I Have Read The OBL Transcript...Have You?

After reading the most recent OBL transcript, I cannot tell who is listening to whom or who is parroting whom. Can you? If one cannot discern the intent of the transcript, mores the pity. If one agrees with the verbiage of the transcript, they are my enemy.

Why are they my enemy? Because the words of my enemy are the words of my enemy and those that agree with the words of my enemy, by default, support and agree with my enemy, therefore, siding with my enemy. That makes them my enemy. If those that agree with OBL's recent message are American citizens, they have become enemies withing, subversive, seditious and treasonous enemies...domestic enemies. Plain and simple.

The first 7 paragraphs are ramblings of a fool...perhaps even psychotic.

He, or someone in his stead, sounds just like our own fruit loops whining about capitalism and democracy failing. Democracy, in its purest form is anarchy and it is indeed a guarantee to fail. He is nearly correct in that for generations, the socialists have tried to steer the country away from being the Federal Republic it once was based on Judeo-Christian norms.

The person in the video sounds just like Hillary, Kennedy and Biden and many others. He asks why the Democrats have failed to end the war. That is simple. The majority of Americans have spoken...that is why and the Democrats lied themselves into office. That much is plain and simple.

OBL mentions Rumsfeld's "war crimes. Is he parroting The Jurist or is The Jurist parroting our enemies?

OBL is "disappointed" with the Democratic Party leadership when it comes to stopping the war. He even quotes them or, are they quoting him?

Naturally, the Leftinistra of Amerika have started whining that we on the right want to know who is supporting whom...OBL supporting the Democrats or the Democrats supporting OBL.

OBL doesn't like our media and neither do the KOSmonoffs. In the 5th paragraph of the transcript, OBL stated the following:

And for your information media, during the first years of the war, lost its credibility and manifested itself as a tool of the colonialist empires, and its condition has often been worse than the condition of the media of the dictatorial regimes which march in the caravan of the single leader.

Click the link above for "Kosmonoffs" and let me know which one sounds like who.

in the 7th paragraph, OBL and ReidCo must have been in consort. Why else is ReidCo so heavily invested in defeat? The Kosmonoffs agree. I will borrow from Wake Up America here for the definitions of a civil war from organizations that the Leftinistra say that they prefer to listen to. And, if they do indeed trust these organizations, their straw man of civil war sinks like a rock.

Actual Criteria for a Civil War:

Some civil wars are categorized as revolutions when major societal restructuring is a possible outcome of the conflict. An insurgency, whether successful or not, is likely to be classified as a civil war by some historians if, and only if, organized armies fight conventional battles.

Military Definition of Civil War:

“A war between factions of the same country; there are five criteria for international recognition of this status: the contestants must control territory, have a functioning government, enjoy some foreign recognition, have identifiable regular armed forces, and engage in major military operations.”

NATO on what is NOT Civil War:

North Atlantic Treaty Organization Glossary of Terms and Definitions (Organisation Du Traite De L'Atlantique Nord Glossaire De Terms Et Definitions) NATO does provide a reference for what is not classified as a civil war. The manual states that 'civil disturbance' is defined as "group acts of violence and disorder prejudicial to public law and order"

Sectarian Violence, not to be mistaken for Civil War:

Sectarian violence or sectarian strife is violence inspired by sectarianism, that is, between different sects of one particular mode of thought, not necessarily religious (e.g. conflicts between the nationalists and communists in China in the early 20th century are largely constructed by Chinese nationals of the time as sectarian). Some of the possible inputs for sectarian violence include power struggles, political climate, social climate, cultural climate, and economic landscape.

"At this point in Iraq there are still Sunnis and Kurds and Shiite who want to have stability, and they are trying to put down the insurgents. Now it is also purely possible that at some point they will give up. Then it is a civil war," Donald Kagan, a history professor from Yale University who's written extensively about war.

Makes one wonder where the Leftinistra get their data from. It certainly isn't from any credible source.

Check the posts here:
David Brooks
Think Digress
Public Vindication
IMAO
ACLU
Storm Warning

The Democrats and the Leftinistra blogs and news outlets speak the exact same language as OBL or OBL speaks the exact same language of the Democrats, the Leftinistra blogs and news outlets. Any way one tries to spin it, the language is exactly the same.

Spin that.

So many on the left (wrong) side of this war issue fall fro the ignorant premise that we are fighting a country...a nation. We are not. We are fighting a wanna-be empire called The Caliphate. The United States stands in the way of the re-establishment of The Caliphate disbanded circa 1924.

Get used to it. Even if we were to exit Iraq en mass tomorrow, this war would not be over...not by a long shot.

The AIJAC has the perfect explanation that most will ignore because it is considered to be that dreaded fear mongering diatribe. Let me tell you. Fear can kill and fear can save. I know. And those close to me know what I mean. Fear kept me alive on many "activities".

Osama bin Laden’s "Declaration of War Against the Americans," August 1996.

"The ruling to kill the Americans and their allies — civilians and military — is an individual duty for every Muslim who can do it in any country in which it is possible to do it..."

Osama bin Laden in a fatwah issued February 23, 1998.

The article above was published 10/01.

DECLARATION OF WAR AGAINST THE AMERICANS OCCUPYING THE LAND OF THE TWO HOLY PLACES. A Message from Usama bin Muhammad bin Laden unto his Muslim Brethren all over the world generally, and in the Arab Peninsula specifically Praise be to Allah, we seek His help and ask for his pardon. We take refuge in Allah from our wrongs and bad deeds. Who ever been guided by Allah will not be misled, and who ever has been misled, he will never be guided. I bear witness that there is no God except Allah no associates with Him and I bear witness that Muhammad is His slave and messenger.

The above was a spattering of a 17-page document. In fact, the above is the preamble. Some would have us believe that this is a war of ideologies. This is an incorrect analogy and conclusion. Just reading the preamble should, to a rational being, reveal that this war declared upon the United States of America is a religious war. We, as a Nation, do not believe as they do. So, we must be either converted or put to the sword, as it were. Read the fatwa and prove me wrong.

Perhaps a trip to my blog now dedicated to the Studies of Islam is in order for the uninitiated and the uneducated. Go there and look for the label Studies in Islam. Be prepared to spend many days and hours there.

Learn of the Caliphate...what it once was and how it was dissolved and why millions of Islamists want it back. What is the Caliphate and what is the breadth of its desired control? Learn the answers to those questions and you shall find what this GWOT is all about.

catch the wave

From MEMRI

On September 8, 2007 the Islamist forum http://al-ekhlaas.org, hosted by Layered Technologies, Inc. in Texas, USA, posted a video message from Osama bin Laden to the American people titled "The Solution."

Track Back from a whiner and sorry-ass dweeb Leftinistra (twice):
Whinings from Left Field (WAY out in left field) and
More whinings from Left Field Flakes