Condemn in the Strongest Possible Terms

Warning: Contains explicit execration!

    Today the demon spawn fired an anti-tank missile at a school bus in Israel. You can read the details at Yahoo News. Modern anti-tank missiles are not cheap, and they must be aimed. The attack was deliberate, the target was intentionally selected.  Because the bus was near the end of its run, there was only one passenger, who was critically wounded.  Had it been earlier, with a full passenger load, there would have been many deaths.

    Click this link and look at the close up of the bus.  The accursed demon spawn intended to murder 60 children and a driver.  Not soldiers, not a tank crew, children.  What do you say?  What would you say if your children were on that bus??  Two words must be said; nobody else will say them. I will; I will say them loud and clear, for the whole world to hear, and I don't care who may be offended.  I am offended by the universal failure to say what must be said:

    Almighty God, we thank you for your mercy and favor. Shield and defend us from the evil intentions of our enemies, make a full end of them and damn them with an everlasting damnation. Amen!  

  Now I want you to read what our Department of State said:

"We condemn the attack on innocent civilians in southern Israel in the strongest possible terms as well as ongoing rocket fire from Gaza,"

"We have reiterated many times there is no justification of the targeting of innocent civilians and those responsible for these terrorist acts should be held accountable,"

strongest possible terms

    Not by a country mile. Not by a light year.  That is no condemnation, that is a skip and slide, glossing over the worst possible evil intentions and actions.
How long, Lord?  How long must we endure the treachery of these traitors who ignore at our peril and the peril of innocent children and the whole world? How long must Israelis  remain as sitting ducks while Satan's slaves aim rockets at their heads? 

    When will insipid words be replaced by suitable execrations?  When will Israel rise up and remove her enemies from the face of the earth?  What part of existential conflict do they not comprehend? 

7:167. And (remember) when your Lord declared that He would certainly keep on sending against them (i.e. the Jews), till the Day of Resurrection, those who would afflict them with a humiliating torment. Verily, your Lord is Quick in Retribution (for the disobedient, wicked) and certainly He is Oft­Forgiving, Most Merciful (for the obedient and those who beg Allâh's Forgiveness).

[...](till the Day of Resurrection, those who would afflict them with a humiliating torment.) on account of their disobedience, defying Allah's orders and Law and using tricks to transgress the prohibitions. It was reported that Musa required the Jews to pay the production tax for seven or thirteen years, and he was the first to do so. Also, the Jews fell under the humiliating rule of the Greek Kushdanin, Chaldeans and later on the Christians, who subjugated and disgraced them, and required them to pay the Jizyah (tribute tax). When Islam came and Muhammad was sent, they became under his power and had to pay the Jizyah, as well. Therefore, the humiliating torment mentioned here includes disgrace and paying the Jizyah, as Al-`Awfi narrated from Ibn `Abbas. In the future, the Jews will support the Dajjal (False Messiah); and the Muslims, along with `Isa, son of Mary, will kill the Jews. This will occur just before the end of this world.[...] Eternal Humiliation placed on the Jews

Sahih Muslim Book 041, Number 6985:
Abu Huraira reported Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: The last hour would not come unless the Muslims will fight against the Jews and the Muslims would kill them until the Jews would hide themselves behind a stone or a tree and a stone or a tree would say: Muslim, or the servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me; come and kill him; but the tree Gharqad would not say, for it is the tree of the Jews.

    Who might he send?  Who is tormenting Jews? I have a clue for you.

9:29.Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.  

Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:
Narrated Anas bin Malik:
Allah's Apostle said, "I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.' And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah." Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, "O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?" He replied, "Whoever says, 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah', faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have."

 

Why, Exactly?

    Because of Allah's promise and threat.  When Muslims exterminate the Jews and appear before the judgment seat, Allah will weigh their good deeds against their sins. If the good deeds are heavier, he will admit them to the gardens; otherwise, he will damn them. 

Good Deeds

    Exactly how does a Muslim accrue the Islamic equivalent of Brownie Points??

9:120. It was not becoming of the people of Al-Madinah and the bedouins of the neighbourhood to remain behind Allah's Messenger (Muhammad SAW when fighting in Allah's Cause) and (it was not becoming of them) to prefer their own lives to his life. That is because they suffer neither thirst nor fatigue, nor hunger in the Cause of Allah, nor they take any step to raise the anger of disbelievers nor inflict any injury upon an enemy but is written to their credit as a deed of righteousness. Surely, Allah wastes not the reward of the Muhsinun

Anything a Muslim does to enrage or injure a Jew or Christian is imputed to him as a good deed.  Got a clue yet? 

9:38. O you who believe! What is the matter with you, that when you are asked to march forth in the Cause of Allâh (i.e. Jihâd) you cling heavily to the earth? Are you pleased with the life of this world rather than the Hereafter? But little is the enjoyment of the life of this world as compared with the Hereafter.

9:39. If you march not forth, He will punish you with a painful torment and will replace you by another people, and you cannot harm Him at all, and Allah is Able to do all things.

61:10. O You who believe! Shall I guide you to a commerce that will save you from a painful torment.

61:11.  That you believe in Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad ), and that you strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allâh with your wealth and your lives, that will be better for you, if you but know!

61:12. (If you do so) He will forgive you your sins, and admit you into Gardens under which rivers flow, and pleasant dwelling in Gardens of 'Adn ­ Eternity ['Adn (Edn) Paradise], that is indeed the great success.

61:13. And also (He will give you) another (blessing) which you love, help from Allâh (against your enemies) and a near victory. And give glad tidings (O Muhammad ) to the believers.

    Now I will show you the dirty details nobody else will show you.  What would you do if you believed the following crap?

78:21. Truly, Hell is a place of ambush,

78:22. A dwelling place for the Tâghûn (those who transgress the boundry limits set by Allâh like polytheists, disbelievers in the Oneness of Allâh, hyprocrites, sinners, criminals, etc.),

78:23. They will abide therein for ages,

78:24. Nothing cool shall they taste therein, nor any drink.

78:25. Except boiling water, and dirty wound discharges.

78:26. An exact recompense (according to their evil crimes).

78:27. For verily, they used not to look for a reckoning.

78:28. But they belied Our Ayât (proofs, evidences, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, and that which Our Prophet (Peace be upon him) brought) completely.

78:29. And all things We have recorded in a Book.

78:30. So taste you (the results of your evil actions); no increase shall We give you, except in torment.

78:31. Verily, for the Muttaqûn, there will be a success (Paradise);

78:32. Gardens and grapeyards;

78:33. And young full-breasted (mature) maidens of equal age;

78:34. And a full cup (of wine).

78:35. No Laghw (dirty, false, evil talk) shall they hear therein, nor lying;

78:36. A reward from your Lord, an ample calculated gift (according to the best of their good deeds).

 

reminder

    What do believers do?

9:111. Verily, Allâh has purchased of the believers their lives and their properties; for the price that theirs shall be the Paradise. They fight in Allâh's Cause, so they kill (others) and are killed. It is a promise in truth which is binding on Him in the Taurât (Torah) and the Injeel (Gospel) and the Qur'ân. And who is truer to his covenant than Allâh? Then rejoice in the bargain which you have concluded. That is the supreme success .

 

Moderate Islam

    There ain't any! Islam is what Moe preached and practiced. Nothing else is Islam.

Radical Islam

    There ain't any!  Islam is what Moe preached and practiced. Nothing else is Islam.

Islam

    What Moe preached & practiced: Jihad, rape, pillage, plunder, genocide, terror and slavery. All else is hypocrisy or apostasy except those who await sufficient military capacity for an effective final strike.
 
   

Bacon laced Qur'an Roast in Lindsey Graham's Dishonor

Ann Barnhardt  sticks it in Goober's eye, in exemplary form, assigning to him the label appropriate to his level of intelligence, buffoonery and real party affiliation.   Part one is the verbal ripper.  In part two, Ann launches into physical ripping, reading, tearing out and burning offensive pages of the Qur'an.  As she does so, she explains why each verse offends her and should offend every sentient American. 

    Just as it is impossible to respect Islam and the Qur'an, it is impossible to respect obsequious politicians who bow down to osculate Islam's anus.  Thanks and a tip of the hat to Bare Naked Islam for posting these excellent videos.  Thanks to Ann Barnhardt for having the courage and conviction to make them.

    As Ann says, she is not endangering our troops, Obamination is with his suicidal rules of engagement.  These videos will enrage the Muslims who see them or learn about them second hand.  That's tough. If they react with riot & murder, that is their doing, not ours.  There is no right to be shielded from all offense.  There is no right to have your superstition held sacrosanct, protected from all questioning, mockery & criticism. 

    Religions do not have rights, people do. Those include the right to live, free from attack and the threat thereof. We also have the right to worship or not as we see fit.  There is no right to worship by applying the sword or dull knife to our necks.  Murder is not a protected ritual of worship, nor is rape.  If there is a right to practice Islam, then all human rights are abrogated.  "Jihad is ordained for you." "They fight in Allah's cause, killing others and being killed." That is Islam in practice; I can neither tolerate nor respect it nor can I respect anyone who demands that I perform the impossible.

    Yes, we also have the right to call out evil when we see it. That is exactly what Ann Barnhardt did in the second video.

   

Lets all give this patriot a standing ovation!

Islamophobia- Koran Burning-Censorship

When it comes to Islamophobia, there is no end of craven cowardice. Our elected and appointed leaders seem devoid of spinal & testicular fortitude. They demonstrate their abject fear of Islam by attempting to appease it through condemnation and censorship of free speech.

    Texas v. Johnson,  stands as precedent for protecting flag burning as a mode of free speech. [Wikipedia]   The flag is a symbol of the rights enshrined in the Declaration of Independence and Constitution.  Burning it in protest demonstrates enmity to our precious rights & liberties.  If that act is protected free expression, how can expressing contempt for a war cult that inculcates hatred and incites genocidal jihad/terror be any less protected? 

Bare Naked Islam sounded an early warning: Reid & Graham consider ban on Koran burning.

"I  wish we could find a way to hold people accountable. Free speech is a great idea, but we're in a war,"

"During World War II, we had limits on what you could do if it inspired the enemy," Graham said, adding that he wanted to do "anything we can to push back here in America against acts like this that put our troops at risk."

.

put our troops at risk

    Pastors Jones & Sapp did not put our troops at risk; President G.W. Bush sent them into harm's way. The accursed abomination should have been answered with tactical nuclear warheads, not boots on the ground.  Sending troops to "liberate" people who prefer to remain slaves is a fool's errand of the worst sort.  So long as the population of Afghanistan remains Muslim, we have lost; our blood and treasure has been wasted. 

    Provocations are desired and sought to rationalize jihad and motivate the rabble to participate, but they are not the cause of Islamic violence.  Islamic violence is doctrine driven, not grievance driven. 

• 2:216. Jihâd (holy fighting in Allâh's Cause) is ordained for you (Muslims) though you dislike it, and it may be that you dislike a thing which is good for you and that you like a thing which is bad for you. Allâh knows but you do not know.
  • Footnote to 2:190. (V.2:190) Al-Jihâd (holy fighting) in Allâh’s Cause (with full force of numbers and weaponry) is given the utmost importance in Islâm and is one of its pillar (on which it stands). By Jihâd Islâm is established, Allâh’s Word is made superior, (His Word being Lâ ilaha illallâh which means none has the right to be worshipped but Allâh), and His Religion (Islâm) is propagated. By abandoning Jihâd (may Allâh protect us from that) Islâm is destroyed and the Muslims fall into an inferior position; their honour is lost, their lands are stolen, their rule and authority vanish. Jihâd is an obligatory duty in Islâm on every Muslim, and he who tries to escape from this duty, or does not in his innermost heart wish to fulfil this duty, dies with one of the qualities of a hypocrite.
    Narrated ‘Abdullâh bin Mas‘ûd رضي الله عنه: I asked Allâh’s Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم "O Allâh’s Messenger! What is the best deed?" He replied, "To offer the Salât (prayers) at their early fixed stated times." I asked, "What is next in goodness?" He replied, "To be good and dutiful to your parents." I further asked, "What is next in goodness?" He replied, "To participate in Jihâd in Allâh’s Cause." I did not ask Allâh’s Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم anymore and if I had asked him more, he would have told me more. (Sahih Al-Bukhâri, Vol.4, Hadîth No.41).
• 8:39. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.
• 9:29.Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
• 9:120.  It was not becoming of the people of Al-Madinah and the bedouins of the neighbourhood to remain behind Allah's Messenger (Muhammad SAW when fighting in Allah's Cause) and (it was not becoming of them) to prefer their own lives to his life. That is because they suffer neither thirst nor fatigue, nor hunger in the Cause of Allah, nor they take any step to raise the anger of disbelievers nor inflict any injury upon an enemy but is written to their credit as a deed of righteousness. Surely, Allah wastes not the reward of the Muhsinun
• 9:123. O you who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are close to you, and let them find harshness in you, and know that Allâh is with those who are the Al-Muttaqûn (the pious - see V.2:2).  
• Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:
  Narrated Anas bin Malik:
  Allah's Apostle said, "I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.' And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah." Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, "O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?" He replied, "Whoever says, 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah', faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have." 
• Reliance of the Traveller

  O9.1: The Obligatory Character of Jihad

  Jihad is a communal obligation (def: c3.2).  When enough people perform it to successfully accomplish it, it is no longer obligatory upon others (O: the evidence for which is the Prophet's saying (Allah bless him and give him peace),

  "He who provides the equipment for a soldier in jihad has himself performed jihad,"

  and Allah Most High having said:

  "Those of the believers who are unhurt but sit behind are not equal to those who fight in Allah's path with their property and lives. Allah has preferred those who fight with their property and lives a whole degree above those who sit behind. And to each, Allah has promised great good" (Koran 4:95).

  If none of those concerned perform jihad, and it does not happen at all, then everyone who is aware that it is obligatory is guilty of sin, if there was a possibility of having performed it. In the time of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) jihad was a communal obligation after his emigration (hijra) to Medina. As for subsequent times, there are two possible states in respect to non-Muslims.

  The first is when they are in their own countries, in which case jihad (def: o9.8) is a communal obligation, and this is what our author is speaking of when he says, "Jihad is a communal obligation," meaning upon the Muslims each year.

  The second state is when non-Muslims invade a Muslim country or near to one, in which case jihad is personally obligatory (def: c3.2) upon the inhabitants of that country, who must repel the non-Muslims with whatever they can).

• Al-Hedaya Volume II, Book IX, Chapter 1
  • Page 141  The destruction of the sword  is incurred by infidels, although they be not the first aggressors, as appears from various passages in the  sacred writings which are generally received this effect.
  • Marginal note: Page 140
    
    • War must be carried on against the Infidels, at all times, by some party of the Muslims.

   

"During World War II, we had limits on what you could do if it inspired the enemy," Graham said, adding that he wanted to do "anything we can to push back here in America against acts like this that put our troops at risk."

    Flip your calender back  66 years. Should an American citizen be punished for criticizing, condemning or burning Mein Kampf?  Why, exactly?  The     major difference between Mein Kampf and the Qur'an is the latter's purported divine origin.

    Our troops and our society were put at risk by the weakness of previous Presidents.  Carter responded with dithering timidity when our Embassy was seized. When he finally acted, his action was poorly planned and ineffectually implemented.  Displaying weakness to a predator invites further attacks.

    Reagan sent the Marines to save Arafat's bacon, a fool's errand if there ever was one. Hundreds of Marines died as a result. Reagan reacted with a few artillery shells; he should have erased the Hezbollah enclaves in Lebanon.

The Wall Street Journal reveals some interesting remarks from Gen. David Petraeus.

"This was a surprise,"

    The event was publicized months in advance on a web site, in press releases and a Facebook page.  I know that the government knew about it because the Department of Homeland Security read my blog posts about it well in advance of the event.  The OIC was aware of it immediately and held an emergency meeting four days after the event to draft a  letter to Ban Ki-moon.

"hateful, extremely disrespectful and enormously intolerant."

    In view of the doctrine outlined above, hatred disrespect & intolerance of Islam's demonic scripture is certainly well warranted.  Bitter kvetching about those attitudes is evidence of extreme intellectual incapacity or inactivity.

    From Newsmax we learn that the Majority leader of the Senate is aroused.

“We’ll take a look at this of course. As to whether we need hearings or not, I don’t know.”

Read more on Newsmax.com: Reid: Probe of Quran Burning Considered

    George Washington said it best: “If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.”
That is exactly what Islam demands. Islamic law forbids any and every negative expression about itself.

• Reliance of the Traveller

  • O8.7: Acts that Entail Leaving Islam

    (O: Among the things that entail apostasy from Islam (may Allah protect us from them) are:

    -1- to prostrate to an idol, whether sarcastically, out of mere contrariness, or in actual conviction, like that of someone who believes the Creator to be something that has originated in time. Like idols in this respect are the sun or moon, and like prostration is bowing to other than Allah, if one intends reverence towards it like the reverence due to Allah;

    -2- to intend to commit unbelief, even if in the future. And like this intention is hesitating whether to do so or not: one thereby immediately commits unbelief;

    -3- to speak words that imply unbelief such as ``Allah is the third of three,'' or ``I am Allah''-unless one's tongue has run away with one, or one is quoting another, or is one of the friends of Allah Most High (wali, def: w33) in a spiritually intoxicated state of total oblivion (A: friend of Allah or not, someone totally oblivious is as if insane, and is not held legally responsible (dis: k13.1(O:) ) ), for these latter do not entail unbelief;

    -4- to revile Allah or His messenger (Allah bless him and give him peace);

    -5- to deny the existence of Allah, His beginingless eternality, His endless eternality, or to deny any of His attributes which the consensus of Muslims ascribes to Him (dis: v1);

    -6- to be sarcastic about Allah's name, His command, His interdiction, His promise, or His threat;

    -7- to deny any verse of the Koran or anything which by scholarly consensus (def: b7) belongs to it, or to add a verse that does belong to it;

    -8- to mockingly say, ``I don't know what faith is'';

    -9- to reply to someone who says, ``There is no power or strength save through Allah''; ``Your saying `There's no power or strength, etc,' won't save you from hunger'';

    -10- for a tyrant, after an oppressed person says, ``This is through the decree of Allah,'' to reply, ``I act without the decree of Allah'';

    -11- to say that a Muslim is an unbeliever (kafir) (dis: w47) in words that are uninterpretable as merely meaning he is an ingrate towards Allah for divinely given blessings (n: in Arabic, also ``kafir'');

    -12- when someone asks to be taught the Testification of Faith (Ar. Shahada, the words, ``La ilaha ill Allahu Muhammadun rasulu Llah'' (There is no god but Allah, Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah) ), and a Muslim refuses to teach him it;

    -13- to describe a Muslim or someone who wants to become a Muslim in terms of unbelief (kufr);

    -14- to deny the obligatory character of something which by the consensus of Muslims (ijma`, def: B7) is part of Islam, when it is well known as such, like the prayer (salat) or even one rak'a from one of the five obligatory prayers, if there is no excuse (def: u2.4);

    -15- to hold that any of Allah's messengers or prophets are liars, or to deny their being sent;

    (n: `Ala' al-din' Abidin adds the following:

    -16- to revile the religion of Islam;

    -17- to believe that things in themselves or by their own nature have any causal influence independent of the will of Allah;

    -18- to deny the existence of angels or jinn (def: w22), or the heavens;

    -19- to be sarcastic about any ruling of the Sacred Law;

    -20- or to deny that Allah intended the Prophet's message (Allah bless him and give him peace) to be the religion followed by the entire world (dis: w4.3-4) (al-Hadiyya al-`Ala'iyya (y4), 423-24). )

    There are others, for the subject is nearly limitless. May Allah Most High save us and all Muslims from it.)

If a Muslim says any of those things, he is an apostate, and must be killed.

•  

  • O8.1

    When a person who has reached puberty and is sane voluntarily apostatizes from Islam, he deserves to be killed.

    O8.2

    In such a case, it is obligatory for the caliph (A: or his representive) to ask him to repent and return to Islam. If he does, it is accepted from him, but if he refuses, he is immediately killed.

How does that apply to non-Muslims?  When Muslims conquer Christians, the Christians must agree to a treaty of protection and pay Jizya. The treaty imposes certain limitations on them, and if they violate it, they are subject to execution.

•  

  • O11.10

    The agreement is also violated (A: with respect to the offender alone) if the state has stipulated that any of the following things break it, and one of the subjects does so anyway, though if the state has not stipulated that these break the agreement, then they do not; namely, if one of the subject people:

    -1- commits adultery with a Muslim woman or marries her;

    -2- conceals spies of hostile forces;

    -3- leads a Muslim away from Islam;

    -4- kills a Muslim;

    -5- or mentions something impermissible about Allah, the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), or Islam.

  • O11.11

    When a subject's agreement with the state has been violated, the caliph chooses between the four alternatives mentioned above in connection with prisoners of war (o9.14).

    • O9.14

      When an adult male is taken captive, the caliph (def: o25) considers the interests (O: of Islam and the Muslims) and decides between the prisoner's death, slavery, release without paying anything, or ransoming himself in exchange for money or for a Muslim captive held by the enemy.

      If the prisoner becomes a Muslim (O: before the caliph chooses any of the four alternatives) then he may not be killed, and one of the other three alternatives is chosen.

    The list of impermissible expressions is contained in O8.7, reproduced above.  That is what they seek to impose upon us at the UN through resolutions and a binding protocol to ICERD.  The mobs demand that Pastor Jones be executed.

OIC: Playing the Victim Card - Qur'an Burning

OIC: Playing the Victim Card- Qur'an Burning The OIC propaganda machine grinds on. I accept their machinations as an opportunity to expose their al-Taqiyya.  They held an emergency meeting after International Judge the Qur'an Day.  The primary output of that meeting was a letter to Secretary General Ban Ki-moon. 

    The letter is reproduced below. Due to the target rich environment, I once again resort to footnoting.  The footnotes are linked to my commentary which follows below the horizontal line. Clicking a superscript will bring the comment into view.  After reading my comment, press the Back Space key to return to your place in the text.

A/65/802–S/2011/210

General Assembly                                                                                  Security Council
Sixty-fifth session                                                                                   Sixty-sixth year
Agenda item 68 (b)
Promotion and protection of human rights: human
rights questions, including alternative approaches for
improving the effective enjoyment of human rights and
fundamental freedoms

Letter dated 29 March 2011 from the Permanent Representative of

Tajikistan to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General

    On behalf of the Ambassadorial Group of the Organization of the Islamic
Conference in New York, I have the honour to convey that the Group held an
emergency meeting on Friday, 25 March 2011, to discuss the despicable act of the
burning of a copy of the Holy Koran¹ by two pastors, following a mock trial in a
church on 20 March 2011 in Florida, United States of America.

    This provocative act², which has hurt the sentiments of the 1.5 billion Muslims
of the world, was strongly condemned by the OIC Group as an act of advocacy of
incitement to religious hatred³, discrimination and violence⁴ against Islam and
Muslims. The OIC Ambassadors urged the international community in general and
you in particular to openly and strongly condemn this act of extreme bigotry⁵ and
religious hatred.⁶

    I am enclosing the text of the statement issued by the OIC Ambassadorial
Group in New York on this subject, with a request for circulation to the entire
United Nations membership (see annex).

    As you will see in the statement, the OIC Ambassadorial Group called upon
you, as well as reiterated the call made by the OIC Group in Geneva to the High
Commissioner for Human Rights, to express unequivocal condemnation of the
insidious desecration of the holy book⁷ of Islam and show action-oriented leadership⁸
to tackle the growing manifestations of religious intolerance and discrimination and
incitement to hatred and violence⁹ based on religion.

    The OIC Group strongly believes that the United Nations has an important role
to play in ensuring peace and harmony among the peoples and nations of the world¹⁰.
Accordingly, in your capacity as the Secretary-General of the United Nations, we
expect you to take the necessary steps to fight such insidious tendencies, to protect
multiculturalism and promote peace and harmony that are fundamental to the
peaceful coexistence of mankind¹¹.

    I should be grateful if you would have the present letter and its annex
circulated as a document of the sixty-fifth session of the General Assembly, under
agenda item 68 (b), and of the Security Council.

(Signed) Sirodjidin Aslov
Ambassador
Permanent Representative

Annex to the letter dated 29 March 2011 from the Permanent

Representative of Tajikistan to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General

Group of the Organization of the Islamic Conference in New York

strongly condemns the sacrilegious act of burning of the Holy

Koran in Florida as an act of advocacy of incitement to religious

hatred, discrimination and violence

                                                                                                        25 March 2011

    The Ambassadorial Group of the Organization of the Islamic Conference at the
United Nations, New York, at an emergency meeting convened today, expressed its
strong condemnation of the despicable act of the burning of a copy of the Koran by
Pastors Wayne Sapp and Terry Jones in Gainesville, Florida, United States of
America, on 20 March 2011. Calling it an act of extremists guided by their hatred
towards other cultures and religions, the OIC Group regretted that it took place in a
church, a sacred place itself, reserved for prayers and remembrance of God.

    The OIC Group shared the disappointment and concern expressed by the
Secretary-General of the OIC over this reprehensible act of extreme bigotry, which
has severely hurt the feelings of 1.5 billion Muslims all over the world, and
cautioned that if necessary conditions were not created by the international
community to prevent a recurrence of such Islamophobic acts, it would have grave
repercussions over interfaith harmony as well as global peace, security and stability¹².

    The Group urged the international community to unanimously condemn these
acts that are clear examples of advocacy of incitement to hatred, discrimination and
violence based on religion¹³. It was further highlighted that such acts, when left
unattended, provide fuel to extremist thoughts and elements in different societies
that lead to undermining peaceful coexistence and harmony among peoples and
societies. While appreciating the condemnatory statement issued by the United
States in the general debate of the Human Rights Council on 22 March 2011 and
other statements by interfaith and community leaders in the United States, the Group
hoped that the United States Administration would take appropriate actions against
the perpetrators of these acts in accordance with its national and international
obligations¹⁴.

    The OIC Group also called upon the Secretary-General of the United Nations
and the High Commissioner for Human Rights to express their unequivocal
condemnation of the insidious desecration of the holy book of Islam and show
action-oriented leadership to tackle the growing problem of religious intolerance¹⁵,
discrimination and incitement to hatred and violence based on religion and belief.

    The Group stated that at a time when Muslims around the world continue to be
confronted with ever-increasing instances of intolerance, negative stereotyping,
stigmatization, discrimination and violence on the basis of their religion, the OIC sponsored
resolution adopted by consensus on 24 March 2011 by the Human Rights
Council in Geneva, entitled “Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping and
stigmatization of, and discrimination, incitement to violence, and violence against
persons based on religion or belief”, should be seen as the confirmation of the
sincere commitment¹⁶ of OIC to the promotion of a global culture of respect¹⁷,
tolerance and peace among all, irrespective of religious and cultural backgrounds
and traditions.

    OIC Ambassadors further reiterated the strong commitment of OIC to the
promotion of interfaith and intercultural dialogue¹⁸ and the need to preserve the
multicultural fabric of our societies that is fundamental to peaceful coexistence
among peoples, cultures and nations.

 

---

1. Pastor Wayne Sapp burned  an English translation of the meaning of the Qur'an, which Islam does not consider authentic or holy. As man's word, not Allah's, was burned,  the act was not despicable; no offense was committed.
2. As a provocation, how does judging and burning a Qur'an translation compare to the act of sacking a U.N. office, murdering ten people and burning a church?  Is the act somehow more provocative than the curse worthy content of the book, which curses^I Christians and commands Muslims to wage perpetual war^II against them? The Qur'an was burned precisely because it is a provocative book: it inculcates hatred and incites violence
3. Pastor Terry Jones judged the Qur'an, Pastor Wayne Sapp burned it. Exactly how does that constitute "advocacy of incitement to religious hatred"? Did they tell their congregants to hate Muslims?  Did they pray for the death of Muslims?  They simply examined the content of a book and its consequences, judged it to be evil and burned it.  The OIC is miscasting the act without any objective basis in fact.
4. What incitement to violence?  What violence?  Did the pastors tell their congregation to riot?  Did they riot?  Did they kill Muslims or destroy Islamic property on their way home from the church? 
5. Bigotry: closed minded persistence in false opinion in the face of the facts, commonly understood in a racial context. What race is Islam?  If Islam is a race, why are there Caucasian, African, Arabian\ and Asian, Muslims?   The pastors  heard the facts in the form of reading  verses from the book and testimony of  its victims.  They acted after consideration of  the facts brought out at trial.  How  is that bigotry?   Did they advocate hatred of or discrimination against Muslims?  Did they generalize about Muslims?  With what evidence do you  hope to substantiate your accusation of  "extreme bigotry"?
6. What is the object of hatred?  It is the damnable doctrines enshrined in the Qur'an, which sanctify & mandate genocidal^III conquest^II & terrorism^IV.  Exactly what is wrong with hatred of absolute evil?
7. How can the profane be desecrated?  They burned a translation, not an Arabic Qur'an.  Even the Arabic Qur'an is profane, not sacred to those who examine it objectively.  The Qur'an consists largely of situational scripture^V and its mission is mercenary^VI. 
8. Condemnation is verbiage, not action. The real demand is for legislation to impose Islam's blasphemy law^VII on us; to make questioning & criticism of Islam punishable by fine and imprisonment. 
9. The usual code word is Islamophobia.  Take a look at the March edition of the Islamophobia Observatory^VIII and see what they are kvetching about.  They consider the House Homeland Security Cmte. hearing into 'radicalization' as 'incitement to discrimination... .
10. The UN was created to maintain peace; prevent war. Islam was created to initiate and perpetuate war^II,VI. To fulfill its mission, the UN must eliminate Islam from the world. 
11. That distills down to: promote surrender to Islam. Peace is what pertains after Dar ul-Islam conquers Dar ul-Harb.
12. That distills down to a threat: "silence our critics or we will go to war". 
13. The sentence is redundant boilerplate.  The Qur'an was burned precisely because it inculcates hatred and incites genocidal violence. They accuse us of their own course of conduct (they obey Allah & emulate Muhammad). 
14. The United States is obligated to protect the rights of its citizens.  We have a right to truthful communication of information, including information about the content and consequences of Islam's damnable scripture. Their demand that Jones & Sapp be punished for exercising their first amendment rights is parallel to their oft repeated demand that the creators of the Motoons & Fitna be punished for communicating the truth about their curse worthy war cult. 
15. So, religious intolerance is a problem?  Is it really?? The Qur'an defines Islam, and it ain't tolerant!  Islam is extremely intolerant! Allah  says that only Islam will be accepted^IX.  Anyone who tries to quit Islam is to be killed^X. Cursing us and mandating war against us are not signs of tolerance.  They are demanding that we tolerate the propagation of a doctrine which demands that we be conquered^II and declares open season^XI on us.
16. Sincere commitment to tolerance & peace? Yeah, right. Egypt, Indonesia & Pakistan are so committed to peace & tolerance that they allow Muslims to subject Christians to assault, murder, malicious persecution & destruction of property with impunity. 
17. Respect is given where respect is due, we have to earn it; so do you. Islam is unworthy of respect; reasonable men will give it none.
18. If you are so committed to interfaith dialogue, why did you not send someone to International Judge the Koran Day to act as defense counsel and present evidence to prove that it does not inculcate hatred, incite war and institutionalize misogyny?

1. 2:161, 9:30
2. 8:39, 9:29, The Order to fight People of the Scriptures until They give the Jizyah.  9:123
3. 8:67, 47:4
4. 3:151,  8:12, 8:57, 8:60, 8:60, 59:13, Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220
5. http://missbeth.wordpress.com/2007/06/04/know-thine-enemy-part-7-2/
6. https://snooper.wordpress.com/author/dajjal/page/2009/08/30/islams-mercenary-mission/
7. http://www.islamicbulletin.com/free_downloads/resources/reliance_complete.pdf#page=614
8. http://www.oic-oci.org/uploads/file/Islamphobia/2011/en/MB_Mar-11.pdf#page=19
9. 3:85 
10. 4:89
11. Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387

Obamination: Liar, Liar, Pants on Fire!

Bare Naked Islam posted a still shot taken from the video of the execution of the Qur'an at the Dove World Outreach Center. I saved that image, cropped, adjusted and enlarged it for maximum clarity.

This is the original image, as posted at BNI.

Examine it closely. Note that the cover is to the right of the back binding. Arabic Qur'ans are printed from right to left, their bindings are on the right side, not the left.  Note that the title is in English, barely legible.

In this cropped image, the Qur'an is brought up close. Note the title.

This cropped image has been enlarged as much as possible and adjusted for maximum clarity.

The English title is legible. Because of the binding and title, we know that the executed Qur'an was an English translation, not an Arabic Qur'an.

Routledge encyclopedia of translation studies   By Mona Baker  will give you some important background information on the controversy over translating the Qur'an into other languages. 

    When the PLO seized the Church of the Nativity, they performed istijmar with pages torn from the Bible. There was an on line fatwa permitting the practice, but it has been scrubbed.  They don't consider the Bible to be holy, because the Qur'an supersedes it, and claims it to be corrupted.

    It is required that Qur'an recitation be performed in Arabic.  They assert that no other language can convey the full meaning of the Arabic words.  They consider translations to be interpretations of the meaning of the Qur'an, not the Qur'an itself, so burning it should be no skin off their noses.

    Pastors Jones & Sapp spent four hours trying the Qur'an before convicting and executing it. I was unable to view the streaming video, so I do not know what evidence was presented by the prosecutor, but I know that he is an apostate fluent in Arabic.  The prosecution witnesses were also apostates.

    I have no knowledge of the evidence presented or witnesses called, if any, by the defense. I would like to see both sides post their briefs and evidence in pdf format. 

    In any case, rioting, murder & malicious destruction of property in reaction to the trial & execution of a Qur'an translation do not defend it, instead they pile on evidence of its evil effect on believers. 

    Obamination had remarks on the subject Saturday, since they are not yet posted on the White House blog, I rely on quotes found in a report on Yahoo News.

"The desecration of any holy text, including the Koran, is an act of extreme intolerance and bigotry,"

 

desecration

How anyone, especially the President of the United States, can impute sanctity to the Koran, or consider it to be sacred, is beyond imagining. What is sacred about a text which attributes divine sanction to imperatives for offensive conquest on a global scale, terrorism & genocide?  Muslims & liars will aver that the Qur'an does not do so. I challenge them to disprove the obvious!

• 8:39. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do. 
  • Tafsir Ibn Kathir
• 9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued. 
  • Tafsir Ibn Kathir
• 8:12. (Remember) when your Lord inspired the angels, "Verily, I am with you, so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes." 
• 8:57. So if you gain the mastery over them in war, punish them severely in order to disperse those who are behind them, so that they may learn a lesson.
• 9:120. It was not becoming of the people of Al-Madinah and the bedouins of the neighbourhood to remain behind Allah's Messenger (Muhammad SAW when fighting in Allah's Cause) and (it was not becoming of them) to prefer their own lives to his life. That is because they suffer neither thirst nor fatigue, nor hunger in the Cause of Allah, nor they take any step to raise the anger of disbelievers nor inflict any injury upon an enemy but is written to their credit as a deed of righteousness. Surely, Allah wastes not the reward of the Muhsinun* 
• 8:67. It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had made a great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land. You desire the good of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives), but Allâh desires (for you) the Hereafter. And Allâh is All-Mighty, All-Wise.  

    What can be more profane than attributing to deity a desire for genocide?

intolerance

    What is more  intolerant than declaring war upon people because they do not share your superstition?  Is there any rational excuse for tolerating that?  The President of the United States implied that we should tolerate the damnable doctrines which motivated the Magnificent Nineteen  to hijack four airliners and slit the throats of the flight crews with the intention of flying them into occupied office buildings.

    Demanding that we tolerate and hold sacred that which instigated Abomination 9/11 is treason, for which Obama should be impeached.

bigotry

    Bigotry implies prejudice. Jones judged the Qur'an, based on evidence.  That is judgment, not bigotry.  Obama is "a person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices" concerning Islam, in denial of the evidence. 

No religion tolerates the slaughter and beheading of innocent people, and there is no justification for such a dishonorable and deplorable act.

 

slaughter

    When one Jewish tribe surrendered following a two week siege, Moe slaughtered all the adult men and adolescent boys. Everything he did is sunnah: exemplary conduct to be emulated.  If no religion tolerates slaughter, then Islam is no religion.

• Sunan Abu Dawud Book 38, Number 4390:
  Narrated Atiyyah al-Qurazi:
  I was among the captives of Banu Qurayzah. They (the Companions) examined us, and those who had begun to grow hair (pubes) were killed, and those who had not were not killed. I was among those who had not grown hair.

innocent

    Only Muslims are innocent, all others are kuffar and rebels against Allah.

• 5:33. The recompense of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and do mischief in the land is only that they shall be killed or crucified or their hands and their feet be cut off on the opposite sides, or be exiled from the land. That is their disgrace in this world, and a great torment is theirs in the Hereafter.
  • 'Wage war' mentioned here means, oppose and contradict, and it includes disbelief, blocking roads and spreading fear in the fairways. Tafsir Ibn Kathir