Morons Ignore Islam's Sworn Enmity at Our Peril

"Islam is not my enemy!"

A Reuters story about the protest against Rep. King's hearings into "radicalization" is illustrated by a photograph featuring a sign with this moronic message.

"Who would Jesus persecute? Islam is not my enemy!"

The only people Jesus persecuted were money changers whom he perceived to be corrupt.  Muhammad persecuted anyone who did not embrace his new cult. If you are not Muslim, Islam is your enemy. Consider the obvious meaning of J.M. Rodwell's translation of At-Taubah 29

Make war upon such of those to whom the Scriptures have been given as believe not in God, or in the last day, and who forbid not that which God and His Apostle have forbidden, and who profess not the profession of the truth, until they pay tribute out of hand, and they be humbled.

Does that or does that not mean exactly what it says?  Lets consult Tafsir Ibn Kathir. The Order to fight People of the Scriptures until They give the Jizyah

[...] This honorable Ayah was revealed with the order to fight the People of the Book, after the pagans were defeated, the people entered Allah's religion in large numbers, and the Arabian Peninsula was secured under the Muslims' control. Allah commanded His Messenger to fight the People of the Scriptures, Jews and Christians, on the ninth year of Hijrah, and he prepared his army to fight the Romans and called the people to Jihad announcing his intent and destination.[...]

Did Moe confirm that, or is it an unauthorized rogue interpretation?

Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:
Narrated Anas bin Malik:
Allah's Apostle said, "I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.' And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah." Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, "O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?" He replied, "Whoever says, 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah', faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have."

Is that commandment an anachronism, limited in application to seventh century Arabia?  Lets consult the all purpose handbook of Shari'ah: Reliance of the Traveller.

O9.8: The Objectives of Jihad

The caliph (o25) makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians (N: provided he has first invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice, and if they will not, then invited them to enter the social order of Islam by paying the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya, def: o11.4) -which is the significance of their paying it, not the money itself-while remaining in their ancestral religions) (O: and the war continues) until they become Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll tax (O: in accordance with the word of Allah Most High,

"Fight those who do not believe in Allah and the Last Day and who forbid not what Allah and His messenger have forbidden-who do not practice the religion of truth, being of those who have been given the Book-until they pay the poll tax out of hand and are humbled" (Koran 9.29),

the time and place for which is before the final descent of Jesus (upon whom be peace).  After his final coming, nothing but Islam will be accepted from them, for taking the poll tax is only effective until Jesus' descent (upon him and our Prophet be peace), which is the divinely revealed law of Muhammad. The coming of Jesus does not entail a separate divinely revealed law, for he will rule by the law of Muhammad. As for the Prophet's saying (Allah bless him and give him peace),

"I am the last, there will be no prophet after me,"

this does not contradict the final coming of Jesus (upon whom be peace), since he will not rule according to the Evangel, but as a follower of our Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) ).

How do we know that is still applicable? Another hadith holds the answer for those who are intelligent enough to learn.

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 14, Number 2526:

    Narrated Anas ibn Malik:

    The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: Three things are the roots of faith: to refrain from (killing) a person who utters, "There is no god but Allah" and not to declare him unbeliever whatever sin he commits, and not to excommunicate him from Islam for his any action; and jihad will be performed continuously since the day Allah sent me as a prophet until the day the last member of my community will fight with the Dajjal (Antichrist). The tyranny of any tyrant and the justice of any just (ruler) will not invalidate it. One must have faith in Divine decree.

'Tain't over 'till the last Muslim is dead.  Is it clear to you yet? 

    Morons object, declaring that most Muslims reject the jihad doctrine.  If they do, they are not believers, they are hypocrites.

2:10. In their hearts is a disease (of doubt and hypocrisy) and Allâh has increased their disease. A painful torment is theirs because they used to tell lies.

2:11. And when it is said to them: "Make not mischief on the earth," they say: "We are only peacemakers."

3:156. O you who believe! Be not like those who disbelieve (hypocrites) and who say to their brethren when they travel through the earth or go out to fight: "If they had stayed with us, they would not have died or been killed," so that Allâh may make it a cause of regret in their hearts. It is Allâh that gives life and causes death. And Allâh is All­Seer of what you do.

    Morons object, declaring that most Muslims reject the violent surahs. That does not cut the mustard, because Islam is not cafeteria Catholicism, it is all or nothing, a package deal.

2:85. After this, it is you who kill one another and drive out a party of you from their homes, assist (their enemies) against them, in sin and transgression. And if they come to you as captives, you ransom them, although their expulsion was forbidden to you. Then do you believe in a part of the Scripture and reject the rest? Then what is the recompense of those who do so among you, except disgrace in the life of this world, and on the Day of Resurrection they shall be consigned to the most grievous torment. And Allâh is not unaware of what you do.

13:36. Those to whom We have given the Book (such as 'Abdullâh bin Salâm and other Jews who embraced Islâm), rejoice at what has been revealed unto you (i.e. the Qur'ân) , but there are among the Confederates (from the Jews and pagans) those who reject a part thereof. Say (O Muhammad ): "I am commanded only to worship Allâh (Alone) and not to join partners with Him. To Him (Alone) I call and to Him is my return."

13:37. And thus have We sent it (the Qur'ân) down to be a judgement of authority in Arabic. Were you (O Muhammad ) to follow their (vain) desires after the knowledge which has come to you, then you will not have any Walî (protector) or defender against Allâh.

    Morons object, declaring that "most Muslims are not violent".  The Morons do not comprehend the Islamic concept of religious obligation.  Fard ayn is binding on all Muslims individually such as salat & zakat.  Fard kifaya is a communal obligation, binding on he entire Muslim community until a sufficient number have responded, which relieves the rest. 

    The obligation to mount a military expedition against kuffar in every year is fard kifaya. Jihad only becomes fard ayn when Dar ul Islam is invaded and the Muslims are in danger of being overrun.

O9.1: The Obligatory Character of Jihad

Jihad is a communal obligation (def: c3.2).  When enough people perform it to successfully accomplish it, it is no longer obligatory upon others (O: the evidence for which is the Prophet's saying (Allah bless him and give him peace),

"He who provides the equipment for a soldier in jihad has himself performed jihad,"

and Allah Most High having said:

"Those of the believers who are unhurt but sit behind are not equal to those who fight in Allah's path with their property and lives. Allah has preferred those who fight with their property and lives a whole degree above those who sit behind. And to each, Allah has promised great good" (Koran 4:95).

If none of those concerned perform jihad, and it does not happen at all, then everyone who is aware that it is obligatory is guilty of sin, if there was a possibility of having performed it. In the time of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) jihad was a communal obligation after his emigration (hijra) to Medina. As for subsequent times, there are two possible states in respect to non-Muslims.

The first is when they are in their own countries, in which case jihad (def: o9.8) is a communal obligation, and this is what our author is speaking of when he says, "Jihad is a communal obligation," meaning upon the Muslims each year.

The second state is when non-Muslims invade a Muslim country or near to one, in which case jihad is personally obligatory (def: c3.2) upon the inhabitants of that country, who must repel the non-Muslims with whatever they can).

    Morons object, swearing that they have Muslim friends, who are the best of neighbors, kind and gentle, like family. Those Morons are truly ignorant and deceived.

5:51. O you who believe! Take not the Jews and the Christians as Auliyâ' (friends, protectors, helpers, etc.), they are but Auliyâ' to one another. And if any amongst you takes them as Auliyâ', then surely he is one of them. Verily, Allâh guides not those people who are the Zâlimûn (polytheists and wrong­doers and unjust).

Tafsir Ibn Kathir has another clue for you.

[...]Allah said next,

﴿إِلاَ أَن تَتَّقُواْ مِنْهُمْ تُقَـةً﴾

(unless you indeed fear a danger from them) meaning, except those believers who in some areas or times fear for their safety from the disbelievers. In this case, such believers are allowed to show friendship to the disbelievers outwardly, but never inwardly. For instance, Al-Bukhari recorded that Abu Ad-Darda' said, "We smile in the face of some people although our hearts curse them.'' Al-Bukhari said that Al-Hasan said, "The Tuqyah is allowed until the Day of Resurrection.''[...] The Prohibition of Supporting the Disbelievers 

    If Islam is not your enemy, then you are one of them,  the enemy of all free men not yet enslaved to Satan.  The protest is an exemplar of playing the victim card.  Islam,. the predator, is purveying itself as the victim of persecution. 

    The investigation is not about Islam, no Congressman has the courage delve deeply into the damnable doctrines & practices of the war cult.  It is about "radicalization" and whether the Muslim community, its organizations and leaders are cooperating in the campaign against terrorism. 

    In fact, "radicalization" is another lie; a misrepresentation of Islam.  Because Islam wears the false mantle of religion, it is assumed to be anodyne & beneficent.  The assumption makes asses of us.  Islam is a complete way of life, encompassing economics, law and war as well as 'religion' which serves as a camouflage and troop motivator. 

    Commands to wage war against disbelievers are contained in Islam's scripture, I showed you one of them along with its codification in Islamic law. Surah At-Taubah 111 exposes the relationship between Allah and the believers: they are his slaves, purchased to fight in his cause, killing and being killed.  Allah's cause is to make Islam dominate; rule the world.

9:111. Verily, Allâh has purchased of the believers their lives and their properties; for the price that theirs shall be the Paradise. They fight in Allâh's Cause, so they kill (others) and are killed. It is a promise in truth which is binding on Him in the Taurât (Torah) and the Injeel (Gospel) and the Qur'ân. And who is truer to his covenant than Allâh? Then rejoice in the bargain which you have concluded. That is the supreme success .

9:33. It is He Who has sent His Messenger (Muhammad) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islâm), to make it superior over all religions even though the Mushrikûn (polytheists, pagans, idolaters, disbelievers in the Oneness of Allâh) hate (it).

Sahih Bukhari  Volume 4, Book 52, Number 65:

Narrated Abu Musa:

A man came to the Prophet and asked, "A man fights for war booty; another fights for fame and a third fights for showing off; which of them fights in Allah's Cause?" The Prophet said, "He who fights that Allah's Word (i.e. Islam) should be superior, fights in Allah's Cause."

    The factor that makes Muslims dangerous is belief, the test of which is hinted at in 9:111 and confirmed in 49:15.

49:15. Only those are the believers who have believed in Allah and His Messenger, and afterward doubt not but strive with their wealth and their lives for the Cause of Allah. Those! They are the truthful.

    Believers kill; its what Islam is; what Muslims do because they believe in Allah's threat and his promise.  If you believed that your eternal destiny depended on participation in jihad: the celestial bordello if you go to war and the fire if you don't, which would you choose? 

9:38. O you who believe! What is the matter with you, that when you are asked to march forth in the Cause of Allâh (i.e. Jihâd) you cling heavily to the earth? Are you pleased with the life of this world rather than the Hereafter? But little is the enjoyment of the life of this world as compared with the Hereafter.

9:39. If you march not forth, He will punish you with a painful torment and will replace you by another people, and you cannot harm Him at all, and Allâh is Able to do all things.

61:10. O You who believe! Shall I guide you to a commerce that will save you from a painful torment.

61:11.  That you believe in Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad ), and that you strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allâh with your wealth and your lives, that will be better for you, if you but know!

61:12. (If you do so) He will forgive you your sins, and admit you into Gardens under which rivers flow, and pleasant dwelling in Gardens of 'Adn ­ Eternity ['Adn (Edn) Paradise], that is indeed the great success.

    The arrogant, condescending Morons who pretend to possess moral superiority over "Islamophobes" who "persecute" Muslims and "defame" Islam, cast those who understand Islam as "racists" & "bigots".  In fact, they are the close minded bigots, who march in solidarity with the predators; identifying with them. The same Morons would have herded Jews into the "showers" for the Nazis in an earlier generation.

Terrorism is an Intrinsic Sacrament of Islam

A U.N. document entitled "Draft Decision on a panel on human rights of victims of terrorism" contains an egregiously obnoxious lie, which is derived from standard boilerplate from the "combating defamation of Islam" resolutions.

Reaffirming  that terrorism cannot and should not be associated with any religion, nationality, civilization
or othnic group. (PP11 GA RES 62/ 169)

Is there some factual basis for asserting that terrorism cannot be associated with Islam?  Is there some factual basis for asserting that terrorism should not be associated with Islam?    I challenge anyone to post a comment containing whatever relevant, verifiable evidence they may have to prove those  most obnoxious assertions.

    Terrorism is associated with Islam for good reasons.

• The attacks on
  • Bali
  • Beslan
  • London
  • Madrid
  • New York
    • were perpetrated by Muslims, in Allah's name.
• Allah said that he would cast terror.
• Allah ordered Muslims to build a powerful army to "strike terror".
• Allah "cast terror" so that the Muslims captured and killed their intended victims, plundering their wealth.
• Moe bragged about being "made victorious" by terror. 

    The fact is clear on the face of  Islam's canonical texts.

3:151. We shall cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve, because they joined others in worship with Allâh, for which He had sent no authority; their abode will be the Fire and how evil is the abode of the Zâlimûn (polytheists and wrong­doers).
8:12. (Remember) when your Lord inspired the angels, "Verily, I am with you, so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes."

8:57. If thou comest on them in the war, deal with them so as to strike fear in those who are behind them, that haply they may remember.

8:60. Against them make ready your strength to the utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror into (the hearts of) the enemies, of God and your enemies, and others besides, whom ye may not know, but whom God doth know. Whatever ye shall spend in the cause of God, shall be repaid unto you, and ye shall not be treated unjustly.

33:26. And those of the people of the Scripture who backed them (the disbelievers) Allâh brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives.

33:27. And He caused you to inherit their lands, and their houses, and their riches, and a land which you had not trodden (before). And Allâh is Able to do all things.

59:2. He it is Who drove out the disbelievers among the people of the Scripture (i.e. the Jews of the tribe of Banî An-Nadîr) from their homes at the first gathering. You did not think that they would get out. And they thought that their fortresses would defend them from Allâh! But Allâh's (Torment) reached them from a place whereof they expected it not, and He cast terror into their hearts, so that they destroyed their own dwellings with their own hands and the hands of the believers. Then take admonition, O you with eyes (to see).

59:13. Verily ye [are] stronger [than they], by reason of the terror [cast] into their breasts from God. This, because they [are] not people of prudence.

  Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 7, Number 331:
Narrated Jabir bin 'Abdullah:
The Prophet said, "I have been given five things which were not given to any one else before me.
1. Allah made me victorious by awe, (by His frightening my enemies) for a distance of one month's journey.
2. The earth has been made for me (and for my followers) a place for praying and a thing to perform Tayammum, therefore anyone of my followers can pray wherever the time of a prayer is due.
3. The booty has been made Halal (lawful) for me yet it was not lawful for anyone else before me.
4. I have been given the right of intercession (on the Day of Resurrection).
5. Every Prophet used to be sent to his nation only but I have been sent to all mankind.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220:
 Narrated Abu Huraira:

    Allah's Apostle said, "I have been sent with the shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy), and while I was sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand." Abu Huraira added: Allah's Apostle has left the world and now you, people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did not benefit by them).

    The association is clear, direct and unmistakable; it is not susceptible to misinterpretation.  Why do the curse worthy fools of the U.N.  continue to reaffirm an easily refuted lie?  They are convinced that we are stupid, ignorant, gullible fools who will believe any lie if it is repeated with sufficient frequency and 'authority'.

NPR: Proctological Rosetta Stone

James O'Keefe 's video of two NPR executives pandering to perceived patrons from the world's worst ideology exposes with great clarity the outstanding arrogance & hypocrisy of the LefTard elite.  While they pose as the self-confirmed best and brightest, they stink like dead carp shining in the moonlight on a river bank.

    When I had a working idiot box, I watched PBS documentaries and news although I was aware of and disgusted by their bias. I listen to Pipe Dreams and occasionally to various NPR news offerings.  But I do not hesitate to jump onto the bandwagon of demand for the termination of federal funding for public broadcasting.

Thanks and a tip of the hat to Atlas Shrugs!

"The current Republican party is not really the republican party.    It's been hijacked by this group -- that is-- basically they are, they are, they believe in sort of I mean, it's scary. "

"What NPR stood for is non-racist, non - bigoted, straightforward telling of the news.  Our feeling is that if a person expresses his or her opinion which anyone is entitled to do in a free society they are compromised as a journalist, they can no longer fairly report and the question w asked internally was can Juan Williams when he makes a statement like he made can he report to the Muslim population and be believed and the answer is no.  ... lost all credibility and that breaks your basic ethics as a journalist."

    The statement about the Republican party is an opinion; an institutional opinion, represented by a top fund raising outreach executive.  NPR has shed its veil of objectivity & credibility and must be defunded, by its own express standard.

    http://www.congress.org/ gives us the keys to the Republic. Do what I am about to do:  once this is posted, I will go there and send emails to my Representative & Senators, the message will be a link to this post. 

H.Res. 141 Condemns Blasphemy Laws

The recent assassinations of two prominent Pakistani officials has not escaped the notice of Congress. One of my Google Alerts informed me of the existence of a House Resolution recently submitted by Rep. Trent Franks

    The resolution is not limited to the murders, it also covers recent abuses of Pakistan's blasphemy law and the OIC's campaign to impose similar laws internationally through U.N. resolutions.

    As soon as I read this resolution, I visited http://www.congress.org/  and sent an email to my Representative, urging him to sign onto the resolution and vote for it at every opportunity.  At the same time, I sent emails to my Senators urging them to initiate and vote for a parallel resolution in the Senate. 

     I have highlighted what I consider to be the most important provisions of the resolution.  Please read it, and if you agree with me, email your Representative & Senators urging them to vote for this resolution.

    Art is long and time is fleeting. In past years, similar resolutions have been bottled up in committee, long after they could have had any possible good effect. It is expected that the UNHRC will pass another in their series of defamation resolutions this month.  We need to apply sufficient pressure to get this resolution passed before that happens. 

112th CONGRESS  1st SessionH. RES. 141Expressing condolences for the murder of Punjab Governor Salman Taseer  and Pakistan Minister of Minority Affairs Shahbaz Bhatti, and calling    for a Taseer-Bhatti Resolution in the United Nations Human Rights     Council honoring their courage in defense of core principles of  Pakistan's democracy, enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human              Rights, particularly the freedom of religion._______________________________________________________________________                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES                             March 3, 2011Mr. Franks of Arizona (for himself, Mr. Cleaver, Mr. Shuler, Mr. Duncan of South Carolina, Mr. Pitts, Mr. Daniel E. Lungren of California, Mr.      Akin, Mr. Lamborn, and Mr. McGovern) submitted the following    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs_______________________________________________________________________                               RESOLUTION Expressing condolences for the murder of Punjab Governor Salman Taseer  and Pakistan Minister of Minority Affairs Shahbaz Bhatti, and calling    for a Taseer-Bhatti Resolution in the United Nations Human Rights     Council honoring their courage in defense of core principles of  Pakistan's democracy, enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human              Rights, particularly the freedom of religion.Whereas two respected Pakistani officials--Punjab Governor Salman Taseer and         Pakistan Minister of Minority Affairs Shahbaz Bhatti--were both murdered         for their advocacy on behalf of religious freedom for people of all         faiths throughout Pakistan on January 4, 2011, and March 1, 2011,         respectively;Whereas both Taseer and Bhatti were actively opposed to the death sentence         handed down to Asia Bibi in November 2010 for insulting Islam and called         for amendments to the blasphemy laws;Whereas blasphemy laws under section 295(c) of the Pakistan Penal Code carry the         criminal penalties of life imprisonment and the death penalty and have         led to increasing acts of harassment and violence against Pakistani         citizens, thousands of whom have had cases filed against them often on         the basis of false accusations and with little recourse or justice;Whereas according to the United States Commission on International Religious         Freedom, ``Blasphemy laws have been used against members of religious         minorities and dissenters within the majority Muslim community, and         frequently result in imprisonment on account of religion or belief and/        or vigilante violence.'';Whereas more than 30 people have been killed by lynch mobs after being accused         of blasphemy in Pakistan since the law was adopted in 1979 and         perpetrators are seldom brought to justice;Whereas Bhatti decried recent attacks by extremist groups on religious         minorities saying they allowed intolerance and violence to perpetuate         itself;Whereas only days before he was murdered Taseer warned on Twitter: ``I was under         huge pressure 2 cow down b4 rightist pressure on blasphemy, Refused.         Even if I'm the last man standing.'';Whereas the United Nations has repeatedly endorsed blasphemy laws through annual         ``defamation of religions'' or ``vilification of religions'' resolutions         that call for member states to take measures to prevent criticism of         religion;Whereas Pakistan has been the main sponsor of resolutions through the         Organization of Islamic Conference at the United Nations since 1999         which attempt to provide an internationally recognized legal         justification for their existing blasphemy laws;Whereas according to the Department of State's 2010 International Religious         Freedom Report on Pakistan, discriminatory legislation and the         Government's failure or delay in addressing religious hostility by         societal actors fostered religious intolerance, acts of violence, and         intimidation against religious minorities;Whereas specific laws that discriminated against religious minorities included         the anti-Ahmadi provisions of the penal code and the blasphemy laws         which provided the death penalty for defiling Islam or its prophets;Whereas according to the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, ``Blasphemy laws         empower states against their citizens, protect ideas rather than         individuals, and engender violence by condemning peaceful speech. While         proponents of the `defamation of religions' resolution and blasphemy         laws say they are needed to defend the honor of vulnerable religious         believers, in reality they only achieve more violence by creating a         culture of impunity where the state officially sides with extremists.'';         andWhereas recalling that Muhammad Ali Jinnah, founder of the Republic, in an         historic speech before the constituent assembly in 1947 urged citizens         to worship as they choose and stated, ``You may belong to any religion         or caste or creed-that has nothing to do with the business of the         State.'': Now, therefore, be it    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--            (1) calls on the Secretary of State and the United States         Permanent Representative to the United Nations to introduce a         ``Taseer-Bhatti Resolution'' in the United Nations Human Rights         Council advocating the repeal of blasphemy laws and condemning         their adverse effects on freedom of religion and thought and to         continue to work to defeat passage of the annual ``defamation''         resolutions introduced by the Organization of Islamic         Conference; and            (2) calls on the President to initiate a dialogue with the         Government of Pakistan to address the blasphemy laws, including         engaging in a bilateral review of--                    (A) the compatibility of all blasphemy legislation                 with the universally recognized freedom of religion                 with the intent to repeal or amend such incompatible                 legislation;                    (B) the actions against those who make claims of                 blasphemy that have incited violence;                    (C) how the Government of Pakistan protects                 individuals like Taseer and Bhatti and can establish an                 early warning mechanism to protect all citizens from                 calls to violence; and                    (D) the burden of proof used to allow citizens to                 file claims of blasphemy against other citizens and                 whether such claims need to meet a certain threshold of                 evidence before being filed, education provided the                 general public on the rights of religious minorities in                 order to create a climate of religious tolerance.

International Judge the Koran Day: Update

STAND UP AMERICA NOW! claims in a press release that Anjem Choudary has confirmed acceptance of an invitation to serve as defense attorney for the Koran at their International Judge the Koran Day event scheduled for March 20, 2011.

    In view of the no show on the third, I don't expect Choudary to go to Florida to defend the Koran.  In view of his conduct in television and radio interviews, I am sure that he would attack those who question the Koran instead of defending it against their charges.   Anjem Choudary's  participation should greatly enhance the event's media presence and coverage.   

"The Koran is accused of inciting murder, rape and terrorist activities.  It is under suspicion of the direct or indirect murder of millions of people around the world."

    Inciting murder? It incites war, with two chapters entirely devoted to it and several more heavily involved, resulting in an estimated 2.7*10⁸ deaths since 622. In citing rape?  Beyond any doubt.  Seven chapters contain this expression: "right hands possess".  I want you to see how it is used; here is a very clear example.  Muslims are given license to rape captives and slaves.  Sexual exploitation of slaves is not a barrier to admission to Paradise.

23:1. Successful indeed are the believers.

23:2. Those who offer their Salât (prayers) with all solemnity and full submissiveness.

23:3. And those who turn away from Al-Laghw (dirty, false, evil vain talk, falsehood, and all that Allâh has forbidden).

23:4. And those who pay the Zakât .

23:5. And those who guard their chastity (i.e. private parts, from illegal sexual acts)

23:6. Except from their wives or (the captives and slaves) that their right hands possess, for then, they are free from blame;

23:7. But whoever seeks beyond that, then those are the transgressors;

23:8. Those who are faithfully true to their Amanât (all the duties which Allâh has ordained, honesty, moral responsibility and trusts etc.) and to their covenants;

23:9. And those who strictly guard their (five compulsory congregational) Salawât (prayers) (at their fixed stated hours).

23:10. These are indeed the inheritors.

23:11. Who shall inherit the Firdaus (Paradise). They shall dwell therein forever.

    Inciting terrorist activities?  Allah said that he would cast terror and that he cast terror.  He also commanded Muslims to build a mighty army to terrify their enemies.

8:60. Against them make ready your strength to the utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror into (the hearts of) the enemies, of God and your enemies, and others besides, whom ye may not know, but whom God doth know. Whatever ye shall spend in the cause of God, shall be repaid unto you, and ye shall not be treated unjustly.

Shariah4America, But Not Today

Shariah4America, But Not Today

    When I viewed two videos of Stand Up For America's counter demonstration, I discovered that Andy Choudary did not show up in front of the White House. I saw a small group of Christians and about half as many Muslims with one of the latter caterwauling in Arabic.  Now, through the news feed at Facebook, I discovered that the grand demonstration has been postponed indefinitely.

    Choudary blames 'media distortion' of his message for the delay. Then he launches into a long screed, condemning our nation and way of life, offering to substitute a combination of Islam & Socialism as the solution. 

    Choderhead declares that Shari'ah is about "enjoining good" & "forbidding wrong".  Who can argue with that concept?  The problem is  is in the definition of terms.  In their minds, anything that ain't Islam is wrong. 

    A marquee runs along the top of  Shariah4America, with blurbs for three articles. The third article is particularly insulting to the logical mind.

The Islamic Punishment for Paedophiles

Probably one of the most wicked and disturbing acts conceivable to the human mind, paedophilia ranks high on the list of crimes worthy of severe punishment – not so in America, it seems.

Unfortunately, with a US constitution so dogged in the false creed that is freedom, it appears that even paedophilia can find solace in a society that virulently promotes perversion and indecency. Organisations such as NAMBLA (North American Man/Boy Love Association), which seek to legalise this vile act demonstrate clearly the severity of the situation at hand as well as the need America has for a divine solution.

The Islamic constitution or Shari’ah, mete out rules and regulations sourced directly from divine revelation and as such compliment the natural disposition of human beings perfectly; indeed those who have not been polluted by the false traditions and customs of their society will undoubtedly find the Shari’ah very agreeable, and it is because of this very reason that we find Islam is the fastest growing religion on earth.

The Islamic punishment for paedophilia not only eradicates this savage behaviour from society, but also provides a feeling that real justice has been delivered, particularly for close relatives of innocent children cruelly subjected to this criminal act.

So what is the punishment, you may ask? If an individual is found guilty of paedophilia in Islam, then he or she will be impaled on a sharp spike, known in Arabic as the Kashabah, and left until death overcomes them; the Kashabah, is also typically placed on public display as a vivid warning to all those wishing to engage in this loathsome act.

As part of the Shariah4America campaign, we propose that the Washington Monument be used as a fitting mechanism to execute this very just punishment.

So ask yourself, would you rather a paedophile receive free healthcare, accommodation and food in California’s Coalinga Mental Hospital or does the Islamic verdict on the matter sound much more reasonable?

    There is something you need to know; something few others will reveal to you. Because I do not give a damn who is offended, I will reveal it, making the fatal facts of Islam easy for the incredulous reader to verify.   We turn first to Allah's word, with critical phrases highlighted for clarity.  This is the Hilali & Khan translation, which includes parenthetical expressions supplied from tafsir by the translators.

65:4. And those of your women as have passed the age of monthly courses, for them the 'Iddah (prescribed period), if you have doubts (about their periods), is three months, and for those who have no courses [(i.e. they are still immature) their 'Iddah (prescribed period) is three months likewise, except in case of death] . And for those who are pregnant (whether they are divorced or their husbands are dead), their 'Iddah (prescribed period) is until they deliver (their burdens), and whosoever fears Allâh and keeps his duty to Him, He will make his matter easy for him.
^[1] (V.65:1) Narrated ‘Abdullâh bin ‘Umar رضي الله عنهما that he had divorced his wife while she was menstruating during the lifetime of Allâh’s Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم . ‘Umar bin Al-Khattâb رضي الله عنه asked Allâh’s Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم about that. Allâh’s Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم said, "Order him (your son) to take her back and keep her till she is clean from her menses and then to wait till she gets her next period and becomes clean again, whereupon, if he wishes to keep her, he can do so, and if he wishes to divorce her he can divorce her before having sexual intercourse with her; and that is the ‘Iddah (prescribed period) which Allâh has fixed for the women meant to be divorced." (Sahih Al Bukhari, Vol.7, Hadîth No.178).
^[2] (V.65:4) See the Our’ân, Verse 2:234.

Of course, that translation is widely considered to be polemical and non-standard, so lets consult another; that of Aisha Bewley, a convert to Islam.

In the case of those of your wives who are past the age of menstruation, if you have any doubt, their ‘idda should be three months, and that also applies to those who have not yet menstruated. The time for women who are pregnant is when they give birth. Whoever has taqwa of Allah – He will make matters easy for him.   http://islamawakened.com/Quran/65/4/

    Why does Allah make provision for a post divorce waiting period for pre-pubescent girls?   Its Shari'ah, stupid!  What Moe said while speaking for Allah and what he did is the law.  Lets consult the all purpose handbook of Shari'ah: Reliance of the Traveller, Book N (Divorce)

Chapter N9.0: A Woman's Postmarital Waiting Period (`Idda)

(O: Meaning the period in which a woman waits (N: before she may remarry) to verify that she is not pregnant, or out of mourning for her deceased husband.)

(N: If the waiting period finishes after a once-or twice-pronounced divorce, the wife is free to marry another man or to remarry the husband with a new contract-returning to the latter with the number of times left (one or two) needed to enact a threefold, finalized divorce (dis: n7.7); while if the waiting period of a less-than-thrice-pronounced divorce has not yet expired, the husband may take her back (def: n7) without a new contract.)

(n: The husband's obligation to support her during the waiting period is discussed at m11.10 above.)

N9.1

There is no waiting period for a woman divorced before having had sexual intercourse with her husband.

N9.2

A waiting period is obligatory for a woman divorced after intercourse, whether the husband and wife are prepubescent, have reached puberty, or one has and the other has not.

Intercourse means copulation (def: n7.7).  If the husband was alone with her but did not copulate with her, and then divorced her, there is no waiting period.

    Islamic law anticipates the consummation of marriage with pre-pubescent girls!  Is that not pedophilia?  Lets delve a little deeper, this time into Book M (Marriage).

M3.13: Guardians Who May Marry a Virgin to a Man Without Her Consent

Guardians are of two types, those who may compel their female charges to marry someone, and those who may not.

-1- The only guardians who may compel their charge to marry are a virgin bride's father or father's father, compel meaning to marry her to a suitable match (def: m4) without her consent.

-2- Those who may not compel her are not entitled to marry her to someone unless she accepts and gives her permission.

Whenever the bride is a virgin, the father or father's father may marry her to someone without her permission, though it is recommended to ask her permission if she has reached puberty. A virgin's silence is considered as permission.

As for the nonvirgin of sound mind, no one may marry her to another after she has reached puberty without her express permission, no matter whether the guardian is the father, father's father, or someone else.

    A Muslim  can compel his virgin daughter to marry whomever he chooses, but if she has reached puberty, it is recommended to ask her assent!  Let that sink in for a moment. That is an integral part of the Islamic Law Muslims want to impose upon us.

    Who the Hell would marry a pre-pubescent girl?   Who indeed!

Sahih Bukhari volume 7, Book 62, Number 64:

Narrated 'Aisha:

that the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old, and then she remained with him for nine years (i.e., till his death).

That hadith comes from the most authentic of the six canonical collections.  It is mutawir, that is, backed up by other narrations. 

• 7.62.65
• 7.62.88
• Sahih Muslim 8.3309
• 8.3310

    Marrying little girls is sunnah, and they accuse us of pedophilia!  The hypocrisy stinks to high heaven.
.

Hillary's Freudian Slip?

    The first paragraph of this excerpt from Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's address to the opening of the UNHRC should raise some concern. I have highlighted the last two sentences of that paragraph.  It appears that she conceives of the HRC as a country instead of a council.  Even the United Nations is not a nation, a sovereign entity. The footnote does not help.  If she did not intend to expand the HRC or its parent organization into a sovereign entity, then the footnote should have corrected the slip.

    The paragraph begins with the first sign of insanity: assertion of a possibility of improving a failed institution whose majority bloc is fundamentally opposed to the council's mission.  Any sane person would know that there is no possibility that one out of 47 members of the council could move it onto the right track. 

    A few paragraphs later, Hillary launches into a sore subject: the annual ritual of condemning 'defamation of Islam'.  She pretends opposition to the ritual & resolution, but we know from the "Freedom of Belief and Expression" jointly sponsored by the State Department and Egypt, that Obomination actually favors censorship.   The transparently false distinction between 'defamation of Islam' and 'negative stereotyping of Islam' stinks like an open sewer.

    Insults?  Stating the fact that Islam's 52 year old founder married the six year old daughter of his bosom buddy, as recorded in muttawir ahadith, is not an insult, it is a statement of historical fact, as is his consummation of that marriage three years later, when Aisha was nine.

    Stating the fact that Islam declared and is prosecuting perpetual warfare against the rest of the human race is not an insult, it is a statement of fact. Since the Qur'an has been translated into multiple languages and posted on the internet, it is possible for us to read it and discover the truth for ourselves.

    Stating the fact that terrorism is an intrinsic, foundational sacrament of Islam is not an insult, it is a statement of fact.  The six canonical hadith collections, like the Qur'an, have been translated and uploaded so that we can  learn that Moe was made victorious by terror. The fatal facts become clear  when certain Qur'an verses are read in the light of Sahih Bukhari 4.52.220 and 1.7.331.  Those are 3:151, 8:12, 8:57, 8:60, 9:120,  33:26, 59:2 & 59:13. Yet the resolutions complain that "Islam is frequently and wrongly associated with terrorism and human rights violations.".

    So Hillary proposes replacing the resolutions with "concrete steps to fight intolerance".  Would she tolerate vampires if they were real instead of mythological?  But she insists that we tolerate the continued existence and expansion of a piracy cult which has murdered an estimated 270,000,000 people since it began its depredations in 622.

    Why  would any sane person tolerate a piracy cult that asserts a divine mandate to conquer the entire world;  declaring the lives and property of non-believers  not to be sacred?  They declare open season on us and we are supposed to tolerate it.  Someone's  head is so far up her anus that she can  perceive neither objective factual reality nor justice. 

    Respect & tolerance must be reciprocal, but Islam is supremely intolerant.  The Qur'an curses us and calls us the worst of living creatures. Islam can not tolerate criticism or questioning because it is false, woven of stories plagiarized from previous faiths. 

    Islam's Shari'ah law prescribes the death penalty for any negative expression about Allah, Moe and their damned cult. The same draconian rule is imposed on conquered Christians.  This annual attempt to impose their rule on us is part of their program of world conquest. We must elect a President who will jam it up their snouts!

[...] In 2009, the United States joined the Human Rights Council because President Obama and I believed we could make a difference by working with you on the inside rather than standing on the outside merely as a critic. And over the past 18 months, we have worked together. We’ve reached across regional lines in an attempt to overcome what hobbles this country^[i] more than anything else, our divisions as member states. The unity of purpose we have forged with respect to Libya offers us an opportunity to continue that progress.

[...]

For example, in this session we have an opportunity to move beyond a decade-long debate over whether insults to religion should be banned or criminalized. It is time to overcome the false divide that pits religious sensitivities against freedom of expression and pursue a new approach based on concrete steps to fight intolerance wherever it occurs.

[...]

[i] council more than...

Chickens Come Home to Roost!

Listen carefully. Listen closely.  Listen between the words. Understand what the hate monger is saying.  Sign of the Mahdi?  Jesus Christ?? Do you have a clue??  What is he ranting about?  You have no clue unless you have delved into Islamic eschatology.  Open Sunan Abu Dawud: The Promised Deliverer and start reading.

     When you come to Book 37, Number 4310, take a deep breath, slow down, and concentrate on it until you comprehend its full import.  That hadith describes the Islamic version of the return of Jesus Christ. What is the meaning of these expressions?

• fight the people for the cause of Islam
• break the cross
• kill swine
• abolish jizyah
• perish all religions except Islam

What will Jesus do?  Their "Jesus" is a genocidal warlord!  There are many who can not comprehend this fatal fact. For them, I include a telling quote from Tafsir Ibn Kathir.

"In the future, the Jews will support the Dajjal (False Messiah); and the Muslims, along with `Isa, son of Mary, will kill the Jews. This will occur just before the end of this world."

Calypso Louis is promising the extension of the bloodshed in Libya to your neighborhood.  Are you ready for that?  Then go immediately to http://www.congress.org   and send an email to your Representatives & Senators.  Tell them that it is time for the Muslims to go home.  Tell them  we want them expelled and excluded.  Explain exactly why.  If we do not rise up demanding common sense, our descendent's will curse us for our negligence; for consigning them to slavery.  Please don't let that happen.

9:111. Verily, Allâh has purchased of the believers their lives and their properties; for the price that theirs shall be the Paradise. They fight in Allâh's Cause, so they kill (others) and are killed. It is a promise in truth which is binding on Him in the Taurât (Torah) and the Injeel (Gospel) and the Qur'ân. And who is truer to his covenant than Allâh? Then rejoice in the bargain which you have concluded. That is the supreme success .

 

9:123. O you who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are close to you, and let them find harshness in you, and know that Allâh is with those who are the Al-Muttaqûn (the pious - see V.2:2).

 

• http://www.bloggersbase.com/politics-and-opinions/islamic-thinkers-ultimate-oxymoron/
• http://www.bloggersbase.com/politics-and-opinions/shariah-america/

Islamic Thinkers: Ultimate Oxymoron

http://www.islamicthinkers.com/index/index.php is the web site of the sponsor of the March 3 razia on the White House.
This graphic is prominently displayed on that site's landing page. If it does not outrage you, you are dead already, go jump into a hole.  Another graphic on the page shows the black flag of jihad flying over the White House.  It is time for them to go. It is no longer possible to tolerate the presence of Islam and Muslims. 

    They don't think, they let Moe and the god between his legs do their thinking for them. There is no rationality in Islam, only hatred, arrogance, supremacism & avarice.

Sovereignty belongs to the people, under our Declaration of Independence and Constitution; it does not belong to Satan and we will not relinquish it to Satan or his slaves.

These seditious slaves of Satan share something with Shari'ah4America:

• Communism is dead.
• Capitalism is dying.
• Islam is the only solution.
• Democracy is hypocrisy
  • rule by divine law
  • not man made law.

    As an American, I want no part of the bloodshed taking place in the middle east. I want no part of the Islamic theocratic slavery that will follow in its wake.  I disrespectfully demand that these enemies of life and liberty be rounded up and deported immediately.  I intend to send a link to this blog post to my Representative. and Senators. If you are a patriotic, liberty loving American, you will follow suit.  If not, as far as I am concerned, you should go with them.

Shari'ah Against America!!

http://shariah4america.com/ was created Feb. 22, '11. A Whois search reveals the owner's dame as "Abdullah".  The site does not appear to include an "about us" link.  They do have a contact form so that prospective attendees can register for the event.

The site sports some articles which may help you to comprehend the full import of this abominable movement. In case you have not guessed, this is an extension of the bloody revolt inflaming the middle east at the present time.  They want to include America in the bloodbath & aftermath: slavery in an Islamic theocracy.

    I did not find any clear sign that the site is a joke or parody. It bears every evidence of being a sincere attempt to foment Islamic revolution. As such, it is clearly seditious and stands as due and timely notice of the absolute necessity of removing Islam's fifth column from our shores. 

    The time has come to round them up and ship them out.  There is no place in America, the land of Liberty, for Islamic theocracy or its proponents!  They absolutely must not be tolerated any longer.  We have no alternative to disrespectfully demanding the expulsion of all Muslims.  I intend to send a link to this post to my Congressman & Senators.  I urge you to follow suit.

• 

  The Islamic Demolition of the Statue of Liberty

  Written on Saturday, 26 February 2011 22:58

  One of the founding principles of the Islamic constitution is to ensure that all sovereignty and supremacy belongs solely to God; the Shari’ah is a practical manifestation of this sovereignty and supremacy because it seeks to establish His…
• 

  The White Masjid

  Written on Saturday, 26 February 2011 22:25

  Have you ever wondered what America would look like under Shari’ah? The ongoing campaign to bring the US and indeed the entire world under the authority of Islam has compelled sincere Muslims to draw up realistic plans for…
• 

  DEMONSTRATION: OUTSIDE WHITE HOUSE

  Written on Wednesday, 23 February 2011 10:04

  Allah (SWT) says in the Qur’an, the final revelation sent to all of mankind, “He it is who has sent the Messenger (Muhammad) with the Guidance and Deen of Truth, to make it victorious over all other ways…

• Muslims without Shariah are like Fish out of Water

  Written on Wednesday, 23 February 2011 10:02

  Many Muslims do not understand the significance of the Shari’ah in their lives as well as its importance in society. It is probably one of the main reasons why we find ourselves struggling to find a solution to…
• 

  Do NOT Obey the Law of the Land

  Written on Friday, 25 February 2011 13:03

  There is a common misconception among Muslims today, that they are obliged to obey the law of the land in whatever country they reside, many advocates or supporters of this call quote Imaam Abu Hanifah (rh) as evidence,…

        If this does not cause your blood and bladder pressure to rise, you may be dead already.  They want to conceal and destroy the Statue of Liberty. Do you need to know anything more about them? 

"The Statue of Liberty, designed by Frederic Bartholdi, stands on Liberty Island in New York Harbor; representing Libertas, the Roman (false) goddess of Freedom, it is symbolic of the rebellious nature of the US constitution that elevates the command of man over the command of God.

In Islam, the public veneration of idols and statues is strictly prohibited. This has forced sincere Muslims to develop realistic plans that will aid in the removal of the Statue of Liberty.

Due to the scale of the task at hand, it is highly likely that rigorous safety checks will need to be employed before the demolition of the Statue of Liberty can commence; thus as a temporary measure, it is proposed that a large burkha is used to cover the statue, thereby shielding this horrendous eye sore from public view as well as sending a strong message to its French creators."

Pat Condell on Andy Choudary's White House Razia

Pat Condell on Andy Choudary's White House Razia

Pat uges us to let Andy in to spew his venom, in hopes that the populace will recognize evil when they hear it.  I am not so optimistic.  First,  the mainstream media will not give it complete coverage and few would watch it on CSPAN, if they would  broadcast it.  Second, the electorate demonstrated their lack of intelligence and judgment in the last half dozen Presidential elections, nominating and electing dufusses & a traitor.

    The only good reason to give that scum a visa would be to serve as bait, so that the DHS could round up and deport the attendees who support imposition of Shari'ah.  Since Obamination is part of the problem, not part of the solution, that won't happen. 

    Great Britain should send its garbage to Pakistan, we don't want it!

    While Pat makes light of it, Shari'ah is a serious subject.  It defines crimes against the Islamic state and prescribes corporal punishments. Didn't we already try prohibition??

Chapter O16.0: The Penalty for Drinking

O16.1

Any beverage that intoxicates when taken in large quantities is unlawful both in small and large quantities, is unlawful both is small and large quantities.whether it is wine, (A: fermented) raisin drink, or something else.

O16.2

The penalty for drinking is obligatorily enforced against anyone who:

(a) drinks;

(b) has reached puberty;

(c) is sane;

(d) is Muslim;

(e) does so voluntarily;

(f) and knows it is unlawful (A: the restrictions mentioned above (o12.4) about the ignorance of the prohibition of adultery also applying here).

O16.3

The penalty for drinking is to be scourged forty stripes, with hands, sandals, and ends of clothes. It may be administered with a whip, but if the offender dies, an indemnity (def: o4.4) is due (A: from the scourger) for his death. If the caliph (def: o25) increases the penalty to eighty stripes, it is legally valid, but if the offender dies from the increase, the caliph must pay an adjusted indemnity, such that if he is given forty-one stripes and dies, the caliph must pay 1/41 of a full indemnity.

    Shari'ah says women and Christians are worth less than Muslims; yeah, right, thats the ticket.

O4.9

(A: For the rulings below, one multiplies the fraction named by the indemnity appropriate to the death or injury's type of intentionality and other relevant circumstances that determine the amount of a male Muslim's indemnity (def: o4.2-6 and o4.13). )

The indemnity for the death or injury of a woman is one-half the indemnity paid for a man.

The indemnity paid for a Jew or Christian is one-third of the indemnity paid for a Muslim. The indemnity paid of a Zoroastrian is one-fifteenth of that a Muslim.

    If you don't know Shari'ah and you don't care, your brain is encased in your underwear.

Duality

Does anyone remember how Yasser Arafat preached "peace" to the cameras and "One million martyrs marching to Jerusalem!" to his followers in Arabic?  In their evil arrogance, Muslims continue to practice duality, cursing us when they think we are not listening. In this case, their damnable prayer has been translated and posted  so that we can share it. Thanks and a tip of the hat to Bare Naked Islam!

    These vermin are praying four our death; for our families to be widowed, orphaned and enslaved.  They should be shipped home and the ship sunk in mid ocean.  Wake up! Wise up!! Rise up!!! Diselect the cretins & traitors who allow this plague to infest Christendom.

"Our lord! Punish us not if we forget or fall into error, our Lord! Lay not on us a burden like thatwhich You did lay on those before us; our Lord! Put not on us a burden greater than we have strengh to bear. Pardon us and grant us forgiveness. Have mercy on us. You are our Maula and give us victory over the disbelieving people." (2:286)

" Our Lord! Forgive us our sins and our transgressions (in keeping our duties to You), establish  our feet firmly, and give us victory over the disbelieving folk." (3:147)     http://www.islamic-world.net/children/daily_read/dua.htm

    Those are voluntary prayers, recited in addition to the compulsory prayers for extra credit.  Their origin is the Qur'an.

O Allah! destroy the Kuffar army.

O Allah! Make the ground shake in an earthquake from under them.

O Allah, they do not glorify you, show them the blackest day of their lives, as you showed the People of Aad and Thamud.

O Allah, destroy them all, not leaving anyone to escape.

O Allah make their wives widows, their children orphans.

O Allah! Grant victory to our brothers and sisters everywhere in the world, Yaa Allah!

O Allah! Have mercy on their widowed women and their orphaned children!

O Allah! Whoever died from them, enter them into Jannat Al-Firdows with your Mercy!

O Allah! Forgive us, forgive us, forgive us, for doing nothing but watch.

Ameen  http://forum.urduworld.com/f50/feelings-44936/index2.html

    If you love life, if you love liberty and you have knowledge of this and do not rise up demanding the expulsion and exclusion of Islam and its votaries  from Western Civilization, then you have a mental or moral defect of unimaginable proportions; worse than single suicide, you are taking the rest of us with you.

Geert Wilders: BBC Hit Piece

http://barenakedislam.wordpress.com/2011/02/18/bbc-tribute-to-geert-wilders-e...

Geert Wilders: Europe's Most Dangerous Man?  Was published in four parts by the BBC.  I became aware of it through the good offices of
Bare Naked Islam.  BNI and most of her commentators seem to be convinced that the series of videos will backfire by yielding increased support for Wilders.  I am afraid that the positive outcome depends on viewers either having background information before viewing or seeking it afterward.

    Here are a few of the unsubstantiated code words that fly in the videos:

• far right
•  fear
•  extreme
•  incitement to hatred
•  new right ideology
•  fitna selects passages
•  viscious Islamophobia

    For those who seek it, the background information can be found here: Geert Wilders On Trial.