Truth Revealed = Hate, Fear Mongering, Racism, YADAYADAYADA

~Snooper~

Yep. The picture to the left is hate speech. So says The Politico via Ace. Let's see. Obama said he had no association with ACORN. That is a lie. He assumed we wouldn't find out. Note to Barack: we aren't the Lame Stream Media. We are the Main Street Media and we are not in the tank for you whatsoever. We are not your friend. We don't reach across the aisle unless it is to yoke some socialist fluff ball. And that, Barack, would be you or any other Enemy of The State. I know, Rick Moran doesn't think Obama is a socialist but, what would you call someone that wants to redistribute the wealth? Santa Claus?

[...] Plumber to Obama: “Your new tax plan is going to tax me more. Isn’t it?”

Obama: “It’s not that I want to punish your success, I just want to make sure that everybody that is behind you, that they have a chance for success too. I think that when you spread the wealth around, it’s good for everybody.”

Crap Sandwiches: It’s what’s for breakfast, lunch, and dinner. [...]

Unbelievable. He actually came out and said it. Rick Moran? Are you listening? I wonder why any and all criticism of any Democrat and Congress is considered hate speech or racist when that is all we have heard about GWB for almost 8 years. Why is criticizing GWB OK but not the socialists of the other Party and some within the GOP?

That reeks of the usual DNC Double Standard.

Others blogging this: WUAs, GP, PL, TAB, RWV, AAB,

If At First You Don't Succeed...Waffle

Here is a shining example, again, why Hillary and Obama are assuredly NOT ready for the Big Tent. Oh, they yammer now and then on how they are indeed qualified but, they delude themselves and they cater and pander to the weak-kneed, the emotional and those that have an adversity to actually think for themselves. Thinking for oneself can give one a massive headache if not yet accustomed to original thought. Such is the case with the followers of the Czarina and the young lad Obama.

Aug. 19 (Bloomberg) -- Senator Hillary Clinton warned Democrats not to ``oversell'' plans to withdraw U.S. troops from Iraq, setting a cautious tone on the war that was echoed by the party's two other leading presidential candidates.

Clinton and her main competitors for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination, Senator Barack Obama and former Senator John Edwards, agreed in a debate this morning that pulling U.S. forces out of Iraq can't be accomplished in just a few months and that any withdrawal must be balanced by security concerns.

``It is so important that we not oversell this,'' Clinton said at the ABC News-sponsored forum in Des Moines, Iowa. Edwards concurred, saying it ``would be hard'' to move troops out within six months, as suggested by New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson, while Obama said U.S. options are limited.

Wasn't it not all that long ago that Czarina AND Obama were saying to get out and get out now? Why the waffle? Could it be that we are WINNING the war now and this scares them?

Actually, I "Rather" enjoy watching the DNC debates because we catch them in their BDS and double standards and their double talk every time. They never learn that honesty is the best policy.

It will be interesting to "see" what the reactions will be after the presentation by General Petraeus mid-September. With the Good Lord permitting, I will be in DC when this takes place as part of the massive formations of Pro-America Rallies and pro-Troop Support Rallies that will overwhelm the Fruit Loop Brigades that will be there as well. We are planning a live broadcast via Blog Talk Radio if all the bugs are worked out. Should be a hoot to watch the moonats run away...again.

For yet another example, here the Czarina is pretending to care but at the same time slamming and slandering our men and women in uniform. What an idiot this turd of a human truly "IS".

SURGE WORKING, BUT TOO LATE: HILL

August 21, 2007 -- WASHINGTON - Hillary Rodham Clinton told a veterans group yesterday that President Bush's troop surge is working - but that it is still time to bring U.S. troops home from Iraq.

"It's working. We're just years too late in our tactics," she said, referring to the beefed-up U.S. troop presence battling insurgents in Iraq, including war-torn Anbar province.

"We can't be fighting the last war. We have to keep preparing to fight the new war. We have to win.

"I think the best way of honoring their service is bringing them home," she told the Veterans of Foreign Wars in Kansas City.

Clinton's positive assessment of the troop surge puts her in agreement with some high-ranking military officials and scholars, but in direct opposition to many fellow Democrats.

Hillary = a box of turtle turds.

Read more at the Hillary Watch

Some Legacies We Could Do Without

And one of those legacies is the hypocrisy of the Vaunted Democratic Party. It is sad in a way.

I dare say that MOST Democrats are "Rather" vexed with their party's leadership and the constant "do as I say but not as I do" as they waltz their way into obscurity and insignificance.

Their competition of who can hate GWB the most has resulted in the Presidential Aspirants of the DNC have painted themselves into a corner of which there is no way out without soiling themselves.

From SFGate:

Even as they call for an end to the war and pledge to bring the troops home, the Democratic presidential candidates are setting out positions that could leave the United States engaged in Iraq for years.

I have a plethora of posts on this blog and the other three I operate in this regard.

The current quagmire the democratic party leadership has gotten themselves into is the direct result of appeasing and appealing to the many individual Fruit Loop Brigades that have no common sense about them, between them or any combination thereof. Each group demands of their selected political affiliations a wide variety of details and the DNC contenders plan each "showing" to appeal to a specific group and pander to them and get that particular group on board with the aspirant of their choice. This is counter-productive to say the least.

A perfect example of this is the announced running of Cindy Sheehan to compete with the now SoH Nancy Pelosi. Cindy, at one time, was all for Nancy Pelosi. Seeing that Nancy has been "proven" to be a pandering liar to obtain the political position she now holds, she now has fallen from grace from one of the Fruit Loop Brigades. It will be interesting to witness what comes of that contest. Surely, Nancy Pelosi has nothing to worry about but it does reveal that the Democratic Party leadership has no Spine and has no message and has no answers solidly in place. The democrats won fairly big last November but they ran on the BDS and the "we can do better" campaign without ever expressing that which they can do better of. Did they?

The Democratic Party has become the laughing stock in the political arena. They have not one single established role or Plan for anything other than "we want to take care of everybody" rhetoric. Specifics, please, if you can.

From Wake Up America, we read:

Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, don't tell anyone.

Democrats still want to leave Iraq...umm, probably, well, possibly, no thats not right, then maybe.... okay, so no, they admit we just can't leave a "failed state behind.

Okay, so all the promises to get out of Iraq before the last election, were....ummm, empty.

Their varying degrees of double speak comes to us by way of the NYT:

Lets start with John Edwards, shall we?

He wants to leave, then GO BACK!!!!! If genocide begins, (which all experts have said it will if we leave prematurely)then we must be prepared to step back in and put an end to that.

And that is just one example. Click the link and read the rest.

Maggie's Notebook wants to know: in regards to the Pelosi Agenda

Why then is House Speaker Nancy Pelosi planning on fighting the bill's outcome in November especially when the FISA changes only last to February? What about the Democrats in the Senate who voted in favor of the bill? What about the 41 Democrats in the House that voted in favor of the bill? Are they not part of the Democratic party leadership's often promoted new direction for America?

Good questions. Perhaps this is why Cindy and others like her are so disillusioned with the Democratic Party. I guess they are figuring out that they have been LIED to.

Red State has some sarcasm I "Rather" enjoyed. Again, this is the type of subject that has those plethora of Fruit Loop Brigades so quiet lately...they have ALL been lied to by the leadership of the Democratic Party. So much for that bringing back ethics thing...whatever that meant.

How 'bout that impeachment?

The left hasn't talked too much about it lately. After spending so long demanding impeachment because Bush lied and people died, the President exceeded his authority by spying on the American people and covering up the partisan firings of US Attorneys, and because Chimpy McBushitler Halliburton is corrupt, they've gotten quiet.

They really shouldn't.

Poor Fruit Loop Brigades. They have thrown in with some pretty cheesy politicians and are just now realizing that they have been bamboozled by the best bamboozlers in the known universe.

Must suck to be in their shoes now, eh?

I could go on for another 50+ pages but you get the drift.

New York Times:
Democrats Say Leaving Iraq May Take Years

Link Search: Google, Ask, Technorati, Sphere, and IceRocket

Discussion: Wake up America, Jules Crittenden, Michael P.F. van der Galiën, JammieWearingFool, neo-neocon, The CultureGhost, The Atlantic Online and Prairie Weather

On Fear Mongering

We have ALL heard the phrase "fear mongering" from the moonbat left and their muppets of the Leftinistra.

It seems as though whenever we hear "...fighting them over there so we don't have to fight them here...", that is proclaimed fear mongering. However, whenever we hear "...attack Pakistan...", that is not called fear mongering. Why is that?

Whenever we hear "...pull the troops out of Iraq so we can fight the 'real' terrorists...", that is not called fear mongering. Why is that?

Whenever we hear "...NYC will be under water due to Global Warming...", that is not called fear mongering. Why is that?

Whenever we hear "...the rich exploit the poor...", that is not called fear mongering...". Why is that?

Whenever we hear "...terrorism is a real threat..." coming from the DNC Aspirants to the Presidency, that is not called fear mongering. Why is that?

Whenever we hear "...the economy is crashing..." that is not called fear mongering. Why is that?

Whenever we hear "...they are trashing the Constitution...", that is not called fear mongering. Why is that?

Why is that??

How about some honesty...for a change? I know honesty is said to be bad policy for those due up for elections...isn't that "fear mongering"?

How about if the country unites...as it once was before the Leftinistra decided they would NOT be in power and control if they remained united against the AQ terrorists NO MATTER WHERE THEY ARE...isn't that "fear mongering"?

Just curious.

Identity Politics...Downfall of America; An International Embarrassment

This right here is too funny in a not so funny way. It isn't funny as far as a HAHA is funny. It is funny in that the Leftinistra are whining...AGAIN! Funny as in, WTF? Funny as in, this is not known? Funny as in, you have got to be kidding me!

Read on.

From Slate:

The Los Angeles Times leads with a look at how the partisan wrangling between lawmakers in Congress has been escalating since Democrats took control and reached a high point last week. Although there was much condemnation of all this infighting, both sides have been turning up the heat, figuring "they have more to gain by warring with their rivals than by working with them." Everyone has much to lose from the deadlock but few expect the mood to change when Congress comes back, particularly since Iraq will be at the forefront again.

Get a load of this headliner:
Los Angeles Times

Partisanship serves parties' interests

And the sub-title is this:

The GOP sees more advantage in disrupting congressional business, and Democrats see no incentive to accommodate the minority.

OK. First off. What is "wrong" with the image running through your mind as you read the title and sub-title? The quote? If you are a closed-mind moonbat, you will readily proclaim the verbiage to be The Truth. If you are someone like...say...me, you will read that and laugh scornfully and proclaim, "So what else is knew?" Someone like me would proclaim the verbiage as "This Is Bull!"

Simply amazing.

For years and years and years and years, since the time of Carter and the few years before him, the Leftinistra have used their badgering techniques on the GOP types that have always maintained or worked hard at maintaining, civil discourse. This has been The Way up until recent years...more so currently.

The GOP Conservatives have FINALLY started to fight fire with fire and some have even taken their gloves off. We can no longer afford to play nice-nice. So, now, it is called "partisanship" when what it really is, and putting it bluntly, is the attitude of STFU! And here is why.

THIS IS MY GUT CALL BASED ON LIFE'S EXPERIENCE...so don't give me a ration of crap because MY gloves have been off for decades and I will trounce and pounce with no mercy. At this point, mercy is tantamount to a stay at Bellevue.

The Democrats MAY have run on the platform of "bring the troops home" but I don't believe that for one minute. I believe that in their heart of hearts, they KNOW that we cannot just walk away, no matter what you call it and the manner of which the "walk out" is termed. It is suicide for the Iraqis and Americans for aeons to come. The Battle MUST be won and THEY KNOW IT!

I believe that they used their moonobat base to win elections in close states in 11/06. They called it "a new direction" in Iraq. They KNEW as most of us knew then as we STILL know now, the then in place ROE was as retarded as Forest Gump. I know it. You know it and so did they. The new direction demanded by the American people was a VICTORY. They knew it. You know it. And so did I. Many conservatives...the hard-core ones and the moderate ones, stayed home. Had they showed up to vote, we would not be in the predicament of which we find the political bodies in at the moment.

The blathered and bantering about of The Vaunted democratic Party has gotten this country where, exactly? Exactly no where? Correct. We are right smack down in the middle of THE WORST Congressioanal Session if the history of this country. The all so hated GWB has OVER 10 times the approval rating as does the Democratic Party led "majority". CONgress has sunk to an all-time low all because the DNC LIED to the base about The War In Iraq.

When you strip down all the rhetoric; when you take the time to dissect the words spoken to various groups across the country from the Politicos; there is no way on God's Green earth that anybody in their right mind is going to pull troops out of Iraq before the job is done.

Anybody that has a head on their shoulders that are of sound mind knows beyond a shadow of a doubt that a "political solution" is NOT possible without a military victory. Cases in point; WWI, WWII, Vietnam, Korea, Grenada, Contra-Sandinista, Kosovo, to name a few. There are more examples.

WWI and WWII and Grenada; political solutions came AFTER the war was won.

Vietnam; "political solutions" lost that war.

Korea; "political solutions" wrought a "tie"...the area, to this day is STILL at war. The war was NEVER settled. The declared war on the South by the North and the declared war on the North by the South has NEVER been rescinded. This is the longest cease fire in history.

Grenada; "political solutions" came AFTER the smallest war in history was won.

Kosovo; "political solutions" have not worked because the war is on-going.

Contra-Sandinista; your guess is as good as mine.

Now, they, the Democrats and RINOs, are using the moonbat base in the SAME way and we see how the KOSmonoffs' convention was a flop if not a total waste of time, effort and money. Just look at the "conflict" taking place between The Fraud Sheehan and The Fraud Pelosi! Pelosi has stated that impeachment of GWB and Cheney will NOT happen. Censure will NOT happen. Why? Because they did NOT A THING to warrant it but it sure does excite the moonbat base.

Look at the "conflict" going on between the top three muts of the DNC. Edwards whines about "they want to shut me up" and Barack said he wants to nuke Pakistan and Hillary says she will bring the troops home. Please. The irony of the ultimate poli-speak jargon is oh so sadly comical.

Keeping the issues simple is the easiest way but it doesn't win elections.

If the Democrats, that KNOW their rhetoric is disingenuous at the minimum would tell their moonbat base to "go to your corners and don't get up until we tell you to" and if the Republicans would clean up their act, The War In Iraq would have been won LONG ago...like 1991.

Rant to be continued I am sure...

Jihad 101

The Ins and Outs of This War…2007

The only “wars” in recent times that I know of that took a very short time to “win” are the Faulkland Islands and the Invasion of Grenada. The current “war” we are involved in has been going on for decades upon decades upon decades. This “debacle” as touted by the Reids of the world must first be understood for what it is; a Global War of Jihad. There really is only one way to have an ultimate and clear-cut end…total annihilation of the enemy.

Some would have us believe that we can negotiate a settlement with the Global Jihadists. Others proclaim that a radical few have hijacked an otherwise peaceful “religion”. Both of these noble premise, although well intended, are as wrong as wrong can get. There is no such thing as “peaceful Islam”. I would like for someone to tell me of one instance…just one and only one…where there was ever a “peaceful Islam”.

What is Jihad?

What is Jihad: The Arabic word Jihad is derived from the root word Jahada (struggle). Jihad has come to mean an offensive war to be waged by Muslims against all non-Muslims to convert them to Islam on the pain of death. Jihad is enjoined on all Muslims by the Quran.

We have a series on this blog dedicated to the exposure of what our pathetic political leaders cannot nor will not accept…it is not politically expedient and it is surely not politically correct to KNOW the truth.

Perhaps this video will begin to cast a glimmer of a shadow of a hope that a dim light at the end of an infinite tunnel will begin to glow.

The Politically Correct proponents fear world opinion and will not allow themselves to honestly see what the world faces. The world faces World Conquest of Jihad.

I find it appalling that the American Quest and Lust for Political Power within my country has brought us to the brink of self-induced destruction. We haven’t been this politically split since 1861 and look how that unfolded. Idealism. Realism. And any other “ism” imaginable or invented to espouse one’s “world view” will be the demise of this nation called The United States of America.

What are we united against? What are we united for? We hear a minority in numbers tout separation of Church and State, when there is no such doctrine in the Constitution, when it comes to the Ten Commandments on display in courtrooms and elsewhere yet we allow without impunity, the fabrication and construction of Islamic “cleansing basins“, a religion-based tenet of foot-washing in our universities, tax dollars supported. We allow “special” public schools where “peaceful Islam” can be taught to the “peaceful Jihadist’s” children in our school systems.

We allow “peaceful religious” Islamic militant compounds to thrive on our own soil yet we take down the Branch Davidians. Duplicitous does not even scratch the surface of this sham called Separation of Church and State.

I read today in the “harpy” news media all manner of wrong-headed and politically charged rhetoric, politically driven, naturally, as to the “ill-gotten when will it all end” nonsense. Those of us that are in The Know, laugh scornfully at the uneducated.

It will all end when the world is ruled by the Caliphate.

More to follow. Let the video sink in.

UPDATE:

Excellent editorial by Seth Leibsohn at NRO:

James Gilmore weighs in:

Liars, GWOT, Jihadists, Studies In Islam, Two-Faced, Terrorists, Jerks, GOP, Democrats, Morons, Political Correctness, Politics

Lost In Palsy

Democrats Out Of Touch With…Everything

From the WaPo…

You can look in vain for major legislative initiatives on the issue from Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid or House Speaker Nancy Pelosi; you have to strain to hear clear statements from our leading presidential candidates — Hillary Rodham Clinton, Barack Obama and John Edwards — or even to find a mention of democracy in their campaign Web sites’ foreign policy sections. The party’s leaders have gone quiet in the larger discussion about values, liberty and human rights; they seem to see no broader purpose for U.S. foreign policy other than self-interest and an end to the Iraq war. When democracy activists from around the world (including those from center-left parties) visit Washington, they often find it easier to get the time and attention of Republican senators than of their Democratic counterparts. Democracy promotion, they are sometimes told, has become “their” — i.e., the Republicans’ — issue.

Capitalize Or Socialize?

Mystery: Will The GOP “Capitalize”?

Doodlehead Obey threatened the GOP and the GOP should jump on this with a vengeance second to none.

FNC

House Appropriations Committee Chairman David R. Obey (D-Wis.) has handed Republican lawmakers a golden (literally) opportunity to end earmarking during the current session of Congress. (In our new book, Outrage, we highlight how abuse of earmarking costs taxpayers $64 billion — three times what it was just a few years ago.)

According to Tuesday’s New York Times, Obey warned Republicans that “he would ban earmarking completely if Republicans attacked individual projects to score political points.” What an opportunity for the GOP!

There we go with the NY Slimes again. What a waste of a facility…