Self Explanatory - Driving the Libtards More Loonier

~Snooper~

HT No Quarter

The People Obama Doesn't Want To Offend Are Planning To Strike Israel

~Snooper~

This should make Barack happy seeing that he doesn't like Israel anyway.

Senior Tehran officials are recommending a preemptive strike against Israel to prevent an Israeli attack on Iran's nuclear reactors, a senior Islamic Republic official told foreign diplomats two weeks ago in London.

The official, Dr. Seyed G. Safavi, said recent threats by Israeli authorities strengthened this position, but that as of yet, a preemptive strike has not been integrated into Iranian policy. [...]

In other news that will make Obama is happy is this:

The Fairfax County Registrar—and possibly other Registrars in Virginia—is rejecting most Federal Write-in Absentee Ballots (FWAB) cast by our men and women in uniform.

The FWAB is a federally mandated write-in ballot that allows military servicemembers and their dependents to cast an absentee ballot when they have not received a ballot before the election. It is a safety net that allows a service member to vote even if the mail truck hasn't reached his or her remote base in Iraq or Afghanistan in time to cast a regular absentee ballot. [...]

Here we go again, not allowing the military to have their say. What else will make The One happy? Oh. Yes. The Fairness Doctrine. That will keep the heat off of the non-US citizen for sure. I guess the above could be at least two of those scenarios that Joe Biden was "flourishing" about.

Here is something else that Barack might be happy about.

[...] I predict the total annihilation of the United States, as a result of the many injustices it perpetrates around the world. These are people who do not believe in Allah or in the reckoning of Judgment Day. The only thing they believe in is brute material force. [...]

Yep. Sounds just like a Democrat to me. The problem is that the yammering came from HAMAS.

The most recent thing that will make Obama happy is that Biden has been removed from the campaign trail after his flourishing. I guess it wasn't all that flourishing after all.

All of the MSM and certainly all of the Democrats have slammed Governor Palin as being such a lousy pick as John McCain's VP choice.

I think the joke is on them ........... Senator Joe Biden has repeatedly embarrassed the Democrats and they apparently have sent him home to "dry out." The guy is obviously on the bottle and his daily gaffes prove it!

For anyone who thinks perhaps I am picking on poor 'ol Joe just remember it was Joe Biden who took the lumber to Joe The Plumber in an effort to discredit him in front of America. He has no shame whatsoever. [...]

Poor guy. Maybe he is a McCain plant after all?

The Violent Left Getting Worse and Worse

~Snooper~

Make no mistake. The Leftinistra are getting more and more violent. It is part of The Plan. Again, we will turn to the List of 45.

15) Capture one or both of the political parties in the US.

17) Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for Socialism, and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers associations. Put the party line in text books.

19) Use student riots to foment public protests against programs or organizations which are under Communist attack.

20) Infiltrate the press. Get control of book review assignments, editorial writing, policy-making positions.

21) Gain control of key positions in radio, TV & motion pictures.

32) Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture - - education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.

33) Eliminate all laws or procedures, which interfere with the operation of the Communist apparatus.

Who, exactly, are the ones doing most of the violence in this election cycle? Are they Republicans or Democrats? Are they McCain-Palin supporters or are they Obama-Biden supporters? Do you know or even care? As a lead-in to this subject, please refer to the Power Line post where now Rush Limbaugh is now a terrorist and keep in mind #21 above:

When we talk about American institutions that have been taken over by the left, women's television shows and magazines are high on the list. One of the worst offenders is The View, where Rush Limbaugh has just been described as a "terrorist:"

Maybe Rush should try to blow up the Capitol and the Pentagon. Then instead of being a terrorist, liberals would call him an education reformer. [...]

This is called disinformation, meant to distract and detract from the real issue or issues with the real issue or issues being that the Leftinistra want to eliminate the United States Constitution. It is so obvious it is pathetic.

The Obama supporters have resorted to, among other things, vandalize property that have McCain-Palin signs, decals and anything else that bears their names. Little Green Footballs has been documenting this data for years and so have many others.

In a piece entitled, "Who are left-wing haters to point fingers at John McCain?", the obvious even to the oblivious leaps out at the individual paying attention.

[...] Since 9/11, major anti-war rallies have included people holding signs and puppets comparing President Bush to Adolf Hitler. Leftist writer Naomi Wolf, who has expressed fears that the feds were monitoring her children's letters from summer camp, recently published a book titled, "The End of America," which likens the Bush administration to a fascist junta.

MSNBC's Keith Olbermann spews over-the-top, hateful rhetoric in his "Special Comments" on a regular basis. He has said that the Bush administration threatens America with a "new type of fascism," referred to the GOP as the "leading terrorist group in this country" on the fifth anniversary of 9/11, and has said that Fox News is "worse than Al Qaeda" and "as dangerous as the Ku Klux Klan ever was."

Have the journalists now bemoaning the low tactics of the McCain campaign and its supporters never set eyes upon the wildly popular Huffington Post? That Web site hosts countless angry rants, many examples of which are too vulgar to document in a family newspaper. In 2004, Nicholson Baker wrote a novel imagining the assassination of President Bush. Last week, Fox's "Family Guy" depicted Nazis donning McCain-Palin buttons.

If these fringe (and most of them are hardly fringe) individuals don't speak for American liberalism writ large - as most "respectable" liberals will tell us when confronted by the examples enumerated above - then the stray hecklers at McCain-Palin rallies cannot represent American conservatism. [...]

And that ain't all there is. When was the last time you have heard that anyone on the Right vandalizing anyone's home for political purpose? When was the last time you have heard anyone on the Left vandalizing anyone's home for political purpose?

When was the last time you have heard that The Law is bracing for a Republican defeat as opposed to a Democrat defeat? When was the last time Republicans rioted in the streets because their guy lost an election? Why are Law Agencies throughout this nation bracing for riots following an Obama defeat? Think back to Kent State and other such incidences.

And why is James Carville saying riots could take place from Democrat supporters regardless of the election outcome? When was the last time Republicans acted in this manner?

Naturally, moron anarchists like this pathetic dweeb only stir things up.

When was the last time a Republican went onto a stage and tried to arrest someone like this moron - a Democrat and anarchist Code Skanker did?

When was the last time a Republican assaulted a Democrat candidate's motorcade like these idiots did to Sarah Palin's?

With all of the voter and campaign fraud going on, it only supports the facts - the only way the democrats win is through intimidation, lying, cheating and stealing. No wonder they feel they have to resort to violence. They are cowards plain and simple.

See Obama Goons for further stories and news.

Czarbie's Goons and Media Cannot Produce

~Snooper~

The loonier the Czarbie Goons, I mean Truth Squads get and the more the Lame Stream Media climb into Czarbie's trousers in search of his Marxist Trouser Trout, the worse their predicament. Think about it.

With the millions the Czarbie Camp has spent, both legally and illegally collected/received, the best he can do is a dead even race? I have never said that McCain is going to win in a landslide that is a Reaganesque occurrence. However, I will still stick by my original opinion back in March and again in May that McCain will take the election with 40 States.

Will it be a close election? Absolutely. Why? Because Czarbie and his Handlers are pulling out all the stops in this election. It is a do or die scenario for them. They have also jumped the shark. They have underestimated their "progress" with our youth for the last few decades. Czarbie's Handlers have chosen the most inexperienced clown that they could because he was the only one available that is clueless and has a severe case of the "ME ME ME ME" syndrome. As Mr. Grey Ghost explains...

Barack Obama can have the whole entire mass media in his back pocket and rich, elitist liberals can fund his campaign till kingdom come, but the idea of having an inexperienced (hey, I'm just quoting Joe Biden there), radically Left, socialist for a President seems to finally be wearing thin on most Americans [...]

I so love being dead nuts correct. I wonder how the Czarbie Trouser Trout worshipers at Digital Journal are handling the bad news.

The American People also realize that the more the media no longer hides their Czarbie gism sucking selves from the public eye, the more they recognize their ignorant bias. Gateway Pundit said it "Rather" well: Most. Corrupt. Media. Ever.

Personally, the most appalling thing about this election doesn't come from any candidate on the Right or any of the bloggers on the Right. The most appalling thing about this election comes from the folks reacting to the statement that Sarah Palin uttered; "God will do the right thing on election day." Holy Cow! One would think that the world had come to a screeching halt! Check out the mutterings at Memeorandum...but the "musings" are in the comments section at the CNN post. If there is any doubt whatsoever about the demonic influences on Czarbie's gism guzzlers, just check the screen shot to the left.

First off, God does not condone the murder of the unborn. Czarbie does and that is merely a scratch on the surface of how evil Czarbie and his pathetic trolls are indeed. Read the comments and see for yourselves.

To add credence to my assertion, one merely needs to read the Holy Scriptures to bear this out. Also, the Vatican has recently come out with the following: Vatican official attacks U.S. Democrats as “party of death”.

[...] Burke, who was named prefect of the Vatican’s Supreme Court of the Apostolic Signature in June, told the Italian Catholic newspaper Avvenire that the U.S. Democratic Party risked “transforming itself definitively into a party of death for its decisions on bioethical issues.” He then attacked two of the party’s most high profile Catholics — vice presidential candidate Joe Biden and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi — for misrepresenting Church teaching on abortion. He said Biden and Pelosi, “while presenting themselves as good Catholics, have presented Church doctrine on abortion in a false and tendentious way.” [...]

Both Nancy Pelosi and Joe Biden have been pretty much ex-communicated from their Church because of their views on abortion. Is it any wonder, then, why George Soros, the self-proclaimed One World Socialist Order, is financing and promoting a group or groups of "liberated" and "socialized" Catholics? (Note: refer to these two posts.)
What does the List of 45 say about this?

27) Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with "social" religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity, which does not need a "religious crutch."

Amazing, isn't it? Have the pieces fallen into place yet?

In an address delivered to a women’s group last week, Archbishop Charles Chaput of the Archdiocese of Denver strongly criticized Obama-supporting Catholic Doug Kmeic, and called it absurd for self-professedly pro-life Catholics to support Obama, “the most committed ‘abortion-rights’ candidate … since the Roe v. Wade decision of 1973.” [...]

And, yes, we are in the midst of an American Civil War Part 2. The only difference is there are no lead and steel projectiles in the air...just yet. And, yes, the Democrats and the terrorists are indeed in league. (Please reference posts here and here) And, the terrorists, working in league with the Democrats in this nation are trying to remove the barrier to world dominance of the Caliphate and World Socialism. The evidence is overwhelmingly damning. The proponents of World Socialism/Communism and the Global Caliphate have a long history of working with each other because their very tenets are barely separable. This from WUAs:

We have often seen, written and posted about Democrats joining in with terrorists and al-Qaeda, siding with them, using their same arguments as if reading the same script and today we see it again.

The Washington Post writes a piece about al-Qaeda trying to scare American voters into voting for Barack Obama, by saying they want John McCain to win and connecting him to the financial crisis, even though Mccain was the one who proposed regulations for companies like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and Democrats opposed those restrictions, and what do the liberals in the blogosphere do?

They jump on the al-Qaeda bandwagon, joining them in their quest to get Obama elected.

"Al-Qaeda will have to support McCain in the coming election," said a commentary posted Monday on the extremist Web site al-Hesbah, which is closely linked to the terrorist group. It said the Arizona Republican would continue the "failing march of his predecessor," President Bush.

Quite amusing, one has to wonder is it al-Qaeda mimicking Democrats or Democrats mimicking al-Qaeda?

My heavens they are so predictable, both Liberals and al-Qaeda.

They are "predictable" because they are in essence, one in the same. More at this Memeorandum link as well...

Thankfully, Jihad Watch keeps us posted as does My Pet Jawa. I have often spoken of and written about the Electronic Jihad as well as the Global Cultural Jihad. As the Campaign Spot wrote, it looks like Al Qaeda has a blog. Whereas that is nothing new, it does show how AQ and other enemies so much want an Obama presidency because they know he will do nothing to stop them. They fear a McCain presidency and for obvious reasons.

Naturally, the libtards show their complete lunacy on the subject of the threats we face. The liberal think tank wants the US to go all Dhimmi...in part:

[...]“Regardless of who gets elected as the US President, there is going to be a change in policy commitments,” Grand stated while observing that the objective of the recommendations is to ensure that the next generation of leaders from the US and the Muslim world understand each other.

The Doha Compact calls for four broad changes in how the US and the Muslim world approach one another. They are:

1. A new style of foreign policy focused less on an ‘Axis of Evil’ and more on building ‘Partnerships of Equals’ to address shared challenges.

2. Jointly addressing the conflicts that have long divided the US and the Muslim world, as they have a shared interest in resolving them peacefully.

3. The US needs to understand that one of the key problems deepening divisions with the Muslim world has been ‘How Muslims perceive how the West perceives them.’

4. The US and the Muslim world should partner in improving education and investing in people, so as to unleash the full talents and potential of the region’s citizenry. [END]

All of the above in the Gulf Times is lib-speak for "let the enemy win" all in the name of "peace". The consequences of that are quite dire. This is one more example in a long list of examples where the American Liberal is working with the terrorists in order to bring about the Caliphate. The problem is this - the liberals don't get it. Well, most don't...there are others that are all on board with that and Czarbie is one of them.

Let the Democrats be upset. Perhaps they will trip themselves up as they always do...ask Joe the Plumber. They whine and complain about being labeled as terrorist sympathizers but the fact remains - it is true. They are. Again, some know it and most don't - that doesn't change the fact that they are terrorist sympathizers. Facts are facts and actions are actions. From Gateway Pundit:

Sorry... I'm not getting what all of the fuss is about?

Didn't the Dems (and Obama) vote to cut-n-run from Iraq?... Like how many times?

Don't they call our troops cold-blooded killers and compare them to Nazis?

Here's a question--- How many times can you vote to defund your military at war before you get labeled an appeaser? Is it 5- 10- 20 times?

And-- Do you really think the terrorists in Gaza and Iran support your party because of your economic plan?
Please.

Sometimes the truth hurts.

UPDATE: Although it's always a close call, lilnilhil wins the brainless and angry Obamatron troll of the day award:

Delete.

AMEN.

Obama will lose this election. The pollsters have admitted as such even though they are busily trying to show something else. However, the only ones they are fooling are the fools.

William Ayers 2002 Audio Shows Up

~Snooper~

HT Amy Proctor

This in incredible folks. This was in 2002. And where was Czarbie then?

And, about that shared office space? Ayers says everyone there knew who he was.

HT JWF

Those damn Christians and Jews by golly gee!

Dear Gayle Williams: A Wonderful Update

A note from Radarsite: When I first contemplated writing my Dear Gayle Williams piece two thoughts went through my mind. One was that if Gayle herself were actually here she would most likely completely disagree with my interpretation of this tragedy and my characterization of Islam. Her decision to do what she did where she chose to do it would it seems to me bear this thought out. I doubt if she would have agreed with my assessment that Islam itself is the enemy.
The second reservation I had in going ahead with this article was the possibility -- no, the probability -- that someone would write in to accuse me of using this innocent woman's death as a cynical attempt to either promote Radarsite or to promote our intolerant, hate-filled, right-wing, anti-Islam agenda. These thoughts crossed my mind. But then what would be the alternative? To not write this article at all? To write this article as a somber lament for a fine woman, but somehow avoid the discussion of her killers agenda ? To qualify or tone down my treatment Islam?

When I first received the email this morning with this important comment to my article which was cross posted at Stop The ACLU I was thrilled and immediately decided to use these enlightening and poignant personal remembrances as a whole new article, a welcome update to my original letter.

Then I got to those last few paragraphs. "A selfless soul who didn’t deserve to be used as a cheap PR move that does nothing for anyone today." So, just as I had predicted, it had happened. And the accusation didn't come from some anonymous leftist commenter who had never known her, but rather from someone who knew her all her life and loved her.

However, as I read on, as I read the title of the book Mr. de Lange was writing, “Faithmentalism”, another reality began to take shape and was confirmed by this final paragraph: "What angers me most is that Islam does not preach killing, only fundamentalists interpret this for their own selfishness!
Beliefs & Doctrine of Christianity & Islamview of the other religion
• Islam is respected as a fellow monotheistic religion, but Muhammad is not seen as a true prophet
• Christians are respected as 'People of the Book,' but they have mistaken beliefs and only partial revelation
We miss you and we will never forget your smile!
Love Ed and family!"

This of course presented me with a moral dilemma. Up until those last few sentences this was a wonderful and touching personal tribute to Gayle "Tree" Williams. But those few final words turned everything upside down. It had suddenly become an indictment, not only of me for writing my letter in the first place, but an indictment of the conclusions I had reached. My first impulse was to forget about posting these comments as a new article altogether -- why post an update that undermines the whole purpose of the original article and questions my personal integrity? Why not just leave well enough alone? No one would even read these comments unless they went on STACLU.
Or, I thought, I could post the whole comment and just leave off those last few sentences. After all, I considered, wasn't the writer was using the tragedy of Gayle Williams death to put forward his own agenda just as he was criticizing me for doing?

Those of you who have been following Radarsite for any period of time know how much I value honesty, especially self-honesty. I firmly believe that that inability to be honest with one's self is what is behind almost all of the major problems of this world.

There could only be one answer. These personal remembrances are so touching, so valuable, and so essential to beginning to understand who Gayle Williams was that there was no way I could justify not posting them or arbitrarily censoring them because the author disagrees with my conclusions.

So here they are in there entirety. Thank you Edwin de Lange for taking the time to write in to STACLU and share these wonderful personal memories of Gayle "Tree" Williams. - rg

--------------------------------------------------------


Comment: Gayle “tree” Williams

A photograph flashes in my mind when I think of Gayle and 7 cousins sitting around a picnic table on the banks of the Kariba Lake ranging in height and age all discussing how many fish we each planned to catch and the art of threading a mud worm onto a hook, as parents busied themselves with making sure sunscreen and hats where all on, no-one thought that one day we would all be on different corners of the world.

As we all grew up Gayle’s Mom always spoilt me as the son she never had. It was Gayle that started horse riding at a young age in Bulawayo, Zimbabwe and got me hooked on what was to become my passion and later become my service back to society by training policemen to ride. I always remember that first ride. Gayle got a pony called Bronwynn (a grey Shetland) that loved ducking under fences and leaving her jockey behind. Gayle used to hate getting this pony but she hung in and mastered the ability of ducking. How many afternoons did we get yelled at as my mad passion for horses and show jumping had all the children skipping around the garden jumping the flowers as if we where horses! At this time memories like Gayle Tamsyn (her middle name) Williams begin to flash back when she now did not like her middle name anymore and wanted to be called Gayle “tree” Williams. No matter how much her mom told her Tamsyn was a wonderful name “tree” seemed to stick!

Years later after immigrating to the UK, Gayle, Karen (her sister) and her mom came back to live with us in South Africa. I clearly remember this tall skinny athletic girl running me backwards and forwards across a tennis court with the ability to hit any ball from any man. For pocket money she came to work for my as a bar lady in the hotel night club and always had that smile that was Gayle. She was very into aerobics and went onto study in the field of sports and bio kinetics and was always competitive, latter getting into mountain biking. Years later she returned to the UK and went off to the East again (Pakistan and Afghanistan) to do charity work. There was trouble and she managed to get out safely after a long hike through the mountains and across borders with women and children in tow! I am glad her fitness paid off.

I remember after I had returned from 4 years in Africa as an expat, having escaped some close calls in different dark corners of the continent, how we had a heated debate about the existence of God and if he had turned his back on some areas. I said, “God had got fat and lazy and couldn’t see over his tummy the continents of Africa and Asia that feel into shadow under him and so ignored those areas!” – always looking for an argument, Gayle was not swayed and never took the bait, she never deemed to judge you or convert you, so claims of proselytisation are nonsense! She simply held her ground and was humble in her beliefs.

A little over 2 and bit years ago I was flying around the world on business and bumped into Gayle & her Mom in London and heard she had decided her true calling was to go back to Afghanistan and help the disabled via a charity organisation. When you speak too many of the family they will all tell you we thought she was much bigger then any of us. Often people look to the easy route with offers of – do something locally – do something in your own back yard – build a career and give a donation if you want to do some good - why go all that way when it’s not safe?

Gayle was due to return home for Christmas and I was eager to debate the book I had written about “Faithmentalism” and the holes in the catholic and Islam thinking around marketing and their use of media when it benefits them. It would have been a debate of note!Gayle sense of adventure and calling to help out a group of people whom she held no malice and no judgement of their religious choices or lifestyle but simply to offer her time, her love and her skill was the greater force in her life. A selfless soul who didn’t deserve to be used as a cheap PR move that does nothing for anyone today. I truly hope that Gayle will find peace wherever that may be and that she will not be forgotten when the press dies down. What angers me most is that Islam does not preach killing, only fundamentalists interpret this for their own selfishness!

Beliefs & Doctrine of Christianity & Islamview of the other religion
• Islam is respected as a fellow monotheistic religion, but Muhammad is not seen as a true prophet
• Christians are respected as "People of the Book," but they have mistaken beliefs and only partial revelation

We miss you and we will never forget your smile!
Love Ed and family!

Latest Update On The AWOL Obama-Soetoro Birth Certificate

~Snooper~

Barack Hussein Obama, or whatever his name is, has by default admitted to not being a United States Citizen.

I saw these reports yesterday but haven't written on it until now.

I thought that it was odd that Obama suddenly had to skip town and head to Hawaii to visit his ailing Grandmother that he threw under the bus some time ago because, after all, she is just another one of those typical white people.

She was admitted to the hospital last week or so and she managed to get there on her own and he didn't bother to go see her then so why now? The following data explains the real reason why he is "SUDDENLY" concerned about dear old Grandma that lives under a bus now.

Obama & DNC Admit All Allegations of Federal Court Lawsuit - Obama’s “Not” Qualified to be President

Contrarian Commentary - Andy Martin of High Noon

As far as I understand, when one does not show up or comply with or respond to legal action within our US Court System, the Judge must rule in favor of the Party that does appear. Obama was ordered by the Courts to produce his Birth Certificate...the real one and not the forged COLB that was on his web site and the Daily Kosmonoff web site.

The DNC was also ordered to produce the documents required and they failed to comply as well. Someone has some explaining to do.

Politeia, Right Side News, McNorman, Humbled Infidel, DTRT, DBKP, WUAs, Atlas Shrugs, Anti-Mullah, AAB,

Go here for a history of posts and articles on this subject...

Go here for the legal stuff...Justia filings and dockets

More data farming can be found here...

You Say You Want A Revolution?

~Snooper~

"But ambitious encroachments of the federal government, on the authority of the State governments, would not excite the opposition of a single State, or of a few States only. They would be signals of general alarm ... But what degree of madness could ever drive the federal government to such an extremity." -- James Madison (Federalist No. 46, 29 January 1788)

Reference: The Federalist

What degree of madness could ever drive the federal government to such an extremity? We call it Marxist mutants trying to usurp the Constitution of the United States.

DiscerningTexan: Please Don't Kill Our Country

~Snooper~

If I have said this once, I have said it countless times; Barack Hussein Obama is unfit to command. He is unfit to command a garbage dump let alone the most powerful nation in the known universe. He has zero experience and has absolutely no accomplishments in life in general let alone politically. His taxing policies he wants to set forth are unconstitutional no matter which way one slices and dices and spins. His stand on abortion is much worse than the unconstitutional SCOTUS debacle called Roe v Wade. His associates throughout his life have been enemies from within and have tried to overthrow the United States government and some have even declared was on the United States at one time.

His foreign policy explanations prompted Joe Biden to inadvertently warn the people of America what a danger the poor lad is. Joe Biden told the American People that there WILL BE a GENERATED international crisis within 6 months of an Obama presidency to "test the metal of the man". Joe Biden also has stated that he would be honored to serve WITH John McCain because the country would be better off with John McCain than Barack Obama. He also has stated that the country doesn't have time for a Obama presidency to undergo on-the-job training.

Barack Obama has stated in so many words that he hates this nation and I can only imagine how his loud-mouthed wife says about this nation that I have fought for and bled for along with MILLIONS of others.

His achievements? None.

His taxing policies? Unconstitutional.

His stand on abortion? Perfectly fine to murder unborn children.

His associates and associations? Dubious at best, criminal at worst and too many radicals to keep up with.

His Foreign Policy expertise? None and his statements are dangerous.

His respect for and honor to this Nation? AWOL, void and hateful.

His bigotry level and racism? Highest levels I have seen in 53 years.

There are 26 videos in the above links which were reposted from the most excellent post at Hot Air. To borrow a commentary from the Discerning Texan at the Astute Bloggers group; "This is one of the most impressive comprehensive arguments I have ever seen in any campaign, ever. And it is DEVASTATING." I agree. The video series are damaging enough but the commentary offered in conjunction with the videos is the PRIMO accomplishment as far as a comprehensive package I have seen presented in a very long time.

There has been more vetting of Joe the Plumber than there has been on Barack Hussein Obama and there is a reason for that of which we can only guess. However, when news anchors get orgasmic chills up and down their legs when they talk about Obama, one can only guess what the hell that is all about.

When each and every criticism of Obama is met with the RACIST charge, one has to wonder what the hell that is all about. To emphasize that, now the term "socialism" is considered to be a RACIST statement according to an idiot by the name of Lewis Diuguid,writing in the Kansas City Star Editorial Page. What a total idiot. I will post a comment from that atrocious and race-baiting abortion that has somehow passed itself off as a journalistic piece:

Newsflash
Submitted by SEO Egghead on October 22, 2008 - 1:49am.

This font is racist because it's printed in black. Clearly, it's time for a font change.

And those Crayola crayons that print "negro" on the labels aren't pluralistic -- they're part of an anti-Obama conspiracy!

My God. Don't you have something better to write about? This is race-baiting at its worst.

It doesn't matter if McCain is right or wrong. He's clearly referring to socialism as defined in the dictionary.

Stop with the tin foil stuff.

Either that, or this is the best link-bait I've seen in awhile. I tip my hat in deference ... but only if it was a joke :)

Jaimie Sirovich
SEO Egghead Inc.

And that says it all and after reading that comment, I opted not to sign up and join the fray. There is more of that nonsense at Memeorandum...have fun.

The title to this post was actually robbed from an entry at the Astute Bloggers previously linked. It is the very last entry in a most eloquent rant. The three entries before go thusly:

[...] But hope is not enough. It is time to ACT.

No matter how hard it is to do, no matter how it may turn your stomach, go cast your vote TODAY for John McCain, Sarah Palin, and every Republican Senator, Congressman, Judge, and City Council member on your ballot. It is time for those who love this country to again cross the Delaware. Otherwise the very idea of preserving, protecting, and defending the Constitution the United States of America could all be gone, poof, just like that. And the sequence of events that initiated the downfall of this magnificent country will have reached critical mass on YOUR watch. The shame will not be mine--it will be YOURS, and it will be triggered by the blind "obedience" to the suggestions of the self-important, corrupted media you so foolishly followed off the cliff like sheep.

If you vote for Barack Obama; if you actually took the trouble read and view all this information, followed all the links and watched all the videos and yet can still somehow in your twisted mind justify voting for this man, then you will have to live for the rest of your life with the consequences of your choice. If you have any conscience at all, if there is such a thing as Justice or Karma: the decision to help this man to steal our country out from under us will haunt you for the rest of your natural lives. And it will be punishment well deserved. [...]

Now, I ask you. Where have you read this before? I know that I have said the exact same thing thousands of times but not in those exact words. However, the message is the same. You will see the Tags I have assigned to this post are "Preserving Freedom" and " American Civil War Part 2". Those are the issues my friends. Those are the issues.

Are we going to sit idly by and whine about McCain and wish and hope that the Conservative Movement wakes up by some stroke of Divine Prodding? Or, are we going to RUCK UP, MAINTAIN FIVE and WATCH SIX and defeat this upstart Marxist Bastard, Barack Hussein Obama? The fight is here and now not then and when. Then and when is too late.

These are the times that try men's souls. The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country; but he that stands it NOW deserves the love and thanks of man and woman. Tyranny, like hell is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph. -- Thomas Paine, 1776

Doug Ross also has a must read post called, "The Manifesto of the SILENCED Majority"

We believe that Barack Obama is a brilliant orator and a man possessed of more charisma than any politician since JFK.

• But we also believe that his philosophy of "spreading the wealth around" is an ill-disguised form of socialism that undermines everything America holds dear.

• We believe that a "tax cut on 95% of working Americans" when only 63% of Americans pay taxes is nonsensical.

• We believe that the Obama campaign's obfuscated funding for ACORN (originally described as "event planning") undermines the integrity of our elections and calls into question the legality of his tactics.

• We believe that Barack Obama's plan to form a "civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded” as our military is ill-considered at best.

• We believe that the Obama campaign's efforts to intimidate WGN (on two separate occasions) when it interviewed his political foes endangers free speech.

• We believe that Obama's choice of Joe Biden as VP runs counter to his twin aspirations of "hope" and "change".

• We believe that a man who could not otherwise receive a security clearance should not serve as Commander-in-Chief.

• We believe that Obama's 20-year relationship with his pastor, who he once described as his "spiritual adviser", displays a basic affinity for a racist ideology that runs counter to everything his candidacy should stand for.

• We believe that most of Obama's senate experience has been spent running for office; from the time he was sworn in as a U.S. senator to the time he formed a presidential exploratory committee, he logged only 143 days in the senate.

• We believe that Obama does voters a disservice by hiding his chairmanship of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge (a $165 million dollar effort to improve Chicago's schools) when he used that service as his central experience in 2000 during his first run for Congress.

• We believe that Obama made a series of very poor choices by serving on boards and sharing an office with Bill Ayers (for three years); Ayers' organization killed three police officers, bombed numerous government facilities and nearly detonated a nail bomb at a Fort Dix Officer's Dance.

• We believe that, no matter Obama's relationship with Bill Ayers, his evasive and ever-morphing answers about their work together smack of a coverup.

• We believe that anyone -- no matter their position on abortion -- who supports killing an infant that survived a botched abortion is on the wrong side of any moral code.

• We believe that Obama's advisers and contributors -- from Tony Rezko to Valerie Jarrett to Allison Davis -- cost taxpayers millions in development fees for failed (and often uninhabitable) apartment complexes.

• We believe that Obama's Illinois state senate experience was insubstantial: it was, by his own description, a "part-time position" and he maintained two offices (one at the state senate and one at his law firm).

• We believe that Obama's state senatorial experience was further diluted by his 129 "present" votes, which, as NPR observes , "There's a saying in Springfield that there's a reason why the present button is yellow... [but] I don't think that Barack Obama was necessarily a coward for voting present on those bills..."

• We also believe that Obama's experience as a community organizer and as a trainer for ACORN are not qualifications for the presidency.

• We believe that the candidate has not been forthcoming with his background and the key influencing forces during his formative years.

We therefore believe that Barack Obama is ill-prepared and ill-suited for the Presidency.

I couldn't have said it better myself. I have stated nearly all of the above in separate posts but not in this brilliant manner. With the above, I present the below taken from here. It matches Barack Hussein Obama to a "T".

I Am Loyal Democrat

I am Loyal Democrat. I will take the side of any entity that declares itself to be an enemy of the United States. I will consider any action taken by my government to be improper, and defend the position of any nation that opposes my own. I will not stand by while the concepts of freedom and liberty are allowed to infect the thoughts of repressed peoples. Rather, I will combat such efforts and convince the slaves of dictatorships that they have it better than anyone else.

I am Loyal Democrat. I will tell all Americans that they had 9/11 coming as retribution for all of our evil deeds inflicted upon members of the most peaceful religion on earth. I will work to undermine any effort to destroy the Islamic tidal wave of terror that has vowed to wash onto our beaches. I will strive to weaken our military as it attempts to carry out its mission overseas. I shall encourage total surrender to any foe that threatens us.

I am Loyal Democrat. I shall stir up domestic unrest by separating my fellow citizens into groups, and then I will encourage each group to distrust the next, and convince each that I am their one true friend. Through this magnificent deception, I will rule them all. I will convince minorities that they are inferior, and that they need my special help to succeed in life. Once I have them suspicious of others and fully demoralized, I will keep them down, and make their every gain dependent on what I decide to let them do. I shall oppress minorities worse than any avowed racist could ever hope to.

I am Loyal Democrat. I will make every effort to criticize people that achieve, to hinder those that aspire, and ridicule those that display self-worth. In spite of my lack of personal merit, I will elevate myself in the eyes of others by bringing people with actual character down. I will prey on people's envy of others' success, and I will gain undeserved power as a result. I will take from those that earn until they lose the motivation to build up mankind any longer.

I am Loyal Democrat. I will promote the tyranny of socialism, and crush the only economic system that has advanced mankind. And when we are all financially destitute and controlled by an omnipotent government, I shall laugh at the destruction I have wrought, for I truly hate mankind.

Remember me in 2008 kiddies...

Dear Gayle Williams --

Kabul, Afghanistan
Gayle Williams, 34, who had dual British and South African nationality, was shot dead on Monday by gunmen on a motorbike in Kabul.

Dear Gayle Williams --
I know you cannot read this letter now, but I am writing to you as though you can, as though you are still here somehow, and because for some reason you are still here with me. I have written two articles about you now. Articles about how you were killed and why. Especially the why. The why is what this is all about, isn't it? The why is why you died, why they killed you. The why is what's important, yet so impossible to comprehend.

I have tried in these two articles to express some of the anger, the outrage and the disbelief that so many of us feel, but it's impossible. There aren't the right words. I couldn't write this if I thought too hard about your grieving parents right now. I'd feel foolish and intrusive, because I've never even met you. But for some reason I realize now that those two articles just weren't enough. I don't know what would ever be enough, but that wasn't it. You deserve more. Your death deserves more. And I'll try very hard to say what's in my heart at this moment.

"She was a person who always loved the Afghans and was dedicated to serving those who are disabled...Needless to say, we are all in shock."

"...one of the inspiring people of the world who truly put others before herself."

"She was killed violently while caring for the most forgotten people in the world; the poor and the disabled," the statement said. "She herself would not regret taking the risk of working in Afghanistan. She was where she wanted to be -- holding out a helping hand to those in need."

This is what they're saying about you now, Gayle Williams. Now that you're gone. How ironic that you who lived your life so unobtrusively, so quietly and humbly are now famous in your death. Thousands, perhaps millions, of people all over the world now know your name and have looked at your face in that picture.

We are in a great war of shadows. Our enemies are illusive and indistinct. Only occasionally -- such as at times like this -- do we see them clearly. They have deftly hidden themselves beneath innumerable veils of half-truths, clever rationalizations and devious obfuscations. Our enemies have sought and gained sanctuary in the sacred temples of religion. Thus, to many, they remain inviolate and unassailable. Our enemy is great but amorphous, a master of disguise. Their greatest disguise is complete invisibility. This is the nature of our war of shadows.

Only half of us can actually see them. They have successfully convinced the others that they don't exist, that they are merely fictional villains, hypothetical constructs of our overwrought imaginations. This is who we are fighting -- or almost fighting. We're not sure yet. We're besieged with doubts and mired in confusion. Is our enemy Islam? Or just some small fanatical core of pitiless brutes who have perverted the great message?

We've been taught to be tolerant of others, to be especially tolerant of other people's religious beliefs. To attack someone because of their religious beliefs goes against everything that we hold sacred. And our ruthless adversaries have used this innate civility to their infinite advantage, haven't they? Coming from the very highest authorities in our own government we have been admonished to not hold the entire religion of Islam accountable for the brutal actions of a few. We have been advised by our experts that Islam is a religion of peace, a great religion which has been hijacked by a few crazy fanatics.

But then there is you, Gayle Williams. And you are immense now. You are a scathing indictment that cannot be answered. You are the truth. Inarguable, unassailable truth. The men who took your life were not fanatics, they were the personification of the purest and most uncorrupted form of Islam. They were most closely following the Prophet's commandments. They are Islam with all the veils removed. Your killers were not perverting the message, they were delivering it.

One of the reasons why we have been so shamefully ineffective in this great war of shadows is our inability to comprehend the enormity of this truth. That one of the world's major religions could be the source of the world's most menacing evils. It is too much to grasp. We seek solace in our delusions. We use metaphors and euphemisms to almost but not quite describe our enemies. We comfort ourselves with the unsustainable hypothesis that most Muslims are good. That Islam itself is not the problem.

But then there is you, Gayle Williams. And you are immense now. How can our homegrown Islamist apologists and multiculturalists answer your scathing indictment. Did you, by ministering to the poor and disabled in Afghanistan bring it on yourself, as we purportedly brought the events of 9/11 on ourselves? How will they argue for your culpability in this crime as they did ours? The very thought of this is sickening to me.

If the purest of all forms of Islam could call for your death, you who have done nothing but give of yourself in your kind quiet way, then who among us is safe? Who among us can argue for tolerance and understanding of the bestial religion that murdered you? Who among us can still not see beneath those veils, even after you have pulled them away.

These are the best words I can come up with, Gayle Williams. This is the best I can do. I wish I could do more. I wish we all could do more. - rg




http://radarsite.blogspot.com/2008/10/taliban-kill-christian-aid-worker-in.html

http://radarsite.blogspot.com/2008/10/reclaiming-power-of-hate-revisted.html

http://edition.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/asiapcf/10/21/afghanistan.violence.aid.groups/?iref=mpstoryview

Reclaiming the Power of Hate: Revisited

Gayle Williams

A note from Radarsite: I am resurrecting this older article in response to two current developments. The first is the report by Holger Awakens of the brutal murder of a defenseless female Western Aid Worker [in photo above] in Afghanistan by the Taliban.
The second reason is to respond to the avalanche of outraged and indignant liberal commenters to my October in New England article cross posted to Susan Duclos' fine Wake Up America website.
Basically, October in New England attempts to address the liberals adamant refusal to acknowledge the existential threats that confront us, or to accept the premise that an Obama presidency is one of the worst of these threats. Interwoven into this premise is a refutation of the liberal concept of tolerating the intolerant. This is the offending paragraph:

Then I see another little sign, tacked up on a telephone pole. An innocuous little sign, weather beaten and torn at the edges -- it's been up there for quite a while now. "No room in this town for hate" it reads. And I shudder to myself. This is the sign that advertises our vulnerabilities and our weaknesses. This is what makes this beautiful little town of mine so friendly and pleasant and so blind to the steady encroachment of that other less friendly reality. We have no room here for hate. And without hate we are vulnerable to those who hate us. We are, this sign proclaims, a community determined to be tolerant and just. We are fair-minded and trusting. We don't just welcome the Other into our midst,we eagerly embrace them. And if you are different than us, we say, if your culture is different than ours, and if your values are different from ours, no matter, we will embrace you just the same. Our survival is secondary to our tolerance.

Here is one response:

I don't know what Sharia law and socialism have to do with what Roger was warning against. Does he mean that these are evils and that only hatred can protect us from them?

And another:

This post reminds me of a bumper sticker I saw recently..."All Fanatics Must Be Killed" it said...Apart from the hysterical thinking behind the idea that a Democratic administration won't care about protecting America, or that the public sector's role in responsible regulation of the economy is somehow equivalent to Stalinism I would point out that hate is always the product of fear. I refuse to live in fear, and it frankly saddens me to see how many Americans have chosen to do otherwise.There is nothing courageous or noble or useful about hatred; being able to defend ourselves depends on courage, foresight and thoughtfulness while hatred brings blindness, paralysis and violence. I wish more Americans would forget their hatred and embrace courage.

And here is a short exchange with a commenter to that original article:

All hate is self hate.
Mr. Golyadkin 12.04.07 - 11:33 pm #

--------------------------------------------------------

Sounds pretty catchy Mr. G., but it just ain't true.
Hate is not always some sort of psychological transference of a self-destructive impulse. It's not always a sign of moral sickness or weakness.

Hate is a legitimate emotion, like love or fear, and sometimes, under certain circumstances, it's quite appropriate. Sometimes, as I tried to point out in that article, it's even essential as a source of strength.

I'm sorry, but if an enemy hates you enough to want to kill you, and is attempting to do just that, clever words like yours just won't help us.

It would be wonderful to live in a world where hate was unnecessary, but I'm afraid we're not quite there yet. And until we are, hate is a weapon we still need in our arsenal. You can not win a battle against people you merely dislike; your lack of passion will be your downfall.

Save your pacifist wisdom for a battle against other pacifists. Against naked aggression your lofty sentiments are useless.
Roger W. Gardner Homepage 12.05.07 - 2:09 am #

-------------------------------------------------------------

This I believe has become a truly crucial topic, perhaps even more critical today than when this article was first written over a year ago. To put oneself in the position of promoting hatred, violence and war is certainly not a way of winning any popularity contests. But, unfortunately, the problems addressed in these essays are not just going to go away because we find them unpleasant to deal with; if anything, they have become even more pertinent and deadly.

At the very core of this monumental debate is the concept that we are presently in a war, a war for our very existence. If you still doubt the validity of this basic premise, if you still honestly believe that this recent Taliban murder of this innocent and defenseless young aid worker is just an aberration, an unfortunate episode that should be addressed as an isolated criminal act; that the proper response to this criminal act should be some form of formal diplomatic indignation; if you still believe that the threats posed to our nation by unchecked Muslim immigration and the slow, subtle but undeniable infiltration of sharia law into our American judicial system; and the the gradual Socialization of America and the accompanying inevitable loss of our national sovereignty are merely the twin bogeymen of right-winger conspiracies, then there is probably no point in reading further.

If, however, this particular Afghan murder of this particular young woman makes your blood boil and pushes you beyond outrage and indignation; if you see this great nation of ours slipping away from us; and all of the core values upon which this great and noble experiment was founded being eroded, undermined and displaced; if you feel, as I do, that within a very short span of time our national resolve will be tested in ways which today may be inconceivable; and that we are in so many ways increasingly vulnerable and imperilled, then please read on. - rg

News Surrounding lord god Czarbie

~Snooper~

Mike's America: Liberals Who Believe in Nothing, Will Believe Anything
American Power: Damn, That Liberal Press! (moonbats in comment sections)
TAB: THE POEM WHICH PROVES FRANK MARSHALL IS OBAMA'S BIOLOGICAL FATHER
NRO: Sowell: Polls and Pols
Melanie Morgan: ENOUGH ALREADY! There is no such thing as "The Bradley Effect"
Protein Wisdom: a CITIZEN JOURNALIST prepares himself for life under Barack Obama’s Socialist Paradise
Sister Toldjah: McCain hits back at Biden over “tested” comments
American Thinker: Obama's campaign built on lies
Mike's America: The Lasting Damage An Obama Presidency Could Do
Politeia: The O Plot Thickens: Law Suits Like Kittens
Pirate's Cove: An “Ugly” Reception For Obama In North Carolina
Jennifer Rubin: All It Took Was Joe the Plumber?

A War Veteran's Tale - An Ugly American?

~Snooper~

This article published at Canada Free Press

Some time ago, I co-authored a piece with Sonlit Knight and I placed it up at a Citizen Journalist site that has morphed into the usual brain-dead Nobama trouser licker site. Freedom of Speech isn't allowed at that place because it injures the sensibilities of the over emotional children pretending that they are adults. Nevertheless, I have chosen to republish the piece here having been compelled to do so after I have thought about for a week now.

The compelling factor was the post at Wake Up Americans penned by auntybrat. That piece is entitled, America the Ugly. Naturally, the enemies of this nation refer to us in that regard but we are the first nation turned to in a time of need. I find that bizarro. So, having read that piece I now present the following.

A War Veteran's Tale - An Ugly American?

Through the heart, soul and eyes, this disabled American veteran, having survived 91101 in the hills of Tajikistan, describes the current events involving American Forces currently deployed and how the Vietnam Vets could not.

As the remnants and incorrigible hippies and their off-spring of the Vietnam War Era make a mockery of themselves and the United States Armed Forces in Berkeley, CA in these recent days unfolds, I am reminded of the ludicrous fallacy of the 'Ugly American'.

Of the many things I have been called by unhinged, hysterical leftwingers, few names cause me to chuckle more than "The Ugly American". The title (like everything else liberals believe) has no basis in any historical reality.

The name was gleaned from a 1958 novel by Eugene Burdick and William Lederer. The book was intended to show that America was losing the war against communism because of our loud, boorish arrogance and inability to understand other cultures. Like all the other dogmas of liberalism, it is based purely in fantasy- fantasy that history would expose.

That The Ugly American was a novel and that should end the discussion. An argument is exposed as inadequate if it must rely on fictitious events to support it. Much speculation has been made about who the characters in the book (and later, in the movie) represented, but it is so much nonsensical blather.

Let's look at the facts.

First, War is as old as civilization itself. Since Cain first slew Abel, mankind's barbarity has been a matter of sad fact. In fact, as time has gone by, the ability of man to torture, maim, brutalize and slay his fellow man has only been brought to more grotesque perfection while the world continues to fall into an ever more cold and callous slumber.

Second, America was not losing the war against communism. In fact, we won the war against communism. That is an objective historical fact, leftist revisionism notwithstanding.

Third, America was certainly not losing the war in Southeast Asia. At least, not by any standard by which war has ever been measured before. That America was losing the war in Vietnam is a work of pure liberal fiction.

America lost the Vietnam war, not to the communists, but to the American Government. That is a fact and it is indisputable. In an article published in Front Page Magazine, Bui Tin, a former North Vietnamese Col. admitted that the North Vietnamese were not achieving military victories, only political ones.

Question: How did Hanoi intend to defeat the Americans?

Answer: By fighting a long war which would break their will to help South Vietnam. Ho Chi Minh said,"We don't need to win military victories, we only need to hit them until they give up and get out."

The American protester was essential to the enemy efforts.

It was essential to our strategy. Support of the war from our rear was completely secure while the American rear was vulnerable. Every day our leadership would listen to world news over the radio at 9 a.m. to follow the growth of the American antiwar movement. Visits to Hanoi by people like Jane Fonda, and former Attorney General Ramsey Clark and ministers gave us confidence that we should hold on in the face of battlefield reverses. We were elated when Jane Fonda, wearing a red Vietnamese dress, said at a press conference that she was ashamed of American actions in the war and that she would struggle along with us.

The Vietnamese army knew they could not defeat the Americans. Only the Americans could do that.

If Johnson had granted [Gen. William] Westmoreland's requests to enter Laos and block the Ho Chi Minh trail, Hanoi could not have won the war.

The enemies of America resurrect the ghost of Vietnam to protest American intervention at any time, in any place. The lesson of Vietnam, they insist, is that an occupier cannot win against a well entrenched insurgency. That lesson, also, is a work of fantasy. When liberals make idiotic claims like this, they only betray their own blind ignorance of history.

The fact is that insurgencies rarely succeed. A student of history would know this, a student of fantasy would not. America did not lose the Vietnam war because of the Ugly Americans over there, it lost because of the [sic] beautiful people here. Namby Pamby sissy types took the streets of America by storm and it was the American citizen, not the American soldier, that could not counter it.

Myths about invincible guerrillas and insurgents are a direct result of America's collective misunderstanding of its defeat in South Vietnam. This loss is generally credited to the brilliance and military virtues of the pajama-clad Vietcong. The Vietnamese may have been tough and persistent, but they were not brilliant. Rather, they were lucky - they faced an opponent with leaders unwilling to learn from their failures: the United States. When the Vietcong went toe-to-toe with U.S. forces in the 1968 Tet Offensive, they were decimated. When South Vietnam finally fell in 1975, it did so not to the Vietcong, but to regular units of the invading North Vietnamese Army. The Vietcong insurgency contributed greatly to the erosion of the American public's will to fight, but so did the way that President Lyndon Johnson and the American military waged the war. It was North Vietnam's will and American failure, not skillful use of an insurgency, that were the keys to Hanoi's victory.

America lost the Vietnam war because - and only because - she lost the will to fight it. Due to the efforts of traitors and liars like John Kerry and Jane Fonda, public opinion was turned against that effort. It was a death by a thousand cuts. Make no mistake, America surrendered in a war it was winning over there because it could not put down an insurgency back here.

Leftists have attempted to capitalize on America's humiliation in Vietnam by co-opting a Novel's fantasy of The Ugly American into a pseudo reality. Remember, The Ugly American was a Novel that takes place in a fictional place called Sarkhan. The foreign policy of the America haters works great in imaginary places. It is in the realm of reality on earth that it is somewhat wanting.

The fantasy of The Ugly American provides a convenient model for moral cowards that are jealous of America and willing to scapegoat her for their empty, meaningless lives. These hysterical cowards envision an America that has been a friend of despots and tyrants but history has been quite unkind to their pathological delusions. For, from Poland to Nicaragua, from Grenada to Iraq, more of the world's people are free and safe, fed, clothed, educated and receiving medical care, as a result of the American Soldier, than because of the combined efforts of all the other nations in the history of the world.

Now, it is no secret that I have had a great deal of fun over the years, poking my enemies with the proverbial stick. I have derived what is probably an unhealthy level of enjoyment by driving unhinged leftist baboons into volcanic fits of rage, by using their own rabid bigotry against them.

It is true that I do not mind being hated by these wild-eyed, spoiled and petulant little cretins. In fact, I relish it. For, I have yet to find one who can articulate a doctrine of how the world is that goes any deeper than "It's America's fault". As shallow as that is, it is all they have...a feeling and ill-conceived belief.

You may call me an ugly American when I say that we can bomb whoever we want, whenever we want, wherever we want, then sit back gleefully and watch leftist cretins meltdown. Even though I say such things only to be incendiary, and entertain myself and, even though they certainly don't reflect my real views, you could make the case that it is an ugly thing to say. That's fair enough. I'll accept the charge.

Just don't expect an apology. I have my reasons. My brother was KIA in Quang Tri Province during the Tet Offensive of 1968. If there is one thing I have learned from the Police Action in Vietnam, it is this. I shall not sit idly by...as my parents and elders did...and let the unhinged do to our veterans now and our Armed Forces now, that which they did in the late 1960s and early 1970s.

For me, true ugliness is not manifested in words purely intended to incite wrath from those who are mentally unbalanced to begin with. To me, true ugliness is manifested in cold indifference to the suffering of innocent people.

You see, for me, people are real. Real pain, real suffering and real anguish are part of the human experience of oppressed people living under the iron fist of tyranny. People live under no more horrid tyranny and brutality than those burdened with the yoke of 7th century Islamic Sharia law.

For the christophobes and the America and Israel haters, all religions are equal and American and Israeli imperialism is the source of all the world's ills. Meanwhile, back on planet Earth, reality tells a very different story, for Sharia oppression and Islamic barbarism are as old as the religion of peace, itself. Once again, a student of history can quickly attest to the truth of what I claim, while a student of fantasy will merely kick and scream in protest.

Unlike the coalition of the callous, we do not have the luxury of living in a world where other people simply don't matter. When they look upon an oppressed people, the narcissists merely rationalize that their plight is-in some way- the result of some past American sin. This, inexplicably, renders the victim unworthy of relief or rescue.

In the world in which we live, it is simply unconscionable to view human beings as no more than pawns in a giant blame the imperialist Americans game. That is what I call ugly.

When I hear the blame America crowd calling the Iraq war immoral and demanding we pull out, I feel ill. When they compare the so-called Immoral war in Iraq with the so-called immoral war in Vietnam, I laugh.

Immoral war in Vietnam? More immoral than victims abandoned in Saigon? More immoral than the killing fields?

It is too easy for the pseudo-intellectuals to stand on the sideline, in a perpetual state of craven condemnation of American foreign policy abroad. They have that luxury because they never have to accept the consequences of their vapid stupidity. Fools such as these empty headed cretins cannot understand the difference between education and intelligence, and are fully lacking in the ability to see the world as it really is.

The one thing liberal elitists are good at is being wrong. They were wrong about Chamberlain and Carter's pacifism just as surely as they were wrong about Reagan's peace through strength and their opposition to the Vietnam war.

Never, ever, have they been as provably wrong as they have been in Iraq.

They predicted the fall of Iraq would not be accomplished without tens of thousands of American dead. They were wrong. They pithily argued that the handover of power wouldn't happen, they were wrong. They claimed the elections would be stopped- wrong again.

More elections, a parliament, a prime minister, a Constitution....

wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong.

Finally, when things were going poorly, came the surge. Yet again, the apostles of failure predicted sure defeat.

Humiliating defeat after humiliating defeat after humiliating defeat. Have they learned? Of course not. They drone on in ever more bitter, ever more caustic fits of neurotic rage and feigned condescension.

.....but we know the truth, don't we?

They, not us, are the ugly ones. Yes, we are arrogant and boorish to them. Yes, we do push them down and kick sand in their faces but we all know they deserve it, so few say anything about it.

After all, these cowards are willing to consign a person...a nation....an entire race to poverty, oppression and misery just to reinforce an arrogant, self-serving hatred towards a nation they are jealous of. Ugly Americans? There is no such thing. We overthrow ugliness and we suffer not the crap of the cowardly pigs who would stand in our way.

In conclusion, then, that which transpired in Vietnam over there and over here; that which transpired against the returning veterans, will not - I repeat - will not happen again...ever. Not on our watch.

This is all so evident because the Iraq War is not even a campaign issue any longer because the politicos were on the wrong side of the issue and they know it now as they knew it then. Why is it not an issue this year, if this were not so? All we hear now is "change".

"Change" to what and from what? They want to "change" from that which was wrought in 2006 and 2007? Didn't they run on that platform of "change". Did not that "change" fail? They want to "change" from last years' rhetoric? Does that mean they want to win, now? Or, do they merely use their all too familiar "change" ignorance to appeal to the emotionally unbalanced?

Speak up, Mr Reid, Madame Pelosi, Mr Murtha, Mr Kennedy. We cannot hear you.