Fort Dix Terrorists
Islamic Terrorist Plot On Fort Dix!
Islamic Terrorist Plot On Fort Dix!
Tuesday, May 08, 2007 10:11 AM
Former Yugoslav Refugees And the bleeding hearts want to allow MORE “refugees” into the country?
Five of them lived in Cherry Hill, about 10 miles east of Philadelphia and 20 miles southwest of Fort Dix, he said.
“They were planning an attack on Fort Dix in which they would kill as many soldiers as possible,” Drewniak said.
The suspects were described as “Islamic radicals” by Greg Reinert, a spokesman for the United States Attorney’s Office. A law enforcement source told FOX News that all of the suspects are recent converts and were not born Muslims.
War On Terror: Cherry Hill, New Jersey
Posted by: Kevin McCullough at 10:44 AM
Remember when the jokers running for President from the democratic party were asked to raise their hands to assert their belief as to whether or not there existed an actual Global War On Terror?
I wonder if an attack on a U.S. Military base, on our soil, by Muslim terrorists, at least one of whom is an illegal alien, would have any impact on their answer?
The Leftinistra are comprised of political posturing morons. Plain and simple.
Tuesday, May 08, 2007 |
Fort Dix Terror Plot Busted |
Posted by: Mary Katharine Ham at 12:53 PM |
Foiled by the One-Hour Photo, thank God:
They had planned to ambush a military facility with automatic weapons. They weighed Fort Monmouth Army Base and Dover Airforce Base before settling on Fort Dix, where one of the suspects allegedly had access as a pizza delivery guy. Attacking a military installation instead of a civilian target seems odd for terrorist operations, doesn’t it? Wonder if they’re independent operators or part of a group. No one has claimed it yet. Reports say the suspects are radicals from former Yugoslavia, Jordan, and Turkey. Three are illegal aliens. The border-as-security-issue topic will get a lot of attention this week from the second-tier Republican candidates who will bash the front-runners’ “comprehensive” plans, and from pundits who want to push the Republican front-runners into harder-core stances. I’m interested to hear the front-runners’ discussions of how comprehensive plans are well-suited to deal with these kinds of threats. I’m not being snippy. The week oughtta be an interesting discussion.
Tony Snow’s claiming no evidence of ties to international terrorist groups:
But they were, indeed, inspired by al Qaeda:
Also, Confederate Yankee gives the plot a name: “I formally move that we call this the “Duka, Duka, Mohammed Jihad.” They wanted to kill 100 soldiers. Thank goodness for the video store employee who reported them and two brave informants who infiltrated the group:
Also, thank goodness the NYT didn’t see fit to write about exactly how the FBI places informants in suspected militant Islamic organizations, you know, during the investigation. You know, for the public good and all. Allah is, of course, updating all day. Check with him for the very latest, as he’s the fastest on the ‘Net. Michelle Malkin notes that many ethnic Albanians made their homes near Fort Dix after they were welcomed there as refugees from Kosovo. Gives lie to the idea that we provoke our attacks…we provoke them, all right, with the imperialistic indignity of three hots and a cot for the downtrodden. Gotta love the gratitude from this little group. Update: Here’s the run-down on the Fort Dix Army installation:
|
And this just in from Hugh Hewitt
Tuesday, May 08, 2007
“Waiting For Al Qaeda’s Next Bonb” and the Fort Dix Terrorists
Posted by Hugh Hewitt | 3:41 PM
The Economist has a long article on the jihadist threat within Great Britain. Key excerpt:
In Britain MI5 is expanding substantially, from 1,800 staff in 2001 to a projected 3,500 in 2008. But the number of suspected terrorist networks is growing exponentially, roughly doubling every year since the invasion of Iraq in 2003.
Dame Eliza Manningham-Buller, MI5’s recently departed head, said in November that her service was tracking more than 1,600 known active militants (up from 250 in 2001, according to a parliamentary report). Those extremists operated in a pool of perhaps 100,000 sympathizers who, according to one poll she cited, thought the London bombings were justified. Referring to a popular British television series about MI5, Dame Eliza said: “I wish life were like ‘Spooks’, where everything is (a) knowable and (b) soluble by six people.”
In fact, surveillance uses manpower intensively. Dozens of people are required to keep track of a single suspect 24 hours a day. Those deemed to pose a “threat to life” take precedence, but these days there are so many of them that MI5 has to decide which threat to life appears to be the most acute. Indeed, some security officials suspect al-Qaeda may be deliberately flooding Britain with terrorist plots in the hope of overwhelming its defences.
The Fort Dix plot underscores that the U.S. is not immune to the very same problems that plague the U.K. “Today we dodged a bullet,” the FBI Special Agent in Charge in Philadelphia declared moments ago, as he described “a new form of terrorism,” “home grown terrorists” at least as dangerous as al Qaeda operatives. “The threat is real and the stakes are very, very high.”
From The National Review:
Wednesday, May 09, 2007
The October Surprise That Wasn’t: The Fort Dix Six
Posted by Hugh Hewitt | 9:06 AM
The editors at Tthe NationalReview.com have a fine piece up on the Fort Dix six that includes this:
Remember the indignation of the Left and civil-liberties extremists at John Ashcroft’s post-9/11 suggestion that ordinary citizens be vigilant and report suspicious behavior to law enforcement? When the alleged jihadists, having recorded one of their paramilitary training sessions, foolishly took the DVD to a store for copying, a store employee became alarmed and notified the FBI. Without the tip, the jihadists might well have gone undiscovered.
To which I’d like to add some other memories: The charges that the Administration has repeatedly used news related to the war and terrorism to sacre the electorate or manipulate voting. Here’s one such insinuation from Kevin Drum in 2004, but the list is long.
Given the left’s certainty about BushCo’s tactics, I wonder if they are wondering why Rove didn’t have the arrests timed for October?
Another update story and commentary here. Dodging bullets at Fort Dix
By Cal Thomas
|