On Fear Mongering

We have ALL heard the phrase "fear mongering" from the moonbat left and their muppets of the Leftinistra.

It seems as though whenever we hear "...fighting them over there so we don't have to fight them here...", that is proclaimed fear mongering. However, whenever we hear "...attack Pakistan...", that is not called fear mongering. Why is that?

Whenever we hear "...pull the troops out of Iraq so we can fight the 'real' terrorists...", that is not called fear mongering. Why is that?

Whenever we hear "...NYC will be under water due to Global Warming...", that is not called fear mongering. Why is that?

Whenever we hear "...the rich exploit the poor...", that is not called fear mongering...". Why is that?

Whenever we hear "...terrorism is a real threat..." coming from the DNC Aspirants to the Presidency, that is not called fear mongering. Why is that?

Whenever we hear "...the economy is crashing..." that is not called fear mongering. Why is that?

Whenever we hear "...they are trashing the Constitution...", that is not called fear mongering. Why is that?

Why is that??

How about some honesty...for a change? I know honesty is said to be bad policy for those due up for elections...isn't that "fear mongering"?

How about if the country unites...as it once was before the Leftinistra decided they would NOT be in power and control if they remained united against the AQ terrorists NO MATTER WHERE THEY ARE...isn't that "fear mongering"?

Just curious.

Identity Politics...Downfall of America; An International Embarrassment

This right here is too funny in a not so funny way. It isn't funny as far as a HAHA is funny. It is funny in that the Leftinistra are whining...AGAIN! Funny as in, WTF? Funny as in, this is not known? Funny as in, you have got to be kidding me!

Read on.

From Slate:

The Los Angeles Times leads with a look at how the partisan wrangling between lawmakers in Congress has been escalating since Democrats took control and reached a high point last week. Although there was much condemnation of all this infighting, both sides have been turning up the heat, figuring "they have more to gain by warring with their rivals than by working with them." Everyone has much to lose from the deadlock but few expect the mood to change when Congress comes back, particularly since Iraq will be at the forefront again.

Get a load of this headliner:
Los Angeles Times

Partisanship serves parties' interests

And the sub-title is this:

The GOP sees more advantage in disrupting congressional business, and Democrats see no incentive to accommodate the minority.

OK. First off. What is "wrong" with the image running through your mind as you read the title and sub-title? The quote? If you are a closed-mind moonbat, you will readily proclaim the verbiage to be The Truth. If you are someone like...say...me, you will read that and laugh scornfully and proclaim, "So what else is knew?" Someone like me would proclaim the verbiage as "This Is Bull!"

Simply amazing.

For years and years and years and years, since the time of Carter and the few years before him, the Leftinistra have used their badgering techniques on the GOP types that have always maintained or worked hard at maintaining, civil discourse. This has been The Way up until recent years...more so currently.

The GOP Conservatives have FINALLY started to fight fire with fire and some have even taken their gloves off. We can no longer afford to play nice-nice. So, now, it is called "partisanship" when what it really is, and putting it bluntly, is the attitude of STFU! And here is why.

THIS IS MY GUT CALL BASED ON LIFE'S EXPERIENCE...so don't give me a ration of crap because MY gloves have been off for decades and I will trounce and pounce with no mercy. At this point, mercy is tantamount to a stay at Bellevue.

The Democrats MAY have run on the platform of "bring the troops home" but I don't believe that for one minute. I believe that in their heart of hearts, they KNOW that we cannot just walk away, no matter what you call it and the manner of which the "walk out" is termed. It is suicide for the Iraqis and Americans for aeons to come. The Battle MUST be won and THEY KNOW IT!

I believe that they used their moonobat base to win elections in close states in 11/06. They called it "a new direction" in Iraq. They KNEW as most of us knew then as we STILL know now, the then in place ROE was as retarded as Forest Gump. I know it. You know it and so did they. The new direction demanded by the American people was a VICTORY. They knew it. You know it. And so did I. Many conservatives...the hard-core ones and the moderate ones, stayed home. Had they showed up to vote, we would not be in the predicament of which we find the political bodies in at the moment.

The blathered and bantering about of The Vaunted democratic Party has gotten this country where, exactly? Exactly no where? Correct. We are right smack down in the middle of THE WORST Congressioanal Session if the history of this country. The all so hated GWB has OVER 10 times the approval rating as does the Democratic Party led "majority". CONgress has sunk to an all-time low all because the DNC LIED to the base about The War In Iraq.

When you strip down all the rhetoric; when you take the time to dissect the words spoken to various groups across the country from the Politicos; there is no way on God's Green earth that anybody in their right mind is going to pull troops out of Iraq before the job is done.

Anybody that has a head on their shoulders that are of sound mind knows beyond a shadow of a doubt that a "political solution" is NOT possible without a military victory. Cases in point; WWI, WWII, Vietnam, Korea, Grenada, Contra-Sandinista, Kosovo, to name a few. There are more examples.

WWI and WWII and Grenada; political solutions came AFTER the war was won.

Vietnam; "political solutions" lost that war.

Korea; "political solutions" wrought a "tie"...the area, to this day is STILL at war. The war was NEVER settled. The declared war on the South by the North and the declared war on the North by the South has NEVER been rescinded. This is the longest cease fire in history.

Grenada; "political solutions" came AFTER the smallest war in history was won.

Kosovo; "political solutions" have not worked because the war is on-going.

Contra-Sandinista; your guess is as good as mine.

Now, they, the Democrats and RINOs, are using the moonbat base in the SAME way and we see how the KOSmonoffs' convention was a flop if not a total waste of time, effort and money. Just look at the "conflict" taking place between The Fraud Sheehan and The Fraud Pelosi! Pelosi has stated that impeachment of GWB and Cheney will NOT happen. Censure will NOT happen. Why? Because they did NOT A THING to warrant it but it sure does excite the moonbat base.

Look at the "conflict" going on between the top three muts of the DNC. Edwards whines about "they want to shut me up" and Barack said he wants to nuke Pakistan and Hillary says she will bring the troops home. Please. The irony of the ultimate poli-speak jargon is oh so sadly comical.

Keeping the issues simple is the easiest way but it doesn't win elections.

If the Democrats, that KNOW their rhetoric is disingenuous at the minimum would tell their moonbat base to "go to your corners and don't get up until we tell you to" and if the Republicans would clean up their act, The War In Iraq would have been won LONG ago...like 1991.

Rant to be continued I am sure...

Give 'Em Hell!

Raise Cain!

Town Hall is running a private survey. This might be worth signing up if you are not yet a member. It is free, anyhow. Here is the survey’s url:

http://www.therealdemocratstory.com/townhallsurvey/

This question is open ended, you can let them have it.

What is your best idea for defeating the Democrats in 2008?

My answer follows:

1. Select genuine Conservative candidates for all offices.

2. Run on genuine Conservative principles.

3. Point out ‘crat hypocrisy at every opportunity.

I am looking for a new party because the GOP has abandoned Conservatism by nominating and electing conmen instead of statesmen.

If enough of us slap them with the truth, the GOP might wake up, I ain’t holding my breath in anticipation, but this may be our best shot, besides withholding financial support.

Jihad 101

The Ins and Outs of This War…2007

The only “wars” in recent times that I know of that took a very short time to “win” are the Faulkland Islands and the Invasion of Grenada. The current “war” we are involved in has been going on for decades upon decades upon decades. This “debacle” as touted by the Reids of the world must first be understood for what it is; a Global War of Jihad. There really is only one way to have an ultimate and clear-cut end…total annihilation of the enemy.

Some would have us believe that we can negotiate a settlement with the Global Jihadists. Others proclaim that a radical few have hijacked an otherwise peaceful “religion”. Both of these noble premise, although well intended, are as wrong as wrong can get. There is no such thing as “peaceful Islam”. I would like for someone to tell me of one instance…just one and only one…where there was ever a “peaceful Islam”.

What is Jihad?

What is Jihad: The Arabic word Jihad is derived from the root word Jahada (struggle). Jihad has come to mean an offensive war to be waged by Muslims against all non-Muslims to convert them to Islam on the pain of death. Jihad is enjoined on all Muslims by the Quran.

We have a series on this blog dedicated to the exposure of what our pathetic political leaders cannot nor will not accept…it is not politically expedient and it is surely not politically correct to KNOW the truth.

Perhaps this video will begin to cast a glimmer of a shadow of a hope that a dim light at the end of an infinite tunnel will begin to glow.

The Politically Correct proponents fear world opinion and will not allow themselves to honestly see what the world faces. The world faces World Conquest of Jihad.

I find it appalling that the American Quest and Lust for Political Power within my country has brought us to the brink of self-induced destruction. We haven’t been this politically split since 1861 and look how that unfolded. Idealism. Realism. And any other “ism” imaginable or invented to espouse one’s “world view” will be the demise of this nation called The United States of America.

What are we united against? What are we united for? We hear a minority in numbers tout separation of Church and State, when there is no such doctrine in the Constitution, when it comes to the Ten Commandments on display in courtrooms and elsewhere yet we allow without impunity, the fabrication and construction of Islamic “cleansing basins“, a religion-based tenet of foot-washing in our universities, tax dollars supported. We allow “special” public schools where “peaceful Islam” can be taught to the “peaceful Jihadist’s” children in our school systems.

We allow “peaceful religious” Islamic militant compounds to thrive on our own soil yet we take down the Branch Davidians. Duplicitous does not even scratch the surface of this sham called Separation of Church and State.

I read today in the “harpy” news media all manner of wrong-headed and politically charged rhetoric, politically driven, naturally, as to the “ill-gotten when will it all end” nonsense. Those of us that are in The Know, laugh scornfully at the uneducated.

It will all end when the world is ruled by the Caliphate.

More to follow. Let the video sink in.

UPDATE:

Excellent editorial by Seth Leibsohn at NRO:

James Gilmore weighs in:

Liars, GWOT, Jihadists, Studies In Islam, Two-Faced, Terrorists, Jerks, GOP, Democrats, Morons, Political Correctness, Politics

Capitalize Or Socialize?

Mystery: Will The GOP “Capitalize”?

Doodlehead Obey threatened the GOP and the GOP should jump on this with a vengeance second to none.

FNC

House Appropriations Committee Chairman David R. Obey (D-Wis.) has handed Republican lawmakers a golden (literally) opportunity to end earmarking during the current session of Congress. (In our new book, Outrage, we highlight how abuse of earmarking costs taxpayers $64 billion — three times what it was just a few years ago.)

According to Tuesday’s New York Times, Obey warned Republicans that “he would ban earmarking completely if Republicans attacked individual projects to score political points.” What an opportunity for the GOP!

There we go with the NY Slimes again. What a waste of a facility…

Videos Of The Past The Leftinistra HATE!

Rightfully Swiped From Miss Beth

BAD GUYS: Factual Videos-What THEY Don”t Want YOU To Know (What THEY HOPE Doesn”t Get Out)

• Democrats Regarding WMD, Saddam Hussein and War In Iraq
• Dems “Iraq Plan”
• Harry Reid Laughs Regarding Troop Funding
• Harry Reid Lies Directly to Veterans Regarding Funding
• Jihadists Posing As American Soldiers to Infiltrate American Sympathies
• John Kerry Agrees With WTC7Conspiracy Theorist
• Moms of Fury Confronting Congressman Hodes
• Rosie’s “Expertise” on the War on Terror
• USA Wake Up

GOP Tough On Terror...DNC Sucks

GOP Tops On Terror

GOP Tops On Terror

Wednesday, June 06, 2007 1:21 PM

Some would have us believe that, I am sure. Whereas the GOP candidates and others are indeed on the right track on the issues we face in regards to terrorism, they are far from realizing the real threats. The DNC, on the other hand are lost in space.

Both parties are guilty of missing the messages from the Islam. Islam is NOT a religion of peace. A few radicals have NOT hijacked the religion of Islam. Islam, is a religion of death, murder, rape, torture and slavery. Just read their unholy book. This blog is running a series by guest authors and their works can be seen in the Studies In Islam (Jihadism).

From the New York Post

GOP TOPS ON TERROR: PANEL
By KENNETH LOVETT

June 6, 2007 — MANCHESTER, N.H. - The Republican presidential candidates were far stronger on the war on terror in their debate last night than their Democratic counterparts Sunday, according to most members of a Post panel of independent voters.

“The Republicans recognize we’re in a war and understand we need to fight it; the Democrats don’t,” said Bob Dugan, 50, a pharmaceutical-products supervisor from Manchester.

The Post gathered the panel of seven undecided independent voters to watch both the Democratic debate Sunday and the GOP debate yesterday in New Hampshire, which holds the earliest presidential primary and where independents can pick which primary to cast a ballot.

“The Republicans are stronger on terror than the Democrats,” concluded Andrea Lamy, 24, a second-year Franklin Pierce Law Center student from Manchester.

Bill Lynch, 62, of Manchester, and Doug Schofield, 36, a benefits-account manager from Franklin, agreed.

“I like the social agenda of the Democrats, but the war on terror is so big,” said Schofield.

But Elizabeth Nistico, 18, a senior at Manchester Central HS, and Debra Davis, a 54-year-old stay-at-home mother of three boys from New Boston, said they believe most of the Republicans were intent on focusing on terrorism and the Iraq war to scare voters.

[And here lies the problem. Scare tactics. Since when is truth designed to be scary to garner support? If these people KNEW what the islamists have intended for us, they truly would be frightened into action instead of platitudes and ignorancs. Exhibiting the Ostrich Syndrome is “Rather” stupid and lethal, in this case.]

“Those Republicans, war, war, war,” Davis said.

[Morons like Davis, dumb, dumber, dumbest. He should be saying, “Those Democrats, socialists, communists and retards.]

Georgian Tutuianu, 17, of Manchester, also a senior at Manchester Central HS, said most of the Republicans are too divisive in dealing with terrorism.

[That is due to some of them KNOW what we face and others pretend they don’t know or refuse to accept it in fear of being called racist.]

“They seem to overly simplify things,” Tutuianu said. “A war is a complex issue and I don’t think you can say ‘we’re good, they’re bad - let’s fight them.’ “

[An idiot prattles.]

Former Mayor Rudy Giuliani and Sen. John McCain drew the most praise from panel members after last night’s debate while former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney was the biggest disappointment.

Dugan described Giuliani’s performance as “very forceful, very commanding.”

[I guess he missed Duncan Hunters three home-runs; Libby, immigration and terrorism.]

“He may be the moderate candidate who can drag independent voters and Reagan Democrats into the Republican camp,” Dugan said. “Most of the other candidates were too polarizing.”

[Yep. Dugan was sleeping.]

GOP/RNC...Lost In Space?

SHAME! SHAME!! SHAME!!!
SHAME! SHAME!! SHAME!!!
Thursday, March 15, 2007 7:20 AM

On Republicans AND Democrats!!!! The comments section is all wanker-jawed on the Big Boy Blogs so I am placing the entire article here so I and others can RANT about this BS non-friggin’ story!!

This whole issue is retarded

Thursday, March 15, 2007

Shame on some Republicans…

Posted by Mike Gallagher 6:08 AM

Many callers to my radio show are constantly asking, “What is wrong with Republicans? Why are so many of them afraid to stand up to the Demcrats and fight?”

I wish I knew the answer to that question. The Alberto Gonzales “controversy” is a perfect example of weak-kneed Republicans who are cowering and bowing and scraping over this total non-issue of the legitimate dismissal of eight U.S. attorneys.

Forget going through the obvious hypocricy of Democrats who seem to forget the political firings that Bill Clinton engaged in during the 1993 purge of 92 U.S. attorneys. How about Republicans like John Sununu who are joining the liberal pack and calling for Gonzales’ head on a platter?
I don’t get Republicans like Sununu and John Cornyn and others who are piling on over this concocted, contrived story.

Is Gonzales becoming a liability to the Bush Administration? Sure he is. But only because he won’t fight back and a few Republicans are bailing.

And the media’s role? Appalling as usual. Try to stomach George Stephanopoulos of ABC grilling Gonzales on TV while apparently forgetting to mention that Georgie boy was Bill Clinton’s right hand man in 1993 while he was firing 92 U.S. attorneys. Or seeing other network anchors interviewing Madame Hillary, giving her all the opportunity in the world to rail against “political firings”, and not bothering to ask her about her husband’s decision to clean house in 1993, doing the same thing President Bush is doing, only more than ten times over!

C’mon, Republicans. Get your sea legs back. Stop acting so shell-shocked over the midterm elections. Grow up and fight back. Don’t let the schoolyard bullies of the Democratic Party and the mainstream press get away with this garbage…

Let's Have A Civil War And Be Done With It!

CPAC v GOP v RNC
CPAC v GOP v RNC
Tuesday, March 13, 2007 6:28 AM

So, does anyone think there just MIGHT be an inkling of hope for Reagan Conservatism or should we just skip all of that and head right into another American Civil War?

"They" Aren't Listening To The Base

CPAC Fallout??
CPAC Fallout??
Monday, March 12, 2007 1:37 PM

YOU BETCHA!!!

So what was/IS the message from CPAC?

WAKE UP GOP!! STOP WITH THE RINO CRAP!! RETURN TO THE REAGAN ERA CONSERVATISM AND THE CONTRACT WITH AMERICA!!

HELLO??

There. I feel better now. The RNC leadership needs to be hung from the nearest oak tree…

CPAC Fallout…:

A Mar. 4 FOXNews.com article about last week’s annual Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in Washington, D.C., began by saying, “America’s conservatives are mad, and they’re not going to take it anymore.”

The object of their scorn? The GOP.

The article–titled “Anger on display among conservative PAC audience”–made a point of emphasizing that conservatives are disillusioned and depressed over the failure of the Republican Party to fulfill its promises to its conservative base.

The article’s author, Kelley Beaucar Vlahos, wrote,

One after another, conservatives told FOXNews.com that they are angry, irritated, frustrated, and in some cases depressed. And the target of their angst and ire is none other than the Republican Party, which wants and needs their support to win the 2008 presidential election and avoid losing more seats in the Senate and House next election. (emphasis added)

Vlahos quoted veteran conservative leader Richard Viguerie as telling the CPAC audience: The Republican Party apparently has a death wish, but that doesn’t mean we conservatives have to go along with it. Let’s focus on the conservative movement, not the GOP. (emphasis added)

Read the entire article…EXCELLENT expose!! Indeed.