Show Your Support for Israel

Free Opinion is running an on line poll dividing supporters of Israel & Fallestine. At present the results are running 43.1% for Israel,56.9% for Fallestine. The poll includes an opportunity to post a short comment. This is an opportunity to participate in an unscientific, self-selected survey and perhaps swing the results. I urge supporters of Israel to participate in this poll and share it with their friends.

The Muslim side is well organized and highly motivated. They vote early & often and they summon their friends and allies to join them. In the end, they use the results to support the logical fallacy of argumentum adnumerum.

Those who perceive the Fallestinians as vulnerable underdogs striving against injustice to regain their sacred homeland should read Islam's canon of scripture & tradition to discover the true foundation of the conflict. These links will assist you in finding the truth.

• 7:167
• Eternal Humiliation is placed on the Jews.
  
• 9:29
• Bukhari Volume 4, Book 53, Number 392
• Abu Dawud 14.2477
• Muslim Book 041, Number 6985
• Bukhari Volume 4, Book 53, Number 386

UHOH! Pollsters Scrambling

~Snooper~

Maybe this moosetwit will be packing grocery sacks sooner than he thinks.

Hot Air: Is Virginia in the bag for Obama?

Meryl Yourish says no — and in fact one of the state’s largest newspapers agrees. The Richmond Times-Dispatch did its own polling in Virginia and got much different numbers than CNN and ABC over the last two weeks. They call the race a dead heat, and winnable for McCain:

OOPS!

I Didn't Need A Retarded Poll To Tell Me This Either

~Snooper~

REALLY? NO KIDDING! WOW! WHO WOULD HAVE THUNK IT? GOLLY! GEE! HUMPH!

Gallup pretends they know something:

While Gallup data do suggest that voter turnout among young people will be high this year (as it was in 2004) compared to historical turnout rates, the data do not suggest that it will be appreciably higher than in 2004. Even if more young voters are registered this year, they do not appear to be any more interested in the campaign or in voting in the election than they were in 2004.

Unless turnout rates among older age groups drop substantially from what they were in 2004, young voters should represent about the same share of the electorate as in the last presidential election. And Gallup’s data suggest interest in the campaign and voting are the same or higher among older voters compared to what they were in 2004.

Sure glad they felt it a requirement to tell the Nation what we already know and thast the Obamabots are lying their asses off as usual and the Eeyores believe them all.

Idiots.

'Paper or Plastic': Pollster Says He'll End Up Bagging Groceries if McCain Wins

HT BB

I can hardly wait for this idiot to come through
Link

The Confessions Of A Disenfranchised Hillary Supporter

~Snooper~

In a previous post here, I brought to your attention the "internals" of the Barack Campaign and how truly desperate they are. They know they have no chance of winning this election fairly and that Obama is indeed a plant. I have said this from the very beginning. My statement that he has been a plant from the beginning has been bolstered and confirmed by his complete and total lack of disclosure. All of his records are sealed from the public - the public he has stated that he wants to lead. He doesn't want to lead us. His handlers and enablers don't want to lead us. They want to CONTROL us. And that is the bottom line. He most assuredly is not a United States Natural Born Citizen...not by a long shot.

America is facing potentially the gravest constitutional crisis in her history. Barack Obama must either stand up in a public forum and prove, with conclusive documentary evidence, that he is “a natural born Citizen” of the United States who has not renounced his American citizenship-or he must step down as the Democratic Party’s candidate for President of the United States-preferably before the election is held, and in any event before the Electoral College meets. Because, pursuant to the Constitution, only “a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States at the time of the Adoption of th[e] Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President” (Article II, Section 1, Clause 4). And Obama clearly was not “a Citizen of the United States at the time of the Adoption of th[e] Constitution.”

Whether the evidence will show that Obama is, or is not, “a natural born Citizen” who has never renounced his American citizenship is an open question. The arguments on both sides are as yet speculative. But Obama’s stubborn refusal to provide what he claims is “his own” country with conclusive proof on that score compels the presumption that he knows, or at least strongly suspects, that no sufficient evidence in his favor exists. After all, he is not being pressed to solve a problem in quantum physics that is “above his pay grade,” but only asked to provide the public with the original copy of some official record that establishes his citizenship. The vast majority of Americans could easily do so. Why will Obama not dispel the doubts about his eligibility-unless he can not?

Now that Obama’s citizenship has been seriously questioned, the burden of proof rests squarely on his shoulders. The “burden of establishing a delegation of power to the United States * * * is upon those making the claim.” Bute v. Illinois, 333 U.S. 640, 653 (1948). And if each of the General Government’s powers must be proven (not simply presumed) to exist, then every requirement that the Constitution sets for any individual’s exercise of those powers must also be proven (not simply presumed) to be fully satisfied before that individual may exercise any of those powers. The Constitution’s command that “[n]o Person except a natural born Citizen * * * shall be eligible to the Office of President” is an absolute prohibition against the exercise of each and every Presidential power by certain unqualified individuals. Actually (not simply presumptively or speculatively) being “a natural born Citizen” is the condition precedent sine qua non for avoiding this prohibition. Therefore, anyone who claims eligibility for “the Office of President” must, when credibly challenged, establish his qualifications in this regard with sufficient evidence. [...] Read the rest

We have all heard Barack pitifully responding to the "socialism or socialistic" charges of his statements to Joe The Plumber and back in 2001. We also know about him "carefully making the proper friends" as he so states in his pathetic memoir - close ties to the radicals and MARXISTS. Yes, he said MARXISTS in his book. He tries to spin that but Truth cannot be spun. He tries to say "McCain calls me a socialist because I want to give the middle class a tax break". No, fool. You know that you are lying. You are classified as a socialist or Marxist because of your associations and that which you have said yourself, QUOTING Karl Marx as if those words were your own. The "redistribution" verbiage is the key, Barack. You spilled the beans that we True American Patriots have known for DECADES and you, Barack, are too dumb to admit that a man outed you and that the man that outed you was a plumber. Remember your words, Barack? "A plumber? A plumber is what he is fighting for!" Idiot.

One of his spinmeisters said the other day that the socialistic allegations merely reveals how McCain and Palin cannot "end the virtue of selfishness". I took it from that statement that NOT being or not becoming a socialist is expressing your selfishness. I have something to say to that moron...DROP DEAD.

For the past few decades, the American Liberal had to shed the moniker of "liberal". Why? Because it had become synonymous with "socialism". They changed their "tag line" to "Progressive". Why? Because they had to dump the "socialist" ties to Marxism as was expressed by the Founders of the ACLU. It was also stated in the 1920s that Americans would never accept socialism or Marxism so it was disguised as "liberalism". That is historical fact.

Now, "Progressives" try and give the impression that they are "progressing" towards a "more perfect union". That is poli-speak for "we are going to PC your ass into submission and once that is accomplished, we will have it all and you will be subjects of us and not the other way around you capitalist whore you". Wake up people. Read the List of 45 and then try and prove me wrong - if you have the guts to do so.

Over at Redstate, there is a post that needs to be spread far and wide because it is not too late to defeat Obama in a stunning and crushing way. We have the power to do so regardless of the ancient and now defunct MSM now the LSM, Lame Stream Media. We are the MAIN STREET MEDIA. We took the streets away from the anti-Americanists as they berated our Troops, burned our Flags and spouted Hate Speech idiocy at President Bush. I want you to read every word very carefully. There is a chance that this is disinformation but I doubt it. Why do I doubt it? I doubt it because he coincides with that which I hear nearly every day on college campuses across North Texas and beyond. So, without further ado:

After a long and careful consideration of all the implications and possible consequences of my actions today, I have decided to go through with this in the hope that our country can indeed be guided into the right direction. First, a little personal background… I am a female grad student in my 20’s, and a registered Democrat. During the primaries, I was a campaign worker for the Clinton candidacy. I believed in her and still do, staying all the way to the bitter end. And believe me, it was bitter. The snippets you’ve heard from various media outlets only grazed the surface. There was no love between the Clinton and Obama campaigns, and these feelings extended all the way to the top. Hillary was no dope though, and knew that any endorsement of Obama must appear to be a full-fledged one. She did this out of political survival. As a part of his overall effort to extend an olive branch to the Clinton camp and her supporters, Obama took on a few Hillary staff members into his campaign. I was one such worker. Though I was still bitterly loyal to Hillary, I still held out hope that he would choose her as VP. In fact, there was a consensus among us transplants that in the end, he HAD to choose her. It was the only logical choice. I also was committed to the Democratic cause and without much of a second thought, transferred my allegiance to Senator Obama.

I’m going to let you in on a few secrets here, and this is not because I enjoy the gossip or the attention directed my way. I’m doing this because I doubt much of you know the true weaknesses of Obama. Another reason for my doing this is that I am lost faith in this campaign, and feel that this choice has been forced on many people in this country. Put simply, you are being manipulated. That was and is our job – to manipulate you (the electorate) and the media (we already had them months ago). Our goal is to create chaos with the other side, not hope. I’ve come to the realization (as the campaign already has) that if this comes to the issues, Barack Obama doesn’t have a chance. His only chance is to foster disorganization, chaos, despair, and a sense of inevitability among the Republicans. It has worked up until now. Joe the Plumber has put the focus on the issues again, and this scares us more than anything. Being in a position to know these things, I will rate what the Obama campaign already knows are their weak links from the most important on down.

1 – Hillary voters. Internal polling suggests that at best, we are taking 70-75% of these voters. Other estimates are as low as 60% in some areas – particularly Ohio and western PA. My biggest problem with this campaign’s strategy was the decision NOT to offer Hillary the VP slot. She was ready and able to take this on, and would have campaigned enthusiastically for it. This selection would have also brought virtually all of her supporters into the fold, and the Obama campaign knew it. Though I have no way of knowing this for certain, and I do admit that I am relying on internal gossip, Senator Obama actually went against the advice of his top advisors. They wanted him to choose her, but the only significant opposition to this within the campaign came from Barack and Michelle Obama. In short, he let personal feelings take precedence over what was the most logical thing to do. Biden, by the way, has been a disaster inside the campaign. Everyone cringes whenever he gives an interview, and he creates so many headaches as the campaign has to stay on their toes in order to disseminate information and spin whatever it was he was trying to say.

2 – Sarah Palin. Don’t believe what the media is telling you about how horrible a choice she was. Again, our internal polling suggest that though she has had a minimal impact on pulling disaffected Hillary Democrats to McCain, she has done wonders in mobilizing the base for McCain. Another thing – we were completely taken by surprise with her pick. In my capacity in the research department, I looked into the backgrounds of Leiberman, Romney, Pawlenty and Ridge, and prepared briefs. I don’t mind bragging that we had pretty good stuff on all of them. With Leiberman, the plan was to paint him as an erratic old-timer who didn’t have a clue as to what he was doing (pretty much a clone of McCain). In Romney, we had him pegged as an evil capitalist who cut jobs. Pawlenty was going to get the “Quayle treatment”, or more precisely: a pretty face, with no valid experience. Tom Ridge was going to be used to provide a direct link from McCain to Bush. As you can see, we were quite enamored of all of them. Then the unexpected happened – Sarah Palin. We had no clue as to how to handle her, and bungled it from the start. Though through our misinformation networks, we have successfully taken some of the shine off. But let there be no doubt. She remains a major obstacle. She has singlehanded solidified “soft” Republican support, mobilized the McCain ground game, and has even had some appeal to independents and Hillary voters. This is what our internal polling confirms.

3 – Obama’s radical connections. Standards operating procedure has been to cry “racism” whenever one of these has been brought up. We even have a detailed strategy ready to go should McCain ever bring Rev. Wright up. Though by themselves they are of minimal worth, taken together, Rev. Wright, Bill Ayers, Father Pfelger, and now, Rashid Khalili, are exactly what the campaign does not need. The more focus on them, the more this election becomes a referendum on Obama. The campaign strategy from the very beginning was to make this election a referendum on Bush. Strategists have been banging their head on how successfully McCain has distanced himself from Bush. This has worked, and right now the tide is in his favor. People are taking a new look at Barack Obama, and our experience when this happens tells us this is not good news at all. When they take a look at him, one or more of these names are bound to be brought up. McCain has wisely not harped on this in recent weeks and let voters decide for themselves. This was a trap we set for him, and he never fully took the bait. Senator Obama openly dared him to bring up Ayers. This was not due to machismo on the part of Obama, but actually due to campaign strategy. Though McCain’s reference to Ayers fell flat in the last debate, people in the Obama campaign were actually disappointed that he didn’t follow through on it more and getting into it. Our focus groups found this out: When McCain brings these connections up, voters are turned off to him. They’d rather take this into consideration themselves, and when this happens, our numbers begin to tank.

4 – The Bradley Effect. Don’t believe these polls for a second. I just went over our numbers and found that we have next to no chance in the following states: Missouri, Indiana, North Carolina, Florida, New Hampshire and Nevada. Ohio leans heavily to McCain, but is too close to call it for him. Virginia, Pennsylvania, Colorado, New Mexico and Iowa are the true “toss up states”. The only two of these the campaign feels “confident” in are Iowa and New Mexico. The reason for such polling discrepancy is the Bradley Effect, and this is a subject of much discussion in the campaign. In general, we tend to take a -10 point percentage in allowing for this, and are not comfortable until the polls give us a spread well over this mark. This is why we are still campaigning in Virginia and Pennsylvania! This is why Ohio is such a desperate hope for us! What truly bothers this campaign is the fact that some pollsters get up to an 80% “refuse to respond” result. You can’t possibly include these into the polls. The truth is, people are afraid to let people know who they are voting for. The vast majority of these respondents are McCain supporters. Obama is the “hip” choice, and we all know it.

As part of my research duties, I scour right wing blogs and websites to get somewhat of a “feel” as to what is being talked about on the other side. Much of it is nonsense, but there are some exceptions which give the campaign jitters. A spirited campaign has been made to infiltrate many pro-Hillary sites and discredit them. A more disorganized, but genuine effort has also been made to sow doubts among the unapologetically right wing sites such as redstate.com. Don’t you guys get it? This has been the Obama campaign’s sole strategy from the very beginning! The only way he wins is over a dispirited, disorganized, and demobilized opposition. This is how it has been for all of his campaigns. What surprises me is that everyone has fallen for it. You may point to the polls as proof of the inevitability of all of this. If so, you have fallen for the oldest trick in the book. How did we skew these polls, you might ask? It all starts with the media “buzz” which has been generated over the campaign. Many stories are generated on the powerful Obama ground game, and how many new voters were registered. None of this happens by coincidence. It is all part of the poll-skewing process. This makes pollsters change their mixes to reflect these new voters and tilt the mix more towards Democratic voters. What is not mentioned or reported on is not the “under-reported cell phone users or young voters” we hear so much about. What is underreported is you.

I changed my somewhat positive opinion of this campaign during the unfair and sexist campaign against Sarah Palin. I will never agree with her on the issues and will probably never vote for her, but I am embarrassed of what has happened. I can’t ignore our own hand in all of this. What I do know is that I will not be voting for Obama this time around. Treat that as you will.

Atlas Shrugs adds the following:

Go read it. I am telling it folks, it is ours ............... no normal person is going to elect the Mansorian candidate. Obama is a plant. Now get out the vote -- we have massive voter fraud to overrcome.

AMEN! This is our election people and we will win this, naysayers be damned.

The Zombie Is A Spy!

~Snooper~

I read this post just a few moments ago and it supports my contention that the "pollsters" haven't a clue. None. Of. Them. It turns out that the phone banking statistics cannot be trusted a bit as Zombie explains. It also supports Zombie's previous posting entitled, "The Left's Big Blunder". Be sure to read both posts. Then and only then will you be enlightened, as it were.

This Is An Eeyore-Free Zone

~Snooper~

This site cracks me up. It is a VERY long post but needs to be read by every Eeyore out there that wet their pants upon every reading of a poll. By the way, CBS has Czarbie up by 14 and the KOSmonoffs have soiled themselves. They think they have something and they do. It is called the rabid case of the dumbass. Read Zell Miller if you need a refresher and a memory jogger as to the CAP on the DNC. Simply amazing how the dunder heads act these days.

If I had acted like some of these civilians around this country are acting out in the Field, I would never have made it back. Incredible. Anyway, here it is:

We’re making this a permanent post on this blog, and keeping it here through the election because as much as we like to repeat ourselves to repeat ourselves to repeat ourselves, we don’t have the energy to deal with Eeyores while we’re working hard for McCain/Palin. Eeyores are all of you who listen to the media, without thinking, and run around saying “We’re doomed! Nothing can stop Obama! His youth army and voter fraud are too much to beat!” - and then you come here, or to other blogs, and leave comments like, “I’m worried about…”, or “I’m afraid…”, or “MSNBC said…”. Listen, this is a little tough love for all of you — start thinking critically, and stop spreading your rain clouds to others. The media’s been in the tank for Obama since 2004 — this is their dream candidate, and they groomed him into a Messiah. If you think the media’s ever going to tell any truth that’s inconvenient for their chosen One, then you’re just stupid.

Look at the party ID samples in every poll that “worries” you and see what the party ID breakdown is: the national breakdown should be 39% Dem, 35% Republican, and 26% Independent. The polls that “worry” Eeyores have Democrats at 45% or above in terms of party ID breakdown — with Republicans as low as 20%. In the last 20 years, Democrats have only had a 4% party ID advantage over Republicans. Why on Earth would that historic fact change in 2008 — and swing to a 25% or more Democrat advantage? That’s ridiculous. And everything Eeyores run around with, crazed over, is equally ridiculous if they’d just take the time to critically think through it.

Yes - the media is promoting Obama, to the point where media figures like Chris Matthews actually campaign for Obama in states like Pennsylvania (which he did, in person, the weekend of October 12-13). No - there is nothing any of us can do about this, except to contact Jeff Zucker at NBC or the sponsors advertised on MSNBC and tell them what we think of their sustained pro-Obama agenda. You just have to stop listening to the media — if you are someone who gets upset when watching MSNBC or CNN, then stop watching those channels. Read www.HillaryClintonForum.net on a regular basis: there are 5,500 users there who log on constantly, 24/7, to post the most important news and breakdown the bias and lies. News aggregate sites like this slice through all the O-baloney, and filter out the propaganda. If you continue to insist on upsetting yourself by watching Kool-Aid networks like MSNBC, don’t spread that gloom and doom to others. And don’t come here to vent your negativity - because we have no sympathy for you. [...]

There are 17 more paragraphs. Go for it and STFU and STFD and let the fighters take care of business while you stew in your polls.

More Polls

~Snooper~

The delusional have Czarbie at 52 and McCain at 41.

All IS Lost - Time To Climb Under A Rock - Or Not

~Snooper~

Well, that tears it. There is a poll out that says McCain is down by 12. I suppose when theoretical conservatives are acting and talking like moonbats, they might as well sign onto that poll "scientifically" deduced by - moonbats. After all, the pollsters know how to think and "normal people" do not. But wait!

Here is another that says McCain is down by 4. Gee. I wonder what the hell is going on.

And, here is another that says McCain is down by 10.

But, but, but here is one that says McCain is down by 7.

Now I am REALLY confused. Here is one that shows McCain down by 5.

And now, ANOTHER one!

OK. 12 + 4 + 10 + 7 + 5 + 4 = 42. So, 42/6 = 8. So, using math, I have deduced that McCain is down by 8. That makes all of the above liars and clueless because NONE of them used my method.

I suppose that we should resign ourselves to accepting the first Marxist to ever occupy the White House. While some conservatives are upset with other conservatives classifying Obama has either a socialist, communist or Marxist, others are calling on Obama to instill communism as the norm of American life.

Some say that his socialism doesn't matter and I whole heartedly disagree. His socialism DOES matter. Waiting for the Iron Curtains to arise in the USSA to "wake people up" is one of the most retarded statements I have heard in my 53 years on this planet. For a detailed look into what an Obama Cabinet would look like, take a stroll over to the American Thinker or Doug Ross's place. I am not quite sure if tin foil hats are in order. Well, then again, the post by Instapundit is quite scary.

[...] I'm no fan of McCain , but as I dislike Obama (and love Palin), I'll be pulling the lever for McCain in November.

This is surely small of me, but if Obama wins, I plan on giving him as much of a chance as the Democrats gave George Bush. I will gleefully forward every paranoid anti-Obama rumor that I see, along with YouTube footage of his verbal missteps. I will laugh and email heinous anti-Obama photoshop jobs, and maybe even learn photoshop myself to create some. I'll buy anti-Obama books, and maybe even a "Not My President" t-shirt. I'm sure that the mainstream bookstores won't carry them, but I'll be on the lookout for anti-Obama calendars and stuff like that. I will not wish America harm, and if the country is hurt (economically, militarily, or diplomatically) I will truly mourn. But I will also take some solace that it occurred under Obama's watch, and will find every reason to blame him personally and fan the flames. [...]

This is a result from decades of idiot Republicans saying inane things like, "This too shall pass" as the Leftinistra have screwed this nation over and over again. Bi-Partisanship is for cowards and idiots, especially when dealing with moonbat libtard socialist DFs.

Simply amazing.

THE POLLS ARE COMING! THE POLLS ARE COMING!!

~Snooper~

Ya just gotta laugh at the pollsters. Actually, I spit on them but, I guess I am rather crass in that regard because I, for one, refuse to worship before their trousers. Those that do, well, they deserve everything that befalls them.

Patrick Ruffini has an interesting take and in his post, he has an interesting statement:

[...] With 15 states, this kind of analysis is plagued by a small-n factor in which one state can throw the calculus off dramatically. [...]

Vote your hearts folks and not what some pollster says trying to make a name for themselves in the pursuit of the almighty dollar. Always check to see who is paying for the poll.

Stephen R Maloney has his take as well and ends his post thusly:

[...] Beware the polls (especially CNN), my friends. I love those polls of course, but I don't really believe them on a day-to-day basis. [END]

Bingo. Screw the polls. Steven M. Warshawsky at TAT thinker says;

[...] Ever since I wrote my anti-Obama piece, I have received numerous emails from Republicans and Democrats alike, asking whether I still think Obama will lose the election. Yes, I do. But what about the polls, they ask? The polls show that Obama is winning. No, they don't, as I will explain. [...]

You will have to read the rest of that article as I did. Interestingly enough, the Leftinistra are the ones running these polls. That is a historical fact. Just for the hell of it, I will relate a story here. My wife was polled last Friday. She didn't tell me who it was because she doesn't remember. However, I did hear the conversation and I was laughing so hard that she had to tell me to shut up. She pretty much told them that she was voting Obama. I asked her why she did that and she said that the country was screwed up enough already and she didn't want the pollster to put her down as another racist. I wish I had recorded the 5 minute conversation she had with an idiot pollster. I wonder how many more Americans are tainting the pollsters in this manner?

Chicago Ray has a post up describing Obama's WHOPPING 2-point lead. Then again, we could always rely on the pollsters that have Obama up by 11 or the one that has Obama up by 5.

Once again, from the previously linked American Thinker:

[...] Lastly, the Rasmussen poll shows that Obama is leading McCain among likely voters nationwide by a margin of 51% to 45%, with 4% undecided. The margin of error for this poll is +/- 2 points. A-ha! Obama definitely is winning according to this poll (that is, assuming the undecided voters do not "break" for McCain). But there is something curious about this poll, which relates to the second issue I raised above about polls. This poll "weighted" its responses to reflect a predicted voting population of 39.3% Democrats, 33.3% Republicans, and 27.4% unaffiliated. However, in the last presidential election, just four years ago, the party affiliation of actual voters (according to the CNN exit poll) was 37% Democrat and 37% Republican. Perhaps Democrats are going to "out vote" Republicans by 6 points this year, but I think this is a very dubious assumption. In any event, there is no reason to accept the results of the Rasmussen poll over those of the other two polls (or over the results of many other polls I could have examined). [...]

And there you have it. The pollsters are out-polling each other and neither one has a clue. There is nothing to compare this election to except wishful thinking and supposition. Run away from the pollsters and those that swear by them folks. Don't give them the pleasure to fake you out and give you the impression that they know what they are talking about because they don't.

Trackposted to Perri Nelson's Website, Rosemary's Thoughts, Faultline USA, The World According to Carl, The Pink Flamingo, Leaning Straight Up, Democrat=Socialist, Conservative Cat, and Right Voices, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

So Many Democrats Running Scared

~Snooper~

The Kosmonoffs have done it again. They claim to have the most scientific and accurate poll in the known universe. I laugh with much disdain, as I do at all pollsters and those that live by the polls, incapable of thinking for themselves. The day I make my decisions by a poll - any poll - is the day I will move in with that moron and Scientology buffoon Cruise.

Anyway, the KOSmonoffs have the poll as such: Czarbie 50 and McCain 43. I suppose Zell Miller is all wrong in their estimation. Zell has said many times that the ceiling on the American Democrat is 48 and will eventually decline from there. Why? Simple. The DNC is becoming more and more irrelevant and out of touch. They believe their own lies. The screen shot to the left is from Zell Millers' book, A National Party No More, preview here.

Their whole poll thing is "Rather" small-minded and only fellow anti-Americanists cannot see the Conservative Tsunami cresting over their heads. Simply amazing. Go ahead, Kosmonoffs. The more you lie to yourselves and others, the harder and funnier your crash will be.

Leftinistra Deathly Afraid Of Recent Poll Showing Czarbie Up By 9%

~Snooper~

In a recent poll, the Leftinistra are all excited that the Republicans are antsy, mainly this idiot. However, if the poll wasn't one of those stacked polls, they just might be correct. But, seeing that the poll is a stacked poll to the Leftinistra, this in merely one more shining example of how frightened the libtards truly are. Must really suck to be a libtard these days. I mean, really. A WaPo/ABC poll? ROFLMAO! That is almost as bad as one of those retarded KOSmonoff polls.

Spin that. Then, spin this:

Party affiliation:

Democrat: 38%

Republican 28%

Independent: 29%

If they push independents to say which party they lean more toward, we get this:

Democrats: 54

Republicans: 38

This poll is weighted from +10 to +16 in favor of the Democrats. That, folks, is what's called stacking the deck.

Idiots.

Trouble In The Czarbie Camp Part XXXXXX

~Snooper~

So McCain is pulling away in battleground states, folks are writing to Czarbie informing him that he is such a fool, unhinged moonbats are coming up with obscene and retarded "artifacts" for Sarah, the fruit loop brigades absolutely hate Sarah, the Marxists at the KOSmonoff dementia collective have conducted the Sarah Palin Fade poll, Dumb and Dumbest claim that Conservatism is dead, the KOSmonoffs say that they are going to get tough, the old media is falling with Czarbie and can't get back up and the McClatchy News whines that the public is too mean to the press. And we are to take them seriously? Why, yes. We are. Just look what they have done to this nation for the last 3 or 4 decades. Now that we have the upper hand, we cannot afford to sit back, sigh and down a cold one or two or three.

The No Oil Zone demented rats in CONgress are proposing yet another entitlement program - GAS STAMPS - and they wonder why the nation is going broke? We have moonbats like Jill Greenberg running around loose with her BDS hanging out and the media hires this unhinged idiot to do a McCain photo spread. And they wonder why we laugh at them scornfully?

Now that the GOP woke up and caught Conservatism again - to a large degree - and have managed to awaken the Silent Majority again, we soon discover why the Leftinistra so hate Conservatives. In short, whenever a socialist liberal goes up against a conservative, the conservative wins every time - without fail.

Czarbie's war room is a mess and the whiners and Soros lap lickers are sore afraid. The more we find about the unknown moonbat from the south side of Chicago, some begin to wonder what will come of the failed Messiah of the DNC. As it is increasingly evident that Sarah Palin is light years ahead of Czarbie in just about everything, more and more moonbats and other members of the fruit loop brigades exclaim just how frightened they are of Sarah Palin. Good for them. I hope they enjoy their strokes or at least move out of the country as they have promised upon many an election - and have yet to do so. Doesn't that make them liars?

As European dip dunks express their fears about Palin, it is soon discovered that for the first time in American History, a Presidential election will be decided by the VP pick(s). Screw Europe. As the world comes to grips as to what Hope and Change really is, Czarbie is hammered by other Czarbie-ites for not paying attention. He just might be ADHD and a host of other irrelevant letters all scrunched together.

As the very first presidential aspirant breeches that magical 50% poll thing, it is soon discovered that it wasn't Czarbie and he and his tribe are classified as scum shortly thereafter due to their reactions to no longer being invincible. Must really suck to be scum. Then again, as racist as they are, should we have expected any other MO? That 50% thing really hurt seeing that on the same day, The One That Was The One is now tied in Minnekstan with McCain. Hell, even Reagan didn't take Minnekstan. This is huge.

Our Own Sonlit Knight IS A Ghost Writer For Financial Times?

~Snooper~

HOLY COW!! CHECK THIS OUT!! WHERE HAVE WE HEARD AND READ THIS BEFORE?

The title to the article at the Financial Times just had to be written by A Newt One's Mighty Sonlit Knight: Democrats anxious for Obama to widen lead

The title itself is a clue because several times on the BTR circuit, Sonlit has mentioned many times that the Czarbamaniacs are slipping in a spiral to, as I would say, dwell in the Abyss of Obscurity we have been preparing for them all. For instance:

[...] The numbers back up the concern. Although Mr Obama has a good shot at winning traditional Republican states such as Colorado, Virginia and even North Carolina, he cannot capture the White House if he loses more than one of Pennsylvania, Ohio or Michigan - the more traditional, blue-collar swing states, which Mrs Clinton won by huge margins in the primary contests. Polls suggest these states are too close to call. [...]

Naturally, the "PC type" verbiage can be seen as a clever disguise. The fact remains, The Mighty Knight has said this exact same context many times. Either Sonlit is the author or the author has been reading Sonlit's posts or has tuned into his BTR segments. To me, the proof is in the pudding. Come clean Sonlit...this IS you, correct?

[...] At this stage in the 1988 presidential race, Michael Dukakis, the Democratic candidate, had a 17 percentage point lead over George H.W. Bush, who went on to win the election. John Kerry emerged from the 2004 Democratic convention with a strong lead over George W. Bush only to lose the election as well. In 2008, conventional wisdom says Mr McCain is running a much less effective campaign than either of the Bushes.

That only reinforces disquiet about Mr Obama's inability so far to take a decisive lead. "Even on his worst day, Bill Clinton was able to signal that he understood voters' concerns and that he felt their pain," said Douglas Schoen, a Democratic consultant. "Obama has no trouble with the campaign stagecraft. But this isn't Harvard, it's the beer hall. He has to talk in language that people understand." [...]

Yep. That's Sonlit.

War on Terror Update...This Is What We Have Been Expecting...

~Snooper~

Rasmussen Reports...perhaps this is what has Murtha all atwitter? Confidence in War on Terror Near Highest Level of Bush's Second Term

Confidence in the War on Terror increased for the fourth straight month in November and is now near the highest level of President Bush's second term in office.

The latest Rasmussen Reports tracking poll finds that 47% of Americans now say the U.S. and its allies are winning the War on Terror (see crosstabs). That's up from 43% a month ago and reflects is the highest level of confidence measured since December 2005. Over the past 35 months, confidence in the War on Terror has been higher than today only twice, in November and December 2005. [...] Read the rest...

Haven't we been telling folks for a LONG time that this is what the Surge would do? The American People want to win and so do our men and women in uniform. There can be no denying that. At least for an honest person.

This is The Change in Direction the vast majority wanted and have now received.

Catch the wave at memeorandum...

Patriots Gain and Anti-Americanists Losing More Ground

I have been holding off commenting on this latest poll while I have been reading other blogs and other web sites, primarily the Moonbat Fruit Loop Brigades sites like ImSoSadlyStupid and TheLoonsFromSalon and most of all, the HuffAndPussPost.

As one can clearly see, it is the "Democrats" that are very much vested in defeat because they are the defeatists of the world and everything is America's fault. Fortunately, the previously inflated numbers of 70% of the country agreeing with "them" is actually nearly 60 off.

The percentage of Democrats (19 percent) who believe that is nearly four times the number of Republicans (5 percent) who gave the same answer. Seven percent of independents said the world would be better off if the U.S. lost the war.

[...]

The pdf file is here

[...]

Here is a round up of those "chattering" about this.

Protein Wisdom
Blogs For Bush
Ian Schwartz
Q&O
Fall Back Belmont
American Digest
Dave In Boca
Mere Rhetoric
The Tiger's Eye


The above is a mere spattering.

FOX News/Opinion Dynamics Poll
4 October 07

Polling was conducted by telephone September 25-26, 2007, in the evenings. The total sample is 900 registered voters nationwide with a margin of error of ±3 percentage points.

40. Do you personally think the world would be better off if the United States loses the war in Iraq?

	YES	NO	DON'T KNOW
26-Sep	11	73	16
REPS	5	87	8
DEMS	19	62	20
INDS	7	76	17

Does anyone see a trend here?

Just curious.

11% of the Democrats are vested in defeat and are pretty much brain dead. 73% of the Democrats have their acts together in regards to the war. The AWOL Democrats, the 20% that don't know, well, they need to be bottled and shipped somewhere other than existing on American soil. These are the milquetoast whiners that cannot commit to anything. If you don't have an opinion about this war by now, there isn't much help for you.

5% of the Republicans are more than likely the members if the RINO class and their mothers must not of taught them right from wrong or through their "higher education" quagmires, were taught that right is wrong and wrong is right. 87 % of the Republicans have their acts together in regards to the war. The remaining Republicans, the 8% that don't know, the same applies to them as does my retort about the AWOL Democrats. I have ZERO respect for someone that cannot answer a question or form an opinion and more than likely will always defer to someone else to do their thinking for them.

The Independents are a pretty curious bunch. The 7% are more than likely Ron Paulie types or members of the Anti-Americanist groups such as Code Pink Petticoats and other such useless and misguided twerps. 76% of the Independents, such as myself, have their acts together in regards to the war. The AWOL Independents are the scariest of the bunch and as the democrats and Republicans that cannot commit, need to be rounded up, stripped of their citizenship and deported to a remote island odd the coast of Antarctica.

Clearly, the majority of Americans KNOW that we MUST win this war. The very few that think otherwise which, are catered to by the Democratic Party Aspirants, including Ronnie Paulie, should be totally ignored and placed in their rightful places...The Abyss of Obscurity.

No Wonder The Moonbats Are Freaky Lately...UPDATED

What with all of the defeats the Leftinistra have been experiencing lately and the inability to overcome the Mighty Veto Pen and the Leftinistra dragging CONgress down to an all time low approval ratings and The Much Hated President George W Bush approval ratings rising to above 40%, it is apparent that their venom has begun seeping into their own kool aids.

Such a pleasant turn of events, yes?


What does it all mean? Does it mean that the mean-spirited and hateful Leftinistra have run out of spinning room? Time will tell as it always does.

President Bush's rating among Americans regained more lost ground in September, with the IBD/TIPP Presidential Leadership Index rising another 6% to 40.2. That's up 16% from its all-time low of 34.7 in June and the first time the index has topped 40.0 since March. The improvement came despite a sharp 29% drop to new low of 11.4 in Democrats' opinion of the president. That was offset by improvements of 8% to an eight-month high of 77.9 among Republicans and 21% to a 2007 high of 34.0 among Independents. Bush's overall rating, however, is still below the 50.0 level that separates optimism from pessimism.

Interesting turn of events. I wonder what will finally break them?

We witnessed the tide turning in DC. We witness the Conservative Tsunami getting taller every day.

This should be fun.

I wonder what other "surprises" are in store for the pathetic Leftinistra.

Trackback: Wake Up America

UPDATE:

From Wake Up America with a MAJOR HT!

Heads must be exploding across the left side of the blogosphere. As reports of the surge and progress come in and America sees them, Bush's ratings are steadily rising, month after month.

The news gets worse for them though. 9/10/07.

(Click image to go to original page where you can click and enlarge all the results)

In a rare public speech, CIA Director Michael Hayden complained last week the public support for aggressive methods used in counterterrorism is waning and leading toward a pre-9/11 complacency.

But the IBD/TIPP Poll taken last week found Americans solidly behind such measures as warrantless wiretaps, detention of terrorist suspects in foreign prisons and keeping open the prison at Guantanamo Bay.

THE QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the following actions by the U.S. government intended to protect the nation?

Breakdown of answers:

Wiretapping terrorist suspects without a court warrant:

Support..........61%
Oppose...........36%
Not sure/refused 3%

Increased surveillance:

Support..........69%
Oppose...........26%
Not sure/refused 5%

Detention of non-U.S. terrorist suspects in foreign jails:

Support..........59%
Oppose...........32%
Not sure/refused 9%

The U.S. Patriot Act, which expands the authority of agencies to pursue information that may be used to foil terrorist plots:

Support..........67%
Oppose...........30%
Not sure/refused 4%

Disallowing some people from flying on commercial airplanes because they may represent potential security threats:

Support..........68%
Oppose...........27%
Not sure/refused 5%

Keeping suspected terrorists or enemy combatants at the Guantanamo Bay detainment camp:

Support..........63%
Oppose...........29%
Not sure/refused 9%


About Investor's Business Daily:

Founded in 1984, Investor's Business Daily revolutionized stock market coverage. IBD is now recognized as a leading commentator on the key issues of our time. IBD editorials are rigorously researched, presenting under-reported - or simply unreported - facts that give you a better insight into the truth behind the headlines.

In other polls, Rasmussen to be exact, pessimism about the war is also slowly declining, 49% of Americans feel congress is doing a lousy job vs 15% thinking they are doing a good job.

Three years of declining numbers are slowly turning around as support rises for the war on terror. The numbers are still, admittedly, low, but since this new trend is only 2-3 months old vs the three years they had to decline, the rise is significant in meaning and as long as we continue to keep getting reports of progress and success in Iraq, those numbers will continue to climb, while congressional numbers have a good possibility of continuing to decline.

This might be the reason that Congress, very quietly, approved a stop gap measure of more funds until a long-delayed appropriations process is completed.

The Senate agreed on Thursday to increase the federal debt limit by $850 billion -- from $8.965 trillion to $9.815 trillion -- and then proceeded to approve a stop-gap spending bill that gives the Bush White House at least $9 billion in new funding for its war in Iraq.

Additionally, the administration has been given emergency authority to tap further into a $70 billion "bridge fund" to provide new infusions of money for the occupation while the Congress works on appropriations bills for the Department of Defense and other agencies.

Translation: Under the guise of a stop-gap spending bill that is simply supposed to keep the government running until a long-delayed appropriations process is completed -- probably in November -- the Congress has just approved a massive increase in war funding.

The move was backed by every senator who cast a vote, save one.

Senate Roll Call can be found here.

Congress Roll Call found here.

So far I am only seeing a couple heads exploding, (check the comments in that last link) but as the news spreads, I will update this with reactions.

[Update] More heads exploding, on cue.

Completely Unnecessary, Captain Proton Takes The Trib, Moonbat Juggernaut

More reactions.

I wonder when the Leftinistra will finally acknowledge that they are in the VAST minority and have lost their bid to sway America to their defeatist rhetoric all for political gain.

I won't be holding my breath.

The American People Are On To The Defeatist Clans

IBD Editorials: Good News for America...bad news for the defeatists and haters of America.

IBD/TIPP Presidential Leadership Index: August 2007

Posted Monday, August 13, 2007 4:30 PM PT

President Bush's rating among Americans continued to regain lost ground in August, new data from the IBD/TIPP Poll show. Bush's ratings began to tank in May, and hit a low of 34.7 in June. Since then, they've steadily crept back. In August, they jumped 6.2% to 37.9, the highest level since May. What's surprising is that he's gained ground among all three major political affiliations in the U.S. Bush's firming leadership numbers may be due to signs of success with the surge strategy used in Iraq.

IBD/TIPP Presidential Leadership Index: August 2007

Another Editorial On Polls by Snooper

New Poll Data Don't Justify National Funk

Not all is gloom out there. That's the dominant message from the most recent Pew Global Attitudes Project's poll of 47 nations. Pew found that there is rising or constantly high contentment all over the globe with one's quality of life and family income.

It isn't all doom and gloom across the globe as the Leftinistra would have us believe. There ARE circumstances where there IS doom and gloom but it IS primarily "their" fault and NOT America's fault, as the Leftinistra would have us and the rest of the world believe.

Read the rest of the article mentioned above and you will see what I mean. The poll referenced is here.

It's partly a partisan response: Almost all Democrats are negative about the nation's future. But when one considers that America has not suffered another Sept. 11, and that it has enjoyed a surging and prosperous economy, it's hard to avoid the conclusion that citizens of this most blessed country are registering a verdict that is in tension with reality.

I find it "unusual" that the Leftinistra, in this current election cycle, much more than the last one, are lying their asses off all in the name of political power and position.

Perhaps most importantly, the Pew global survey showed sharply reduced numbers of Muslims saying that suicide bombings are often or sometimes justified, as compared with 2002. That's still the view of 70% in the Palestinian territories. But that percentage has declined from 74% to 34% in Lebanon, from 43% to 23% in Jordan, and from 33% to 9% in Pakistan.

Perhaps reality is setting in?

We've been instructed by many sages that the rest of the world hates us and does not want to follow our example. The Pew numbers tell us something different.

People around the world may oppose American intervention in Iraq, but they also want many of the things we do. Perhaps we should take a cue from the optimism of the developing world and appreciate what we have — and get out of our national funk.

National Funk. A malaise, if you will. A self-centered "what about me?" attitude. I chuckle to myself when the woe-is-me crowd gets air time and when the Leftinistra which are weak as balsa wood on issues, start pulling on the heart strings of the over emotional and the weak-spirited...and the lazy.

The major difference between the Liberals and the Conservatives has been iterated by A Newt One as thusly; the Liberals stand for what "it would be nice to be and/or should be" and the Conservatives stand for "how realities are".

In recent days, the NY Times has conducted an opinion poll and they could not accept their findings and did it over. They found that their results were consistent with their first round. What is interesting is that the poll revealed that the Leftinistra and the far-left hate-mongers have been LYING all along the way about The War In Iraq. In spite of the Lame Stream Media, up to this point, have been LYING to the American People and so have the Leftinistra. Support FOR the war effort VICTORY is making a rebound and the Leftinistra's heads are spinning like Linda Blair in the Exorcist. (I keep waiting for the pea soup to spew forth from ReidCo.)

Wake Up America has written a piece which goes into detail in regards to "what does it mean?", in regards to the NY Times now having to print the Good News that we on the right have been writing, blogging and calling about for quite some time.

In less than a week from the NY Times "shocker", we find that by golly there IS progress being made in Iraq and this thing just can be winnable. Imagine that? I wrote a short blurb on this here, and the rest of the world woke up with the article in their emails, some of them sent by me, Snooper. When I saw the article I was just to plumb tired to get into the nitty gritty. Besides, some are better at that then I am.

What this all means is this; we on the RIGHT have been CORRECT the whole time. In a nutshell, Bush was right and so ARE we. It also means that the Milbloggers were also CORRECT the entire time.

Now, the ROE up until the "surge" (a pathetic term) has been painfully WRONG as wrong can possibly be and I KNOW for a FACT it has been wrong all along. One CANNOT pussy-foot with an enemy that will NOT be negotiated with.

It also means that the Leftinistra have been WRONG ever since they decided that if they remained supportive of the war effort, they would not win any elections. That in itself is a "Rather" pathetic attitude as well and I dare say that their attitude in this regard is much more pathetic than the ROE up until the "surge".

Those on the left have worked diligently to have Iraq turn into another Vietnam and it almost succeeded. Thanks to we in The New Media, we would not let that happen. Because we did not allow that to happen, and we defeated the Amnesty Bill, the left is now working to silence us. We will NOT let that happen, either.

If I was a member of a party with the lowest approval ratings in history, I would be working to improve that, not make it worse. They just aren't smart enough to know that. Perhaps, one day.

The anti-war "movement" has turned into a convoluted bowel movement. The crowds are no longer as numerous as they once were. The celebrities that once came out are far and few between now. Cindy Sheehan retired and then came back out, reminiscent of a few flunkies from days of yore. Can you spot them? Just in case one is wondering, Snopes has verified that the Kerry pictures are genuine.

At one time, Hanoi Jane now redubbed Jihad Jane, was so humiliated that she has gone into hiding...again. It seems her rhetoric came back to bite her on her ass. For nostalgia purposes:

The NY Times recent poll and the follow-on article that has caused an implosion which can be heard from the Pits of hell, seems to be along the lines of the IBD poll results where it reveals an almost 50-50 split, depending upon which direction the undecideds go:

It "IS" "Rather" perplexing, then, how the Leftinistra say time and time again how the majority of Americans are on their side. If that be the case, why, then, are their approval ratings hovering just above whale poop?

In recent days The Gathering of Eagles members have totally trounced the moonbat anti-war minions and sent them scampering away as the cowards they are.

When will these moonbats figure out that the majority of Americans are sick and tired of hearing that our country sucks? If they don't like it, perhaps seeing that they are the minority, they should leave.

If I had the power and the say so, I would have them rounded up and charged with sedition, subversion and treason against the United States and stripped of their American citizenship, seeing they hate the country so much. I would not hang them or have them executed. I would revive Alcatraz and set them loose out there. Let them live or die on their own...out there in San Fran Fruit Loop Bay.

End of rant.

I be tired.


UPDATE: On my second wind. I need a new batch of trolls to trounce. I grew weary of the old crop and zapped their access. We are taking on new trolls.

As an addendum to the above post and digging up my old pics of Jihad Jane and Jihad Kerry, I decide to put the following in this post. I originally saw it at Townhall in the comments section of an article by Michelle Malkin. All the particulars can be found in the "Labels" listed in the sidebar. Look for "Loyal Democrat" and "The John Doe Manifesto". Without further ado:



I Am A Loyal Democrat

I am Loyal Democrat.I will take the side of any entity that declares itself to be an enemy of the United States. I will consider any action taken by my government to be improper, and defend the position of any nation that opposes my own. I will not stand by while the concepts of freedom and liberty are allowed to infect the thoughts of repressed peoples. Rather, I will combat such efforts and convince the slaves of dictatorships that they have it better than anyone else.

I am Loyal Democrat.

I will tell all Americans that they had 9/11 coming as retribution for all of our evil deeds inflicted upon members of the most peaceful religion on earth. I will work to undermine any effort to destroy the Islamic tidal wave of terror that has vowed to wash onto our beaches. I will strive to weaken our military as it attempts to carry out its mission overseas. I shall encourage total surrender to any foe that threatens us.

I am Loyal Democrat.

I shall stir up domestic unrest by separating my fellow citizens into groups, and then I will encourage each group to distrust the next, and convince each that I am their one true friend. Through this magnificent deception, I will rule them all. I will convince minorities that they are inferior, and that they need my special help to succeed in life. Once I have them suspicious of others and fully demoralized, I will keep them down, and make their every gain dependent on what I decide to let them do. I shall oppress minorities worse than any avowed racist could ever hope to.

I am Loyal Democrat.

I will make every effort to criticize people that achieve, to hinder those that aspire, and ridicule those that display self-worth. In spite of my lack of personal merit, I will elevate myself in the eyes of others by bringing people with actual character down. I will prey on people’s envy of others’ success, and I will gain undeserved power as a result. I will take from those that earn until they lose the motivation to build up mankind any longer.

I am Loyal Democrat.

I will promote the tyranny of socialism, and crush the only economic system that has advanced mankind. And when we are all financially destitute and controlled by an omnipotent government, I shall laugh at the destruction I have wrought, for I truly hate mankind.

I am Loyal Democrat.

Remember me in 2008 kiddies…..



Yes. We will.