Inside the Islamophobia Network

Inside the Islamophobia Network Muslims and their dhimmis are kvetching & caterwauling over what they perceive as a right wing extremist campaign to divert attention from the important items of their Socialist agenda  by seeking laws to bar Shari'ah from American courts.  Thanks and a tip of the hat to Bare Naked Islam for bringing this to my attention.

Inside the Islamophobia Network has a video in which snippets of remarks by several experts  are used to create a false image of superficiality.  The most accessible handbooks of Shari'ah run in excess of 1000 pages. The experts can't tell us everything in a few seconds of air time. 

agenda: demonize Muslims

    The "experts" called Shari'ah a threat, they accurately described it, they  did not declare it satanic nor did they attach that label to Muslims.  Shari'ah is a system of law based on the Qur'an & hadith.  Many provisions of Shari'ah are not compatible with our Constitution.

link to terrorism

    Terrorism is a battle tactic¹, the battle is part of jihad.  Jihad is defined in Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9, which also describes the communal religious obligation to perform it annually.  It describes the caliph as making war against Jews, Christians & Zoroastrians¹⁰ until they are subjugated and pay the jizya. It describes the caliph as fighting all other peoples until they become Muslim.

infiltration of Shari'ah

    Shari'ah courts are operating in England, but not here, of course; it can't happen here. "This Shari'ah law business is crap". So Says Governor Christie..  But CSPI has a surprise for you: in the last three decades, fifty court cases have involved Shari'ah.

Shariah Law and American State Courts: An Assessment of State Appellate Court Cases
Version 1.4 / June 21, 2011 (PDF, 635 pages, 2.4 MB)

The Center for Security Policy’s report, Shariah Law and American State Courts: An Assessment of State Appellate Court Cases evaluates 50 Appellate Court cases from 23 states that involve conflicts between Shariah (Islamic law) and American state law.

The facts are the facts: some judges are making decisions deferring to Shariah law even when those decisions conflict with Constitutional protections.

Table 1 on page 44 enumerates the cases by state.
Table 3 on page 46 lists cases by category.
Table 4 enumerates compliant and non-compliant trial court decisions.
Table 5 enumerates compliant and non-compliant appellate decisions.
Table 6 on page 47 lists the conflicts by country of origin.

    Twenty one cases dealt with marriage law and seventeen with child custody. 

its crap!

    The crap is flowing from the mouths of the smug, smarmy, holier than thou self-righteous deniers of objective factual reality.  Shari'ah has been admitted to American courts already. Seventeen cases involved child custody. Do you have a clue concerning the relevant provisions of Shari'ah?  I have some clues for you.

    This is not hate speech. This is not demonization. This is not Islamophobia. This is exposing a significant sample of the provisions of Islamic law so that you can see and understand them.  I am providing quotes and links to source documents so that you can delve as deeply into them as you like.  Reliance of the Traveller, Books  M & N regulate marriage and divorce.

This partial table of contents comes from page 508 of the text, page 526 of the pdf.
Child Care and Custody m13.0
Meaning of Child Care mB.O(O:)
Precedence Order of Who Deserves Child's Custody m13.1
Conditions for Eligibility to Have Child Custody m13.2
Non-Muslim Day-Care Centers, Schools, Etc. m13.3
A Woman Who Remarries Loses Right to Custody m13.4
Older Children Decide Which Parent to Stay With mB.5

    Now we are going to get down to some gritty detail. There is blessed good reason why Shari'ah should not be enforced in our courts and I shall now expose you to it. 

Shari'ah denies custody to a secular mother

Shari'ah denies custody to a Christian mother

 

 

m13.2 The necessary conditions for a person to
have custody of a child are:
(a) uprightness (def: 024.4) (0: a corrupt
person may not be a guardian, because child care
is a position of authority, and the corrupt are
unqualified for it. Mawardi and Ruyani hold that
outward uprightness (def: m3.3(f) is sufficient
unless there is open wrongdoing. If the corruptness
of a child's mother consists of her not performing
the prayer (sal at) , she has no right to
custody of the child, who might grow up to be like
her, ending up in the same vile condition of not
praying, for keeping another's company has its
effects);
(b) sanity (0: since a mother uninterruptedly
insane has no right to custody, though if her
insanity is slight. such as a single day per year. her
right to custody is not vitiated by it);
(c) and if the child is Muslim, it is a necessary
condition that the person with custody be a Muslim
(0: because it is a position of authority, and a
non-Muslim has no right to authority and hence
no right to raise a Muslim. If a non-Muslim were
given charge of the custody and upbringing of the
child, the child might acquire the character traits
of unbelief (kufr». {Emphasis added.}

    Under Shari'ah a divorced woman loses custody of her children if she does not perform Salat, if she remarries or if she is not a Muslim.   If you do not comprehend this, go back and read sections a, c & d again. 

Risala treats of custody in Chapter 33 on page 332 of the pdf. 
Maliki & Shafi'ite do not agree perfectly.

33.9b. Custody
After a divorce, the woman has custody of a boy until he reaches puberty
and a girl until she marries and the marriage consummated.
[This is the right of the mother, be she free or slave, Muslim, or Kitabi, sensible or
foolish according to Ibn 'Arafa. This right also pertains if she is widowed. The
girl's maintenance is owed by the father until her marriage is consummated.]
33.9c. Order of custody
After that if the mother dies or remarries, custody goes to the grandmother
and then the maternal aunt. If there are no female relatives of the mother,
then it goes to one of the sisters and paternal uncles. If there are none,
then the agnate relatives.
[Custody goes first to the mother's mother and then the father's mother.]

Hedaya, Volume I, page 138  on page 197 of the pdf, has this ruling, which indicates that re-marying would  void the mother's right to custody.

In case of separation, the care of the infant
children belongs to the mother, the right
of nursing and keeping it rests with the
mother, because it is regarded that a woman
once applied to the. prophet, sayiug, " 0,
prophet of God ! this 1s .my son, the fruit
of my womb, cherished in my bosom and
suckled at my breast, and his father is desirous
of taking him away from me into ,his
own care ;"-to which the prophet replied,
" thou hast a right in the child prior to that
of thy husband, so long as thou dost not
marry with a stranger :'

On page 139, page 198 of the pdf, there is another interesting ruling. A non-Muslim woman loses custody once the child is old enough to decide on religion.

And also an infidel mother the wife of a
Mussulman or female infidel
subject, married to a Mussulman, is entitled
to the Hizanit of her child, although  he be
a Mussulman like the father; but this only
so long as the child is incapable of forming
any judgment with respect to religion, and
whilst there is no apprehension of his imbibing
 an attachment to infidelity ; but when
this is the case, he must be taken from.the
mother, because, although it be for the child's
advantage to be under her care until that
period, his remaining longer with he might
prove injurious.

forced marriage

    Should a father be able to compel his pre-pubescent daughter to marry? He is, if Shari'ah is applied. 

m3.13 Guardians are of two types, those who
may compel their female charges to marry someone,
and those who may not.
(1) The only guardians who may compel
their charge to marry are a virgin bride's father or
father's father, compel meaning to marry her to a
suitable match (def: m4) without her consent.
(2) Those who may not compel her are not
entitled to marry her to someone unless she
accepts and gives her permission.
Whenever the bride is a virgin, the father or
father's father may marry her to someone without
her permission, though it is recommended to ask
her permission if she has reached puberty. A virgin's
silence is considered as permission.
As for the nonvirgin of sound mind, no one
may marry her to another after she has reached
puberty without her express permission, no matter
whether the guardian is the father, father's
father, or someone else.

    Risala rules on this issue in page 302 of the pdf.

32.2 The authority of the guardian
32.2a. A father arranging the marriage of a virgin daughter
A father can arrange the marriage of his virgin daughter without her permission even if she is
beyond the age of puberty. It is up to him whether he consults her or not.
[To whomever he wants for the dowry he wishes, even for less than a suitable dowry. He can give her
choice, and it states in al-Jawahir and elsewhere that it is recommended that he ask her permission.]

    Hedaya  covers this issue tangentially in Volume I, page 32, in the second column of Page 93 of the pdf. 

    I focused on the child custody issue because of its familiarity and critical importance. If your daughter marries a Muslim, gives you grand children and is divorced by tripple talaq, do you want the provisions listed above to determine who gets custody?  If your wife is raped, do you want her to be required to provide four male witnesses to prove it? What is your attitude toward being excluded from being a witness because you are not Muslim? 

    Shari'ah compliant finance is a related issue, requiring the payment of a 2.5% tax. 12.5% of that tax must be paid to those "fighting in Allah's cause" ie. terrorists. Do you give a damn? 

    Remember, "it's crap!"; it can't happen here, "nobody is demanding it"; except that there have already been 50 cases involving Shari'ah in state trial and appellate courts.   It will happen unless we rise up to put a stop to it. If your state has pending legislation to exclude foreign law, contact your legislators and ask them to vote for it. Contact your Congressman to ask him to co-sponsor and vote for H.R. 973.  Congress.org  lets you email your state and federal legislators without knowing their names or district numbers. You need only know your Zip Code. Sign up and send those emails today!
http://www.congress.org/

---

1. Relevant ayat & ahadith:
   1. http://www.islamawakened.com/Quran/3/151/
   2. http://www.islamawakened.com/Quran/8/12/
      1. http://corpus.quran.com/wordbyword.jsp?chapter=8&verse=12
         1. (8:12:16)
            l-ruʿ'ba
            the terror
   3. http://www.islamawakened.com/Quran/8/57/
   4. http://corpus.quran.com/wordbyword.jsp?chapter=8&verse=60
      1. http://corpus.quran.com/wordbyword.jsp?chapter=8&verse=60
         1. (8:60:10)
            tur'hibūna
            (to) terrify
   5. http://www.islamawakened.com/Quran/33/26/
      1. http://corpus.quran.com/wordbyword.jsp?chapter=33&verse=26
         1. (33:26:12)
            l-ruʿ'ba
            [the] terror,
   6. http://www.islamawakened.com/Quran/59/2/
      1. http://corpus.quran.com/wordbyword.jsp?chapter=59&verse=2
      2. (59:2:32)
         l-ruʿ'ba
         [the] terror,
   7. http://www.islamawakened.com/Quran/59/13/
   8. http://www.usc.edu/schools/college/crcc/engagement/resources/texts/muslim/hadith/bukhari/007.sbt.html#001.007.331
   9. http://www.usc.edu/schools/college/crcc/engagement/resources/texts/muslim/hadith/bukhari/052.sbt.html#004.052.220
   10. http://www.islamawakened.com/Quran/9/29/
   11. http://www.islamawakened.com/Quran/8/39/
       

 

Educating our Youth about Islam

Regular readers of my posts know that my specialty is deliaring pious frauds.  In the present case, two clues stand out from the beginning.  First, the source: Common Ground News: the name implies the existence of common ground shared by Islam and Western Civilization where no common ground exists.  The second clue is the French word in the title: it is impossible to re-establish cordial relations because only a state of war has existed since the foundation of Moe's war cult. 

Three keys to Christian-Muslim rapprochement in the United States
Michael S. Bos

Before 9/11, many Americans were blissfully ignorant about Islam. After 9/11, everyone had something to say about it. Unfortunately, much of it was based on half-truths and unsubstantiated claims that cast Islam’s past, present and future as one of violence. This has left us with the great need and challenge of reshaping our public understanding of Islam in America.

Islam: violence

past 

    "How many Ghazwat did the Prophet undertake?" Zaid replied, "Nineteen."[Sahih Bukhari 5.59.285] Visit Wikipedia's article on Moe's military career  and view the list of battles in the right sidebar.  Next, visit the Wikipedia article on Islamic conquests and view the map in the right sidebar.

    How was Islam established? "By Jihâd Islâm is established, Allâh’s Word is made superior, (His Word being Lâ ilaha illallâh which means none has the right to be worshipped but Allâh), and His Religion (Islâm) is propagated. "[Noble Qur'an footnote to 2:190]

    What is jihad?  Al-Jihâd (holy fighting) in Allâh’s Cause (with full force of numbers and weaponry); "Jihad means to war against non-Muslims"[Reliance of the Traveller O9.0]

present

    The Armenian genocide, attempted reconquest of Israel, Indian civil war, Lebanese civil war and subsequent terrorist attacks are ample evidence of the continuance of jihad.

future

    I do not have a crystal ball, and I doubt that Mr. Bos has one, but we do have Islamic texts.  Allah's jihad imperative against Jews & Christians, contained in Surah At-Taubah 29, is outcome oriented, with neither geographic nor chronological limits.  Moe's oral tradition has a clue for us:
"jihad will be performed continuously since the day Allah sent me as a prophet until the day the last member of my community will fight with the Dajjal ".
[Sunan Abu Dawud14.2526]  Of course, Sunan Abu Dawud is ranked third in authenticity; perhaps we should consult the most authentic hadith collection. "The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. "O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him."[Sahih Bukhari 4.52.177]  "The Hour" refers to the day of judgment, when the gates of Paradise will swing open to Muslims.

    Perhaps Mr. Box will favor us with a comment elaborating on the "half truths" and "unsubstantiated claims", but I won't hold my breath waiting.

understanding of Islam

    Exactly what is wrong with our "public understanding of Islam" that  needs to be "reshaped"?  Is it the infamous lie by President Bush that "Islam is a great religion of peace"?  Is it his infamous lie that "Islam has been hijacked", or is it both?

 Just a cursory review of the number of evangelical Christian responses to “A Common Word” (www.acommonword.com), a letter written by a number of high profile Muslim leaders that outlines common principles in the Muslim and Christian scriptures, evidences this.

common word

    I have seldom seen such a slickly crafted and target rich fraud as the Ulema's missive to Christianity. My initial dissection ran to 45KB. I later created a separate blog, Go Burn With Muhammad, primarily to deliar it in detail.

People have overcome biases and changed opinions because of their relationships with Muslims. It is through the face of another, not facts about them, that we are forced to re-examine our positions. As the number of people who find themselves in relationships with Muslims increases, so will the fairness and respect with which they treat their faith.

relationships with Muslims

    Our relationship with Muslims is prey:predator, nothing can change that objective factual reality.  We do not have Muslim friends. Allah explicitly forbids friendly relations with Kuffar. This is one of nine explicit prohibitions: 5:51. O you who believe! Take not the Jews and the Christians as Auliyâ' (friends, protectors, helpers, etc.), they are but Auliyâ' to one another. And if any amongst you takes them as Auliyâ', then surely he is one of them. Verily, Allâh guides not those people who are the Zâlimûn (polytheists and wrong­doers and unjust).. The prohibition extends to parents & siblings[9:23].

face, not facts

    Stare into the eyes of a photograph of Usama bin Ladin or Nidal Malik Hasan. How do their visages force you to re-examine your positionon Islam?
The assertion is so absurd on its face as to require no elaboration. 

fairness

    Fairness is an abstract concept that can neither be efficiently defined nor measured.  Exactly how does it apply to Islam?  What is fair; is it allowing the construction of Mosques in America while no church can be built in Saudi Arabia or Egypt?  Is it fair to tell office workers in Britain that they must not eat in the presence of Muslim co-workers during Ramadan?

respect

    Respect, like credit, is given where respect is due. Islam is not due any respect; it is due contempt and detestation.  How can a Christian respect a cult whose doctrine denies the patrimony, deity, crucifixion, death & resurrection of his Savior and reveres him as a genocidal warlord?  How can a freeman respect a cult whose doctrine postulates a divine mission to conquer him?

As I consider what the next ten years will hold in our rapprochement with Islam, I think the answer largely depends on where our youth will get their information. Make no mistake about it, someone will teach them.

where our youth will get their information

    They will not receive relevant, accurate factual information from the public schools because Islam is already infiltrating and intimidating the text book publishers and those who set the standards for text books. 

    They will not receive relevant, accurate factual information about Islam from the mainstream media, because they are infiltrated & intimidated. They will not receive it from politicians because most of them are either ignorant or politically correct. 

    Will our youth receive relevant, accurate factual information about Islam from the church? Will Sunday school divert attention from the Gospel to the Qur'an, Life of Muhammad and hadith?  Will our youth slog through several hundred pages of redundant, obtuse Arab fantasy? Will they read an 800 page biography?  Will they slog through thousands of redundant and fantastic stories about men long dead?  Perhaps they might if you tell them there is sex in it. 

    Will the church introduce students to the writings of Robert Spencer, Andrew Bostom, Andrew McCarthy  or Raymond Ibrahim? Fat chance. Perhaps the students will become curious and search the web for information. With luck, they might discover this blog post and click its links. 

Our youth have been exposed to disparate components of Islam and will not accept only broad generalisations and a bottom line message that Islam is a religion of peace – please be clear that I am not countering this as the religion’s ideal.

Islam is a religion of peace

    While that might be the personal ideal of a substantial sub set of Muslims, it is not Allah's ideal nor that of his Messenger. A religion of peace would not devote two chapters of its scripture to the warfare, commanding its votaries to engage in it, commanding its Messenger to urge them to it and laying down rules for division of spoils.  If Islam were a religion of peace, its canon law would not define a "religious obligation" to attack disbelievers in every year.

    A religion of peace would not threaten its votaries with eternity in Hellfire if they refuse to go to war, nor would it promise them admission to Paradise if they join the jihad.  A religion of peace would not impute "steps" to injure or enrage disbelievers to its votaries as "deeds of righteousness", accruing Brownie Points toward admission to Paradise.  

Chrislam: Malignant Malarkey

NPR has a story about friendship between a church and a mosque: A Ramadan Story Of Two Faiths Bound In Friendship.  It seems that a church offered the use of its facility while the mosque was under construction.  A year later, the two groups cooperate in charity projects.

    So friendly, touchy~feeley & upbeat; what a great story. Unfortunately, the story values form over substance.  Christianity and Islam do not share a common deity.  Christians worship the God of Israel. Muslims worship Allah, one of 360 idols in the Kaaba before Moe throw out the other 359.

    The Christian God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son. Allah has no son, only a slave, who was not crucified, did not die and was not resurrected,  who will return to kill the Jews & Christians and rule the world by the Qur'an.  Allah demands human blood sacrifice, setting great slaughter as Moe's price of admission to Paradise. 

    But Muslims and Christians can be friends and share common goals, can't they?  Allah said they can't, and repeated it frequently.

• 3:118
• 4
  • 89
  • 139
  • 144
• 5
  • 51
  • 57
• 9:23
• 60
  • 1
  • 13

    What do pious Muslims pray for during Ramadan?  Of course, they pray for blessing and forgiveness, and something more, which I have highlighted to make it stand out. 

And bless us our hearing, and our sight, and our faculties, as long as You allow us to live; and make them protectors for us against the transgressions we have committed; and make us victorious over our enemies; and do not allow us to have problems in our deen; and do not allow us to make the life of this world our greatest concern; and remove from us difficulty in attaining knowledge; and do not make hellfire our destination; and make jannah our home; and do not impose upon us, because of our sins, people who lack mercy and do not fear You (as authorities over us)

    Invite Muslims into our churches to remind Allah why he should burn us, pray four our defeat and the overthrow of our government; what a great idea. 

Google: Commercial & Prejudicial Injustice

I received information by emal from Logan's Warning: Google has withdrawn its Ad Sense service from the web site because it publishes negative information and opinion about Islam. 

VIOLATION(S) FOUND:

HATE/ANTI: Publishers are not permitted to place Google ads on sites with content advocating against any individual, group, or organization.More information about this policy can be found in our help center (https://www.google.com/adsense/support/as/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=105947).

ACTION TAKEN: We have disabled ad serving to your site.

    Logan's Warning advocates for individual and civilizational life & liberty by warning against the demonic doctrines and predatory actions of Islam.  Google's action is equivalent to censoring and squelching those warning about Hitler's program of world conquest in World War II and Communism;s program of expansion after the war. 

    Christopher Logan  performs a service I am not in a position to perform:  he produces local interest video from Islamic places and events in N.Y.C and does first person local reporting.  Christopher incurs expenses in his reporting as well as in domain registration and site hosting.  He needs to monetize his site to offset those expenses.

    By complaining to Google against Logan's Warning, Muslims are attempting to silence an effective voice which exposes their demonic ideology.  I hope that you will visit http://loganswarning.com/2011/08/22/google-disables-ads-on-logans-warning/ , sign up for email updates and develop a habit of making regular visits to the site.  I hope that those who are financially able will click Logan's donation button and contribute to the site's mission.  It may be the most you can do to preserve freedom of expression. 

United Nations & Islam--Genocide Incorporated

The General Assembly uttered and published A/66/153 (Part I), titled: Establishment of a nuclear-weapon-free zone in the region
of the Middle East.

     After an introduction and observations consisting of six paragraphs, the document concludes with responses from several states. Three of those are important. I will return to the observations after commenting on these.

Cuba exposes the top level issue:

The acquisition of nuclear capability by  Israel represents  a threat to the
security of the neighbouring States and to peace in the region, which is already in
turmoil. The statements made by the Israeli Prime Minister on 12 December 2006,
admitting that Israel is a nuclear-weapon State, are a source of great concern.

    The focus of the U.N. campaign for a nuclear free Mid East is on Israel.  Only Japan mentioned Iran's nuclear weapons program.  Its not what you do, its who you are and who your allies are. 

Egypt piles on:

The main impediment to establishing a nuclear-weapon-free zone in the
Middle East has been Israel. Egypt notes with grave concern that Israel remains the
sole country in the Middle East not to  adhere to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation
Treaty.

    If Israel had not bombed Iraq's reactor, would they be bitching about Saddam's nuclear weapons program?  They are gravely concerned that only Israel has nukes. Once Iran obtains them, their concern will fade away. 

Syria piles on:

The Syrian Arab Republic expresses its grave concern that Israel’s refusal to
accede to the Treaty, despite numerous calls and international resolutions urging it
to do so, remains the fundamental obstacle to ridding the Middle East of nuclear
weapons. 

    Iran signed the treaty and violates it with impunity; nobody gives a damn about that. Its all about Israel. Then there is the little matter of the a reactor project in which North Korea and Syria were partners. Only Israel was concerned about that reactor and bombed it.  Syria has not permitted effective analysis of the site. 

    Pandora's box is open. The lid is off, the demons are loose; they can not be returned to the box. Hitler's regime was working on the A bomb. The scientists who worked on it came over to our side, resulting in an early end to the war in the Pacific, saving millions of lives.  

    Communists who infiltrated our government transmitted vital information to Russia and now the demons are loose.  No treaty is worth the paper it is printed on. Tyrants Hellbent on expanding their empires to global scope will not adhere to treaties. They will not disarm. They can not be disarmed short of all out war. 

    Dreams of nuclear free zones and a nuclear free world are the ultimate insanity. Disarmament means that only those most inclined to aggression will have weapons.  It means that their victims will be unable to mount an effective defense. Disarmament is the predator's fondest dream: a guarantee of easy prey.

    Now is the time to expose and dissect the real agenda, which is exposed in ¶6 of the Observations.

6. The Secretary-General reaffirms the urgent need for a just and lasting solution
to the Arab-Israeli conflict. He believes that it is in the best interest of both parties
to achieve an end to the conflict, a resolution of all final status issues — including
Jerusalem, borders, refugees and security — and the emergence of a sovereign,
ndependent, contiguous and viable State of Palestine living side-by-side in peace
and security with Israel. He calls for the implementation of all relevant resolutions
of the Security Council, in particular resolutions 1850 (2008) and 1860 (2009). The
Secretary-General welcomes the efforts of the United States to facilitate political
progress between Israelis and Palestinians.  He appeals to the parties to return to
negotiations without preconditions and without delay and to discuss all core issues
with a view to a final resolution of the conflict. He will continue to work towards
that end with the Quartet. The Secretary-General emphasizes the importance of any
peace settlement to be comprehensive and reiterates the importance of the Arab
Peace Initiative in this regard. He calls upon all concerned parties within and
outside the region to adopt a constructive  attitude with a view to creating stable
security conditions and an eventual settlement that  would facilitate the process of
establishing a zone free of nuclear weapons in the Middle East. The SecretaryGeneral
reiterates the continued readiness of the United Nations to provide any
assistance deemed helpful in this regard. 

The Litany of lies:

Arab-Israeli conflict

    There is no conflict; there is an ongoing genocide. The 1400 year timescale makes this fact difficult to detect. Moe plagiarized Hebrew scripture and co-opted Hebrew prophets in hopes of attracting Jews to his new war cult. His ruse was detected and rejected, so Moe set out to punish the Jews for rejecting his lies.

• Attack on B. Qaynuqa
• Attack on B. Qurayza
• Attack on B. al-Mustaliq
• Expedition to Khaybar
• The Affair of Fadak
• Banu Nadir.

    According to the Qur'an, Allah commanded Muslims to wage war against Jews. That imperative includes war against Christians & Zoroastrians; anyone with a scriptural religion. It is contained in Surah At-Taubah 29; read it and curse Islam.

9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

Does it really mean that?

"Allah commanded His Messenger to fight the People of the Scriptures, Jews and Christians, on the ninth year of Hijrah, and he prepared his army to fight the Romans and called the people to Jihad announcing his intent and destination. The Messenger sent his intent to various Arab areas around Al-Madinah to gather forces, and he collected an army of thirty thousand." [Tafsir Ibn Kathir]

Fight those who do not believe in God, nor in the Last Day, for, otherwise, they would have believed in the Prophet (s), and who do not forbid what God and His Messenger have forbidden, such as wine, nor do they practise the religion of truth, the firm one, the one that abrogated other religions, namely, the religion of Islam — from among of those who (min, ‘from’, explains [the previous] alladhīna, ‘those who’) have been given the Scripture, namely, the Jews and the Christians, until they pay the jizya tribute, the annual tax imposed them, readily (‘an yadin is a circumstantial qualifier, meaning, ‘compliantly’, or ‘by their own hands’, not delegating it [to others to pay]), being subdued, [being made] submissive and compliant to the authority of Islam. [Tafsir al-Jalalayn]

Moe confirmed it.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:
Narrated Anas bin Malik:
Allah's Apostle said, "I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.' And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah." Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, "O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?" He replied, "Whoever says, 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah', faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have."

It is codified in Shari'ah..

O9.8: The Objectives of Jihad
The caliph (o25) makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians (N: provided he has first invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice, and if they will not, then invited them to enter the social order of Islam by paying the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya, def: o11.4) -which is the significance of their paying it, not the money itself-while remaining in their ancestral religions) (O: and the war continues) until they become Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll tax (O: in accordance with the word of Allah Most High,

"Fight those who do not believe in Allah and the Last Day and who forbid not what Allah and His messenger have forbidden-who do not practice the religion of truth, being of those who have been given the Book-until they pay the poll tax out of hand and are humbled" (Koran 9.29),...

Allah had something more to say, something very revealing: that he would always send someone to torment and humiliate the Jews. Who might he send?

7:167. And (remember) when your Lord declared that He would certainly keep on sending against them (i.e. the Jews), till the Day of Resurrection, those who would afflict them with a humiliating torment. Verily, your Lord is Quick in Retribution (for the disobedient, wicked) and certainly He is Oft­Forgiving, Most Merciful (for the obedient and those who beg Allâh's Forgiveness).

In the end, he will send the Muslims, led by Jesus Christ. Nobody else will tell you about this; I will because I do not give a damn who is offended.

..."In the future, the Jews will support the Dajjal (False Messiah); and the Muslims, along with `Isa, son of Mary, will kill the Jews. This will occur just before the end of this world."...[Tafsir Ibn Kathir]

Four more ahadith are relevant to this issue. The first of these is local to the Hijaz, but has global implications, which I have highlighted.  The first two display Moe's intent as well as his arrogance. The third confirms genocidal intent: the gates of Paradise will not swing open until they kill the last Jew.  The fourth shows how caliph Umar followed up on the others.   Umar was one of the four "rightly guided caliphs", the one who conquered Israel in 638.

Bukhari Volume 4, Book 53, Number 392:

    Narrated Abu Huraira:

    While we were in the Mosque, the Prophet came out and said, "Let us go to the Jews" We went out till we reached Bait-ul-Midras. He said to them, "If you embrace Islam, you will be safe.You should know that the earth belongs to Allah and His Apostle, and I want to expel you from this land. So, if anyone amongst you owns some property, he is permitted to sell it, otherwise you should know that the Earth belongs to Allah and His Apostle."

Sunan Abu Dawud 14.2477
Narrated Ibn Hawalah:

    The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: It will turn out that you will be armed troops, one is Syria, one in the Yemen and one in Iraq. Ibn Hawalah said: Choose for me, Apostle of Allah, if I reach that time. He replied: Go to Syria, for it is Allah's chosen land, to which his best servants will be gathered but if you are unwilling, go to your Yemen, and draw water from your tanks, for Allah has on my account taken special charge of Syria and its people.

Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 177:
    Narrated Abu Huraira:

    Allah's Apostle said, "The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. "O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him."

Bukhari Volume 4, Book 53, Number 386:
Narrated Jubair bin Haiya:
'Umar sent the Muslims to the great countries to fight the pagans. ...  Our Prophet, the Messenger of our Lord, has ordered us to fight you till you worship Allah Alone or give Jizya (i.e. tribute); and our Prophet has informed us that our Lord says:-- "Whoever amongst us is killed (i.e. martyred), shall go to Paradise to lead such a luxurious life as he has never seen, and whoever amongst us remain alive, shall become your master."

    Ban Ki-moon, I call you out: are you an ignorant damned fool or a traitor to the human race?  Which of these fatal facts were you unaware of?  Which of these fatal facts do you not comprehend?  Muslims were commanded to conquer the entire world, including Israel. Muslims were promised that all land they conquered would always remain under their control.  Muslims can not tolerate the existence of Israel because it proves Allah to be an impotent idol whose threat and promise are void.  Islam's urge to reconquer Israel can not end while there are living Muslims on the face of the earth. Do you still deny this fatal fact?  If so, then you are, indeed a traitor to the human race. 

end to the conflict

    There is no conflict; there is only the Islamic imperative of genocidal conquest which can not end while Muslims remain alive on the face of the earth. 

resolution of all final status issues

    There is only one issue: the existence of Israel.  While Israel exists, Muslims can never be satisfied. Nothing less than the total destruction of Israel and genocide of the Jews can satisfy Islam. 

State of Palestine

    Trans-Jordan: the state of Palestine. One is enough!!! Its creation consumed 70% of the mandate which was to be restored to the Jews as their homeland. Israel does not owe Falestinians any more land beyond mass graves.

side-by-side

    They demand a state in place of, not beside Israel. Read the Charter of HAMAS and the PLO Charter.

negotiations

    What is there to negotiate with an ideology which demands genocide and politicide?  What part of existential do you not comprehend?!

without preconditions

• Jerusalem
• borders
• refugees
  
• security
• and the emergence of a State of Palestine   
  
  • sovereign
  • independent
  • contiguous
    
  • viable 

    Am I the only one who can perceive the obvious hypocrisy?  First he lists the preconditions, then he denies them.  We are not dealing with an ignorant fool, we are dealing with an arrogant traitor who perceives us as too stupid and indolent to recognize objective factual reality.

final resolution

•     Translation: "final solution". Obvious meaning: genocide.
  • Moe
  • Hitler
  • Ban Ki-moon
• Did someone once say "Never again!"? It sure was not Ban Ki -Moon.

Arab Peace Initiative

    "First you surrender, then we negotiate."  No preconditions, remember?

If Bibi had Balls

He would connect Ban Ki-moon, Barack Obama, Nicolas Sarkozy, Angela Merkel, David Cameron and Catherine Ashton om a conference call.  The monologue would flow like this:

Your pets have fired twenty rockets too many. The first rocket was one million too many. The attacks will stop immediately and will not resume now or at any future time. The next bullet, knife, bomb, mortar shell or rocket will be the last.  Gaza will be purged of survivors and annexed.  Gaza will be a living place for Jews forever.

    Our Ambassadors have been instructed to prepare for permanent return to Jerusalem and will leave at the first mention of  "restraint", "cease fire", "negitiation", "compromise", "peace keepers" or "end the conflict".  With 'friends' such as you we don't need enemies. We will eliminate our enemies without respect for your disapproval.

    Unfortunately, Bibi lacks the resolve, fortitude and common sense to make that statement and do what is necessary for Israel's survival.  It may be too late to replace him with someone wiser and stronger.