad thinks it speaks for Allah. it also thinks that Allah, who is really an impotent idol, is God.  He implores his demon to give victory to the Mahdi. Perhaps you might ask yourself: "victory over whom"?   I have a clue for you: who does Ahmadinejad say it wants to conquer first and second?

Without security, human beings will never be able to fulfill their aspirations neither in material nor spiritual domains.

    `How long did it take Ahmadinejad to figure that out.  But he does not mean security for us, he means security or Muslims and victory over us.

Divine prophets, thinkers and people of good faith have always sought to guide human beings through having faith to God, and practicing diving teachings and injunctions which guarantee a peaceful and safe life in both worlds.

Divine prophets

    The reference is to Moe, who forced his ersatz faith on anyone who resisted it. ¹ The implication is that Jesus Christ did the same thing, and will continue on the war path when he returns. ²

peaceful and safe

    "...embrace Islam and you will be safe; embrace Islam and Allah will bestow on you a double reward. But if you reject this invitation of Islam, you shall be responsible for misguiding the peasants "³

From the viewpoint of divine prophets, a …. society, is a global society where the belief in the oneness of God is professed, and justice is proclaimed, a place where security, pure, friendship and brotherhood prevail under the leadership of the most noble servant of God together with Jesus Christ (P.B.U.H) and other dedicated people.

Tawheed

    [8:39]
And fight them on until there is no more tumult or oppression, and there prevail justice and faith in God altogether and everywhere; but if they cease, verily God doth see all that they do. [Abdullah Yusuf Ali] [Emphasis added.]  For the practical application of this verse see Reliance of the Traveller o9.9 ⁴  

friendship & brotherhood 

    The problem is that friendship & brotherhood are for Muslims only. ⁵

most noble servant

    Ahmadinejad makes Moe superior to Jesus Christ.  Remember, the devil is in the details.

Today, although countries allocate a major portion of resources to boost their national security, there is no sign of any improvement in the current circumstances or the shadow of threat predominating the international climate.

shadow of threat

    What threat?   What is the origin of current threats to security?  "Embrace Islam and you will be safe."  Get a clue.

 Regrettably, in spite of this vitally-crucial need, and because of the behavior of a few governments whose policies reflect a departure from the teachings of divine prophets, the threat of nuclear bombs continue to cast a shadow on the entire globe, where no one can feel safe. Some governments in their strategies introduce nuclear bombs an element of stability and security, a mindset which is based on fallacy and misleading argument. 

departure from the teachings of divine prophets

    Translation: they ain't Islamic-- the threat to security comes exclusively from kuffar.

Some governments in their strategies

    Iran: joining the nuclear club, gaining respect & prestige, getting rid of Israel.  Get a clue.

Look at the disastrous consequences of atomic explosions in Hiroshima and the use of depleted nuclear bombs in south Iraq. Nuclear arms are, therefore, a fire against humanity rather than a weapon for defense or offence.

    So why are you Hellbent on getting  them if they are so evil?  President Truman saved a few million lives and ended the war in the Pacific by dropping Little Boy & Fat Man.

fire against humanity

    Islamic law requires perpetual war against  pagans until they become Muslim,  Jews, Christians & Zoroastrians until they are subjugated and extorted   Islam is perpetual war against the rest of humanity.  ^4,6

Possession of nuclear weapons is not something to be proud of; rather it is ugly and ignominious. More ignominious is the threat to use such weapons, the specter and ramifications of which are in no way comparable with any crime committed in history.

not a source of pride

"In regard to the nuclear issue, you should regard the nuclearization of Iran as a bygone fact,"... "By God's grace, Iran has entered the world countries' nuclear club," ^₇

More ignominious is the threat

    "endanger your entire world" ⁷

In the mindset of divine prophets and devoted people and based on all humanitarian beliefs, superiority comes from devotion to moral principles, purity, humility and the desire to serve human kind, not from the power of suppressing others.

superiority : morality, not suppression

    3:110. You [true believers in Islâmic Monotheism, and real followers of Prophet Muhammad  and his Sunnah (legal ways, etc.)] are the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind; you enjoin Al-Ma'rûf (i.e. Islâmic Monotheism and all that Islâm has ordained) and forbid Al-Munkar (polytheism, disbelief and all that Islâm has forbidden), and you believe in Allâh. And had the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) believed, it would have been better for them; among them are some who have faith, but most of them are Al-Fâsiqûn (disobedient to Allâh - and rebellious against Allâh's Command).

Sahih Bukhari Volume 6, Book 60, Number 80:

Narrated Abu Huraira:

The Verse:--"You (true Muslims) are the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind." means, the best of peoples for the people, as you bring them with chains on their necks till they embrace Islam.  [Emphasis added.]

The policies aimed at bringing under control the entire world has clearly suffered a dramatic defeat, and the dreams of new empires will never come true.

world domination

    From the viewpoint of divine prophets, a …. society, is a global society where the belief in the oneness of God is professed, and justice is proclaimed, a place where security, pure, friendship and brotherhood prevail under the leadership of the most noble servant of God together with Jesus Christ (P.B.U.H) and other dedicated people.

    I hope that I am not the only one able to detect the internal conflict in  Ahmadinejad's damnable lies.

Instead of following the outdated course of the past, it is better to join to the mainstream of nations and independent governments on the solid foundation Instead of following the outdated course of the past, it is better to join to the mainstream of nations and independent governments on the solid foundation of human culture and logic.

join to the mainstream

human culture and logic.

    Translation: Islam.  Ahmadinejad is demanding that we submit to Islam.

This is for their own good and best interest’s future belongs to the nations, security, peace and justice shall prevail in the whole world with the help of the faithful under the leadership of the perfect human being. There will be no room in the future world for intimidation and arrogant powers.

for their own good

3:110. ...    And had the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) believed, it would have been better for them; among them are some who have faith, but most of them are Al-Fâsiqûn (disobedient to Allâh - and rebellious against Allâh's Command).

3:111. They will do you no harm, barring a trifling annoyance; and if they fight against you, they will show you their backs, and they will not be helped.

3:112. Indignity is put over them wherever they may be, except when under a covenant (of protection) from Allâh, and from men; they have drawn on themselves the Wrath of Allâh, and destruction is put over them. This is because they disbelieved in the Ayât (proofs, evidences, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.) of Allâh and killed the Prophets without right. This is because they disobeyed (Allâh) and used to transgress beyond bounds (in Allâh's disobedience, crimes and sins).

    You might recall that 3:110 and a related hadith  were quoted previously, revealing how true believers are the best people as they drag us to Islam with chains on our necks.  That is "better for us" = " for their own good".   If you can't perceive the hypocrisy in the paragraph quoted above, it would be best if you remove yourself from the gene pool, we have  enough morons already.

The collective movement of the world nations aimed at launching major reforms based on monotheism and establishment of justice in international relations has begun.

monotheism

    Monotheism  Islam.

justice

    Justice  Shari'ah. ⁸

I hereby invite the esteemed President of the United States Mr. Obama to join this movement if he is still committed to his motto of change, since tomorrow would be too late.

join this movement

    This is dawah: the invitation to embrace Islam, a legal  condition precedent to attack.  "...provided he has first invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice...."⁹

tomorrow would be too late

    Here we have the old fashioned high pressure sales pitch. "This offer is good for a limited time only."

    There is nothing more stupid than maundering about nuclear disarmament.  The jinn is out of the bottle and can not be recaptured.  There is no possibility of disarmament because it can not be verified. In any case, it would be  dynamic, not a static condition.  If  we disarm and our  enemies subsequently build nukes, we are screwed.  We can not accept that risk.

    Nuclear technology is dual use. The same centrifuge technology used to enrich  reactor fuel can enrich fissile material for explosives.  Nuclear reactors produce plutonium as a byproduct, a byproduct which can be used to make bombs.

    It appears that the transcript I relied upon was not complete.  Another offering includes the extremely offensive remarks about the accursed abomination.

First, the event of the II September 2001 which has affected the whole world for  almost a decade.  All of a sudden, the news of the attack on the twin towers was broadcast using  numerous footages of the incident.  Almost all governments and known figures strongly condemned this incident.
But then a propaganda machine came into full force; it was implied that the whole  world was exposed to a huge danger, namely terrorism, and that the only way to save  the world would be to deploy forces into Afghanistan.

condemnation of terrorism

    Totally irrelevant!  None of them condemn Islam nor its damnable doctrines which sanctify and mandate  global conquest, genocide & terrorism. ¹⁰
Who will stand and condemn the execrable words and actions of Allah and his messenger?  "I will cast terror"¹¹, "Allah cast terror." ¹²,  "I have been made victorious with terror."¹³

    Who will condemn 8:39 & 9:29 which command warfare against pagans and "people of the book"?.  Who will condemn Allah's demand for "great slaughter"?¹⁴

only way

    Invading Afghanistan is no solution.  Terrorism can only be ended by ending the existence of Islam.  Terrorism is an inseverable intrinsic sacrament of Islam.

It was said that some three thousands people were killed on the II September for  which we are all very saddened. Yet, up until now, in Afghanistan and Iraq hundreds of thousands of people have been killed, millions wounded and displaced and the  conflict is still going on and expanding.

    5:32 tells us that killing one person is as bad as killing all of mankind. The terrorists deliberately planned and carried out an attack which killed three thousand, hoping to kill fifteen times that many.  Absent that act, there would be no invasion of Afghanistan or Iraq.  The vast majority of indigenous casualties were caused by the acts of indigenous terrorists and their  Arab allies.

In identifying those responsible for the attack, there were three viewpoints. 1- That a very powerful and complex terrorist group, able to successfully cross all layers of the American intelligence and security, carried out the attack.  This is the main viewpoint advocated by American statesmen.

terrorist group

    They left a trail of evidence.  They should never have been allowed to enter this country. A traitor, President Clinton, weakened our security measures so that they were able to gain entry.   We have U.b.L. on video tape chortling about his success.  We have a confession by K.S.M. and four of his companions.  What more do we need?  

2- That some segments within the U.S. government orchestrated the attack to reverse the declining American economy and its grips on the Middle East in order  also to save the Zionist regime.  The majority of the American people as well as other nations and politicians agree with this view.

U.S. government orchestrated the attack

    The U.S. delegation walked out. They should have verbalized their objections. Shrub is not capable of creating and operating such a  conspiracy nor could it have been kept secret in an open society.  The accusation is idiotic and offensive in the extreme.

3- It was carried out by a terrorist group but the American government supported and took advantage of the situation. Apparently, this viewpoint has fewer proponents. The main evidence linking the incident was a few passports found in the huge volume of rubble and a video of an individual whose place of domicile was unknown  but it was announced that he had been involved in oil deals with some American  officials. It was also covered up and said that due to the explosion and fire no trace of the suicide attackers was found.

American government supported

    Blame the victims. AssWholliness in its purest form. I would bet that U.b.L. is in Iran, where his family is hiding.  The absurdity of these assertions cries out for a Boston stomping.

- Would it not have been sensible that first a thorough investigation should have been conducted by independent groups to conclusively identify the elements involved in the attack and then map out a rational plan to take measures against them?

investigation    

    We knew an attack was planned, we did not know the exact target, time, place and method.  We did know that it was planned by Muslims.  The rational plan for dealing with them is easy: nuke every Gd'd Islamic nation off the face of the earth and announce to the world "don't reed on me".  You all want to be Shahid, we should give you what you desire and deserve.

    Evidently you Muslims forgot that your canon of scripture tradition, exegeses & jurisprudence has been translated into our language and posted on the web.  Those of us who know what is happening and why are spreading that knowledge as rapidly and extensively as possible.

2- Assuming the viewpoint of the American government, is it rational to launch a classic war through widespread deployment of troops that led to the death of hundreds  of thousands of people to counter a terrorist group?  3- Was it not possible to act the way Iran countered the Riggi terrorist group who killed and wounded 400 innocent people in Iran. In the Iranian operation no innocent person was hurt.  

rational to launch a classic war

    No! Staging land invasions & occupations on the cheap is a fool's errand. Victory can only be achieved by eradicating Islam. There are two ways to do that, one of them is easier but less humane.  No attempt has been made to convert  the enemy away from the war cult which enslaves them and motivates their actions.  Every dollar and every drop of blood spent has been wasted because of that idiotic error.

terrorist group

    The terrorist group is Islam.  This war can not be won without eliminating Islam from the earth. Anything less than total eradication of the demonic doctrines which sanctify and mandate conquest, genocide & terrorism will be a miserable failure.  Islam is a real, proximate and persistent existential threat to civilization. When men believe that their eternal destiny depends on conquering the world, that they will go to Hell if they don't and to a celestial bordello if they  engage in jihad, nothing but death will stop them unless their faith in their demon is destroyed.  

innocent

   As far as Islam is concerned, only Muslims are innocent. all others are "rebels against Allah" who are "waging war against Allah"¹⁵  The punishments prescribed for them are set out in 5:33.

It is proposed that the United Nations set up an independent fact-finding group for the event of the II September so that in the future expressing views about it is not forbidden.

independent fact-finding group

    Is there anyone  so Gd'd stupid that they think that any such investigation would be impartial & objective?  The insult to our intelligence can not be ignored.

I wish to announce here that next year the Islamic Republic of Iran will host a
conference to study terrorism and the means to confront it. I invite officials, scholars,
thinkers, researchers and research institutes of all countries to attend this conference.

Iran will host a terrorism conference

    What is next?  Will the Mafia host a conference to investigate the cause of  bootlegging, prostitution and gambling rackets???  There is one and only one way to deal with terrorism: eliminate Islam from the world.

Second, is the occupation of the Palestinian territories

Palestinian territories

    Its Israel, stupid! "Palestine" is a Gd'd lie!  It is a linguistic corruption of a Roman attempt to rename Israel after the Philistines as an insult after they suppressed a rebellion.  Jews, not Arabs are the indigenous people of Israel. ¹⁶

The oppressed people of Palestine have lived under the rule of an occupying regime for 60 years, been deprived of freedom, security and the right to selfdetermination, while the occupiers are given recognition.

oppressed people of Palestine

    Palestinians lived under Roman occupation until 638, then under Muslim occupation until the end of WW1 and British occupation until 1948 when they finally threw off their oppressors and restored their sovereignty.

self-determination

    Falestinians never had self-determination because they were and are undifferentiated Arabs, nothing special. They never had a separate culture, currency, language and nation.  They do not crave a state of their own, they crave a regional and global caliphate: pan Arabism. .

occupiers

    Palestine is occupied by falestinians, not the other way around.  It ain't Arab land, Arabs stole it from Israel, the Ottoman Empire lost it in WW1.   Israel recovered some of  the land that was stolen from her in 1948.  In 1967, they recovered more when the Arabs attacked them again.

On a daily basis, the houses are being destroyed over the heads of innocent women and children. People are deprived of water, food and medicine in their own homeland.

houses  destroyed

    Houses constructed illegally, houses used to conceal smuggling tunnels and houses sheltering terrorists who kill Jews are destroyed.  If Falestinians were not  building without permits and attacking Jews, they would be secure in their homes.

deprivation

    The Falestinians were far better off and more prosperous when Israel was running things. Their fortunes crumbled  after their own  corrupt leaders wasted their resources on graft and weapons.  They could have peace & prosperity, they chose war and poverty. Their choice, their suffering.

The Zionists have imposed five all-out wars on the neighboring countries and on the Palestinian people.

five wars

    That assertion is a total inversion of history.  Muslims were the aggressors in every case.  The fact that Israel preempted their attack in 1967  changes nothing.  Egypt had declared their genocidal intent and massed forces.

The Zionists committed the most horrible crimes against the defenseless people in the wars against Lebanon and Gaza.

horrible crimes

    Israel defended herself against aggression.  She had every right to flatten Lebanon & Gaza but stupidly  exercised restraint.  If  they did not attack, Israel; would not retaliate.  In his address to the General Assembly, P.M. Netanyahu  reiterated the details of extraordinary measures taken to minimize civilian casualties in Gaza.

The Zionist regime attacked a humanitarian flotilla in a blatant defiance of all international norms and kills the civilians.

humanitarian flotilla

    When Muslims videotape their "wills"  and declare "victory or martyrdom", they ain't civilians and their mission ain't humanitarian and everyone with any intelligence at all blessed well knows what they are and what fate they richly deserve.

This regime which enjoys the absolute support of some western countries regularly  threatens the countries in the region and continues publicly announced assassination  of Palestinian figures and others, while Palestinian defenders and those opposing this regime are pressured, labeled as terrorists and anti Semites. All values, even the  freedom of expression, in Europe and in the United States are being sacrificed at the altar of Zionism.

absolute support

    The Falestinians who launch rockets & mortars and attack Jews with guns, knives, axes, tractors and anything ready to hand  have the  unconditional support of Russia, the OIC, the United Nations, and  the European Union.  What are they kvetching about??  The U.S.A., while pretending to support Israel, arrogantly demand that she commit suicide.   As always, Muslims invert objective factual reality as well as morality.

Solutions are doomed to fail because the right of the Palestinian people is not taken into account.

Falestinian right

    They are undifferentiated Arabs, not a people, not a nation, and have no more rights than anyone else.  They have no legitimate claim to Israel's land.   The only solution is to usher them into Hell, from where they can no longer attack Jews.

Would we have witnessed such horrendous crimes if instead of recognizing the occupation, the sovereign right of the Palestinian people had been recognized?

horrendous crimes

    Thousands of missiles, hundreds of mortar shells, dozens of homicide bombers, snipers, knife assaults; 5 wars of genocidal intent: these are the horrendous crimes committed by Islam against Israel.  The sovereign right of Israel has not been  fully recognized but ought to be.,  Falestine has no such right.

Our unambiguous proposition is the return of the Palestinian refugees to their home  land and the reference to the vote of the people of Palestine to exercise their  sovereignty and decide on the type of governance.

return

    They left at the urging of the Arab powers so that they could crush the Jews without collateral damage.  Their act of leaving was part of a campaign of genocide.  They therefore have no right to return, they abandoned the land and their homes for the purpose of furthering a campaign of genocide.  They forfeited all rights and claims.  To Hell with them and their descendants!!!

Nuclear energy is clean and cheap and a heavenly gift which is amongst the most   suitable alternatives to cut the pollutions emanating from fossil fuels.

Nuclear energy

    That is what leveled Hiroshima & Nagasaki. It is common knowledge that is the nuclear energy Iran seeks.  Oil  and gas are their main source of revenue. Domestically, using gas is far less expensive than their nuclearization campaign.  Their  program can not be justified on the basis of economics.  If we had any common sense, we would give it to them.

Very recently the world witnessed the ugly and inhumane act of burning the Holy Quran.  The Holy Quran is the Divine Book and the eternal miracle of the Prophet of lslam.  It calls for worshipping the One God, justice, compassion toward people,
development and progress, reflection and thinking, defending the oppressed and resisting against the oppressors; and it names with respect the previous Messengers of God, like Noah, Abraham, Isaaq, Joseph, Moses and Jesus Christ (Peace be Upon
them all) and endorses them..

Qur'an burning

    Does anyone raise Hell when they burn our flag and the Bible?  How do we react  when they march en mass chanting "death to America"?  Do we riot?  Do we burn autos and buildings?  Do we burn mosques?

divine book

    What the Hell is divine about a book  containing verses which gave divine sanction to wife beating, rape, pillage, plunder & genocide?  Even Moe's favorite wife was onto the fact that he issued situational scripture. ¹⁷  Go to your favorite hadith search engine and search for was revealed.  You will find plenty of evidence of situational scripture.

compassion

    Lashing, stoning, amputation; pretty damn compassionate!!! And for disbelievers¹⁵, there is crucifixion, too. ¹⁸

oppressors

    All rulers who ain't Muslims, who govern by man made law, are classified as oppressors by Islam.

Jesus Christ

    According to the Qur'an, he was not God's none, not divine, not crucified, never died  nor was resurrected.  According to the hadith, he will return as a genocidal warlord to kill the Jews and rule the world by the Qur'an. ¹⁹
.

For years the inefficiency of the capitalism and the existing world management and structures has been exposed and the majority of States and nations have been on a quest for fundamental changes and for the prevalence of justice in global relations.  The cause of the United Nation’s ineptitude is in its unjust structure. Major power  is monopolized in the Security Council due to the veto privilege, and the main pillar of the Organization, namely the General Assembly, is marginalized.   In the past several decades, at least one of the permanent members of the Security Council has always been a party to the disputes.  The veto advantage grants impunity to aggression and occupation; How could, therefore, one expect competence while both the judge and the prosecutor are a party to the dispute?
Had Iran enjoyed veto privilege, would the Security Council and the IAEA  Director General have taken the same position in the nuclear issue?

hypocrisy

    If I need to point it out to you, you are too stupid to recognize it, no matter how I might emphasize it.  The comparative records of  feudalism, capitalism, socialism and communism are clear on the record of history.  No system is perfect, but capitalism is far superior.

    The U.N. is  built on consensus and compromise.  It could not have been formed otherwise.  Nobody was willing to have  a new institution to be created to
be used against them.   For America to participate without having veto power would be suicidal.  I hope that we are not that stupid.

The United Nations is the key center for coordinating the common global management. Its structure needs to be reformed in a manner that all independent States and nations be able to participate in the global governance actively and  constructively.

The veto privilege should be revoked and the General Assembly should be the highest body and the Secretary-General should be the most independent official and all his positions and activities should be taken with the approval of the General
Assembly and should be directed towards promoting justice and eliminating discrimination.

The Secretary-General should not come under pressure from powers and/or the country hosting the Organization for his stating the truth and administration ofjustice.  It is suggested that the General Assembly should, within one year and in the
framework of an extraordinary session, finalize the reformation of the Organization’s structure

The Islamic Republic of Iran has clear suggestions in this regard and stands ready to participate actively and constructively in the process.

UN Reform

    Like Ghadaffy²⁰, Ahmedinejad is demanding that we turn the U.N. over to the predator nations.  We should let the OIC dominate the world and use the U.N. as a tool of conquest.  In Hell we should!  While right does not make right, neither do numbers.  They are not smarter, better informed, more rational, more competent or better qualified to run the world  just because they outnumber us.  Starting with a large population base and breeding like rats is not a spring of virtue.

    The world is not a unitary body to be run, dominated or managed.  The several nations remain sovereign.  International institutions should be tools for cooperation, not for seizing power and plundering minorities.

I announce clearly that the occupation of other countries under the pretext of freedom and democracy is an unforgivable crime.

The world needs the logic of compassion and justice and inclusive participation instead oflogic offorce, domination, unilateralism, war and intimidation.

The world needs to be governed by virtuous people like the Divine Prophets.

pretext

    If done  to promote freedom & democracy, occupation is "an unforgivable crime".  But of course,  when the objective is elimination of "oppression", its a  divine virtue.  To us, freedom & democracy are the opposite of oppression; to Muslims, they are oppression.  

The world needs

    "The logic of compassion and justice" translates to: Islam, the very opposite of what the world needs.

governed by

   "Virtuous people like the Divine Prophets " translates:to: Muslims, the very opposite of what the world needs.

---

1. " I do not intend to wage war against you till you receive my written reason for it. It is better for you, either to accept Islam or agree to pay Jiziya and consent to remain obedient to Allah, His prophet and his messengers. My messengers deserve honour. Treat them with respect. Whatever pleases my messengers, will also please me."...  http://alquraan.net/letters/letters_3.html#LETTER%20TO%20THE%20CHIEFS%20OF%20AQABA
2. He will fight the people for the cause of Islam. He will break the cross, kill swine, and abolish jizyah. Allah will perish all religions except Islam.  Sunan Abu Dawud 37.4310
3. Sahih Bukhari 4.52.191
4. http://www.islamicbulletin.com/free_downloads/resources/reliance_complete.pdf#page=621
5. 9:23. O you who believe! Take not for Auliyâ' (supporters and helpers) your fathers and your brothers if they prefer disbelief to Belief. And whoever of you does so, then he is one of the Zâlimûn (wrong-doers, etc.). 
6. http://www.islamicbulletin.com/free_downloads/resources/reliance_complete.pdf#page=620
7. Ahmad Khatami, member of  the Assembly of Experts, quoted by Reuters. 
8. http://www.islamicbulletin.com/free_downloads/resources/reliance_complete2.pdf#page=596
9. http://www.islamicbulletin.com/free_downloads/resources/reliance_complete2.pdf#page=620
10. http://snooper.wordpress.com/2008/10/10/whats-wrong-with-islammuslims/
11. 8:12
12. 33:26
13. Sahih Bukhari 4.52.220
14. 8:67. It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had made a great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land. You desire the good of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives), but Allâh desires (for you) the Hereafter. And Allâh is All-Mighty, All-Wise.
15. "`Wage war' mentioned here means, oppose and contradict, and it includes disbelief, blocking roads and spreading fear in the fairways." The Punishment of those Who Cause Mischief in the Land
16. We have all been had!
• Palestinian people do not exist
• Refugee scam
• Palestine Facts makes the relevant regional history available.
17. Sahih Bukhari Volume 6, Book 60, Number 311:
    
    Narrated Aisha:
    
    I used to look down upon those ladies who had given themselves to Allah's Apostle and I used to say, "Can a lady give herself (to a man)?" But when Allah revealed: "You (O Muhammad) can postpone (the turn of) whom you will of them (your wives), and you may receive any of them whom you will; and there is no blame on you if you invite one whose turn you have set aside (temporarily).' (33.51) I said (to the Prophet), "I feel that your Lord hastens in fulfilling your wishes and desires." 
18. 5:33. The recompense of those who wage war against Allâh and His Messenger and do mischief in the land is only that they shall be killed or crucified or their hands and their feet be cut off on the opposite sides, or be exiled from the land. That is their disgrace in this world, and a great torment is theirs in the Hereafter. 
19. The Defamation of Jesus Christ
20. Moammar Al-Gadhafi at the UN The lunatic thinks he should run the asylum. 10/01/09

Spurring Facebook Censorship

My Facebook friend Frank Einstein alerted me to the existence of a Facebook page dedicated to demanding the removal of Facebook groups critical of Islam. In perusing their page, I discovered that they are also attacking another of my old friends, Az Zaqqum. I find their information page to be full of hypocrisy, which I expose here by giving selected excerpts H2 status and interspersing my comments between them.

The document is long and rambling, I took excerpts out of context in order to conserve space. I have added bold face and font color emphasis to some quotes from Islam's canon in order to make the significant points stand out with more clarity. The heading immediately below is a link to the page.

Remove All Groups and Pages that Attack Islam

Brothers and sisters, not just in religion, but in creation

until when will we watch transgressors step into our lives as if they own us?

We would live and let live, but you will not. Islam demands that the entire world submit to it. We object to Islam precisely because it attempts to impose itself upon us by force. For the details, see: What's Wrong With Islam/Muslims?

Until when will we specifically ignore our own rights to the freedom of religion

Until Islam is no more.

3:85. And whoever seeks a religion other than Islâm, it will never be accepted of him, and in the Hereafter he will be one of the losers.

As the son or daughter of a male Muslim, you have no choice. If you apostatize, you are subject to execution.

• http://www.crusadersarmory.co.cc/RelianceO8-7.html List of acts entailing apostasy.
• http://www.crusadersarmory.co.cc/RelianceO8-2.html Penalty for Apostasy.

My right to question, criticize and mock Islam does not in any way impair your freedom of religion.

practice it peacefully anywhere civilized?

Islam can not be practiced peacefully. Jihad is ordained for you. Allah commands you to wage war upon us. [J.M. Rodwell] hadith confirm & Shari'ah codifies the jihad imperatives.

• Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387
• http://www.crusadersarmory.co.cc/RelianceO9-8.html The caliph makes war on Jews... codification of 9:29.
• http://www.crusadersarmory.co.cc/RelianceO9-9.html The caliph fights all other people... codification of 8:39.

Until when will we watch transgressors attack our religion

Until you go blind or wise up and emancipate yourself from slavery to Allah. Between 1787 and 1815 you attacked our shipping. On September 11, '01, you attacked our World Trade Towers for the second time. We have every right to name and shame the enemy who is attacking us, and by God, we will.

be satisfied with having their own rights

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/constitution/amendment01/

We have the right to choose our own religion or none; to worship or not as we choose. You have a demonic mandate to impose Islam upon us. We have a right to freedom of speech & press. You assert a right to be shielded from criticism. We have rights, and by God, we will blessed well maintain them!

not even dare to force other's in their decision making

Our Facebook groups do not have any force. We can do nothing more than expose Islam to ridicule by reference to its own canon of scripture, tradition, exegeses & jurisprudence, just as I do in these blog posts. It is Muslims, demanding that Facebook delete us, threatening boycotts and demanding international legislation to criminalize criticism of Islam who are attempting to use force.

do not know the true essence of peace and justice

"Peace" is what happens after Islam completes its global conquest. "Justice" is just us Muslims.

purpose of individual rights is to recognize and protect the

individual's freedom of choice for "constructive" purposes

The only right is the right to obey Allah's dictates in every facet of life. That is how Islam defines the term.

When people think they can mentally or physically attack anyone

• ... fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]... 8:39 The Order to fight to eradicate Shirk and Kufr
• Fight against those who ... and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued. 9:29 The Order to fight People of the Scriptures until They give the Jizyah

Yes I agree killing innocent people is wrong

Only Muslims are innocent, all others are rebels against Allah, subject to the hudud prescribed in 5:33. Ibn Kathir, in his tafsir, defines waging war against Allah to include disbelief.

`Wage war' mentioned here means, oppose and contradict, and it includes disbelief, blocking roads and spreading fear in the fairways. [ The Punishment of those Who Cause Mischief in the Land]

publicly humiliating any religion

• 98:6. Verily, those who disbelieve (in the religion of Islâm, the Qur'ân and Prophet Muhammad ()) from among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) and Al-Mushrikûn will abide in the Fire of Hell. They are the worst of creatures.
• 5:60. Say (O Muhammad to the people of the Scripture): "Shall I inform you of something worse than that, regarding the recompense from Allâh: those (Jews) who incurred the Curse of Allâh and His Wrath, those of whom (some) He transformed into monkeys and swines, those who worshipped Tâghût (false deities); such are worse in rank (on the Day of Resurrection in the Hell­fire), and far more astray from the Right Path (in the life of this world)."
  
  

creating any laws that contradict individual rights is wrong

O11.5

Such non-Muslim subjects are obliged to comply with Islamic rules that pertain to the safety and indemnity of life, reputation, and property. In addition, they:

-1- are penalized for committing adultery or theft, thought not for drunkenness;

-2- are distinguished from Muslims in dress, wearing a wide cloth belt (zunnar);

-3- are not greeted with "as-Salamu 'alaykum";

-4- must keep to the side of the street;

-5- may not build higher than or as high as the Muslims' buildings, though if they acquire a tall house, it is not razed;

-6- are forbidden to openly display wine or pork, (A: to ring church bells or display crosses,) recite the Torah or Evangel aloud, or make public display of their funerals and feastdays;

-7- and are forbidden to build new churches.

http://www.crusadersarmory.co.cc/RelianceO11-5.html Restrictions on dhimmis.

Durban II: Egregious Arrogance Part 7

The preliminary draft is in five Microsoft Word files linked at the bottom of this page. Click this link to read Section 5, a target rich environment from which I have excerpted some of the most egregious clauses.

5. Reaffirms that any discrimination based on any ground such as sex, race, colour, ethnic or social origin, genetic features, language, religion or belief, political or any other opinion, membership of a national minority, property, birth, disability, age or sexual orientation shall be prohibited;

Islam:

• mandates war upon
• pagans & non-Muslims in general
• societies with scriptural religions
• subjects:
• conquered pagans & atheists to death or slavery
• conquered "people of the book" to Dhimmitude; less than second class citizenship
• objectifies women as chattel property, literally as tilth, fields to be plowed
• values their testimony as half that of a male
• sets their default inheritance as half that of a male
• declares them deficient in religion & intelligence.

Is it not, therefore, under the standard you have just reaffirmed, necessary to prohibit the propagation & practice of Islam?

6. Calls upon all States to take specific measures for the promotion and protection of the fundamental rights and freedoms of victims of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance who also belong to vulnerable groups, especially children, youth, the disabled, people with HIV/AIDS, migrants, refugees and indigenous populations;

Exactly what measures should Egypt & Iraq take to protect indigenous Christians? How would those measures be made effective?

10. Underlines the importance of the implementation of the Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Intolerance and Discrimination Based on Religion e1981;

Of course, that wouldn't include Dhimmitude & Jizya, would it? How about the exclusion of Jews & Christians from Mekkah & Medina?

12. Intellectual and political resistance to multiculturalism is one of the root causes of the resurgence of racist and xenophobic violence. Rejection of diversity has led to negation of the very humanity of the immigrants, foreigners and minorities. The most serious manifestation of racism is the democratic legitimization of racism and xenophobia in the guise of defending 'national identity or preference'. No country, religion or minority should be discriminated on the grounds of its race, colour and creed;

The Muslim's creed requires them to make perpetual war against all other people until the entire world is conquered for Allah and he alone is worshiped. But we can't discriminate against them; we can't defend ourselves. Go to Hell with that notion!

16. Urges States to adopt and enforce legal and administrative measures at the national and local levels, or to strengthen existing measures, with the aim of preventing and punishing expressly and specifically contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance in public and private life;

Since Durban conflates opposition to Islam with racism, this effectively demands legislation prohibiting criticism of Islam. As such, it is an egregious affront to the first amendment and must be rejected.

17. Urges States to bolster protection against racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance, thereby ensuring that everyone enjoys access to the administration of justice, competent national tribunals and other State institutions and mechanisms, in order to seek just and adequate reparation or satisfaction for any damage suffered as a result of such discrimination, and also stresses the importance for complainants of acts of racism and racial discrimination to have access to the protection of the law and the courts, and draws attention to the need to raise awareness of judicial recourse and other existing legal remedies and for these to be easily accessible, speedy and not excessively complicated;

Make it cheap & easy for CAIR and others to bring nuisance suits and intimidate us with litigation. This must be rejected.

23. Calls upon States to put in place policies and to establish mechanisms, including by means of international cooperation, to identify, prevent and punish contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance;

This is another restatement of the demand for censorship.

24. Urges States to continue implementing Durban Declaration and Programme of Action effectively and to adopt or strengthen as required, as a matter of high priority, laws, policies and measures aimed at countering and eradicating racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance;

They never quit; they continue to demand the abrogation of our right to free speech.

29. Encourages States to promote at the national level strategies, policies and programmes, including affirmative action, for the promotion and protection of the economic, social and cultural rights of all victims of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance and for affording greater opportunities to them to share in the prosperity and wealth of the societies they live in, as well as for guaranteeing that the benefits of development, science and technology contribute effectively to the improvement of the quality of life of such victims;

Likewise, they continue to push reparations. There is no escaping from this arrogance.

37. Calls upon States to develop social policies, as appropriate, in order to encourage stable and harmonious relationships between different nations, peoples and groups, fostering mutual understanding, solidarity, tolerance and the development of a culture of peace;

This is a demand that we promote tolerance of the intolerable: of institutionalized hatred, discrimination & violence (Jihad). No way in Hell! As reasonable men; as lovers of life & liberty, we reject this imposition of Dhimmitude!

40. Urges States to ensure the independence of national human rights institutions, together with their dovetailing and coordination in practice, both with specialized State bodies and mechanisms and with other civil society stakeholders, particularly in respect of the prevention of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance;
41. Urges States to ensure the independence of national human rights institutions, together with their dovetailing and coordination in practice, both with specialized State bodies and mechanisms and with other civil society stakeholders, particularly in respect of the prevention of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance;

42. Devising programmes and the creation of national institutions responsible for human rights issues in accordance with the Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action of 1993 and the Paris Principles;

43. Urges States, as appropriate, to establish, strengthen, review and reinforce the effectiveness of truly independent national human rights institutions, particularly on issues of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance, in conformity with the Paris Principles and to provide them with adequate financial resources, competence and capacity for investigation, research, education and public awareness activities to combat these phenomena;

44. Encourages States to establish and strengthen, where required, national human rights institutions, and other similar entities to address problems connected to endemic racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance and to assist victims of such discrimination in areas of their jurisdiction;

45. Calls upon States to establish and equip specialized State bodies and mechanisms for the implementation of public policies to eradicate racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance and to promote racial equality with suitable financial resources, capability and capacity to survey, investigate, educate and undertake public awareness-raising activities;

These provisions demand the establishment of kangaroo courts, like the Canadian HRC, from whose arbitrary, pre-ordained rulings there is no appeal. Not, by God, in America! We will not accept it!

46. Underscores the need to step up efforts to protect the human rights of migrants, whatever their migratory status, together with the importance of upholding the duty of States Parties to the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations to comply with that Convention, including the obligation on States Parties on whose territory foreign nationals are detained to inform them of their right to communicate with their consular officers, which was upheld in the ruling of the International Court of Justice of 31 March 2004 in the case Avena and Other Mexican Nationals (Mexico v. United States of America);
47. Protecting the human rights of migrants whether regular or irregular;

48. Countering anti-immigration ideologies advocating the criminalization of irregular migration with a view to achieving relevant objectives under paragraph 30 of the Durban Programme of Action as well as other relevant international instruments;

These provisions attempt to interfere in our judicial system; to prevent us from effectively prosecuting illegal aliens who commit crimes. They also demand outlawing political programs against and criticism of illegal immigration. This must not stand!

80. As has also been highlighted in different reports under agenda item 9, one of the principal reasons fomenting the tide of racism is the growing increase in the right wing extremist political discourse, including in some of the most liberal and pluralistic societies. This trend has led to the deepening of the racist tendencies in those societies through propaganda against immigrants and promotion of cultural and religious superiority doctrines. Immunity granted to such acts has led to denial of basic human rights to the affected communities including their right to freely practice and preserve their religious and cultural identities. Effective legislation is needed at the national, regional and international levels to curb these tendencies as well as to ensure relief to the victims;
81. Urges States to adopt, and implement strictly, stringent laws against political platforms and ideologies based on racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance or doctrines of racial or national superiority;

This is another angle of approach to the constantly repeated demand that all criticism of Islam be outlawed. Opposition to Jihad, genocide & terrorism is not racism! This crap must come to a complete and permanent end.

Foreign occupation

93. Expresses deep regret the practices of racial discrimination against the Palestinians as well as other inhabitants of the Arab occupied territories which have an impact on all aspects of their daily existence such as to prevent the enjoyment of fundamental rights, express our deep concern about this situation and renew the call for the cessation of all the practices of racial discrimination to which the Palestinians and the other inhabitants of the Arab territories occupied by Israel are subjected;

The territories are illegally occupied by Muslim Arabs, subsequent to Umar's conquest of 638 and the renewed conquest of 1948. The Fallestinians have nothing to bitch about except the necessary consequences of their continued attempts at policide & genocide. The OIC & UN continue their insistence on moral inversion. Enough already!

Incitement to religious hatred

94. Calls upon States to promote and protect the exercise of the rights set out in the Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Intolerance and of Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief, proclaimed by the General Assembly in its resolution 36/55 of 25 November 1981, in order to obviate religious discrimination which, when combined with certain other forms of discrimination, constitutes a form of multiple discrimination;

They claim a right to practice their 'religion', whose sacraments include:

• aggressive conquest
• 8:39
• 9:29
• 9:123
• genocide
• 8:67
• 47:4
• terrorism
• 3:151
• 8:12
• 33:26
• rape 4:24

Islam's canon of jurisprudence requires a minimum of one military expedition against the Kuffar in every year.

• Reliance of the Traveller: Book O, Chapter 9, Paragraph 1

• The first is when they are in their own countries, in which case jihad (def: o9.8) is a communal obligation, and this is what our author is speaking of when he says, "Jihad is a communal obligation," meaning upon the Muslims each year.

• Below is what Al-Ghazali actually wrote about jihad war, and the treatment of the vanquished non-Muslim dhimmi peoples (from the Wagjiz, written in 1101 A.D.): …one must go on jihad (i.e., warlike razzias or raids) at least once a year...one may use a catapult against them [non-Muslims] when they are in a fortress, even if among them are women and children. One may set fire to them and/or drown them...If a person of the Ahl al-Kitab [People of The Book - Jews and Christians, typically] is enslaved, his marriage is [automatically] revoked…One may cut down their trees...One must destroy their useless books. Jihadists may take as booty whatever they decide...they may steal as much food as they need...

• Al-Shafi'i (God have mercy on him) said: "The least that the imam must do is that he allow no year to pass without having organised a military expedition by himself, or by his raiding parties, according to the Muslims' interest, so that the jihad will only be stopped in a year for a (reasonable) excuse." He said: "If he did not undertake the sending of enough troops to fight, those who are absent (must) go out, and consider as an obligation that which God (who is praised) said."

No way in Hell can the practice of such a 'religion' be a right! It is clearly & obviously a wrong; a crime against humanity of the worst sort. Moe made it plain, clearly denying our right to life and declaring open season.

• Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:
  Narrated Anas bin Malik:
  Allah's Apostle said, "I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.' And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah." Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, "O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?" He replied, "Whoever says, 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah', faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have."
  

A Muslim, in order to avoid eternal Hellfire and be assured of admission to Paradise, must participate in Jihad.

• 61:10. O You who believe! Shall I guide you to a commerce that will save you from a painful torment.
• 61:11. That you believe in Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad), and that you strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allâh with your wealth and your lives, that will be better for you, if you but know!
• 61:12. If you do so) He will forgive you your sins, and admit you into Gardens under which rivers flow, and pleasant dwelling in Gardens of 'Adn ­ Eternity ['Adn (Edn) Paradise], that is indeed the great success.

It is not possible for a rational man who loves life & liberty to tolerate that enormity. Free men must rise up as one, condemning & cursing Islam and demanding its eradication. Demands for its protection & promotion by law must be rejected in all cases.

95. Prohibiting by law, and adopting necessary policy measures to combat, the dissemination of all ideas based upon racial superiority or hatred and incitement to hatred;

Since Islam is based on supremacism, inculcates hatred and incites violence, it must be prohibited by law, not given shelter and immunity from criticism.

96. Ensuring, in relation to the two above-mentioned themes:

a) That lawmakers in every country discharge their responsibilities in conformity with paragraph 2 of article 20 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and article 4 of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, taking due account of General Comment 15 of the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination;

b) That model legislation on this issue is elaborated through a joint exercise to be undertaken by the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination and the Human Rights Committee;

c) That permissible limitations on the exercise of the right to freedom of expression are elaborated and, where appropriate, incorporated into national legislation;

Political speech, promoting and opposing ideas & policies must be protected as a necessity for democratic and representative government. Speech exposing and criticizing the damnable doctrines & practices of Islam must be protected under our first amendment because it is necessary to our self defense against Jihad.

d) That a voluntary ethical code of conduct is elaborated, in association with the International Federation for Journalists, to address racism in the media and other modern information and communication technologies while taking into account fundamental issues, such as the right to freedom of expression, and to eliminate the projection and perpetuation through the media and new technologies of negative images and stereotypes of African people and people of African descent;

e) Establishing the necessary complementarity and balance between human rights and fundamental freedoms with a view to fighting racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance;

Without the right to live, to be secure in our persons and property free from aggression, threat of aggression & intimidation, we have no rights at all. We must preserve the absolute right to speak and write in opposition to Moe's Murder Cult, which is at present, the most clear and proximate threat to our lives and liberties. To all these demands for censorship we must reply: Go to Hell and be damned!!!

97. Calls upon all Member States to continue international efforts to enhance dialogue and broaden understanding amongst civilizations, in an effort to prevent the discriminatory targeting of different religions and cultures;

There is nothing to talk about with Islam except the time, place and manner of its induction into Hell. Islam does not compromise, it does not negotiate, it demands surrender. A Common Word Between Us and You, a missive to Pope Benedict from the Ulema, is composed of tricks & deceptions which are dissected in detail in:
A Common Word: Islamic Extortion Scheme.

98. Invites States to promote intercultural and inter-religious dialogue and cooperation at all levels, especially the local and grass-roots levels;

99. Operationalizing the recommendation of the Special Rapporteurs on contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance and freedom of religion or belief that the Human Rights Council invite member States to promote and practice dialogue among cultures, civilizations and religions as a profound way of combating racial and religious intolerance. To that end, the following approaches are suggested:

a) Promotion of reciprocal knowledge among cultures, civilizations and religions, with a particular emphasis on value systems;

b) Adoption of policies and programmes in the fields of education, social, economic and cultural life favouring interactions among communities;

c) Recognition of the value of cultural and religious diversity associated with the promotion of unity within society;

d) Creation of conditions that facilitate encounters, dialogue and joint action for social harmony, peace, human rights and development, and combat all forms and manifestations of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance;

This persistent demand that we tolerate the intolerant & intolerable murder cult which seeks total world domination, shield it from exposure & criticism and allow it to be propagated & promoted in our schools is an egregious outrage.

100. Urges States to take serious steps to address the contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance and in this context to take firm action against negative stereotyping of religions and defamation of religious personalities, holy books, scriptures and symbols;

Racial profiling

101. Prohibiting by law, and adopting the necessary policy measures to eliminate, racial profiling and profiling based on any grounds of discrimination recognized under international human rights law, providing for sanctions for those who violate the law and ensuring effective redress for their victims;
102. Calls on States to ensure that any measures taken in the fight against terrorism do not discriminate, in purpose or effect, on the grounds of race, colour, descent, or national or ethnic origin as well as on the grounds of culture, religion and language and that non-citizens are not subjected to racial or ethnic profiling or stereotyping;
103. Urges States to formulate, implement and ensure compliance with practical measures to eradicate the phenomenon commonly known as “racial profiling”, which includes the practice whereby police officers and other officials responsible for upholding the law act on the basis, to some extent or other, of race, colour, descent or ethnic or national origin as a reason for investigating persons or determining if a person is committing offences;

Who planted the bombs in Bali? Who blew up Pan Am 103? Who bombed the World Trade Center and the London & Madrid rail systems? Was it little old Lutheran ladies or was it young Muslim males? Every Muslim on the face of the earth is a potential terrorist, because terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam. Profiling makes sense. Random searches do not make sense.

Media & Internet

106. Urges States to take necessary measures to denounce, actively discourage and prohibit the transmission of racist and xenophobic messages through all communications media, including new communications technologies such as the Internet;

Bear in mind that Durban conflates opposition to Islam with racism. They are trying to outlaw these blog posts.

107. Calls upon States to develop, in cooperation with multilateral organizations, internet service providers, private sector stakeholders and civil society, and taking into account the principles of multilateralism, democracy and transparency, a coordinated global strategy to formulate a voluntary code of conduct to prevent the dissemination of messages of racial hatred and intolerance;

Read You’ve Been Mooned! , watch FITNA and compate it to Ban's statement. These officious AssWholes would make it illegal to post FITNA on the internet. FITNA is neither hate speech nor a token of intolerance. It is an objective, factual exposure of the reality of Islam. These demands for censorship must be rejected!

108. Urges States to disseminate information, through appropriate means, including the use of the media and school curricula, to promote a spirit of respect for diversity and inclusiveness amongst the various racial, ethnic, national, linguistic and cultural groups;

They want our schools to be used as indoctrination tools; inoculating our children against the true facts concerning Islam. That can not be accepted!

109. Recommends that the use of the new information technologies, including the Internet, should contribute to combating racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance and that they should also be used to promote tolerance and respect for diversity;

They demand that the web be polemicized; used as a captive indoctrination tool. This can not be accepted by lovers of liberty!

110. Calls upon the world media to establish and disseminate through their relevant associations and organizations a code of ethical conduct with a view to prohibiting the proliferation of ideas of superiority and the justification of racial or religious hatred and discrimination in any form, and promoting mutual respect and tolerance among all peoples;

There is no such thing as mutual respect and tolerance. Islam gives neither. Islam demands, it does not give. This is a demand for back door self censorship. It is not acceptable.

111. Calls upon States to prevent, through all appropriate means, stereotyping of any ethnic, racial, national, cultural, religious and linguistic group, and encourage objective and balanced portrayals of people, events and history, especially in the media, recognizing the profound influence that such portrayals have on societal perceptions of groups whose members are frequently victims of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance;

That is another blatant demand for censorship. Islam is perpetual war, neither peaceful nor a religion. That is the fact which they seek to prevent from being disseminated. No, thank you, we will keep our first amendment rights!

116. Urges States that have not yet condemned, apologized and paid reparations for the grave and massive violations as well as the massive human suffering caused by slavery, the slave trade, the transatlantic slave trade, apartheid, colonialism and genocide, to do so at the earliest;

Who captivated, enslaved & sold those Africans? Who committed genocide against Armenia, Assyria & India? Who was complicit in the genocide against Jews in WWII? Where is the apology; where are the reparations from Islam? Kiss my foot!

126. Renews its call for international efforts to promote an understanding between different civilizations and cultures so as to counter attempts at cultural and civilizational domination and imposition motivated by racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance;

Civilizational domination is at the core of Islam. Who has read 8:39 & 9:33? Those who wrote the draft know; they don't want you to find out. It is precisely because we understand Islam that we reject this crap.

127. Reiterates that the Palestinian people continue to be denied the fundamental right of self determination and urges member States to look at the situation of Palestinian people during the Durban Review Conference and implement the provisions of DDPA with a view to bring lasting peace in the Middle East;

The Palestinian people are Jews; Israelies. Falestinians are interlopers; an illegal occupation force who must be sent home to Arabia where they belong. It is Israel who has a right to self determination in a Levantine homeland.

128. Urges States to take necessary measures to denounce, actively discourage and prohibit the transmission of racist and xenophobic messages through all communications media, including new communications technologies such as the Internet;

These AssWholes conflate opposition to Islamic conquest with racism. The two are unrelated; Islam is not a race; it is a murder cult.

(c) International legal framework:

137. Invites the Human Rights Committee and the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination to adopt a joint general comment on article 20 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and article 4 of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination further clarifying and defining, inter alia, States’ obligations thereunder and the threshold beyond which an act constitutes a violation thereof, bearing in mind general comment 11 of the Human Rights Committee and general recommendation 15 of the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination;

138. Urges the Human Rights Committee to clarify the scope and content of article 20 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights within the framework of its general comments with the aim, among other things, of defining an appropriate threshold for enacting relevant legislation;

139. Relevant recommendations must also find place in the new international standards to be developed in the area of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance as well as mainstreaming the subject of racism throughout the UN system;

140. Condemns human rights violations, irrespective of their origin, and is not against "reasonable and fair criticism." However, recent events have once again highlighted the need to demarcate the legal contours between freedom of expression and hate speech. OHCHR's proposed Expert Consultations on the permissible limits to freedom of expression, by taking into account the mandatory prohibition of advocacy of religious hatred, should reach some conclusions and recommendations coming out from the consultations should be worthy of including in the Review Conference documents

141. Taking into account the difficulties encountered by the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination in its activity, the United Nations should strive to enhance the Committee’s capabilities by providing it with more time and resources to enable it to discharge fully its mandate under the 1965 Convention
142. National laws alone cannot deal with the rising tide of defamation and hatred against Muslims, especially if such trends are spreading to the grass root communities. A framework is needed to analyze national laws and understand their provisions. This could then be compiled in a single "universal document" as guidelines for legislation – aimed at countering "defamation of religions".

It never ceases; these arrogant AssWholes demand that we be silenced; prevented from pointing out the fatal facts of Islam: that Allah is a demon, not the Almighty Creator, that the Qur'an contradicts instead of confirming the Holy Scriptures, that Moe was a murdering pirate & pederast, not a holy prophet, that he revealed situational scripture mandating perpetual conquest, genocide & casting terror.

Anyone doubting or disputing those fatal facts would do well to read the Qur'an and Bukhari's Sahih collection of hadith. Those books are readily available in the Compendium of Islamic Texts at USC-MSA. Scroll to the top of the linked page and use the links in the left side bar. Direct your attention primarily to the following:

1. AL-BAQARA (THE COW)
2. AAL-E-IMRAN (THE FAMILY OF 'IMRAN, THE HOUSE OF 'IMRAN)
3. AN-NISA (WOMEN)

8. AL-ANFAL (SPOILS OF WAR, BOOTY)
9. AT-TAWBA (REPENTANCE, DISPENSATION)

47. MUHAMMAD (MUHAMMAD)
48. AL-FATH (VICTORY, CONQUEST)

Sahih Bukhari:

52. Fighting for the Cause of Allah (Jihaad)
53. One-fifth of Booty to the Cause of Allah (Khumus)

59. Military Expeditions led by the Prophet (pbuh) (Al-Maghaazi)

The meaning is clear and obvious on the face of the texts. Jihad: aggressive wars of conquest, is a sacrament and participation therein is mandatory, not optional. Ibn Kathir's Tafsir, which explains the meaning of the Qur'an, confirms the fatal facts. I call your attention to the following topics in his tafsir. Read them and curse Islam.

• The Command for Endurance when the Enemy Engaging
• The Command for Jihad against the Disbelievers and the Hypocrites
• The Command to fight Those Who fight Muslims and killing Them wherever They are found
• The Command to strike the Enemies' Necks, tighten Their Bonds, and then free Them either by an Act of Grace or for a Ransom
• The Order to fight People of the Scriptures until They give the Jizyah
• The Order for Jihad against the Disbelievers, the Closest, then the Farthest Areas
• The Order to fight to eradicate Shirk and Kufr
• The Order to fight until there is no more Fitnah
• The Order for Jihad against the Disbelievers and Hypocrites

So terrorism is haram? Explain these tafsir which explain 8:60 and 8:12!!

• Making Preparations for War to strike Fear in the Hearts of the Enemies of Allah
• Muslims invoke Allah for Help, Allah sends the Angels to help Them

If any doubt remains, consult 3:7 and its tafsir; they tell you that Allah's commands are contained in clear verses which are to be believed and carried out.

Further confirmation is found in Sharia. Islamic law is derived from Muhammad's recitation and example: Qur'an & Sunnah. "Umdat as-Salik wa 'Uddat an-Nasik (Reliance of the Traveller and Tools of the Worshipper, also commonly known by its shorter title Reliance of the Traveller) is a classical manual of fiqh for the Shafi'i school of Islamic jurisprudence." Here is the Wikipedia entry.

The book is about 1200 pages long. While you can search it at Muhaddith, there are some limitations to the search. The text has been posted an an educational site. This is a raw text file, and some of it is extremely RAW! I suggest using the Ctrl F search function to find what you are seeking if you go here and delve into it: http://www.nku.edu/~kenneyr/Islam/Reliance.html . Reliance is available as a scanned image, with a search engine at Scribid. Book O, "Justice", includes the laws of Islamic warfare. Turn to Chapter 9 to learn what Jihad is, against whom it must be performed and how often. Keep reading until you learn what happens to captive women & children.

Throughout this series of seven articles, I have quoted from the Noble Qur'an translated by Hilali & Khan, and linked to www.quranbrowser.com, which displays a table of ten translations for easy comparison. This link 2:190 is to the King Fahd Complex for Printing the Holy Qur'an. Scroll to the bottom of the page and read the footnote to 2:190, which defines Jihad. Compare that to the definition given in Reliance of the Traveller: O9.0.

The UN & OIC seek to outlaw the exposure of these fatal facts. They seek to allow Islam to continue its infiltration, demographic expansion and Jihad without resistance. This crap must come to an end! Their unreasonable demands must be rejected, and we must get America out of the UN and the UN out of America. Let them find an alternative source of funding.