JB Williams on Backbone v Testosterone
This is really too "funny". I have read a plethora of the fall-out pieces over Barack's flagrant ass-idiocy over his spanking by Czarina. The moonbats are chanting away and granting accolades to a man that is repeating what GWB has been saying but the Leftinistra have repeatedly denied that which Barack has, in a snit of anger over Hillary's chastisement, proclaimed to be true, but of which his party has vehemently denied.
Can you spell Round Robin?
Go figure. JB Williams explains in much detail below.
Read on. And in case someone asks or as a troll has demanded to know, JB Williams has given his permission to me to reprint and publish his work...naturally accompannied with the proper etiquette.
Don’t Confuse Backbone with Testosterone
One will keep you alive - the other will get you killed!
Reacting to widespread criticisms of his gross inexperience, child-like naiveté and pure ignorance regarding international diplomacy with third world thugs, presidential wannabe Barrack Obama made perhaps his boldest, albeit ill-advised, maneuver by attempting to grab the War on Terror mantle for his party, which otherwise seems to not notice that such a thing actually exists.
"I understand that President Musharraf has his own challenges," Obama said. "But let me make this clear. There are terrorists holed up in those mountains who murdered 3,000 Americans. They are plotting to strike again. It was a terrible mistake to fail to act when we had a chance to take out an al Qaeda leadership meeting in 2005. If we have actionable intelligence about high-value terrorist targets and President Musharraf won't act, we will."
Now he and former First Victim Hillary Clinton are in a rhetorical showdown over who is willing to nuke those folks eager to nuke us first if they get the chance.
Who would have thought we would ever hear a Democrat presidential candidate calling for the US military invasion of a sovereign nation which not only did not attack us on 9/11, but has worked pretty hard to play ally to America ever since? When Bush announced “You are either with us or against us” days after 9/11, Musharraf listened. It’s Democrats who have chosen the wrong side in the war ever since, including Obama and Clinton.
This inside-the-party chest pounding can’t make the spineless retreat and defeat core of today’s Democrat Party happy at all. So why the sudden bluster? War-mongering talk like this just won’t play well in the Code Pinko base of today’s Democrat Party. Is this a demonstration of belated backbone or just another empty example of political testosterone gone wild? I’ll give you the facts and you decide…
We begin by properly dissecting his statement.
“There are terrorists holed up in those mountains” – According to his party, these folks are “freedom fighters” resisting American global domination? Since when did any Democrat think they were “terrorists”?
“who murdered 3,000 Americans” – Doesn’t he mean, 3000 capitalist pigs seeking daily profit for personal greed?
“They are plotting to strike again.” – Fear-mongering, pure fear-mongering! We have no evidence of any credible threat, say Pelosi and Reid!
“It was a terrible mistake to fail to act when we had a chance to take out an al Qaeda leadership meeting in 2005.” – Wait a minute… Obama is focused only upon a chance to get Bin Laden AFTER 9/11 in 2005?
1993
1994
1995
1997
2000
Even Clinton friendly lamestream news outlets confirmed and reported, “In its exhaustive report, the 9/11 Commission identified at least five separate times in 1998 and 1999 when operations were underway to get bin Laden. In only one case was there a decision to proceed.”ABC News
But Obama thinks it was some kind of “mistake” that our military, hot on his heels, failed to capture or kill Bin Laden before he slipped across the border into Pakistan? Who made the mistake? And if that was a “mistake”, what would he call the eight years of Clinton rule, a catastrophic calamity?
“If we have actionable intelligence”- Since we had twelve years of “actionable” intelligence against the Hussein regime in Iraq, which Obama fails to grasp even today, shouldn’t Obama define his idea of actionable intelligence?
“If President Musharraf won't act, we will." – What, - attack a sovereign nation that did not attack us? Without an exit strategy? You can’t be serious!
No sir… This news isn’t going to fly well over at Howard Dean headquarters at all. Those Code Pinko bloomers are in a wad for sure today. The retreat and defeat base of the DNC will be ringing up the moonbat phone to Jack Murtha, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid every hour on the hour, which surely can’t support a war-mongering doctrine like this, can they?
What happened to the “can’t we all just get along” doctrine of the Democrat Party? I thought Obama wanted to sit down with the world’s most brutal killers over tea and talk things out?
Does he mean what he say’s? Or is this just another circus style campaign stunt, a typical liberal testosterone induced saber rattling for the mindless voters behind the “can’t we just surrender” left?
What kind of message is Obama trying to send here and to whom is he trying to send it?
Well, what would you do in your ego driven quest for an office you are highly unqualified for, once someone pointed out just how unqualified you really are?
You would either shrink your ego back into reality and admit that they have a point - or come out firing bluster aimed at fooling the fools into thinking you’re something you have never been in your entire pathetic little life.
Don’t confuse backbone with politically driven testosterone. Terrorists know the difference even if you don’t and that will get you killed…
Tough talk should be reserved for people willing to take tough action, even when it is unpopular. Never swat a hornet’s nest unless you have a plan for the swarming hornets…
Obama clearly thinks that only his voters are listening. Nothing could be further from reality. And that’s what makes Obama and all Democrats dangerous today. All blow and no go!
|