NPR: Proctological Rosetta Stone

James O'Keefe 's video of two NPR executives pandering to perceived patrons from the world's worst ideology exposes with great clarity the outstanding arrogance & hypocrisy of the LefTard elite.  While they pose as the self-confirmed best and brightest, they stink like dead carp shining in the moonlight on a river bank.

    When I had a working idiot box, I watched PBS documentaries and news although I was aware of and disgusted by their bias. I listen to Pipe Dreams and occasionally to various NPR news offerings.  But I do not hesitate to jump onto the bandwagon of demand for the termination of federal funding for public broadcasting.

Thanks and a tip of the hat to Atlas Shrugs!

"The current Republican party is not really the republican party.    It's been hijacked by this group -- that is-- basically they are, they are, they believe in sort of I mean, it's scary. "

"What NPR stood for is non-racist, non - bigoted, straightforward telling of the news.  Our feeling is that if a person expresses his or her opinion which anyone is entitled to do in a free society they are compromised as a journalist, they can no longer fairly report and the question w asked internally was can Juan Williams when he makes a statement like he made can he report to the Muslim population and be believed and the answer is no.  ... lost all credibility and that breaks your basic ethics as a journalist."

    The statement about the Republican party is an opinion; an institutional opinion, represented by a top fund raising outreach executive.  NPR has shed its veil of objectivity & credibility and must be defunded, by its own express standard.

    http://www.congress.org/ gives us the keys to the Republic. Do what I am about to do:  once this is posted, I will go there and send emails to my Representative & Senators, the message will be a link to this post. 

H.Res. 141 Condemns Blasphemy Laws

The recent assassinations of two prominent Pakistani officials has not escaped the notice of Congress. One of my Google Alerts informed me of the existence of a House Resolution recently submitted by Rep. Trent Franks

    The resolution is not limited to the murders, it also covers recent abuses of Pakistan's blasphemy law and the OIC's campaign to impose similar laws internationally through U.N. resolutions.

    As soon as I read this resolution, I visited http://www.congress.org/  and sent an email to my Representative, urging him to sign onto the resolution and vote for it at every opportunity.  At the same time, I sent emails to my Senators urging them to initiate and vote for a parallel resolution in the Senate. 

     I have highlighted what I consider to be the most important provisions of the resolution.  Please read it, and if you agree with me, email your Representative & Senators urging them to vote for this resolution.

    Art is long and time is fleeting. In past years, similar resolutions have been bottled up in committee, long after they could have had any possible good effect. It is expected that the UNHRC will pass another in their series of defamation resolutions this month.  We need to apply sufficient pressure to get this resolution passed before that happens. 

112th CONGRESS  1st SessionH. RES. 141Expressing condolences for the murder of Punjab Governor Salman Taseer  and Pakistan Minister of Minority Affairs Shahbaz Bhatti, and calling    for a Taseer-Bhatti Resolution in the United Nations Human Rights     Council honoring their courage in defense of core principles of  Pakistan's democracy, enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human              Rights, particularly the freedom of religion._______________________________________________________________________                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES                             March 3, 2011Mr. Franks of Arizona (for himself, Mr. Cleaver, Mr. Shuler, Mr. Duncan of South Carolina, Mr. Pitts, Mr. Daniel E. Lungren of California, Mr.      Akin, Mr. Lamborn, and Mr. McGovern) submitted the following    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs_______________________________________________________________________                               RESOLUTION Expressing condolences for the murder of Punjab Governor Salman Taseer  and Pakistan Minister of Minority Affairs Shahbaz Bhatti, and calling    for a Taseer-Bhatti Resolution in the United Nations Human Rights     Council honoring their courage in defense of core principles of  Pakistan's democracy, enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human              Rights, particularly the freedom of religion.Whereas two respected Pakistani officials--Punjab Governor Salman Taseer and         Pakistan Minister of Minority Affairs Shahbaz Bhatti--were both murdered         for their advocacy on behalf of religious freedom for people of all         faiths throughout Pakistan on January 4, 2011, and March 1, 2011,         respectively;Whereas both Taseer and Bhatti were actively opposed to the death sentence         handed down to Asia Bibi in November 2010 for insulting Islam and called         for amendments to the blasphemy laws;Whereas blasphemy laws under section 295(c) of the Pakistan Penal Code carry the         criminal penalties of life imprisonment and the death penalty and have         led to increasing acts of harassment and violence against Pakistani         citizens, thousands of whom have had cases filed against them often on         the basis of false accusations and with little recourse or justice;Whereas according to the United States Commission on International Religious         Freedom, ``Blasphemy laws have been used against members of religious         minorities and dissenters within the majority Muslim community, and         frequently result in imprisonment on account of religion or belief and/        or vigilante violence.'';Whereas more than 30 people have been killed by lynch mobs after being accused         of blasphemy in Pakistan since the law was adopted in 1979 and         perpetrators are seldom brought to justice;Whereas Bhatti decried recent attacks by extremist groups on religious         minorities saying they allowed intolerance and violence to perpetuate         itself;Whereas only days before he was murdered Taseer warned on Twitter: ``I was under         huge pressure 2 cow down b4 rightist pressure on blasphemy, Refused.         Even if I'm the last man standing.'';Whereas the United Nations has repeatedly endorsed blasphemy laws through annual         ``defamation of religions'' or ``vilification of religions'' resolutions         that call for member states to take measures to prevent criticism of         religion;Whereas Pakistan has been the main sponsor of resolutions through the         Organization of Islamic Conference at the United Nations since 1999         which attempt to provide an internationally recognized legal         justification for their existing blasphemy laws;Whereas according to the Department of State's 2010 International Religious         Freedom Report on Pakistan, discriminatory legislation and the         Government's failure or delay in addressing religious hostility by         societal actors fostered religious intolerance, acts of violence, and         intimidation against religious minorities;Whereas specific laws that discriminated against religious minorities included         the anti-Ahmadi provisions of the penal code and the blasphemy laws         which provided the death penalty for defiling Islam or its prophets;Whereas according to the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, ``Blasphemy laws         empower states against their citizens, protect ideas rather than         individuals, and engender violence by condemning peaceful speech. While         proponents of the `defamation of religions' resolution and blasphemy         laws say they are needed to defend the honor of vulnerable religious         believers, in reality they only achieve more violence by creating a         culture of impunity where the state officially sides with extremists.'';         andWhereas recalling that Muhammad Ali Jinnah, founder of the Republic, in an         historic speech before the constituent assembly in 1947 urged citizens         to worship as they choose and stated, ``You may belong to any religion         or caste or creed-that has nothing to do with the business of the         State.'': Now, therefore, be it    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--            (1) calls on the Secretary of State and the United States         Permanent Representative to the United Nations to introduce a         ``Taseer-Bhatti Resolution'' in the United Nations Human Rights         Council advocating the repeal of blasphemy laws and condemning         their adverse effects on freedom of religion and thought and to         continue to work to defeat passage of the annual ``defamation''         resolutions introduced by the Organization of Islamic         Conference; and            (2) calls on the President to initiate a dialogue with the         Government of Pakistan to address the blasphemy laws, including         engaging in a bilateral review of--                    (A) the compatibility of all blasphemy legislation                 with the universally recognized freedom of religion                 with the intent to repeal or amend such incompatible                 legislation;                    (B) the actions against those who make claims of                 blasphemy that have incited violence;                    (C) how the Government of Pakistan protects                 individuals like Taseer and Bhatti and can establish an                 early warning mechanism to protect all citizens from                 calls to violence; and                    (D) the burden of proof used to allow citizens to                 file claims of blasphemy against other citizens and                 whether such claims need to meet a certain threshold of                 evidence before being filed, education provided the                 general public on the rights of religious minorities in                 order to create a climate of religious tolerance.

International Judge the Koran Day: Update

STAND UP AMERICA NOW! claims in a press release that Anjem Choudary has confirmed acceptance of an invitation to serve as defense attorney for the Koran at their International Judge the Koran Day event scheduled for March 20, 2011.

    In view of the no show on the third, I don't expect Choudary to go to Florida to defend the Koran.  In view of his conduct in television and radio interviews, I am sure that he would attack those who question the Koran instead of defending it against their charges.   Anjem Choudary's  participation should greatly enhance the event's media presence and coverage.   

"The Koran is accused of inciting murder, rape and terrorist activities.  It is under suspicion of the direct or indirect murder of millions of people around the world."

    Inciting murder? It incites war, with two chapters entirely devoted to it and several more heavily involved, resulting in an estimated 2.7*10⁸ deaths since 622. In citing rape?  Beyond any doubt.  Seven chapters contain this expression: "right hands possess".  I want you to see how it is used; here is a very clear example.  Muslims are given license to rape captives and slaves.  Sexual exploitation of slaves is not a barrier to admission to Paradise.

23:1. Successful indeed are the believers.

23:2. Those who offer their Salât (prayers) with all solemnity and full submissiveness.

23:3. And those who turn away from Al-Laghw (dirty, false, evil vain talk, falsehood, and all that Allâh has forbidden).

23:4. And those who pay the Zakât .

23:5. And those who guard their chastity (i.e. private parts, from illegal sexual acts)

23:6. Except from their wives or (the captives and slaves) that their right hands possess, for then, they are free from blame;

23:7. But whoever seeks beyond that, then those are the transgressors;

23:8. Those who are faithfully true to their Amanât (all the duties which Allâh has ordained, honesty, moral responsibility and trusts etc.) and to their covenants;

23:9. And those who strictly guard their (five compulsory congregational) Salawât (prayers) (at their fixed stated hours).

23:10. These are indeed the inheritors.

23:11. Who shall inherit the Firdaus (Paradise). They shall dwell therein forever.

    Inciting terrorist activities?  Allah said that he would cast terror and that he cast terror.  He also commanded Muslims to build a mighty army to terrify their enemies.

8:60. Against them make ready your strength to the utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror into (the hearts of) the enemies, of God and your enemies, and others besides, whom ye may not know, but whom God doth know. Whatever ye shall spend in the cause of God, shall be repaid unto you, and ye shall not be treated unjustly.

Shariah4America, But Not Today

Shariah4America, But Not Today

    When I viewed two videos of Stand Up For America's counter demonstration, I discovered that Andy Choudary did not show up in front of the White House. I saw a small group of Christians and about half as many Muslims with one of the latter caterwauling in Arabic.  Now, through the news feed at Facebook, I discovered that the grand demonstration has been postponed indefinitely.

    Choudary blames 'media distortion' of his message for the delay. Then he launches into a long screed, condemning our nation and way of life, offering to substitute a combination of Islam & Socialism as the solution. 

    Choderhead declares that Shari'ah is about "enjoining good" & "forbidding wrong".  Who can argue with that concept?  The problem is  is in the definition of terms.  In their minds, anything that ain't Islam is wrong. 

    A marquee runs along the top of  Shariah4America, with blurbs for three articles. The third article is particularly insulting to the logical mind.

The Islamic Punishment for Paedophiles

Probably one of the most wicked and disturbing acts conceivable to the human mind, paedophilia ranks high on the list of crimes worthy of severe punishment – not so in America, it seems.

Unfortunately, with a US constitution so dogged in the false creed that is freedom, it appears that even paedophilia can find solace in a society that virulently promotes perversion and indecency. Organisations such as NAMBLA (North American Man/Boy Love Association), which seek to legalise this vile act demonstrate clearly the severity of the situation at hand as well as the need America has for a divine solution.

The Islamic constitution or Shari’ah, mete out rules and regulations sourced directly from divine revelation and as such compliment the natural disposition of human beings perfectly; indeed those who have not been polluted by the false traditions and customs of their society will undoubtedly find the Shari’ah very agreeable, and it is because of this very reason that we find Islam is the fastest growing religion on earth.

The Islamic punishment for paedophilia not only eradicates this savage behaviour from society, but also provides a feeling that real justice has been delivered, particularly for close relatives of innocent children cruelly subjected to this criminal act.

So what is the punishment, you may ask? If an individual is found guilty of paedophilia in Islam, then he or she will be impaled on a sharp spike, known in Arabic as the Kashabah, and left until death overcomes them; the Kashabah, is also typically placed on public display as a vivid warning to all those wishing to engage in this loathsome act.

As part of the Shariah4America campaign, we propose that the Washington Monument be used as a fitting mechanism to execute this very just punishment.

So ask yourself, would you rather a paedophile receive free healthcare, accommodation and food in California’s Coalinga Mental Hospital or does the Islamic verdict on the matter sound much more reasonable?

    There is something you need to know; something few others will reveal to you. Because I do not give a damn who is offended, I will reveal it, making the fatal facts of Islam easy for the incredulous reader to verify.   We turn first to Allah's word, with critical phrases highlighted for clarity.  This is the Hilali & Khan translation, which includes parenthetical expressions supplied from tafsir by the translators.

65:4. And those of your women as have passed the age of monthly courses, for them the 'Iddah (prescribed period), if you have doubts (about their periods), is three months, and for those who have no courses [(i.e. they are still immature) their 'Iddah (prescribed period) is three months likewise, except in case of death] . And for those who are pregnant (whether they are divorced or their husbands are dead), their 'Iddah (prescribed period) is until they deliver (their burdens), and whosoever fears Allâh and keeps his duty to Him, He will make his matter easy for him.
^[1] (V.65:1) Narrated ‘Abdullâh bin ‘Umar رضي الله عنهما that he had divorced his wife while she was menstruating during the lifetime of Allâh’s Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم . ‘Umar bin Al-Khattâb رضي الله عنه asked Allâh’s Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم about that. Allâh’s Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم said, "Order him (your son) to take her back and keep her till she is clean from her menses and then to wait till she gets her next period and becomes clean again, whereupon, if he wishes to keep her, he can do so, and if he wishes to divorce her he can divorce her before having sexual intercourse with her; and that is the ‘Iddah (prescribed period) which Allâh has fixed for the women meant to be divorced." (Sahih Al Bukhari, Vol.7, Hadîth No.178).
^[2] (V.65:4) See the Our’ân, Verse 2:234.

Of course, that translation is widely considered to be polemical and non-standard, so lets consult another; that of Aisha Bewley, a convert to Islam.

In the case of those of your wives who are past the age of menstruation, if you have any doubt, their ‘idda should be three months, and that also applies to those who have not yet menstruated. The time for women who are pregnant is when they give birth. Whoever has taqwa of Allah – He will make matters easy for him.   http://islamawakened.com/Quran/65/4/

    Why does Allah make provision for a post divorce waiting period for pre-pubescent girls?   Its Shari'ah, stupid!  What Moe said while speaking for Allah and what he did is the law.  Lets consult the all purpose handbook of Shari'ah: Reliance of the Traveller, Book N (Divorce)

Chapter N9.0: A Woman's Postmarital Waiting Period (`Idda)

(O: Meaning the period in which a woman waits (N: before she may remarry) to verify that she is not pregnant, or out of mourning for her deceased husband.)

(N: If the waiting period finishes after a once-or twice-pronounced divorce, the wife is free to marry another man or to remarry the husband with a new contract-returning to the latter with the number of times left (one or two) needed to enact a threefold, finalized divorce (dis: n7.7); while if the waiting period of a less-than-thrice-pronounced divorce has not yet expired, the husband may take her back (def: n7) without a new contract.)

(n: The husband's obligation to support her during the waiting period is discussed at m11.10 above.)

N9.1

There is no waiting period for a woman divorced before having had sexual intercourse with her husband.

N9.2

A waiting period is obligatory for a woman divorced after intercourse, whether the husband and wife are prepubescent, have reached puberty, or one has and the other has not.

Intercourse means copulation (def: n7.7).  If the husband was alone with her but did not copulate with her, and then divorced her, there is no waiting period.

    Islamic law anticipates the consummation of marriage with pre-pubescent girls!  Is that not pedophilia?  Lets delve a little deeper, this time into Book M (Marriage).

M3.13: Guardians Who May Marry a Virgin to a Man Without Her Consent

Guardians are of two types, those who may compel their female charges to marry someone, and those who may not.

-1- The only guardians who may compel their charge to marry are a virgin bride's father or father's father, compel meaning to marry her to a suitable match (def: m4) without her consent.

-2- Those who may not compel her are not entitled to marry her to someone unless she accepts and gives her permission.

Whenever the bride is a virgin, the father or father's father may marry her to someone without her permission, though it is recommended to ask her permission if she has reached puberty. A virgin's silence is considered as permission.

As for the nonvirgin of sound mind, no one may marry her to another after she has reached puberty without her express permission, no matter whether the guardian is the father, father's father, or someone else.

    A Muslim  can compel his virgin daughter to marry whomever he chooses, but if she has reached puberty, it is recommended to ask her assent!  Let that sink in for a moment. That is an integral part of the Islamic Law Muslims want to impose upon us.

    Who the Hell would marry a pre-pubescent girl?   Who indeed!

Sahih Bukhari volume 7, Book 62, Number 64:

Narrated 'Aisha:

that the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old, and then she remained with him for nine years (i.e., till his death).

That hadith comes from the most authentic of the six canonical collections.  It is mutawir, that is, backed up by other narrations. 

• 7.62.65
• 7.62.88
• Sahih Muslim 8.3309
• 8.3310

    Marrying little girls is sunnah, and they accuse us of pedophilia!  The hypocrisy stinks to high heaven.
.

Hillary's Freudian Slip?

    The first paragraph of this excerpt from Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's address to the opening of the UNHRC should raise some concern. I have highlighted the last two sentences of that paragraph.  It appears that she conceives of the HRC as a country instead of a council.  Even the United Nations is not a nation, a sovereign entity. The footnote does not help.  If she did not intend to expand the HRC or its parent organization into a sovereign entity, then the footnote should have corrected the slip.

    The paragraph begins with the first sign of insanity: assertion of a possibility of improving a failed institution whose majority bloc is fundamentally opposed to the council's mission.  Any sane person would know that there is no possibility that one out of 47 members of the council could move it onto the right track. 

    A few paragraphs later, Hillary launches into a sore subject: the annual ritual of condemning 'defamation of Islam'.  She pretends opposition to the ritual & resolution, but we know from the "Freedom of Belief and Expression" jointly sponsored by the State Department and Egypt, that Obomination actually favors censorship.   The transparently false distinction between 'defamation of Islam' and 'negative stereotyping of Islam' stinks like an open sewer.

    Insults?  Stating the fact that Islam's 52 year old founder married the six year old daughter of his bosom buddy, as recorded in muttawir ahadith, is not an insult, it is a statement of historical fact, as is his consummation of that marriage three years later, when Aisha was nine.

    Stating the fact that Islam declared and is prosecuting perpetual warfare against the rest of the human race is not an insult, it is a statement of fact. Since the Qur'an has been translated into multiple languages and posted on the internet, it is possible for us to read it and discover the truth for ourselves.

    Stating the fact that terrorism is an intrinsic, foundational sacrament of Islam is not an insult, it is a statement of fact.  The six canonical hadith collections, like the Qur'an, have been translated and uploaded so that we can  learn that Moe was made victorious by terror. The fatal facts become clear  when certain Qur'an verses are read in the light of Sahih Bukhari 4.52.220 and 1.7.331.  Those are 3:151, 8:12, 8:57, 8:60, 9:120,  33:26, 59:2 & 59:13. Yet the resolutions complain that "Islam is frequently and wrongly associated with terrorism and human rights violations.".

    So Hillary proposes replacing the resolutions with "concrete steps to fight intolerance".  Would she tolerate vampires if they were real instead of mythological?  But she insists that we tolerate the continued existence and expansion of a piracy cult which has murdered an estimated 270,000,000 people since it began its depredations in 622.

    Why  would any sane person tolerate a piracy cult that asserts a divine mandate to conquer the entire world;  declaring the lives and property of non-believers  not to be sacred?  They declare open season on us and we are supposed to tolerate it.  Someone's  head is so far up her anus that she can  perceive neither objective factual reality nor justice. 

    Respect & tolerance must be reciprocal, but Islam is supremely intolerant.  The Qur'an curses us and calls us the worst of living creatures. Islam can not tolerate criticism or questioning because it is false, woven of stories plagiarized from previous faiths. 

    Islam's Shari'ah law prescribes the death penalty for any negative expression about Allah, Moe and their damned cult. The same draconian rule is imposed on conquered Christians.  This annual attempt to impose their rule on us is part of their program of world conquest. We must elect a President who will jam it up their snouts!

[...] In 2009, the United States joined the Human Rights Council because President Obama and I believed we could make a difference by working with you on the inside rather than standing on the outside merely as a critic. And over the past 18 months, we have worked together. We’ve reached across regional lines in an attempt to overcome what hobbles this country^[i] more than anything else, our divisions as member states. The unity of purpose we have forged with respect to Libya offers us an opportunity to continue that progress.

[...]

For example, in this session we have an opportunity to move beyond a decade-long debate over whether insults to religion should be banned or criminalized. It is time to overcome the false divide that pits religious sensitivities against freedom of expression and pursue a new approach based on concrete steps to fight intolerance wherever it occurs.

[...]

[i] council more than...

Chickens Come Home to Roost!

Listen carefully. Listen closely.  Listen between the words. Understand what the hate monger is saying.  Sign of the Mahdi?  Jesus Christ?? Do you have a clue??  What is he ranting about?  You have no clue unless you have delved into Islamic eschatology.  Open Sunan Abu Dawud: The Promised Deliverer and start reading.

     When you come to Book 37, Number 4310, take a deep breath, slow down, and concentrate on it until you comprehend its full import.  That hadith describes the Islamic version of the return of Jesus Christ. What is the meaning of these expressions?

• fight the people for the cause of Islam
• break the cross
• kill swine
• abolish jizyah
• perish all religions except Islam

What will Jesus do?  Their "Jesus" is a genocidal warlord!  There are many who can not comprehend this fatal fact. For them, I include a telling quote from Tafsir Ibn Kathir.

"In the future, the Jews will support the Dajjal (False Messiah); and the Muslims, along with `Isa, son of Mary, will kill the Jews. This will occur just before the end of this world."

Calypso Louis is promising the extension of the bloodshed in Libya to your neighborhood.  Are you ready for that?  Then go immediately to http://www.congress.org   and send an email to your Representatives & Senators.  Tell them that it is time for the Muslims to go home.  Tell them  we want them expelled and excluded.  Explain exactly why.  If we do not rise up demanding common sense, our descendent's will curse us for our negligence; for consigning them to slavery.  Please don't let that happen.

9:111. Verily, Allâh has purchased of the believers their lives and their properties; for the price that theirs shall be the Paradise. They fight in Allâh's Cause, so they kill (others) and are killed. It is a promise in truth which is binding on Him in the Taurât (Torah) and the Injeel (Gospel) and the Qur'ân. And who is truer to his covenant than Allâh? Then rejoice in the bargain which you have concluded. That is the supreme success .

 

9:123. O you who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are close to you, and let them find harshness in you, and know that Allâh is with those who are the Al-Muttaqûn (the pious - see V.2:2).

 

• http://www.bloggersbase.com/politics-and-opinions/islamic-thinkers-ultimate-oxymoron/
• http://www.bloggersbase.com/politics-and-opinions/shariah-america/

Islamic Thinkers: Ultimate Oxymoron

http://www.islamicthinkers.com/index/index.php is the web site of the sponsor of the March 3 razia on the White House.
This graphic is prominently displayed on that site's landing page. If it does not outrage you, you are dead already, go jump into a hole.  Another graphic on the page shows the black flag of jihad flying over the White House.  It is time for them to go. It is no longer possible to tolerate the presence of Islam and Muslims. 

    They don't think, they let Moe and the god between his legs do their thinking for them. There is no rationality in Islam, only hatred, arrogance, supremacism & avarice.

Sovereignty belongs to the people, under our Declaration of Independence and Constitution; it does not belong to Satan and we will not relinquish it to Satan or his slaves.

These seditious slaves of Satan share something with Shari'ah4America:

• Communism is dead.
• Capitalism is dying.
• Islam is the only solution.
• Democracy is hypocrisy
  • rule by divine law
  • not man made law.

    As an American, I want no part of the bloodshed taking place in the middle east. I want no part of the Islamic theocratic slavery that will follow in its wake.  I disrespectfully demand that these enemies of life and liberty be rounded up and deported immediately.  I intend to send a link to this blog post to my Representative. and Senators. If you are a patriotic, liberty loving American, you will follow suit.  If not, as far as I am concerned, you should go with them.

Shari'ah Against America!!

http://shariah4america.com/ was created Feb. 22, '11. A Whois search reveals the owner's dame as "Abdullah".  The site does not appear to include an "about us" link.  They do have a contact form so that prospective attendees can register for the event.

The site sports some articles which may help you to comprehend the full import of this abominable movement. In case you have not guessed, this is an extension of the bloody revolt inflaming the middle east at the present time.  They want to include America in the bloodbath & aftermath: slavery in an Islamic theocracy.

    I did not find any clear sign that the site is a joke or parody. It bears every evidence of being a sincere attempt to foment Islamic revolution. As such, it is clearly seditious and stands as due and timely notice of the absolute necessity of removing Islam's fifth column from our shores. 

    The time has come to round them up and ship them out.  There is no place in America, the land of Liberty, for Islamic theocracy or its proponents!  They absolutely must not be tolerated any longer.  We have no alternative to disrespectfully demanding the expulsion of all Muslims.  I intend to send a link to this post to my Congressman & Senators.  I urge you to follow suit.

• 

  The Islamic Demolition of the Statue of Liberty

  Written on Saturday, 26 February 2011 22:58

  One of the founding principles of the Islamic constitution is to ensure that all sovereignty and supremacy belongs solely to God; the Shari’ah is a practical manifestation of this sovereignty and supremacy because it seeks to establish His…
• 

  The White Masjid

  Written on Saturday, 26 February 2011 22:25

  Have you ever wondered what America would look like under Shari’ah? The ongoing campaign to bring the US and indeed the entire world under the authority of Islam has compelled sincere Muslims to draw up realistic plans for…
• 

  DEMONSTRATION: OUTSIDE WHITE HOUSE

  Written on Wednesday, 23 February 2011 10:04

  Allah (SWT) says in the Qur’an, the final revelation sent to all of mankind, “He it is who has sent the Messenger (Muhammad) with the Guidance and Deen of Truth, to make it victorious over all other ways…

• Muslims without Shariah are like Fish out of Water

  Written on Wednesday, 23 February 2011 10:02

  Many Muslims do not understand the significance of the Shari’ah in their lives as well as its importance in society. It is probably one of the main reasons why we find ourselves struggling to find a solution to…
• 

  Do NOT Obey the Law of the Land

  Written on Friday, 25 February 2011 13:03

  There is a common misconception among Muslims today, that they are obliged to obey the law of the land in whatever country they reside, many advocates or supporters of this call quote Imaam Abu Hanifah (rh) as evidence,…

        If this does not cause your blood and bladder pressure to rise, you may be dead already.  They want to conceal and destroy the Statue of Liberty. Do you need to know anything more about them? 

"The Statue of Liberty, designed by Frederic Bartholdi, stands on Liberty Island in New York Harbor; representing Libertas, the Roman (false) goddess of Freedom, it is symbolic of the rebellious nature of the US constitution that elevates the command of man over the command of God.

In Islam, the public veneration of idols and statues is strictly prohibited. This has forced sincere Muslims to develop realistic plans that will aid in the removal of the Statue of Liberty.

Due to the scale of the task at hand, it is highly likely that rigorous safety checks will need to be employed before the demolition of the Statue of Liberty can commence; thus as a temporary measure, it is proposed that a large burkha is used to cover the statue, thereby shielding this horrendous eye sore from public view as well as sending a strong message to its French creators."

Pat Condell on Andy Choudary's White House Razia

Pat Condell on Andy Choudary's White House Razia

Pat uges us to let Andy in to spew his venom, in hopes that the populace will recognize evil when they hear it.  I am not so optimistic.  First,  the mainstream media will not give it complete coverage and few would watch it on CSPAN, if they would  broadcast it.  Second, the electorate demonstrated their lack of intelligence and judgment in the last half dozen Presidential elections, nominating and electing dufusses & a traitor.

    The only good reason to give that scum a visa would be to serve as bait, so that the DHS could round up and deport the attendees who support imposition of Shari'ah.  Since Obamination is part of the problem, not part of the solution, that won't happen. 

    Great Britain should send its garbage to Pakistan, we don't want it!

    While Pat makes light of it, Shari'ah is a serious subject.  It defines crimes against the Islamic state and prescribes corporal punishments. Didn't we already try prohibition??

Chapter O16.0: The Penalty for Drinking

O16.1

Any beverage that intoxicates when taken in large quantities is unlawful both in small and large quantities, is unlawful both is small and large quantities.whether it is wine, (A: fermented) raisin drink, or something else.

O16.2

The penalty for drinking is obligatorily enforced against anyone who:

(a) drinks;

(b) has reached puberty;

(c) is sane;

(d) is Muslim;

(e) does so voluntarily;

(f) and knows it is unlawful (A: the restrictions mentioned above (o12.4) about the ignorance of the prohibition of adultery also applying here).

O16.3

The penalty for drinking is to be scourged forty stripes, with hands, sandals, and ends of clothes. It may be administered with a whip, but if the offender dies, an indemnity (def: o4.4) is due (A: from the scourger) for his death. If the caliph (def: o25) increases the penalty to eighty stripes, it is legally valid, but if the offender dies from the increase, the caliph must pay an adjusted indemnity, such that if he is given forty-one stripes and dies, the caliph must pay 1/41 of a full indemnity.

    Shari'ah says women and Christians are worth less than Muslims; yeah, right, thats the ticket.

O4.9

(A: For the rulings below, one multiplies the fraction named by the indemnity appropriate to the death or injury's type of intentionality and other relevant circumstances that determine the amount of a male Muslim's indemnity (def: o4.2-6 and o4.13). )

The indemnity for the death or injury of a woman is one-half the indemnity paid for a man.

The indemnity paid for a Jew or Christian is one-third of the indemnity paid for a Muslim. The indemnity paid of a Zoroastrian is one-fifteenth of that a Muslim.

    If you don't know Shari'ah and you don't care, your brain is encased in your underwear.

Duality

Does anyone remember how Yasser Arafat preached "peace" to the cameras and "One million martyrs marching to Jerusalem!" to his followers in Arabic?  In their evil arrogance, Muslims continue to practice duality, cursing us when they think we are not listening. In this case, their damnable prayer has been translated and posted  so that we can share it. Thanks and a tip of the hat to Bare Naked Islam!

    These vermin are praying four our death; for our families to be widowed, orphaned and enslaved.  They should be shipped home and the ship sunk in mid ocean.  Wake up! Wise up!! Rise up!!! Diselect the cretins & traitors who allow this plague to infest Christendom.

"Our lord! Punish us not if we forget or fall into error, our Lord! Lay not on us a burden like thatwhich You did lay on those before us; our Lord! Put not on us a burden greater than we have strengh to bear. Pardon us and grant us forgiveness. Have mercy on us. You are our Maula and give us victory over the disbelieving people." (2:286)

" Our Lord! Forgive us our sins and our transgressions (in keeping our duties to You), establish  our feet firmly, and give us victory over the disbelieving folk." (3:147)     http://www.islamic-world.net/children/daily_read/dua.htm

    Those are voluntary prayers, recited in addition to the compulsory prayers for extra credit.  Their origin is the Qur'an.

O Allah! destroy the Kuffar army.

O Allah! Make the ground shake in an earthquake from under them.

O Allah, they do not glorify you, show them the blackest day of their lives, as you showed the People of Aad and Thamud.

O Allah, destroy them all, not leaving anyone to escape.

O Allah make their wives widows, their children orphans.

O Allah! Grant victory to our brothers and sisters everywhere in the world, Yaa Allah!

O Allah! Have mercy on their widowed women and their orphaned children!

O Allah! Whoever died from them, enter them into Jannat Al-Firdows with your Mercy!

O Allah! Forgive us, forgive us, forgive us, for doing nothing but watch.

Ameen  http://forum.urduworld.com/f50/feelings-44936/index2.html

    If you love life, if you love liberty and you have knowledge of this and do not rise up demanding the expulsion and exclusion of Islam and its votaries  from Western Civilization, then you have a mental or moral defect of unimaginable proportions; worse than single suicide, you are taking the rest of us with you.

Geert Wilders: BBC Hit Piece

http://barenakedislam.wordpress.com/2011/02/18/bbc-tribute-to-geert-wilders-e...

Geert Wilders: Europe's Most Dangerous Man?  Was published in four parts by the BBC.  I became aware of it through the good offices of
Bare Naked Islam.  BNI and most of her commentators seem to be convinced that the series of videos will backfire by yielding increased support for Wilders.  I am afraid that the positive outcome depends on viewers either having background information before viewing or seeking it afterward.

    Here are a few of the unsubstantiated code words that fly in the videos:

• far right
•  fear
•  extreme
•  incitement to hatred
•  new right ideology
•  fitna selects passages
•  viscious Islamophobia

    For those who seek it, the background information can be found here: Geert Wilders On Trial.

Piracy: A Token of Islamic Arrogance

The Somalian capture of the QUEST followed by the murder of its crew and passengers has been in the news but has it been properly analyzed and answered?   This CBS News article has some interesting quotes.

    `A pirate had this to say about killing hostages:   "now become part of our rules," Murder is one of their objectives, a higher priority than collecting ransom.

"From now on, anyone who tries to rescue the hostages in our hands will only collect dead bodies," he said. "It will never ever happen that hostages are rescued and we are hauled to prison."

    After the recent conviction of one pirate, they said this:

"If they still want a solution and safety for their citizens in the oceans, let them release our men they arrested."

    Those two obnoxious statements stand alone as light posts to guide the policy of a proud and powerful nation which the U.S.A. once was.  Consider these elements:

• rescue yields corpses
• impunity
• release of convicts.

    At one time, we had a half assed President, who swore we would never negotiate with terrorists. Of course, he violated that oath, with horrific consequences.  His successors in office failed to learn from his experience. At the time of the murders, two pirates were aboard our naval vessel to negotiate ransom payment. 

    Rational citizens can only curse and condemn any and every attempt to negotiate with hostage takers.  Rewarding evil invites more evil.  Piracy can not be stopped by escalating rewards, it can only be stopped by an ocean of pirate's blood. 

    After decades of beeding our treasury with tribute payments, President Jefferson finally wised up and sent the Marines to Tripoli so that piracy was reduced for a season.  Now, because of the profligate insanity of his successors in office, piracy is resurgent. 

    There is something you need to know about those pirates, something nobody else will tell you.  I will tell you because I don't give a damn who I offend.
After the death of Caliph Abu Bakr, Caliph Umar sent the Muslim army "to the great countries to fight the pagans".  When they met the Persians, they asked who they were. Their answer speaks volumes; nobody is listening. [Sahih Bukhari 4.53.386]

Our Prophet, the Messenger of our Lord, has ordered us to fight you till you worship Allah Alone or give Jizya (i.e. tribute)¹; and our Prophet has informed us that our Lord says:-- "Whoever amongst us is killed (i.e. martyred), shall go to Paradise to lead such a luxurious life as he has never seen^2,3, and whoever amongst us remain alive, shall become your master."

   
    More than 1000 years later, T. Jefferson & J.Q. Adams  asked an Ambassador from Tripoli by what right they attacked our shipping. His answer is obviously based on the same source as the Muslim general's.

"The ambassador answered us that [the right] was founded on the Laws of the Prophet (Mohammed), that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have answered their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and that every Mussulman (or Muslim) who should be slain in battle was sure to go to heaven." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Barbary_War

   

    Jefferson subsequently took the first step toward solving the problem, but left it there, and his successors ignored it.  Now we are back in the same old trap because nobody learned from history. 

    There is a group of people who believe that they have a divine commission to conquer the world; that they will be richly rewarded if they pursue the mission and condemned to the fire if they shirk it.  Why do they believe that? 

9:38. O you who believe! What is the matter with you, that when you are asked to march forth in the Cause of Allâh (i.e. Jihâd) you cling heavily to the earth? Are you pleased with the life of this world rather than the Hereafter? But little is the enjoyment of the life of this world as compared with the Hereafter.

9:39. If you march not forth, He will punish you with a painful torment and will replace you by another people, and you cannot harm Him at all, and Allâh is Able to do all things.

61:10. O You who believe! Shall I guide you to a commerce that will save you from a painful torment.

61:11.  That you believe in Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad), and that you strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allâh with your wealth and your lives, that will be better for you, if you but know!

61:12. (If you do so) He will forgive you your sins, and admit you into Gardens under which rivers flow, and pleasant dwelling in Gardens of 'Adn ­ Eternity ['Adn (Edn) Paradise], that is indeed the great success.

    If you want to make international waters safe for recreational sailing and commercial shipping, then you must either destroy the faith of the Muslims or usher them into Hell.  There are no other solutions.  Which will it be?  Will you show them that Allah is an impotent idol whose promises & threats are vain
or will you nuke them?   Nuking them is probably the most efficient way to destroy their faith. 

    Nobody in power, particularly not the Muslim occupying the White House, is willing to nuke Somalia.   Mark Levin suggesting anchoring a battleship off the coast and shelling the pirate's bases of operation to smithereens.  That is a great idea, but our battleships were decommissioned.   So lets make a good start: drop a Daisy Cutter on each and every one of those coastal villages.

    Announce to the world that anyone who objects can have a taste of the same treatment. Tell them that Islam is going back to Hell, with or without their consent. 

    When pirates are captured, slit their throats and throw them overboard to feed the sharks. They do not deserve trials; they are not entitled to the rights, privileges & immunities of U.S. citizens.  While in captivity, they are bait, an inducement to take more hostages.  Send them to Hell and be done with them.

    When ships are captured, the crews and passengers are dead already, according to the latest pronouncements.  Hold their funerals, pay off on their insurance policies and sink those vessels in place.  Then obliterate another Somalian village or two.

    The only way such common sense policies will be enacted is if we rise up as one disrespectfully demanding them with  a loud voice.  Copy this blog post, paste it into an email or fax and send it to your Congressmen & Senators.  Tell them that their re-election depends on their signatures and votes on Congressional resolutions calling for the death of pirates, sinking of vessels and obliteration of pirate nests.  If not us, who? If not now, when?? 

White House Shari'ah Rally: What Do They Want?

I learned from a Daily Mail article that three infamous British Muslims have been asked to address a pro Shari'ah rally at the White House March 3, 2011. The event is sponsored by the International Institute of Islamic Thought.   If we had rational and patriotic leaders in power, Anjem Choudary, Abu Izzadeen and Sayful Islam would be denied visas.

    The theme of the rally is supposed to be exhortation to rise up and impose Shari'ah on America. Literally the "path to life giving waters", Shari'ah is a codification of the laws laid down in the Qur'an & hadith. 

    The Sunnis comprise the majority of Muslims and the Shafi'ite school of jurisprudence is the most widely accepted of the Sunni schools. Its handbook of fiqh is Reliance of the Traveller and Guide to the Faithful.

    I have included images from a pdf file scanned from Reliance of the Traveller. Click them to view full sized images. Lest you doubt the authenticity of the text, I included two certifications of authenticity, from al-Azhar & IIIT. 

    Reliance is divided into topical books. Book o treats of "Justice"; chapter 9 treats the law of jihad, beginning with a definition:

09.0 JIHAD
(0: Jihad means to war against non-Muslims,
and is etymologically derived from the word
mujahada, signifying warfare to establish the
religion.[...]

The text cites several verses of the Qur'an and hadith to back that up.  o9.1 discusses the communal obligation of waging war against infidels, which is "meaning upon the Muslims each year"  Islamic law requires a minimum of one military expedition against infidels in every year. 

    O9.8 reveals the practical application of that communal obligation.

o9.8 Thc caliph (025) makes war upon Jews,
Christians, and Zoroastrians (N: provided he has
first invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice,
and if they will not, then invited them to
enter the social order of Islam by paying the nonMuslim
poll tax (jizya, def: 01 L4)-which is the
significance of their paying it, not the money
itself-while remaining in their ancestral religions)
(0: and the war continues) until they
become Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll
tax (0: in accordance with the word of Allah Most
High,...

The text continues with the scriptural basis of the ruling, which is 9:29.  Note the similarity of expression used by J.M. Rodwell.

Make war upon such of those to whom the Scriptures have been given as believe not in God, or in the last day, and who forbid not that which God and His Apostle have forbidden, and who profess not the profession of the truth, until they pay tribute out of hand, and they be humbled.

    O9.9 follows up with warfare against pagans.

09.9 The caliph fights all other peoples until
they become Muslim (0: because they are not a
people with a Book, nor honored as such, and are
not permited to settle with paying the poll tax...

Imam Faisal Abdul Rauf and other advocates of Shari'ah won't tell you about those provisions, why not? 

    There are important considerations other than violence. The concept of equality is one of them.  Consider what chapter 24 says about testimony.

024.2 Legal testimony is only acceptable from a
witness who:
(a) is free;
(b) is fully legally responsible (mukallaf, def:
c8.1) (0: as testimony is not accepted from a child
or insane person, even when the child's testimony
regards injuries among ehildren that oeeurred at
play);
(e) is able to speak;
(d) is mentally awake;
(e) is religious (0: meaning upright (024.4)
(A: and Muslim), for Allah Most High says,
"Let those of rectitude among you testify"
(Koran 65:2),
and unbelief is the vilest form of corruption, as
goes without saying);

If you ain't Muslim, you can't be a witness!  Let that sink in for a moment. Read it again.  What do you think about Shari'ah now?  The testimony of a man is worth that of two women.

024.7 The testimony of the following is legally
acceptable when it concerns cases involving property,
or transactions dealing with property, such
as sales:
(1) two men;
(2) two women and a man;
(3) or a male witness together with the oath
of the plaintiff.

Why is the feminist movement silent about this?

    In England and some American states, there is pressure for application of Shari'ah to domestic matters; family disputes.  The laws concerning marriage are laid out in book m.  I will raise one quote from that book, containing a concept which will cause any rational and compassionate person to reject Shari'ah.

GUARDIANS WHO MAY MARRY A VIRGIN
TO A MAN WITHOUT HER CONSENT
m3.13 Guardians are of two types, those who
may compel their female charges to marry someone,
and those who may not.
(1) The only guardians who may compel
their charge to marry are a virgin bride's father or
father's father, compel meaning to marry her to a
suitable match (def: m4) without her consent.
(2) Those who may not compel her are not
entitled to marry her to someone unless she
accepts and gives her permission.
Whenever the bride is a virgin, the father or
father's father may marry her to someone without
her permission, though it is recommended to ask
her permission if she has reached puberty. A virgin's
silence is considered as permission.
As for the nonvirgin of sound mind, no one
may marry her to another after she has reached
puberty without her express permission, no matter
whether the guardian is the father, father's
father, or someone else.

Let that sink in for a moment.  Read it again. Do you want Shari'ah to be applied here?  Why/why not??

    Divorce is one of the more important family law matters. Under Shari'ah, a husband need only declare divorce three times to give it legal effect.

n1.3 The person conducting the divorce may
effect it himself or commission another (def:
k17.5-6) to do so, even if the person commissioned
is a woman.
The person commissioned may effect the
divorce at any time (0: provided the one who
commissions him does not cancel the commission
before the divorce takes place (dis: k17.16»,
though when a husband tells his wife. "Divorce
yourself," then if she immediately says, "I divorce
myself," she is divorced, but if she delays, she is
not divorced unless the husband has said, "Divorce
yourself whenever you wish."

n2.1 A free man has three pronouncements of
divorce (0: because of the word of Allah Most
High,
"Divorce is two times, then retain with kindness
or graciously release" (Koran 2:229),
and when the Prophet (Allah bless him and give
him peace) was asked about the third time, he
said,
"It is Allah's having said, 'or graciously
release' ").

    I have furnished links to the pdf file containing Reliance. The images below are screen shots taken from that file. Click them to view full sized images. You don't need to take my word for the facts, I make it easy for you to verify what I write. 

Certificate of authenticity from IIIT	Certificate of authenticity from al-Azhar University
o9.0 Defines jihad.	o9.1 Describes the obligation of annual attacks on disbelievers.
o9.8 "The caliph makes war on Jews, Christians...	o9.9 ...fights all other peoples...
Christians can't testify in court.	Woman's witness: half weight.
Further details on testimony.	A father may force his pre-pubescent daughter to wed.
Book N: Divorce: contents	Book N: Divorce: contents
N2.2 Divorce

    Reliance is not the only handbook of Islamic law, though it is the most popular. Others are generally less detailed in some matters. Al-Hedaya is not as easy to read but it explains the differences between Shafi'ite and Hanifi fiqh. 

    For the Maliki fiqh on jihad, turn to chapter 30 of Risala, which offers less detail than Reliance.  The Hanifi fiqh of jihad is in  al-Hedaya, Vol. II, Book IX, Chapter 1.

    The fiqh of wudu & prayer tends to be arcane, nonsensical and harmless to us. But the Islamic law regarding war is totally unacceptable, as is the inequality of women and religious minorities.  The concepts of arbitrary divorce & forced marriage are so repugnant as to compel vigorous objection to imposition of Shari'ah. 

    Let us therefore rise up as one with a loud voice shouting HELL NO!!! to those who demand imposition of Islamic law.  Let us support the state legislation designed to ban it and make demands for national legislation to prevent the imposition of Shari'ah in the federal courts.