Our Own Sonlit Knight IS A Ghost Writer For Financial Times?
~Snooper~
The title to the article at the Financial Times just had to be written by A Newt One's Mighty Sonlit Knight: Democrats anxious for Obama to widen lead
The title itself is a clue because several times on the BTR circuit, Sonlit has mentioned many times that the Czarbamaniacs are slipping in a spiral to, as I would say, dwell in the Abyss of Obscurity we have been preparing for them all. For instance:
[...] The numbers back up the concern. Although Mr Obama has a good shot at winning traditional Republican states such as Colorado, Virginia and even North Carolina, he cannot capture the White House if he loses more than one of Pennsylvania, Ohio or Michigan - the more traditional, blue-collar swing states, which Mrs Clinton won by huge margins in the primary contests. Polls suggest these states are too close to call. [...]Naturally, the "PC type" verbiage can be seen as a clever disguise. The fact remains, The Mighty Knight has said this exact same context many times. Either Sonlit is the author or the author has been reading Sonlit's posts or has tuned into his BTR segments. To me, the proof is in the pudding. Come clean Sonlit...this IS you, correct?
[...] At this stage in the 1988 presidential race, Michael Dukakis, the Democratic candidate, had a 17 percentage point lead over George H.W. Bush, who went on to win the election. John Kerry emerged from the 2004 Democratic convention with a strong lead over George W. Bush only to lose the election as well. In 2008, conventional wisdom says Mr McCain is running a much less effective campaign than either of the Bushes.Yep. That's Sonlit.
That only reinforces disquiet about Mr Obama's inability so far to take a decisive lead. "Even on his worst day, Bill Clinton was able to signal that he understood voters' concerns and that he felt their pain," said Douglas Schoen, a Democratic consultant. "Obama has no trouble with the campaign stagecraft. But this isn't Harvard, it's the beer hall. He has to talk in language that people understand." [...]
|