~Snooper~Reference Parts
1 and
2 and
3.
It was a simple post actually and an obvious one at that. It started with a simple question and the poor thing had a conniption fit over the Republic v Democracy thing. It obviously wants a Democracy and I am sure any Democracy would make this idiot happier than returning to our Federal Republic as outlined in our Constitution.
UHOH! More talking dulls from a deluded and poisoned mind. It actually DOES believe this crap!
Comment #5 From Libtard IDIOT A: ROFLMAO! I really don't know where to begin with this complete and utter fool.
you said you wanted to debate. you haven't answered any of my questions:
Federal Republic IS a form of democracy. we consider ourselves a democracy.here is a map of modern democricies. They are even called "Liberal Democracies:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Lib...beral_democracy
case closed. please answer my questions about the gutting of all of our regulatory agencies.
here's another question: apparently, you think government doesn't work. that't true when it's run by incompetents and criminals like the ones in the Bush administration. Bush privitized Walter Reed Hospital. Greed took over and veterans received no care.It is back to government control now.when Obama gets in, veterans will get the care they deserve. Bush pushed student loans into private credit providers. Those providers are gutting students with usorous interest rates and unfair practices. here is an article in today's paper.
Student Loan Aid Is Test for Treasury
Groups Urge No Bailout Benefit To Private Lenders
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp...ml? hpid=topnews
of course the republican congress gutted all the regulations on credit card companies and they are now charging up to 39% interest. I suppose you support that too.
So since you are against government, Mr Historian, why don't you name one country in the whole history of the world that has had NO government. Do you suggest a country of 390 million people have no rules and regulations, no one to fix the roads, protect the consumer, provide a safety net for the poor and sick. what are governments for, just for killing and the military, kind of like the Libertarian idea??? Tell me Mr Historian. Elaborate on those phoney nonsensical soundbites of yours!
Please tell me how providing health care to all of our citizens would be unconstitutional. Explain how it would be unconstitutional. I will be happy to debate.
I am sorry I called you names. I am not proud of that, but I would like your detailed answers since you have written a long opinion piece.
Respectfully,
Barbara
Holy Toledo ladies and gentlemen! I mean, DAMN! This was sure has the SALAD thing down doesn't it?
The very first sentence in this idiot's comment is one of those jumping to conclusions things. I wonder where I stated that I "wanted to" debate? I don't debate idiots. I squash them. Period. There is no debating a fool and this particular fool is the very epitome of a spoiled brat, breaking out in temper tantrums. It really is amazing.
In parts 2 and 3 of this series, the comments therein bear the assertion of the emotional idiocy so common among the basic childish libtard that has absolutely no idea what they think they are talking about. It is incredible. Comments for Part 2
is located here and Part 1 comments is located here. I am quite sure that this series will go for quite some time due to the comments that are in Parts 1 and 2...I haven't even gotten to them yet but if one of the contributors of this blog wants to make a post on them, go ahead and do so.
Whenever they mention ANYTHING with wikipedia in it you know you have a total buffoon on your hands. Checkmate at this point and anything they say afterwards can be discounted as irrelevant. To make matters worse for itself, after IT cited wiki, he cited the Washington Compost. I am surprised that IT didn't cite the National Enquirer as well. Hell, in other comments IT cited the Rolling Stone for Christ's sake. DAMN!
These idiots shouldn't be allowed to vote. Now do you all understand why our Founding Fathers allowed for only the informed people vote? This one is sorely ill informed. Michael Sall has something to say about that as well.
Once again and as usual, IT makes a claim with absolutely no examples and no proof. IT makes the claim and I guess expects or "demands" that I answer ITS questions. That doesn't fly here in this blog. So, when the moron says that Bush is a war criminal and incompetent without the examples or proof or substantiation, I'll not do ITS homework for IT. I know EXACTLY what IT is going to say if IT has the guts to place the examples in the comments but I doubt IT will. The poor thing has already been spanked hard and has been had by the Mad Hadder...me.
When did President Bush "privatize" Walter Reed? I must have missed that memo. Chapter and verse please. Another incredible and outrageously retarded statement by this moron is that I don't want a government. I nearly lost an entire mouthful of coffee on that one.
Someone help me out here and let me know EXACTLY when and where that I have ever said that.
The only item that can be truly addressed in this comment is the subject of Federal Government provision of Health Care. National Health Care or Socialized Health Care or any other name the liberals want to give it is unconstitutional because the very premise cannot be reconciled with the United States Constitution. Period. End of discussion. Name the chapter and verse in the United States Constitution where that is addressed and I will buy into it. Now, if each individual State wants to provide that kind of health care to the residents of the individual States and the PEOPLE of those States so choose that for themselves, that is a different story. The Federal Government, by the US Constitution, does not have that authority.
The United States Constitution belongs to We The People and not the Government. Period.
|