The “Peace Activists” Are Actually” Anti-Americanists”

The “Peace Activists” Are Actually” Anti-Americanists”

And this can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

My pet anti-American group on my hit list is Code Pink. They support the murder of United States Military Men and Women. It is plain to see by the mere way they act around men and women of uniform whether currently serving or have served. I myself have experienced their accursed ways and I find them contemptible, disgusting and absolutely unacceptable.

Everywhere they rear their ugly mugs, they spread and spew hate and discontent. They are the worse of the lot, bar none, mostly due to their insidious stupidity and disgrace. Last week or so I posted a picture that I had thought was a real picture. I was driven by my knowledge of Code Pink and without a doubt I would not put it past them to display such a banner. Knowing what I know about Code Pink, the sentiment is true. I had said that I saw the banner which in fact I did not. The banner I saw destroyed in DC is shown in this video here and in the photo below. In the video, if you pay close attention to the background, you will see a “Snooper” hat behind a camera.

Now, what is my beef with Code Pink? Madea Benjamin is a terrorist sympathizer and lover of dictators, a dictator worshipping propagandist, if you will. A fairly informative write-up can be found here. There are links galore there to further your studies if you are at all interested.

This group called Code Pink, co-founded by Madea Benjamin, sent $650K in humanitarian aid to our enemies…America’s enemies. What do you suppose this money was used for and just how in the hell did it get there? It was used to kill American Men and Women in uniform, fighting the war against terrorism. This was and still is an un-American act. It is treason; aiding and abetting the enemy; lending aid and comfort to the enemy, plain and simple. No matter the spin, the fact remains…Code Pink is not a “peace movement”. Code Pink is not an “anti-war movement”. Code Pink is an anti-American movement and it closely resembles a convoluted bowel movement. The leaders of Code Pink were also sending funds to the communist guerrillas in El Salvador in the 1980s. Imagine that.

This is why this picture which has the Code Pinkies in a panty wad contest will stand until the organization is disemboweled. The sentiment is true. Get over it.

Code Pink is financed to a major degree by those people that are in support of the World Tribunal On Iraq and the findings thereof. Of the several “findings”, Code Pink, by default and by association, upholds the following “finding”:

[…]

There is widespread opposition to the occupation. Political, social, and civil resistance through peaceful means is subjected to repression by the occupying forces. It is the brutality of the occupation that has provoked a strong armed resistance and certain acts of desperation. By the principles embodied in the UN Charter and in international law, the popular national resistance to the occupation is legitimate and justified. It deserves the support of people everywhere who care for justice and freedom.

[…]

The World Tribunal On Iraq is summarily a farce. Click the link provided and read it yourself. Since the Tribunal met and altogether fell apart, the “conclusions” it reached have been since debunked and nullified but the fervor still lives on and this is what we are fighting here at home. Knowing and understanding this POS document will enable and embolden you to fight these un-American organizations.

Other anti-American groups that call themselves “anti-war” or “peace activists” are as follows with very brief bios:

International A.N.S.W.E.R.

This is the Party for Socialism and Liberation. Don’t believe me…go to their web site. I provided links for some items above. Go find your own for Int’l Answer. On their site, you will see a picture of Che. Che is dead and in hell…get over it. There is a link there which will direct you to Marxism 101. There, you will find a widely distributed flyer. It is a flyer pronouncing the seeking of support for counter revolution and resistance in Iraq and seeking unconditional support for Iraq’s anti-colonial resistance.

It is unclear who is trying to colonialize Iraq. These people are about as intelligent as a slug.

Iraq Veterans Against The War

These poor slogs have been organized and mentored by the idiots of the Vietnam Veterans Against The War, the cowards that won’t come out of their dope-tainted closets and their Hanoi Jane dolls. They are John Kerry wannabes. They are the Junior Varsity and Hanoi Jane loves them. That in itself speaks volumes. Hanoi/Jihad Jane has been really quiet since her last debacle and publicity stunt.

This group sent Tim Goodrich to the Tribunal. This cretin testified before the Tribunal that Americans were committing war crimes. I guess this is where Murtha gets his data from? Enough said.

This group is sponsored by Vets For Peace and the web site is funded by the Inavale Foundation. Vets For Peace are primarily comprised of ex-Soldiers and ex-Marines that have an axe to grind and are funded in part and indirectly by Soros. They think they represent all veterans and fighting men and women but that is merely the drug induced stupor speaking.

United For Peace and Justice

This group is wholly insane. Its leader, Leslie Kagan, in the 60s went to Cuba for weapons and military training and since returning to the US, enables others to do the same. I wonder which peace she wants and which justice she intends to impose. This is kind of odd that this warmonger is trying to lead a “peace movement”.

World Can’t Wait

I find it curious that the FBI hasn’t shut these folks down. They are the Revolutionary Communist Party USA. They are a cult group that envisions end-time calamities and when the smoke clears, they will lead the world with world-wide communism. These are the really dangerous types.

I believe their logo is the world on fire. The leader is a fruit loop names Bob Avakian. The dude is a nut case.

Summary

The “peace activists” are as un-American as un-American can get. They are in no way in any shape or form American Patriots. Their leaders are known communists and support America’s enemies without and within.

As Dr Raoul Deming has so stated: “They are in mid-campaign to smear this generation of veterans and military as baby killers. If this war was 10 years from now, they would all be in their graves and unable to organize”

These defacto “peace activists” are the elderly throw-backs from the 60s and 70s and have slithered out from under their drug stashes to once again promote communism and everything under the sun contrary to the United States Constitution.

We wont’ allow that to happen.

Catch the wave

This is an example of how non-Patriots conduct themselves

From Age of Hooper

I can only post one picture from the latest of skanky boob people

Good God Almighty I think I am going to hurl. Check Hooper's place for the rest and GREAT comments. He has a video of flag burners also...another activity Patriots do NOT partake of. Notice the CHE sign held by an idiot that can only be cured by my 243.

And they call themselves Patriots...patriots of whom and of what?

I have a post here in regards to another Breasts Not Bombs on the other coast. It seems the only coast left that is worth a damn is the Gulf Coast.

Catch this wave at meme

Vast Majority Support Victory In The Battle In Iraq

Results of the latest scientific poll by Snooper.


Question: How Important Is A victory In Iraq?

The poll has since closed, having been open for nearly 60 days. As anyone can see, an overwhelming majority think the answer is of the highest priority. It is clear who the real Patriots are in this country.

Eleven voters have openly declared their "udder" stupidity. Then again, these could very well be those jihadi trolls that are dumber than a box of turtle turds.

Four voters are clearly just plain stupid with no hope of redemption.

Thirty eight at least have an honest opinion albeit it completely and totally against the Main Stream.

Highest Priority	257 (82%)
Could Care Less	11 (3%)
Where Is Iraq	4 (1%)
Lowest Priority	38 (12%)

Stand by for another scientific poll by Snooper:

MEMRI...News The Leftinistra Lose

Iran flexes its muscle even though their president said that they were no threat...

Against the backdrop of the increasing threat of a possible attack on Iran, Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) commander Mohammad Ali J'afari warned the countries in the region against permitting the U.S. to attack Iran from its territory, saying "We will pay you back, and this is only natural." [1]

Federalism taking route in the Middle East

Gen. Paul Fares: "Once a new election law is passed, and after we promote the idea of a federal state, we will hold [parliamentary] elections, and in light of their outcome - two years later, after stability in Lebanon is restored - we will raise the idea of a federal state. This idea should arise out of the conviction of all Lebanese, not just some of them. It will take time for this conviction to take root. We need to explain it to the people, so they will understand the benefits of this new regime. It is not easy to shift them from one regime to the other..."

Egyptian playright smacks down on Jihadis

"The culture of death is a culture of irresponsibility. It is a culture in which a person considers all the 'others' to be his enemies. He is terrified of them, and he feels he must finish them off before they finish him off. In addition, this culture does not glorify life - although life is the greatest thing Allah has created for us. I'm not relying on any religious authority or historical examination, but I can only give you my personal opinion. Allah created us in order to enjoy this beautiful universe, and in order to make it even more beautiful, or at the very least, to keep it beautiful.

Saudi government pissed off about Suadi AQ

Recently, a public debate has emerged in Saudi Arabia regarding the involvement of Saudi nationals in terrorist activities throughout the world.

This involvement has been confirmed by numerous sources. For example, reports point to Saudi involvement in terrorist activities in Syria. The Lebanese news agency Al-Markaziyya reported, citing a diplomatic source, that Saudi Arabia had demanded that Syria round up the 980 Saudi Al-Qaeda members currently at a refugee camp in Syria, and hand them over to Saudi authorities as a precondition for any negotiations between the two countries. [1]

Well, Leftinistra?

The above are excerpts from a reporting agency that our dear untrustworthy and defamed morons in CONgress will not accept.

War News

US CENTCOM Press Releases

COALITION FORCES KILL LIKELY SUCCESSOR TO ABU AYYUB AL-MASRI Posted: 28 Sep 2007 01:59 PM CDT COALITION FORCES KILL LIKELY SUCCESSOR TO ABU AYYUB AL-MASRI

POLAR BEARS DISCOVER 9-11 PROPAGANDA IN IRAQI HOME Posted: 28 Sep 2007 11:17 AM CDT POLAR BEARS DISCOVER 9-11 PROPAGANDA IN IRAQI HOME

U.S. AIR FORCE F-16 AIR STRIKE KILLS 3 TERRORIST LEADERS Posted: 28 Sep 2007 11:06 AM CDT U.S. AIR FORCE F-16 AIR STRIKE KILLS 3 TERRORIST LEADERS

THREE BAGHDAD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT STAFF DETAINED Posted: 27 Sep 2007 02:34 PM CDT THREE BAGHDAD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT STAFF DETAINED

DOUBLE SUICIDE ATTACK AVERTED BY ANSF Posted: 27 Sep 2007 10:43 AM CDT DOUBLE SUICIDE ATTACK AVERTED BY ANSF

CITIZENS LEAD 3RD ID SOLDIERS TO WEAPONS CACHE Posted: 27 Sep 2007 10:21 AM CDT CITIZENS LEAD 3RD ID SOLDIERS TO WEAPONS CACHE

BRIG. GEN. DORKO VISITS GRS Posted: 27 Sep 2007 10:15 AM CDT BRIG. GEN. DORKO VISITS GRS

NINE LOCAL NATIONALS KILLED, INVESTIGATION UNDERWAY Posted: 27 Sep 2007 10:09 AM CDT NINE LOCAL NATIONALS KILLED, INVESTIGATION UNDERWAY

The Grand Globalist...Socialist Soros, Man of The Abyss

"On the practical level, I have established a network of founda­tions devoted to fostering open societies. This network covers all the countries of the former Soviet empire and it has branched out to other parts of the world: South Africa, the ten countries of South­ern Africa, the sixteen countries of Western Africa, Haiti, Guate­mala, Burma, and more recently Indonesia. There is also an Open Society Institute in the United States." Socialist Soros


And the morons of the Leftinistra call GWB a Globalist? Not hardly.

OPEN SOCIETY

Reforming
Global Capitalism

by GEORGE SOROS

No wonder the moonbats love this guy...

An all so Clear and Present Danger

Everything the guy touches turns to shiite...eventually...

(Hat Tip tip Gateway Pundit for the image.)

Check out Wake Up America's take on the Grand Socialist Loser...

"Universal Health Care" (aka Socialist Health Care)

Hat Tip to Norman Hooben via email: GREAT questions/commentary

1. Our quasi-socialist health-care system in which the government pays almost half of all health-care costs (verses 12% of health-care costs paid out of pocket by individuals) is already killing and injuring Americans. Putting government in exclusive control of any service increases the costs and decreases the quality of the service provided. Why then would we want to put government in exclusive control of health-care as Hillary and the Democrats are proposing?

2. To those who say, "no American should go without health-care...." The U.S. Congress passed the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act in 1986 which requires emergency rooms to treat any person who shows up seeking medical treatment, regardless of their ability to pay or whether they are a legal US citizen or an illegal alien. So, which citizens are you referring to that "go without" health-care?

3. To those who claim that, "universal health-care should be a guaranteed right for every American...." Since our Constitution only guarantees rights to take actions (i.e. the right to pursue happiness, the right to free speech, the right to self defense, the right to equal protection under the law, etc…) on what basis does our Constitution guarantee health-care insurance? Are you claiming that health-care insurance is an enumerated unalienable "right" in our Constitution? If it is then isn't car insurance, life insurance, and other forms of insurance also a "right" to which all Americans are entitled?

4. To those who claim that "too many Americans don't have health-care and hence there is a need for universal health-care...." First, by law no one residing in the United States -- legal or illegal -- can be denied treatment at any emergency room in America. Secondly of the 45 million uninsured Americans, according to the US Census Bureau, 37% live in households earning greater than $50,000 per year, 19% have incomes greater than $75,000 per year, 20% are not US citizens (aka "undocumented workers" or "potential Democrat voters"), and 33% are eligible for government programs but are not enrolled. Should tax-paying U.S. citizens be forced by the government to subsidize health-care insurance for 12-20 million illegal aliens who don't have coverage? And what about the 17 million Americans who make over $50,000 a year who can afford insurance but choose not to buy it? Don't they have this right? And why should the government force them to have health insurance if they chose to pay out of pocket? Wouldn't it make more sense to implement market based reforms -- to reduce the cost of health-care and increase the affordability and availability -- such as equalizing the tax treatment for businesses and individuals, increasing the availability of tax-free health savings accounts, nationalizing the 50-state insurance market, reducing expensive and onerous government insurance mandates, limiting Medicare and Medicaid for those at or below the poverty line, and ending "guaranteed issue" laws that enable people to put off purchasing insurance until they need it?

5. To those at the New York Times, which wrote "the United States is a laggard not a leader in providing good medical care verses other countries...." The World Health Organization and Commonwealth Fund Studies on which the Times based its statement judged a country's overall quality of health-care based on life expectancy. But is this really a fair basis for comparison given the fact that we have a significantly higher number of fatal car accidents, a higher homicide rate, and a higher obesity rate (that have nothing to do with the quality of our health-care) than other countries such as the "U.K. and Canada? When these things are taken into account the U.S. actually has a higher life expectancy rate than nearly every industrialized nation in the world. People come from all over the world to receive virtually every type of high-technology medical procedure and advanced drug therapy that they cannot obtain in their own country. If we are a "laggard", then why are people from all over the world coming here for inferior quality health-care?

6. To those who claim: "We need to ensure health-care for all Americans and need to institute a government health-care single-payer system like they have in Canada, France, the U.K. and Cuba so that all Americans can receive quality affordable health-care." Why would we want to do that given the fact that in these countries, patients who have "universal government" coverage face significantly longer waiting times, treatment times, rationing, and inferior health-care overall? Why are citizens from these countries flocking to the U.S. to receive high quality life saving treatment in virtually every area from neurosurgery, to cardiology, to organ transplant, to cancer treatment, to even routine MRIs?

7. To those who claim: "We need to invest more in health-care." How can one say this and also argue that American health-care is inferior to other socialist countries because we spend too much on health-care as a percentage of GDP? How will spending trillions of tax dollars on health-care actually reduce costs, empirically speaking? The only way that socialist countries have been able to "reduce" overall costs is through the rationing of health-care. Could we "reduce costs" without rationing? How would we do that? Where has it ever been done?

8. To those who say: "We need to roll back 'the Bush tax cuts for the rich' and 'invest' that money on health-care for the poor." Why can't we lower taxes across the board and institute competitive affordable health-care simultaneously? How would increasing taxes on the most productive workers (the "rich") in America enable more "poor" Americans to obtain health-care? Raising taxes on those making more than $200,000 (80% are small businesses who pay taxes at the individual rate) will leave many businesses with less money to expand and hire more workers. How will this help make insurance for the "poor" more affordable? Also, if having more money available to the government to "invest" in a national single-payer health-care plan is the goal, wouldn't it be preferable to actually reduce tax rates across the board since every time taxes have been reduced over the last century tax receipts to the treasury have increased significantly?

9. To those who say: "Health-Care Savings Accounts (HSAs) will only benefit the rich and will result in higher costs to those who wish to remain in the traditional program which will hurt the elderly and the poor." HSAs have enabled small businesses to realize an average savings of about forty percent on health-insurance premiums according to the Center for Health Transformation. What specific data shows that HSAs only benefit the "rich" and hurt the "poor?"

10. To those who say "the vaccine shortages in America prove that government has to be in control of health-care to ensure universal vaccinations -- that profits should not come before health for the children and the elderly...." In 1993 Congress passed Mrs. Clinton's "Vaccines for Children" program which gave the federal government the power to negotiate prices exclusively with drug companies to ensure universal vaccinations. The government agreed to purchase sixty percent of the national pediatric vaccine supply (Clinton pushed for 100%) at a forced discount of about 50% to be delivered to doctors, the poor, and the uninsured even though vaccines are already free for the needy through programs such as Medicaid and S-CHIP. Since government bureaucrats instead of doctors became the direct purchaser of vaccines and dictating prices below costs, many manufacturers were forced out of business (thirty years ago twenty-five companies produced vaccines. Today there are only five). Given that history, how will expanding government control make vaccines more abundant and affordable? Isn't the lesson here that government mandated price-controls limit competition which leads to rationing and shortages?

11. Mrs. Clinton, under your universal health-care proposal people would automatically be enrolled in a government-run "health alliance." Your plan specifically states: "It is the obligation of every eligible individual to enroll in a health plan. Anyone who does not meet the established deadline for enrollment automatically is enrolled in a health plan when he or she seeks medical care. Regional alliances assign patients who do not seek enrollment to a health plan; they automatically assign any newborn infant who is not enrolled through his or her parents to a plan." Once you are enrolled, "health-providing institutions... would send all patients through medical 'gatekeepers,' who would decide what care people really need." Can you please specify who these "gatekeepers" will be and what specific criteria they will use to determine what type of care "people really need?" Isn't the type of care a patient needs a decision best made by the patient and his physician?

12. To those who claim that a "single-payer system will save money because people will seek care earlier when it is easier and more affordable to treat diseases...." While it is true that we could significantly reduce health-care costs overall by focusing more on earlier state preventative care instead of advanced stage treatments and therapies, what would make one think that people would have easier access to health-care in a single-payer government run health-care system given the excessive long waits and difficulties getting appointments in the U.K., Canada, France, and Australia? Is there one example where a single-payer system actually saves money and increases access simultaneously?

Spin that.

UPDATES to follow, I am most sure...

Today In History

Catch up post



9/29

1789 The U.S. War Department established a regular army with a strength of several hundred men.

1918	Allied forces scored a decisive breakthrough of the Hindenburg Line during World War I.
AP Photo

1943 General Dwight D. Eisenhower and Italian Marshal Pietro Badoglio signed an armistice aboard the British ship Nelson off Malta.

1988The space shuttle Discovery blasted off from Cape Canaveral, Fla., marking America's return to manned space flight following the Challenger disaster.

2005New York Times reporter Judith Miller was released from 85 days of federal detention after agreeing to testify in a criminal probe into the leak of a covert CIA officer's identity.

And Armitage is STILL free. He was The leaker but the Democrats don't care.

9/30

AP Highlight in History: On Sept. 30, 1938, British, French, German and Italian leaders agreed at a meeting in Munich that Nazi Germany would be allowed to annex Czechoslovakia's Sudetenland. Read the original AP story

AP Photo

1946An international military tribunal in Nuremberg, Germany, found 22 top Nazi leaders guilty of war crimes.

1949The Berlin airlift, which delivered 2.3 million tons of food and fuel to West Berliners while circumventing a Soviet blockade, came to an end.

1954The U.S. Navy commissioned the first atomic-powered vessel, the submarine Nautilus.

1991The military in Haiti overthrew Jean-Bertrand Aristide, the country's first freely-elected president.

1997France's Roman Catholic Church apologized for its silence during the systematic persecution and deportation of Jews by the pro-Nazi Vichy regime.

2003The FBI began a criminal investigation into whether White House officials had illegally leaked the identity of an undercover CIA officer.

And they STILL cannot find Armitage?

Iran In Deal To Cut Iraq Arms Flow

But, but, but, but, didn't AchmadImADingDong say that his country was NOT involved? Must have been the ludes, man.

From the LASlimes:

Petraeus says Tehran's pledge to Iraqi officials in August may have led to a dip in attacks associated with Shiite militants.

BAGHDAD -- Prime Minister Nouri Maliki has secured a pledge from Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to help cut off weapons, funding and other support to extremist militiamen in Iraq, U.S. and Iraqi officials said Saturday.

Army Gen. David H. Petraeus, the top U.S. commander in Iraq, said there were signs of a slight drop in the types of attacks associated with Shiite militants since the deal was reached in August, and he raised the possibility that U.S. and Iraqi officials might be able to do something in return. But he said it was too early to tell whether there had been a real reduction in cross-border support. read more

If a nation wasn't involved in the first place, how can they also become instrumental in stopping the flow? Hmmmm?

Catch the wave:

oops

Oakland Repeats Vietnam Era Troop Treatment

It could be the usual "hate the troops" philosophy from being really close to the San Fran Morons. You know. The city government that would not let the Marines film a commercial in their fine gay city. Disgusting it is.

From Michelle Malkin

Two days ago, an e-mail about the rude treatment of Marines and soldiers returning from Iraq started making the rounds on the Internet. The brother of one of the mistreated Marines who described the incident at Oakland Airport works on the Hill. The brother forwarded the Marine’s e-mail around. The e-mail is real, contrary to the Daily Kos nut who dismissed it as “fake” without any evidence whatsoever (can you say p-r-o-j-e-c-t-i-o-n). I contacted the Marine chaplain to verify the e-mail on Friday. He confirmed.

In short: “On September 27th 204 Marines and soldiers who were returning from Iraq were not allowed into the passenger terminal at Oakland International Airport.Instead they had to deplane about 400 yards away from the terminal where the extra baggage trailers were located. This was the last scheduled stop for fuel and food prior to flying to Hawaii where both were based. The trip started in Kuwait on September 26th with a rigorous search of checked and carry on baggage by US Customs. All baggage was x-rayed with a ‘backscatter’ machine AND each bag was completely emptied and hand searched. After being searched, checked bags were marked and immediately placed in a secure container. Carry on bags were then x rayed again to ensure no contraband items were taken on the plane. While waiting for the bus to the airport, all personnel were in quarantined in a fenced area and were not allowed to leave.” Nevertheless, Oakland forbade them from entering its terminal. According to the Marine, a Lieutenant who served in Afghanistan with the same unit in 2006 noted that Oakland had treated troops the same way before. He “was almost arrested by the TSA for getting belligerent about them not letting the Marines into the terminal,” despite more rigorous screening prior to landing in Oakland. Both JFK airport and in Germany had no problem with the Marines entering their terminals.

Simply amazing. Click the link back to Michelle's place and read the response from the airport Nazis. She also has the originating links to the message that has sparked this response. Truly amazing and typical answer coming from the typical bleeding heart liberal trash of "it isn't my fault...the devil made me do it..." One day, a liberal will shock the world by accepting responsibility for their own actions and quit blaming someone else.

Treating American Heroes like this will not be accepted and will not go unnoticed and we will not allow the repeats of the 60s and 70s.

I wonder who to believe...a known Communist led group like the KOSmonoffs or a decorated United States Marine upon a fresh return from the war.

Catch the wave:

oops!

Trackback: Wake Up America (can we question their patriotism...yet; yes we can and do)

John McCain Exposes His Ignorance of Islam

Anyone in contact with Senator John McCain and able to influence him could perform a valuable public service by directing him to this blog, where he could learn a little about Islam before opening his mouth and inserting his foot.

The Senator gave an interview to beliefnet. Here is a prime excerpt. Note: the video did not perform well on dial up. They promise more video and transcripts Monday.

• I admire the Islam. There's a lot of good principles in it. I think one of the great tragedies of the 21st century is that these forces of evil have perverted what's basically an honorable religion. But, no, I just have to say in all candor that since this nation was founded primarily on Christian principles.... personally, I prefer someone who I know who has a solid grounding in my faith. But that doesn't mean that I'm sure that someone who is Muslim would not make a good president.

1. What good principles does McCain find in Islam? Perhaps its wankahoo with slave girls and 9 year olds?
   
2. Is it the ordination of fighting?
   
3. Or terror?
   
4. Or taking booty?
   
5. Or female inferiority?
   
6. What makes that ignoramus declare that Islam was corrupted in the 21st century when it has a 1384 year track record of rapine??!??
   
7. Doesn't he know about 2:216, 2:190, 8:12 , 8:39, 8:60, 8:67,9:5, 9:29, 9:111, 47:4, 48:15-20 & 61:4 ???
8. Has he never seen Sahih Bukhari's books of Jihad or Khumus nor Al-Misri's Reliance of the Traveler?
   

It appears that Senator McCain thinks that Usama bin Laden invented Jihad, genocide & terrorism and perverted a religion of peace by introducing bida. How far he is from the truth!!! If only he had read our Myth vs Fact series, which exposes the Qur'anic origin of those evils which Muhammad practiced!!

Catch the wave:

Defamamation of Islam

Now comes Doudou Diene,Special Rapporteur on contemporary forms of racism, racial
discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance, complaining to the United Nations Human Rights Council complaining of religious defamation & Islamophobia.

15. Islamophobia is a growing phenomenon and a matter of concern in the aftermath of the events of 11 September 2001. Ongoing instability in the Middle East at large, particularly in Iraq, and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, along with the global war on terror have contributed to the rise of Islamophobia. In the typical expression of Islamophobia, Muslims are seen as opposed to so-called Western values and often portrayed as enemies and a threat to national values and social cohesion. Ensuing is a discourse that in many cases persuades Muslims living abroad to "assimilate" in local cultures, implicitly or explicitly requesting them to abandon their cultural and religious heritage and even their visibility.

76. The Special Rapporteur recommends that the Council invite Governments, in the fight against racial and religious hatred, to fully abide by their obligations concerning both freedom of expression and freedom of religion, as prescribed in the pertinent international instruments, and in particular articles 18, 19 and 20 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, in respect of their interrelation and complementarity.

77. In the light of the polarized and confrontational reading of these articles, the Special Rapporteur wishes to recall the recommendation made to the Council in his joint report with the Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief (A/HRC/2/3) to promote a more profound reflection on their interpretation. In particular, both Special Rapporteurs encouraged the Human Rights Committee to consider the possibility of adopting complementary standards on the interrelations between freedom of expression, freedom of religion and non-discrimination, in particular by drafting a general comment on article 20.

78. The Special Rapporteur recommends that the Council invite Member States to adopt approaches in the promotion of dialogue between cultures, civilizations and religions taking into consideration:

(a) The need to provide equal treatment to the combat of all forms of defamation of religions, thus avoiding hierarchization of forms of discrimination, even though their intensity may vary according to history, geography and culture;

(b) The historical and cultural depth of all forms of defamation of religions, and therefore the need to complement legal strategies with an intellectual and ethical strategy relating to the processes, mechanisms and representations which constitute those manifestations over time;

Is it possible to defame Islam? Has it not been infamous for more than 1300 years? How did the population of the Khaibar Oasis react when they detected the approach of Muhammad's army?

When it was morning, the Jews came out with their spades and baskets, and when they saw him (i.e. the Prophet ), they said, "Muhammad! By Allah! Muhammad and his army!"

Evidently Muhammad already had a reputation for brutality, which was neither unintentional nor undeserved.

59:2 He it is Who drove out the disbelievers among the people of the Scripture (i.e. the Jews of the tribe of Bani An-Nadir) from their homes at the first gathering. You did not think that they would get out. And they thought that their fortresses would defend them from Allah! But Allah's (Torment) reached them from a place whereof they expected it not, and He cast terror into their hearts, so that they destroyed their own dwellings with their own hands and the hands of the believers. Then take admonition, O you with eyes (to see).

What did Allah do to the Bani Anb-Nadir? Does that have some connection with Allah's Word?

8:12 (Remember) when your Lord inspired the angels, "Verily, I am with you, so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes."

8:60 Against them make ready your strength to the utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror into (the hearts of) the enemies, of God and your enemies, and others besides, whom ye may not know, but whom God doth know. Whatever ye shall spend in the cause of God, shall be repaid unto you, and ye shall not be treated unjustly.

9:29 Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

Perhaps the Battle of Badr was a singularity. Or did Allah make a habit of terrifying Jews?

33:26-27 And those of the people of the Scripture who backed them (the disbelievers) Allâh brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives. And He caused you to inherit their lands, and their houses, and their riches, and a land which you had not trodden (before). And Allâh is Able to do all things.

And Muhammad? What is the Prophet's attitude? Surely he must have objected to terrorism!

Allah made me victorious by awe, (by His frightening my enemies) for a distance of one month's journey.

I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy), and while I was sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand.

But Muhammad is supposed to be a good example for Muslims to follow; the greatest and best of men.

33:21. Indeed in the Messenger of Allâh (Muhammad ) you have a good example to follow for him who hopes in (the Meeting with) Allâh and the Last Day and remembers Allâh much.

Muhammad must have been a humble, gentle and compassionate man, right?

Bukhari Ch 61 # 2756: ...It is mentioned from Ibn 'Umar from the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, "My provision has been placed under the shadow of my spear, and abasement and humility have been placed on the one who disobeys my command.

About defamation of religion; where did that originate?

1:7. The Way of those on whom You have bestowed Your Grace, not (the way) of those who earned Your Anger (such as the Jews), nor of those who went astray (such as the Christians).

8:22. Verily! The worst of (moving) living creatures with Allâh are the deaf and the dumb, those who understand not (i.e. the disbelievers).

98:6. Verily, those who disbelieve (in the religion of Islâm, the Qur'ân and Prophet Muhammad ()) from among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) and Al-Mushrikûn will abide in the Fire of Hell. They are the worst of creatures.

9:30 And the Jews say: 'Uzair (Ezra) is the son of Allâh, and the Christians say: Messiah is the son of Allâh. That is a saying from their mouths. They imitate the saying of the disbelievers of old. Allâh's Curse be on them, how they are deluded away from the truth!

9:73. O Prophet (Muhammad )! Strive hard against the disbelievers and the hypocrites, and be harsh against them, their abode is Hell, - and worst indeed is that destination.

And those jibes about "sons of pigs and monkeys", where does that come from?

5:60. Say (O Muhammad to the people of the Scripture): "Shall I inform you of something worse than that, regarding the recompense from Allâh: those (Jews) who incurred the Curse of Allâh and His Wrath, those of whom (some) He transformed into monkeys and swines, those who worshipped Tâghût (false deities); such are worse in rank (on the Day of Resurrection in the Hell­fire), and far more astray from the Right Path (in the life of this world)."

Islamophobia: phobia implies irrational, unfounded fear. In view of 9:29 & 59:2 (cited above) is there any reason to fear Islam? Perhaps the 900 Jewish men and boys slaughtered at Medina? [Bukhari 4.52.280 & Abu Dawud 48.4390] Or the genocide of Hindus at Hindu Kuah? Or the genocide of the Assyrians? Or, more recently, the genocide of the Armenians? And what is the stimulus for Islamic genocide?

8:67 It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had made a great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land. You desire the good of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives), but Allâh desires (for you) the Hereafter. And Allâh is All-Mighty, All-Wise.

And what of Islamic Supremacism?

Tabari IX:69 "Arabs are the most noble people in lineage, the most prominent, and the best in deeds. We were the first to respond to the call of the Prophet. We are Allah's helpers and the viziers of His Messenger. We fight people until they believe in Allah. He who believes in Allah and His Messenger has protected his life and possessions from us. As for one who disbelieves, we will fight him forever in Allah's Cause. Killing him is a small matter to us."

Sahih Bukhari Volume 6, Book 60, Number 80:

Narrated Abu Huraira:

The Verse:--"You (true Muslims) are the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind." means, the best of peoples for the people, as you bring them with chains on their necks till they embrace Islam.

Then there is the little matter of triumphalism.

40:51 Verily, We will indeed make victorious Our Messengers and those who believe (in the Oneness of Allâh Islâmic Monotheism) in this world's life and on the Day when the witnesses will stand forth, (i.e. Day of Resurrection),

Have I, by exposing the execrable doctrines and practices of Islam, by means of its own scripture, tradition & history, defamed Islam? Far from it; I have only exposed the truth. I have not twisted, distorted, mis-interpreted nor mis-translated anything. I have not concealed my sources, giving you hyperlinks to each quotation.

I showed you that Allah commanded conquest and genocide. I showed you that Muhammad practiced what he preached and that he was an arrogant pirate. I showed you that Allah commanded terrorism and Muhammad bragged of it. Follow the links I have provided, read the entire Qur'an & Bukhari's Books of Jihad, Khumus & Military Expedition. Then, if you are intelligent, logical & rational, you will join me in cursing and condemning Islam and demanding its extinction.